Introduction of Lifecycle Funds by the Thrift Savings Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

Introduction of Lifecycle Funds by the Thrift Savings Plan

Description:

Introduction of Lifecycle Funds by the Thrift Savings Plan A case study James B. Petrick TSP Facts and Statistics Largest defined contribution plan in the world Over ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:352
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: jpet5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Introduction of Lifecycle Funds by the Thrift Savings Plan


1
Introduction of Lifecycle Funds by the Thrift
Savings Plan
  • A case study
  • James B. Petrick

2
TSP Facts and Statistics
  • Largest defined contribution plan in the world
  • Over 3.5 million participants, serving employees
    of the U.S. Federal government, including all
    U.S. military personnel
  • Almost 180 billion in assets
  • Over 340,000 transactions each month
  •  

3
Annual Year-End BalancesG, F, C, S, and I
Funds( millions)
173,281
152,009
128,925
99,312
100,553
97,686
94,649
77,268
58,166
44,889
4
What is the TSP?
  • Employee benefit plan U.S. tax-favored
    arrangement. Not taxed on money contributed or
    on earnings until withdrawn
  • Defined contribution Benefits are based solely
    on participant contributions and earnings
  • Participant-directed Participants decide how
    much to contribute and how to invest
  • Like 401k plans

5
What is the TSPs purpose?
  • Provides retirement income that is complementary
    to the defined benefit component
  • For its core group (FERS), one part of a
    three-part retirement program
  • Defined benefit component
  • Social Security
  • TSP
  • Originally estimated would match old system
    replacement ratios (56 of final three salary at
    30 years and age 55), but not being tracked.
  • For other groups, supplements a full defined
    benefit

6
Why was TSP established?
  • Social Security reforms in 1983. Needed to
    include federal workers to enhance solvency
  • End unfunded liability of old defined benefit
    program
  • Increasing mobility of workforce required
    portability you could take TSP to and from a
    private sector plan
  • Deficit reduction Accounting gimmick kept
    government securities on budget - since changed

7
Investment Structure
  • Law requires use of index funds for equity
    options
  • Index funds are designed to follow entire markets
    or broad slices of markets
  • Ensures decisions are passive
  • Active decisions could be based on politics
  • Index funds are low cost
  • Board decided to use indexing for fixed income
    also

8
TSP Investment Options
  • G Fund Specially issued government securities
  • F Fund U.S. corporate and government bond index
    fund. Tracks the Shearson/Lehman Bros. Corporate
    Bond index
  • C Fund Large capitalization U.S. stocks.
    Tracks the SP 500 index
  • S Fund Small to medium capitalization U.S.
    stocks. Tracks the Dow Jones Wilshire 4500 index
  • I Fund International stocks. Tracks the EAFE
    index

9
Post-employment withdrawals
  • Three options
  • Lump-sum payment
  • Phased withdrawals
  • Annuity
  • Can mix options
  • Transfer certain payments to IRAs or other plans
  • One-time partial withdrawal
  • Required to begin by age 70 ½

10
Annuities
  • Only an option (not required unless spouse
    insists)
  • 18 different annuity types (single life, joint
    and survivor, etc.)
  • TSP selects vendor and monitors performance. No
    liability once annuity is purchased
  • Annuity provider competitively procured
  • Insurance companies compete on price
  • Not yet a popular option, although numbers
    increasing

11
Why Did the TSP Need Lifecycle Funds?
12
Knowledge, Interest, Time
  • Studies show participants do not have
  • Knowledge
  • Interest
  • Time
  • to manage their portfolio allocations

13
Poor Allocation
  • TSP looked at their own statistics and found
    evidence of poor investment practices
  • Poor investment allocation by over 60 of
    participants
  • 38 invested only in G Fund 13 only in C Fund
  • Another 12 had barbell investments Totally G
    Fund and one other risky fund

14
Return Chasing
  • Participants are chasing returns
  • Investing in the fund with the best return or
    highest price last month or yesterday
  • Buying high and selling low

15
The Cumulative Effect of Chasing Returns
16
Not Rebalancing
  • In 2002, only 16 of TSP participants made an
    interfund transfer
  • Many participants never reallocate their accounts

17
How Will Lifecycle Funds Help?
18
What Are Lifecycle Funds?
  • Target date asset allocation funds
  • Target date - when you begin to withdraw (not
    necessarily retirement date)
  • Target date farther away higher risk
    investments
  • Target date closer change automatically to
    lower risk investments

19
Compare With Lifestyle Funds
  • Investing style conservative (low risk),
    moderate (medium risk) or aggressive (high
    risk)
  • Do not change over time. If you are getting near
    to retirement, you must change them yourself
  • Terms are not applied consistently. Sometimes
    you will hear lifecycle funds called lifestyle
    and vice versa

20
Current Trends
New Trend
  • 55 of U.S. private sector plans now use these
    funds number continues to grow
  • Up 20 in past 2 years
  • When offered, 10 of assets invested in these
    funds

21
Reasons TSP Chose Lifecycle Over Lifestyle
  • Size of plan requires simple approach Not
    feasible to design or implement tailored solution
    for 3.5 million participants
  • Easier to communicate
  • No need for questionnaires about your investing
    style or your tolerance for risk
  • Turn-key approach. No further action by
    participants needed
  • Simply choose a date when you want to begin
    withdrawing your money. Allocations change
    automatically over time to meet your needs
  • Matched assumed profile of those we wanted to
    reach people who didnt want to be involved in
    their investments

22
Risk profiles of TSP Funds
  • Risk refers to how far annual returns vary
    from the average return over time. The more
    variance, the higher the risk. Here are the risk
    profiles for the five TSP funds

Range of Returns Bar Graph
Return
January 1988 - December 2003
Legend
20.0
15.9
Highest
15.6
18.0
16.0
11.4
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.0
3.8
6.0
0.8
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.2
-2.0
G Fund Actual Returns
-4.0
-3.4
Average
-6.0
-8.0
F Fund Actual Returns
-10.0
-12.0
-14.0
-13.8
-14.5
-16.0
-18.0
I Fund Composite Returns
C Fund Actual Returns
-20.0
-19.4
-22.0
S Fund Composite Returns
-24.0
-26.0
-28.0
-30.0
Lowest
23
Time Reduces Risk
  • Participants with longer time horizons can invest
    in higher risk funds, because time mitigates risk
  • As horizon shortens, portfolios can be adjusted
    to have lower risk investments

24
The Efficient Frontier
  • Allocations that achieve the greatest predicted
    return for a predicted level of risk are said to
    be on the efficient frontier
  • Based on predicted economic trends and investment
    performance. Historical results are only part of
    the prediction

25
The efficient frontier can be shown as a line
representing all portfolios that yield the
greatest returns at all levels of risk
26
Lifecycle Fund Goal
  • More return for the same amount of risk, or
  • The same returns with less risk

C Fund
(1.06)
TSP
(1.30)
G Fund
27
Obtained expert advice
  • After competitive procurement, Board hired Mercer
    Investment Consulting to advise us on
  • Number of funds to use
  • Target dates for the funds
  • Asset allocation schedules for the life of the
    funds (to put investors nearer to the efficient
    frontier
  • Required to use only existing TSP investment
    options (statutory constraint) Existing funds
    provided adequate diversification

28
Mercers process
  • Chose target participants e.g., FERS
    participant who is currently 27 with a 7000
    account, retiring at age 62. (Based on our
    demographic studies)
  • Mercer used its economic assumptions about asset
    classes to calculate risk and return of 5 funds.
  • Also developed correlation assumptions among
    asset classes represented by TSP funds.

29
Mercers process (continued)
  • Devised sample portfolios lying along efficient
    frontier (based on their economic assumptions
    about future performance)
  • Stochastic modeling of results for these
    portfolios over next 50 years under difference
    combinations of economic scenarios
  • Assumed participants would increase contributions
    over time and retire at age 62

30
The Recommended Funds
  • Five funds selected - 10 considered but rejected
    as too complex
  • Income Fund
  • For those already withdrawing their accounts
  • 2010 Fund
  • 2020 Fund
  • 2030 Fund
  • 2040 Fund

31
The TSP Lifecycle Funds
  • Funds with higher target dates, primarily
    equities (C, S, and I Funds)
  • Income Fund largely, but not entirely, invested
    in fixed income (G and F Funds)
  • Over time, as target date nears, fund allocations
    will move towards fixed income

32
Initial Lifecycle Fund Allocations
2010
2040
42 C Fund
18 S Fund
43 G Fund
27 C Fund
10 F Fund
7 F Fund
25 I Fund
5 G Fund
8 S Fund
15 I Fund
33
Lifecycle Allocation Schedules
  • The allocation schedules
  • Set up at the beginning
  • Will change at regular intervals
  • Will be reviewed and may be revised from time to
    time
  • Rebalance funds to the schedules

34
Initial Position of Recommended Lifecycle Funds
on the Efficient Frontier
Expected Geometric Return
S-Fund
2040
2030
2020
2010
C-Fund
I-Fund
Current Income
F-Fund
G-Fund
Standard Deviation
35
Rolling Down the Efficient Frontier
  • The fund with the farthest target date would
    roll down the efficient frontier until, at its
    target date, it would merge with the income fund.
    As each fund merges, a new one is created

2040
2030
2020
2010
INCOME
RETURN
RISK
36
Expected results
  • For 27 year old investing in L2040, at age 62
  • 4.76 median real return
  • 14.61 standard deviation
  • 1,630,000 median account balance with 57.6
    replacement ratio
  • 981,000 5th percent account balance with
    34.2 replacement ratio (worst case
    scenario)
  • .1 probability of decline in last 3 years

37
TSP Communications Strategy
  • Sought expert advice concerning communications
    rollout
  • Key idea
  • Up-front choice between lifecycle funds and
    managing their own accounts.
  • Two-path or the fork in the road solution
  • Allows those who want to invest for themselves to
    continue

38
Participant Investment in a Lifecycle Fund
  • Participants not restricted in their use of L
    Funds
  • Can choose to invest in L Funds and other TSP
    funds
  • Can choose to invest in more than one L Fund
  • But -- present L Funds as a single fund solution
    if used as intended

39
Results (after 7 months)
  • 8 of FERS participants using L funds
  • 6 of assets invested in L Funds
  • L Funds assets are almost 10 billion
  • Different groups (by age, retirement system)
    appear to be using funds appropriately

40
Returns of L Funds vs. Underlying FundsInception
(August 2005) to Date
Income
2010
2020
2040
2030
G
F
C
S
I
Underlying Funds
L Funds
41
Future initiatives
  • Make L Funds the default funds
  • Requires statutory change

42
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com