Title: Introduction of Lifecycle Funds by the Thrift Savings Plan
1Introduction of Lifecycle Funds by the Thrift
Savings Plan
- A case study
- James B. Petrick
2TSP Facts and Statistics
- Largest defined contribution plan in the world
- Over 3.5 million participants, serving employees
of the U.S. Federal government, including all
U.S. military personnel - Almost 180 billion in assets
- Over 340,000 transactions each month
-
3Annual Year-End BalancesG, F, C, S, and I
Funds( millions)
173,281
152,009
128,925
99,312
100,553
97,686
94,649
77,268
58,166
44,889
4What is the TSP?
- Employee benefit plan U.S. tax-favored
arrangement. Not taxed on money contributed or
on earnings until withdrawn - Defined contribution Benefits are based solely
on participant contributions and earnings - Participant-directed Participants decide how
much to contribute and how to invest - Like 401k plans
5What is the TSPs purpose?
- Provides retirement income that is complementary
to the defined benefit component - For its core group (FERS), one part of a
three-part retirement program - Defined benefit component
- Social Security
- TSP
- Originally estimated would match old system
replacement ratios (56 of final three salary at
30 years and age 55), but not being tracked. - For other groups, supplements a full defined
benefit
6Why was TSP established?
- Social Security reforms in 1983. Needed to
include federal workers to enhance solvency - End unfunded liability of old defined benefit
program - Increasing mobility of workforce required
portability you could take TSP to and from a
private sector plan - Deficit reduction Accounting gimmick kept
government securities on budget - since changed
7Investment Structure
- Law requires use of index funds for equity
options - Index funds are designed to follow entire markets
or broad slices of markets - Ensures decisions are passive
- Active decisions could be based on politics
- Index funds are low cost
- Board decided to use indexing for fixed income
also
8TSP Investment Options
- G Fund Specially issued government securities
- F Fund U.S. corporate and government bond index
fund. Tracks the Shearson/Lehman Bros. Corporate
Bond index - C Fund Large capitalization U.S. stocks.
Tracks the SP 500 index - S Fund Small to medium capitalization U.S.
stocks. Tracks the Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 index - I Fund International stocks. Tracks the EAFE
index
9Post-employment withdrawals
- Three options
- Lump-sum payment
- Phased withdrawals
- Annuity
- Can mix options
- Transfer certain payments to IRAs or other plans
- One-time partial withdrawal
- Required to begin by age 70 ½
10Annuities
- Only an option (not required unless spouse
insists) - 18 different annuity types (single life, joint
and survivor, etc.) - TSP selects vendor and monitors performance. No
liability once annuity is purchased - Annuity provider competitively procured
- Insurance companies compete on price
- Not yet a popular option, although numbers
increasing
11Why Did the TSP Need Lifecycle Funds?
12Knowledge, Interest, Time
- Studies show participants do not have
- Knowledge
- Interest
- Time
- to manage their portfolio allocations
13Poor Allocation
- TSP looked at their own statistics and found
evidence of poor investment practices - Poor investment allocation by over 60 of
participants - 38 invested only in G Fund 13 only in C Fund
- Another 12 had barbell investments Totally G
Fund and one other risky fund
14Return Chasing
- Participants are chasing returns
- Investing in the fund with the best return or
highest price last month or yesterday - Buying high and selling low
15The Cumulative Effect of Chasing Returns
16Not Rebalancing
- In 2002, only 16 of TSP participants made an
interfund transfer - Many participants never reallocate their accounts
17How Will Lifecycle Funds Help?
18What Are Lifecycle Funds?
- Target date asset allocation funds
- Target date - when you begin to withdraw (not
necessarily retirement date) - Target date farther away higher risk
investments - Target date closer change automatically to
lower risk investments
19Compare With Lifestyle Funds
- Investing style conservative (low risk),
moderate (medium risk) or aggressive (high
risk) - Do not change over time. If you are getting near
to retirement, you must change them yourself - Terms are not applied consistently. Sometimes
you will hear lifecycle funds called lifestyle
and vice versa
20Current Trends
New Trend
- 55 of U.S. private sector plans now use these
funds number continues to grow - Up 20 in past 2 years
- When offered, 10 of assets invested in these
funds
21Reasons TSP Chose Lifecycle Over Lifestyle
- Size of plan requires simple approach Not
feasible to design or implement tailored solution
for 3.5 million participants - Easier to communicate
- No need for questionnaires about your investing
style or your tolerance for risk - Turn-key approach. No further action by
participants needed - Simply choose a date when you want to begin
withdrawing your money. Allocations change
automatically over time to meet your needs - Matched assumed profile of those we wanted to
reach people who didnt want to be involved in
their investments
22Risk profiles of TSP Funds
- Risk refers to how far annual returns vary
from the average return over time. The more
variance, the higher the risk. Here are the risk
profiles for the five TSP funds
Range of Returns Bar Graph
Return
January 1988 - December 2003
Legend
20.0
15.9
Highest
15.6
18.0
16.0
11.4
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
3.8
6.0
0.8
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.2
-2.0
G Fund Actual Returns
-4.0
-3.4
Average
-6.0
-8.0
F Fund Actual Returns
-10.0
-12.0
-14.0
-13.8
-14.5
-16.0
-18.0
I Fund Composite Returns
C Fund Actual Returns
-20.0
-19.4
-22.0
S Fund Composite Returns
-24.0
-26.0
-28.0
-30.0
Lowest
23Time Reduces Risk
- Participants with longer time horizons can invest
in higher risk funds, because time mitigates risk - As horizon shortens, portfolios can be adjusted
to have lower risk investments
24The Efficient Frontier
- Allocations that achieve the greatest predicted
return for a predicted level of risk are said to
be on the efficient frontier - Based on predicted economic trends and investment
performance. Historical results are only part of
the prediction
25The efficient frontier can be shown as a line
representing all portfolios that yield the
greatest returns at all levels of risk
26Lifecycle Fund Goal
- More return for the same amount of risk, or
- The same returns with less risk
C Fund
(1.06)
TSP
(1.30)
G Fund
27Obtained expert advice
- After competitive procurement, Board hired Mercer
Investment Consulting to advise us on - Number of funds to use
- Target dates for the funds
- Asset allocation schedules for the life of the
funds (to put investors nearer to the efficient
frontier - Required to use only existing TSP investment
options (statutory constraint) Existing funds
provided adequate diversification
28Mercers process
- Chose target participants e.g., FERS
participant who is currently 27 with a 7000
account, retiring at age 62. (Based on our
demographic studies) - Mercer used its economic assumptions about asset
classes to calculate risk and return of 5 funds. - Also developed correlation assumptions among
asset classes represented by TSP funds.
29Mercers process (continued)
- Devised sample portfolios lying along efficient
frontier (based on their economic assumptions
about future performance) - Stochastic modeling of results for these
portfolios over next 50 years under difference
combinations of economic scenarios - Assumed participants would increase contributions
over time and retire at age 62
30The Recommended Funds
- Five funds selected - 10 considered but rejected
as too complex - Income Fund
- For those already withdrawing their accounts
- 2010 Fund
- 2020 Fund
- 2030 Fund
- 2040 Fund
31The TSP Lifecycle Funds
- Funds with higher target dates, primarily
equities (C, S, and I Funds) - Income Fund largely, but not entirely, invested
in fixed income (G and F Funds) - Over time, as target date nears, fund allocations
will move towards fixed income
32Initial Lifecycle Fund Allocations
2010
2040
42 C Fund
18 S Fund
43 G Fund
27 C Fund
10 F Fund
7 F Fund
25 I Fund
5 G Fund
8 S Fund
15 I Fund
33Lifecycle Allocation Schedules
- The allocation schedules
- Set up at the beginning
- Will change at regular intervals
- Will be reviewed and may be revised from time to
time - Rebalance funds to the schedules
34Initial Position of Recommended Lifecycle Funds
on the Efficient Frontier
Expected Geometric Return
S-Fund
2040
2030
2020
2010
C-Fund
I-Fund
Current Income
F-Fund
G-Fund
Standard Deviation
35Rolling Down the Efficient Frontier
- The fund with the farthest target date would
roll down the efficient frontier until, at its
target date, it would merge with the income fund.
As each fund merges, a new one is created
2040
2030
2020
2010
INCOME
RETURN
RISK
36Expected results
- For 27 year old investing in L2040, at age 62
- 4.76 median real return
- 14.61 standard deviation
- 1,630,000 median account balance with 57.6
replacement ratio - 981,000 5th percent account balance with
34.2 replacement ratio (worst case
scenario) - .1 probability of decline in last 3 years
37TSP Communications Strategy
- Sought expert advice concerning communications
rollout - Key idea
- Up-front choice between lifecycle funds and
managing their own accounts. - Two-path or the fork in the road solution
- Allows those who want to invest for themselves to
continue
38Participant Investment in a Lifecycle Fund
- Participants not restricted in their use of L
Funds - Can choose to invest in L Funds and other TSP
funds - Can choose to invest in more than one L Fund
- But -- present L Funds as a single fund solution
if used as intended
39Results (after 7 months)
- 8 of FERS participants using L funds
- 6 of assets invested in L Funds
- L Funds assets are almost 10 billion
- Different groups (by age, retirement system)
appear to be using funds appropriately
40Returns of L Funds vs. Underlying FundsInception
(August 2005) to Date
Income
2010
2020
2040
2030
G
F
C
S
I
Underlying Funds
L Funds
41 Future initiatives
- Make L Funds the default funds
- Requires statutory change
42Questions?