Title: Landing Site Surface Characteristics From TES EPF Observations
1Landing Site Surface Characteristics From TES EPF
Observations
- Joshua L. Bandfield
- Arizona State University
Melas Chasma THEMIS VIS (C. Edwards)
2Overview
- What are emission phase function (EPF)
measurements and how do they work? - How can they be useful for landing site
characterization? - Examples of slope retrievals from EPFs
- Example of EPFs and rocky surfaces
Athabasca Valles THEMIS Day IR/MOLA (R. Luk)
3Emission Phase Function (EPF) Measurements
- EPFs measure a single surface from different
viewing angles - Thermal IR spectrometer or bolometer (TES or MCS)
measurements with spot size of 10s of km - Similar to visible/NIR phase measurements (e.g.
HRSC) but not sensitive to solar phase angle
4Slope Effects in EPF Measurements
- Surface slopes (larger than cm scale) have
different temperatures based on whether sunlit or
shaded - Measured radiance is dependent on viewing angle
and azimuth
q1
q2
q1
q2
Measured radiance (and apparent surface
temperature) will decrease when passing over the
surface from the left to the right
5Slope Effects in EPF Measurements
TES EPF Observations
6
4
OCK 10823 (dune field)
2
0
DT (K)
Delta T (K)
-2
-4
-6
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
THEMIS VIS
Emission Angle
6Slope Effects in EPF Measurements
TES EPF Observations
6
4
OCK 10823 (dune field)
2
0
DT (K)
OCK 9938
Delta T (K)
-2
-4
-6
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
THEMIS VIS
Emission Angle
7Slope Effects in EPF Measurements
TES EPF Observations
6
4
OCK 10823 (dune field)
12 Slope Model
2
5 Slope Model
0
DT (K)
OCK 9938
Delta T (K)
-2
-4
-6
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Emission Angle
8TES EPF Observations
Slope (deg.)
- Phoenix B region landing site EPF data displays
variations in modeled slopes - This is currently a critical data product effort
9TES EPF Observations
Slope (deg.)
- Phoenix B region landing site EPF data displays
variations in modeled slopes - This is currently a critical data product effort
Slope (deg.)
10Slope Effects in EPF Measurements
- Some details
- High solar incidence and viewing aligned with
solar azimuth increases sensitivity - Correction for atmospheric and directional
emissivity effects need to be applied - Complimentary to slope retrieval techniques using
MOLA and imaging
11Effects of Rocks on EPF Observations
- High-inertia rocks make up a larger proportion of
the field of view at high emission angles
12Effects of Rocks on EPF Observations
- High-inertia rocks make up a larger proportion of
the field of view at high emission angles - This causes a change in apparent temperature with
changing emission angles
Mini-TES temperatures with Pancam at
Gusev (NASA/JPL/Cornell/ASU)
13Effects of Rocks on EPF Observations
6
- Rocky surfaces have a symmetrical effect on the
apparent temperature - This is most apparent at night or when the solar
azimuth is orthogonal to viewing azimuth
OCK 8468 EPF 14.5 N, 325.2 E
4
2
0
Delta T (K)
-2
-4
-6
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
Emission Angle
14Technique Development
- Currently allows for qualitative comparisons
between regions - More realistic surfaces are necessary to better
quantify slopes and rocks
J. Byrnes, USGS
15Summary
- TES EPFs are useful for
- Surface slopes at decimeter and larger scales
- Rock abundances (but how precise/accurate?)
- TES EPFs are currently being targeted for Phoenix
landing sites - Will be targeted for MSL sites
Gale Crater THEMIS VIS/Night IR (R. Luk)