KOPIO Roadmap to Baseline

1
KOPIORoadmap to Baseline

• Michael Marx
• December 9, 2004

2
(No Transcript)
3
Kinematics
4
Arizona State University J.R. Comfort Brookhaven
National Laboratory D. Beavis, I-H. Chiang, A.
Etkin, J.W. Glenn, A. Hanson, D. Jaffe, D.
Lazarus, K. Li, L. Littenberg, G. Redlinger,
C. Scarlett, M. Sivertz, R. Strand University of
Cinncinnati K. Kinoshita IHEP, Protvino
G.Britvich, V. Burtovoy, S.Chernichenko, L,
Landsberg, A. Lednev, V. Obraztsov, R.Rogalev,
V.Semenov, M. Shapkin, I.Shein, A.Soldatov,
N.Tyurin, V.Vassil'chenko, D. Vavilov,
A.Yanovich INR, Moscow A. Ivashkin, D.Ishuk, M.
Khabibullin, A. Khotjanzev, Y. Kudenko, A.
Levchenko, O. Mineev, N. Yershov
and A.Vasiljev. INFN-University of Perugia G.
Anzivino, P. Cenci, E. Imbergamo, A. Nappi, M.
Valdata KEK M. Kobayashi Kyoto University of
Education R. Takashima Kyoto University K.
Misouchi, H. Morii, T. Nomura, N. Sasao, T.
Sumida Virginia Polytechnic Institute State
University M. Blecher, N. Graham, A.
Hatzikoutelis University of New Mexico B.
Bassalleck, N. Bruner, D.E. Fields, J. Lowe, T.L.
Thomas University of Montreal J.-P. Martin State
University of New York at Stony Brook N.
Cartiglia, I. Christidi, M. Marx, P. Rumerio, D.
Schamberger TRIUMF P. Amaudruz, M. Barnes, E.
Blackmore, A. Daviel, M.Dixit, J. Doornbos, P.
Gumplinger, R. Henderson, N. Khan, A. Mitra,
T. Numao, R. Poutissou, G. Wait University of
British Columbia S. Begin, D. Bryman, M.
Hasinoff, J. Ives University of Virginia E.
Frlez, D. Pocanic University of Zurich P.
Robmann, P. Trüol, A. van der Schaaf, S. Scheu
Yale University G. Atoyan, S.K. Dhawan, V.
Issakov, H. Kaspar, A. Poblaguev, M.E. Zeller
5 countries 18 institutions 80 scientists 10
Grad students
5
(No Transcript)
6
Charge

• Overview of Process (15 total)
• Process by which estimates are constructed
• o Description of formal process from conception
  to entry into ACCESS, MS
• Project. Non-inclusive list of items
• ?? How estimates are arrived at, and by who
  (costs, schedules, resources).
• Are Level 3 Managers responsible for information
  provided? If not, how is this handled? Is it
  clear who has responsibility for the estimates,
  and for the project realization they describe?
• ?? Guidance to project from Project Manager (PM)
• ?? Meeting, discussions between PM and those
  developing information
• ?? Checking of estimate by PM prior to entry
• ?? Mechanics of entry
• ?? Iterations performed, and how
• ?? Facility of sub-project mgrs with project tools

7
Overview of Baseline Process

• Estimates assembled by ISSMs with input from
  collaborators, technical staff, outside technical
  experts, vendors, etc.
• Guidance transmitted step by step by PM
• Frequent meetings with Technical Board
• Project Office (Marx, Kane, Becker, Brown),
  ISSMs, spokesmen, ad hoc members
• Review progress and iterate

8
KOPIO
WBS Trees http//www.kopio.bnl.gov/Project_Office
/Estimates/KOPIOMasterWBSA_frame.htm
9
9/24
10
10/18
10/27
11
11/16
12
Overview of Baseline Process

• Tech Board identifies technical and common issues
  for resolution
• Mechanics
• Staff of 4 (not full time) assembling estimate
• Evolution has been spreadsheets to MS Project
• Staff entering MS Project to get started
• RSVP Server should facilitate ISSM interaction,
  but learning curve will be steep
• Anticipate Staff entry for initial Access set up,
  then ISSM interaction

13
Overview of Baseline Process

• Current Estimates are raw
• Some eye-ball review, some global strategy, but
  no scrubbing yet
• Scrubbing to begin 12/9 for January Review
• Back-up material not available yet
• Labor rates to be standardized which will impact
  estimate, but make it more reliable
• Look for Access and full cost books for February

14
RLS Prep Effort
15
Overview of Baseline Process

• Facility of ISSMs
• Some did not work with Excel
• Only one has MS Project and made an attempt
• Many do not even use Windows
• Caveat emptor this is a work in progress!!
  Slides are taken from presentations over 3 weeks
  and many numbers have moved. Summaries represent
  current best estimates.

16
KOPIO Approach to Baseline
Baseline Approved
Start
Determine goals
Develop Performance Baseline
Define Scope Approach
Cost/Benefit Analyses
Performance
Baseline Approved
Develop WBS
Define Project Priorities
Schedule
Fully Resource Loaded Schedule
Finalize Milestones
Prioritize Tasks
Time Order Tasks
Estimate Durations
Define Tasks
Identify Milestones
Identify Resources
Estimate Costs
Load Resources
Apply Funding Constraints
Develop Cost Profiles
Cost
Done (90)
Started
Not Started
Goal
17
KOPIO Baseline Status
9 December 2004
18
KOPIO Baseline Status
January 2005
19
KOPIO Baseline Status
April 2005
20
Unification of Approach

• Several common areas have been costed with
  identical approaches
• Photodetector FEE gt DAQ
• Utilize developed Calorimeter system
• Includes preamp, WFD, HV, LV, calibration,
  cables,
• Applied to PreRad scintillator Xveto, Charged
  Veto, Photon Veto, and Catcher
• Shashlyk module fabrication
• Applied to PreRad Xveto and Photon Veto barrel

21
Subsystems with PhotoDetectors

• Preradiator (WBS 1.2.2)
• Scintillator System (WBS 1.2.2.2)
• 1536 channels
• External Photon Veto (WBS 1.2.2.5)
• 1600 channels
• Calorimeter (WBS 1.2.3)
• Regular Modules (WBS 1.2.3.2.3)
• 2672 channels
• BeamLine Modules (WBS 1.2.3.2.6)
• 72 channels
• Charge Particle Veto (WBS 1.2.4)
• Barrel Charged Particle Veto (WBS 1.2.4.1)
• 224 channels
• DownStream Charged Particle Veto (WBS 1.2.4.2)
• 308 channels
• Photon Veto (WBS 1.2.5)
• UpStream Photon Veto (WBS 1.2.5.1)
• 186 channels
• Barrel Photon Veto (WBS 1.2.5.2)

• DownStream Photon Veto (WBS 1.2.5.4)
• 280 channels
• Catcher (WBS 1.2.6)
• Aerogel counters (WBS 1.2.6.1)
• 370 channels
• Magnet Photon Veto (WBS 1.2.5.3)
• 160 channels
• Acrylic Guard Counters (WBS 1.2.6.2)
• 144 channels

22
Goals Common Elements

• Unify (as much as possible) the readout
  electronics used in all photo-detector subsystems
• Minimize design effort
• Minimize maintanence costs
• Share expertize and spares
• Model
• 250 MHz, 10 bit Wave Form Digitizer
• Use two channels if higher sampling required
• Common HV system

• Module Instrumentation
• PMT or APD
• Preamplifier/Signal conditioner
• HV distribution
• Output and HV cabling
• Readout Instrumentation
• WFD System
• Interface to Trigger
• Off Module Instrumentation
• HV control system
• Monitoring and Calibration

23
Example Subsystem (WBS 1.2.3)
24
Example Subsystem (WBS 1.2.3) cont.
25

• o Overall level of PM confidence in cost,
  schedule, technical estimate
• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system?
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)?
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  any systems? Can they be addressed?
• Level 3 Roll-Up Summary (15)
• o Cost, contingency, risk, possible funding
  sources, etc.
• o Cost comparison with previous estimates, cost
  history evolution

• Status of each L3 system (30)
• o Cost estimates
• ?? Show each system to see depth, detail of
  estimates
• ?? How is base cost estimated
• ?? How is contingency estimated was contingency
  guidance followed?
• ?? Any risk analysis completed, plans
• ?? Plans to begin assembling cost books
• o Schedule
• ?? Status of resource loading
• ?? Initial labor profiles, by category
• ?? Logic within sub-system, including links
• ?? Overall logic for experiment, including links
• ?? Milestones classes, etc.

26

• 1.2.1 Vacuum
• Biggest technical challenge
• 12m3, walls lt5 X0
• FEA work on domes and ribbed oval beam pipes
• Russian proposal to prototype carbon-fiber
  composite vessel
• 5 1/5 scale models for 105K within the year!
• FEA buckling analysis suggests hemi domes
  shorter cylinder gt revisiting aluminum

FEA Model and Stress Analysis of Dome and Beam
Pipe
27
1.2.1 Vacuum
28
WBS 1.2.1.1 U/S Vacuum Vessel

• WBS Description Matl Labor Total
• 1.2.1.1 U/S Vacuum Vessel 2,055K 1,140K 3,195K
• The scope of effort is the engineering, design,
  and multi-phase-procurement of the upstream
  composite material decay vacuum vessel. This
  3-phase procurement consists of 1/5 scale
  prototype vessels, full scale prototype vessels,
  and operational vessels, all pressure tested for
  buckling stability to 3.5 FOS. It includes vessel
  supports, flanges and pump-out ports, vacuum
  feed-thru adapter rings, internal CPV support
  geometry, and transportation and installation
  fixtures. Labor requirements are an engineering
  estimate, while materials is based on estimate
  from IHEP collaborators.

29
WBS 1.2.1.2 Vacuum Transitions

• WBS Description Matl Labor Total
• 1.2.1.2 Vacuum Transitions 425K 505K
  930K
• The scope of effort includes the engineering,
  design, procurement, and technical assembly of an
  internal vacuum membrane between high and low
  vacuum volumes in the U/S decay vessel. It
  includes the cost for both a prototype and
  operational membrane design. This also includes
  the U/S and D/S vacuum window assemblies for the
  U/S decay vessel. This is based on an engineering
  estimate of both labor and materials.

30
WBS 1.2.1.3 D4 Vacuum Box

• WBS Description Matl Labor Total
• 1.2.1.3 D4 Vacuum Box 175K 110K 285K
• The scope of effort includes the engineering,
  design, procurement and fabrication of a
  non-magnetic material vacuum box located in the
  magnetic gap of the D4 sweeping magnet D/S of the
  Calorimeter. It includes U/S vacuum bellows
  transition and support of beam pipe and D/S
  transition connection to the D/S decay vessel.
  This is based on an engineering estimate of both
  labor and materials.

31
WBS 1.2.1.4 D/S Vacuum Vessel

• WBS Description Matl Labor Total
• 1.2.1.4 D/S Vacuum Vessel 450K 220K 670K
• The scope of effort includes the engineering,
  design, procurement, and fabrication of
  structural metal vacuum vessel. This is a large
  volume tank with personnel access ports, U/S and
  D/S flange connections, internal veto counter
  support, pump-out ports, and electrical/fiber
  feed-thru. It includes and integral vessel
  support system and lifting fixture for
  installation. This is based on an engineering
  estimate of both labor and materials.

32
WBS 1.2.1.5 Vacuum Pumping Sta.

• WBS Description Matl Labor Total
• 1.2.1.5 Vacuum Pumping Sta. 400K 372K
  772K
• The scope of effort includes the engineering,
  design, procurement, fabrication, technical
  assembly and testing of vacuum pumping stations.
  This will service the vacuum requirements for
  both high and low vacuum volumes in the neutral
  beam, U/S decay vessel, D4 vacuum box, and D/S
  decay vessel. This will include all pump skid
  hardware, valves, gauges, flanges, controls and
  interlocks, piping and transition ports. This is
  based on an engineering estimate from the C-A
  Vacuum Group that will be tasked with this design
  effort.

33
WBS 1.2.1.6 Management Activities

• WBS Description Matl Labor Total
• 1.2.1.6 Management Activities 25K 165K
  190K
• The scope of effort includes a subsystem manager
  (scientist) and project engineer to develop and
  implement a project plan, and report monthly
  performance measures for cost and schedule. They
  are responsible for the management of all
  deliverables and supervision of all resources
  involved in this effort and the technical
  oversight of all procurement and fabrication
  contracts. This is based on an engineering
  estimate for both labor and materials.

34
IHEP/KOMPOZIT Proposal Step 1 initiated with
preliminary designWill be repeated with final
design
35
Schedule

• WBS Description Start Complete Needed
• 1.2.1 Vacuum Subsystem 10/05 9/09
• 1.2.1.1 U/S Vacuum Vessel 10/05 9/09 9/09
• 1.2.1.2 Vacuum Transitions 10/05 9/08 2/10
• 1.2.1.3 D4 Vacuum Box 10/07 9/08 11/08
• 1.2.1.4 D/S Vacuum Vessel 9/08 9/09 10/09
• 1.2.1.5 Vacuum Pumping Sta. 10/06 10/08
  10/08

36
WBS 1.2.1 Costs Evolution

• WBS Description Matl Labor Total Delta
  
• 1.2.1 Vacuum Subsystem 3,530K 2,512K 6,042K
  3,422
• 1.2.1.1 U/S Vacuum Vessel 2,055K 1,140K 3,195K
  1,287
• 1.2.1.2 Vacuum Transitions 425K 505K
  930K 930
• 1.2.1.3 D4 Vacuum Box 175K 110K 285K
  285
• 1.2.1.4 D/S Vacuum Vessel 450K 220K 670K
  418
• 1.2.1.5 Vacuum Pumping Sta. 400K 372K
  772K 215
• 1.2.1.6 Management Activities 25K 165K
  190K 190

37
1.2.1 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Critical! Technically most
  challenging issue in KOPIO with lack of
  scientific and engineering resources
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? Needs design, integration,
  manufacturing effort
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review Little change
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• - On time
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system?
• Yes, at BNL

38

• 1.2.2 PreRadiator
• Largest, most complex subsystem dominates
  electronics and costs
• 10 prototype chambers constructed. 200µm
  resolution obtained.
• Extruded scintillator successfully manufactured
  and tested.
• Front end electronics have been tested.
• HV board and cables prototyped.
• Simulation for mechanical support, thermal
  expansion and other issues

Prototype with 16 2m long wires
Current Status of PreRadiator Readout Electronics
39
1.2.2 Preradiator
40
Numbers of Components
Preradiator system 4 Quadrants Quadrant
8 Modules Module 8
chambers 9 Scintillator planes Chamber
384 channels of anodes and cathodes
Scintillator p. 12 20-cm wide strips
4 X planes to be multiplexed ? 12 x 2 (X
readouts) 5 Y planes to be multiplexed
? 12 x 2 (Y readouts) Photon veto 45
Shashlyk modules Anode readout 4 x 8 x 8 x
384 98,304 Cathode readout 4 x 8 x 8 x 384
98,304 Scintillator readout 4 x 8 x (24 24)
1536 Photon veto readout 4 x 8 x 45 1500

41
1.2.2 Preradiator Cost Summary
The above table includes design and prototyping
costs. No contingency is shown.
42
Chamber (production)
Chamber material G10 sheets, wires, pins,
sockets, foils Cost for chamber designprototype
85k375k gas-system
43k83k
43
Scintillator (preradiator part)
Material Styron, dopents, N2, Run fee, Paint,
Glue Other items PMT sets 558k ?
300/ch. Scintillator prototyping of 353k
includes the cost of jigs and other tools.
44
Electronics
Anode readout
38/ch
96ch
16ch
HV
L1
Cathode readout
96ch
32/ch
16ch
Cathode adaptor
L1
45
Electronics (production)
Cost for chamber electronics design and prototype
is 15-20 of production cost. Here, Adaptor
card includes cables. DAQ interface is in
HV,LV. PMT electronics is common to the other
PMT/APD system. PMT cost for external PV appears
in External PV.
46
1.2.2.4.1 Support plates (module assembly)
47
Other parts (production stage)
External PV includes 491k of readout
electronics.
48
Cost evolution

in thousand 7/2001 estimate
11,848 1/2003
estimate
12,525 1/2004 estimate
13,478 The present estimate
26,062 The major
difference comes from - Added Canadian labor
cost/Pre-inst. ?5,000 - External PV has
been costed 3,024 - Included
scintillator readout 500 -
PMTs have been included
500 - Full readout (85 ? 100)
?1,500 - Added rails/shipping cost
?2,000
49
Schedule
50
Spending profile
Thousand dollars
Year
The graph assumes flat construction spending
starting at January, 2006.
51
1.2.2 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Good
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? Finish prototyping, firm up RLS
  inputs, design integration of support and
  access system
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review Better schedule contingency
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• On schedule
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system?
• RLS in good shape, XVeto needs new
  collaborators

52

• 1.2.3 Calorimeter
• 2500 Shashlyk blocks most advanced KOPIO system
  ready
• NSLS test of 20 final modules
• Energy resolution - (2.90.1)/ÖE(GeV)
• Time resolution - (9010)psec /
  ÖE(GeV)
• Single module threshold
• 0.5 MeV for PMT/ADC,
• 1 MeV for APD/ADC and
• 2 MeV for APD/WFD
• Initiated fabrication of 10 x 10 array of
  pre-production modules
• Progress on unified photo detector readout
• Prototype WFD boards July (no )
• 8 ch/board, run at 250 MHz with a resolution of
  10 bits (CAMAC)
• Second set of prototypes PCI-express fast serial
  communication protocol July 2005

53
1.2.3 Calorimeter
54
V. Issakov Physics Department, Yale University,
New Haven, CT 06511 12/01/2004 Contributors of
the cost/schedule estimation V. Issakov (50)
Subsystem manager, physicist, Yale
University A.     Soldatov (10) Leader group,
Deputy director, IHEP, Russia S. Chernichenko
(20) Chief of Scintillator facility, IHEP,
Russia
55

• The requirements to the KOPIO Photon Calorimeter
• Energy resolution ? 3.5/?E.
• Time resolution ? 100psec/?E.
• Photon detection inefficiency (due to
  holes-cracks) ? 10-4.
• Granularity ?11?11 cm2.
• Active area ? 5.5? 5.5 m2
• Radiation length ?16X0
• (18X0 including Preradiator).
• Physical length ? 60 cm.
• The Shashlyk technique with the APD photo-readout
  satisfies the KOPIO requirements.

56

• Calorimeter System includes
• Mockup of Calorimeter System - the
  complete-equipped prototype of Calorimeter system
  (16?8 modules), to study the performance
  parameters of the Calorimeter
  Preradiator/Calorimeter systems and to develop
  the pattern recognition algorithms.
• Photon Calorimeter the matrix of the 52?52
  APD-instrumented modules with a beam hole of 18?2
  modules , Calorimeter mechanics (including two
  mobile halves of Calorimeter frame, Calorimeter
  railways and Calorimeter installation/service
  equipment) Calorimeter cooling system.
• Instrumentation of Photon Calorimeter -
  Calorimeter High-Voltage control system,
  Calorimeter LV power supply system, Calorimeter
  cosmic-ray Pre-calibration System, Calorimeter
  Monitoring/Calibration System, Calorimeter
  WFD-readout System.
• The cable system of Photon Calorimeter 3,172
  signal cables, 2704 HV control cables 2704 ?3
  LV power supply cables.

57
) Support of the FTE scientists KOPIO -
1,188k, IHEP - 330k, YALE - 1,030k. ) IHEP
contribution in past Scintillator factory
(3,000k), Test facility (200k).
58
) Production cost of Calorimeter mockup is
360k. Support of the FTE scientists for study of
Calorimeter mockup performance is 187k (Yale
145k, KOPIO 42k).
59
) Additional IHEP support of the FTE scientists
for supervision and tests of modules, APD-units
APD-instrumented modules is 330k.
60
The modules design includes 15 assembling details
Modules production rate is 6 modules/shift
61
Cost of the modules instrumentation (APD)
Quoted price of the LV-HV Model C20 Quantity
2,500 Unit Price 79.00 John Bianchi EMCO
High Voltage Corp.11126 Ridge RoadSutter Creek,
CA 95685, USAPhone [phone]www.emcohighvo
ltage.com
Quoted price of APD Model SD630-70-74-510 Quantit
y 3,000 Unit Price 425.00 Paul Sharman
Advanced Photonix, Inc.1240 Avenida
Acaso Camarillo, CA 93012, USAPhone (805)
987-0146www.advancedphotonix.com
Modules instrumentation rate is 6 units/shift
62
Cost of the modules instrumentation (PMT)

• Requirement for the PMT instrumentation is the
  low magnetic field (lt 100 Gauss) into the
  PMT-location volume.
• Cost economy is 230k ( 3 of total
  Calorimeter system cost)
• Energy resolution will be 3.5/?E, instead
  3.0/?E

Modules instrumentation rate is 6 units/shift
63
HV control system for control of APD HV-units.
System includes 2704 programmable D-A VME
converters. A base unit is a commercial 12-bits
D/A converter (XIP-TVME200/XIP-5220, produced by
Xycom Automation Inc.). The production cost per
channel is 72. Cosmic-ray pre-calibration
system for adjustment of APD HV, the Calorimeter
pre-calibration (accuracy better than 4) and
online long-term monitoring of the APD gain
(accuracy better than 1). System is based on
detection of signals from the cosmic-ray muons,
vertically traversing Calorimeter modules, and
includes 468 programmable Low-Threshold
Discriminator Trigger Programmable Logic. A
base units are the commercial LTD TPL (V814
V495, produced by CAEN). The production cost per
channel is 69. Monitoring-calibration system
for online short-term monitoring of the APD gain
timing. System is based on the "ultrabright
LED-lamps" with an electronic method of
stabilization of the light output and includes 44
special LED modules. The similar system has been
developed and tested for LHCb project. We propose
to adapt the LHCb system for our project. The
production cost per channel is 63. Calorimeter
readout electronics include 176 WFDs boards and
12 crate-collector boards. The production cost
per channel is 301.
64
) Additional YALE support of the FTE scientists
for supervision and tests of modules, APD-units
APD-instrumented modules is 370k.
Cosmic ray test pre-calibration of the
delivered module Procedure includes the
accumulation of data-base for APD-instrumented
Calorimeter modules
65
) Additional YALE support of the FTE engineer
scientists for supervision and tests is 179k.
Installation of The Calorimeter Mechanics (for R.
Brown)
66
NSF Contribution
67

• The complete risk-factor of CS is low-middle
  (Well-approved technology)
• The complete contingency of Calorimeter system is
  24.
•  Maximal technical risk factor is 4 (New design,
  nothing exotic)
•  Maximal cost risk factor is 10 (Top-down
  estimate from analogous program)
•  Maximal schedule risk factor is 10 (Delays
  completion of critical path item)
•  Maximal design risk factor is 15 (Concept only)

68
Calorimeter System schedule
69
Calorimeter-system spending-profile
70
1.2.3 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Excellent
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? Scrubbing and unification,
  mechanical design and integration
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review - Scrubbed
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• No outstanding issues
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system? No

71

• 1.2.4 Charged Particle Veto
• Array of scintillators inside decay volume vacuum
  and downstream beam pipe
• Possible low pressure beam chamber at downstream
  end
• Extensive measurements of photo electron yields
  and timing of various light collection schemes
  averaged over the detector surface has been done
  at Zurich
• Readout with photo detectors coupled directly to
  the scintillator, gives almost ten times more
  photo-electrons than observed with embedded
  wavelength shifting fibers

Time Response of Individual PMT And Earliest PMT
Response
72
1.2.4 Charged Veto
73
andries van der schaaf
1.2.4 Charged Particle Veto
1.2.4 CPV cost overview
Costs in k
74
andries van der schaaf
1.2.4 Charged Particle Veto
1.2.4.1 Barrel CPV

• Main Costs
• - 50 for modules, mainly light sensors.
• Estimate based on Burle PMTs used so far,
  16x14 modularity
• and three sensors per module.
• 20 for vacuum feed throughs
• Issues
• Geometry of vacuum chamber
• Choice of sensor (PMT or Geiger mode APD)
• Coating versus wrapping/vacuum foil
• End-cap modularity

75
andries van der schaaf
1.2.4 Charged Particle Veto
1.2.4.2 Downstream CPV
Photo-readout Integration with vacuum
system Counter material Design Assembly of
counters Assembly into structure
installation Monitoring system
25 20 20 10 10 10 5

• - How well does beam chamber work ?
• Requirements depend on this.
• How well does scintillator coating work ?
• Otherwise dead layer from wrapping.
• Choice of light sensor
• Affects sensitivity to stray fields

76
andries van der schaaf
1.2.4 Charged Particle Veto
1.2.4.6 Beam chamber system
- This MWPC would detect charged particles
escaping the barrel CPV. - Location either at end
of decay tank, or behind calorimeter. -
Low-pressure to minimize window thickness. - Even
a device with 99 efficiency would be very
useful. - Veto blindness? - Timing ? - Could it
produce background ?
77
andries van der schaaf
1.2.4 Charged Particle Veto
Costs per Channel
USD PMT                
650 On-detector electronics    
90 Feed throughs             
170 Cabling            
30 Off-detector electronics   210 Front-end
electronics       715

----------------- Total                
1865 - Half of the
CPV costs scale with the number of readout
channels 30 less channels would save
15 costs. - Each detector module requires 2-3
readout channels cost of the actual
detectors are totally negligible
78
andries van der schaaf
1.2.4 Charged Particle Veto
CPV spending profile
Costs in k
79
1.2.4 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Good gt Undeveloped
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? Mechanical designs, integration
  with vacuum, design of downstream system,
  iteration/scrubbing of RLS, beam chamber entry
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review
• Some scrubbing
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• Ready after subsystem reviews
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system? Need additional groups, engineering and
  RD, Swiss viability

80

• 1.2.5 Photon Veto
• Photon upstream veto top and bottom assembled of
  straight bars
• Prototypes have been under continuous cosmics
  test for 2 years - lt4 variation
• Barrel veto made of tapered shashlyk prototypes
  used calorimeter tiles and post-machined
  awaiting tests with fiber
• Magnet veto like upstream with clear fibers
• Downstream veto similar but undesigned

PMT Change
C-module under construction
Grooved Scintillator with fibers
81
1.2.5 Photon Veto
82
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
WBS1.2.5.1 Upstream Photon
Veto WBS1.2.5.2 Barrel Photon
Veto WBS1.2.5.3 Magnet Photon
Veto WBS1.2.5.4 Downstream Photon Veto
All detectors are lead-scintillator sandwich
types with WLS fiber and photomultiplier
readout. Their WBS numbers reflect geometrical
position along the kaon beam.
O. Mineev , Institute for Nuclear Research of
RAS (Moscow)
83
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Contributors to the subsystem cost
estimation Vladimir Issakov, physicist at
Yale University Yury Kudenko, physicist at INR
RAS Emmanuil Garber, mechanical engineer at
BNL Victor Mayatski, director of Uniplast
factory in Vladimir Sergey Chernichenko,
director of Scint. Factory at IHEP Paul Davison,
sales manager of EMI company
84
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Magnet photon veto WBS 1.2.5.3 (160
channels) Downstream photon veto WBS 1.2.5.4
(280 channels)
Barrel photon veto WBS 1.2.5.2 (1100
channels) Upstream photon veto WBS 1.2.5.1 (372
channels)
Total number of readout channels 1912 w/o spares
85
WBS 1.2.5 Photon Veto Tree
1.2.5 8,676 k
Upstream Barrel Veto
Magnet Veto Downstream
1.2.5.1 2,009 k
1.2.5.2 4,895 k
1.2.5.3 617 k
1.2.5.4 1,154 k
1.2.5.2.1 Barrel detector modules 2,102
k
1.2.5.2.2 Preinstallation/test/support
653 k
1.2.5.2.3 Instrumentation for readout 683
k
1.2.5.2.4 Calibration and monitoring 109
k
1.2.5.2.5 Mechanics for setup
721 k
1.2.5.2.6 Front-end electronics
514 k
1.2.5.2.7 Cabling
112 k
86
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Major Tasks Manufacturing of 1100 modules of
shashlyk type. Each module consists of 250
layers of lead and polystyrene based
scintillator. Readout implemented with 500 WLS
fibers. Weight is 65 kg.
Issues Optimization of module, segmentation, and
sampling fraction with Monte-Carlo simulation.
87
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Molding machine at IHEP Scintillation Factory.
Can mold the large plates of 30x30 cm2 size.
Output of molding machine. 300,000 such plates
will be molded for Barrel Veto with high optical
and geometrical quality.
88
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Direct cost w/o contingency
Major Tasks Preinstallation tests. Technical
support and supervision during installation.
Tests and comissioning after installation.
Issues No major issues.
89
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Direct cost w/o contingency
Major Tasks Purchase of phototubes and
components for 1100 photooptical
readout channels. Production of the phototube
modules with incorporated HV power units.
Calibration of all phototubes and test of HV
units.
Issues Present cost is based on 1100 readout
channels. Number of channels can be increased to
achieve the better statistics of searched
decays.
90
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Direct cost w/o contingency
Major Tasks Manufacturing of optical fiber based
monitoring system. Routing the calibration light
signal to each readout channel. Adjustment and
tests.
Issues No major issues.
91
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Direct cost w/o contingency
Major Tasks Design and manufacturing the
cylindrical mechanical support for the shashlyk
modules. Diameter is 4.5 m, length is 4 m.
Issues The mechanical design takes into account
the access to vacuum vessel.
Needs significant engineering effort impacts
C-A, vacuum, overall integration!
92
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Direct cost w/o contingency
Major Tasks Purchase of front-end electronics.
Waveform digitizers and control system for
phototube high voltage supply .
Issues Present cost is based on 1100 readout
channels. Can be increased for trigger
electronics.
93
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Direct cost w/o contingency
Major Tasks Purchase of cables. Connecting 2
coaxial signal cables and 2 low-voltage cables
per each readout channel. Check of right cable
mapping.
Issues No major issues.
94
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Cost per channel for BV modules , their readout
and electronics
Notes Shashlyk module for Photon Barrel Veto has
almost the same segmentation as for Calorimeter
but 4 times larger in volume.
Issues Cost of FE electronics can be increased
to include the photon veto signals in the
trigger
95
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Direct cost w/o contingency
Summary There are no major unresolved issues.
96
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Cost growth
Main factors for 81 growth 1. Two photon veto
detectors were added under WBS1.2.5 ( 37
up of total old estimation). 2. Cost of
supervision, tests and technical support was
reevaluated (20) 3. Number of readout channels
was increased following the larger veto detector
volumes ( 15 up of total old cost). 4. Cost
of front-end electronics per channel was
increased (4) .
97
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Photon Veto Cost Schedule
Issues Shipping and transportation of large
parts of mechanical support must be taken into
account at the design stage to keep on the
schedule.
98
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Photon Veto spending over years
Note All detectors are similar in design and
have similar spending profile.
99
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Barrel Veto items cost over years
Note Not all cost items for WBS1.2.5.2 (Photon
Barrel Veto) are shown in this graph.
100
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Barrel Veto contingency 21
Largest BV sublevel contingency for front-end
electronics (WFD boards) as a new development,
mechanics as only a conception of removable
frame exists for now.
101
WBS 1.2.5 (Photon veto)
Barrel Veto contingency estimation (weights are
not shown)
102
1.2.5 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? New cylindrical shashlyk design,
  costs by analogy with calorimeter, mechanical
  issues unaddressed
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? RD, Design and prototyping,
  technical review of RLS
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review
• Iterate RLS inputs and contingency analysis
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• No technical advances, scrubbed with reviews
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system? Need group for downstream veto,
  engineering support for overall system

103
1.2.6 Catcher
104
Description of subsystem
Photon veto inside/near the beam at downstream
end
Catcher
SOLUTION Lead and aerogel tile sandwich counter
inside the beam named aerogel counter Lead and
acrylic slab sandwich counter near the
beam named guard counter
105
Catcher overview
Guard counter
144 modules of Pb-Acrylic sandwich
Aerogel Counter
beam
420 modules ofPb-Aerogel counter
And their readout and cabling
106

• 1.2.6 Catcher
• Proof of principle done with two stages of
  prototypes
• Light yield measurement by charged beam
• Response to proton as a substitute of neutron
• Good agreement with MC
• System designs progressing
• Optics in a module to obtain uniform efficiency
  and to simplify production
• Optimization of whole configuration
• Quality check system for aerogel tiles
• Establish measurement system of transmittance,
  refractive index

Catcher Module Prototypes
107
Catcher Cost Summary
() Labor costs are now being examined, but
difficult to estimate, since many subjects will
be covered by our graduate students.
108
Aerogel Counter Module
109
Guard counter
110
Instrumentation and Cabling
111
Evolution from TDR 2001
112
Cost Schedule
113
1.2.6 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Excellent
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? System design, installation,
  scrubbing
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review Iterated RLS
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• No issues
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system? No

114
1.2.7 Trigger
115
1.2.7.8 1.2.7.9 1.2.7.10
1.2.7.3
1.2.7.4 1.2.7.5 1.2.7.6
Veto digitizers
Module collector
Boolean logic card
Veto digitizers
Boolean logic card
Module collector
Calorimeter digitizers
Projection card
Prerad digitizers
Strip collector
Pattern card
Strip routing board
116
Digitizers (1.2.7.3)

• Functions
• 25 MHZ 10 bit p.h. 6bit time digitizers
• Digital processing
• Flavor A p.h. sum and mean time for groups of 2
• Flavor B p.h. sum and time elaboration for
  groups of 4
• Unsolved technical issues
• Analog signal shaping/preconditioning (ASIC)
• Individual delay adjustment
• Evaluating alternative of WFD with special
  firmware
• Caveat
• Assume analog summing in 2X6 groups for Shashlyk
  and vetos. Cost not included
• Vetos not used for the trigger not costed
• Cost drivers
• Development and fabrication of ASIC
• Number of channels (110 modules)
• Prototyping work

117
Routing/collector modules (1.2.7.4 to 7)

• Module collector (PR-CAL-Veto)
• Sum and logical OR of signals from up to 2
  digitizers (meant for x-y view in PR or strip
  grouping in CAL)
• Strip routing (PR-CAL)
• Rearrange input data from digitizers grouped by
  module into outputs grouped by strip number
• Strip collector (PR-CAL)
• Combine back to back strips and apply thresholds.
  Compute sums in depth
• Technical issues
• Bandwidth requirements and interconnections
• Resync after zero suppression latency and
  deadtime issues

118
Logic modules (1.2.7.8 to 11)

• Projection card
• Clustering algorithm in projections
• Pattern card
• Pattern recognition algorithm on logical strip
  signals
• Boolean logic card
• Perform logic combinations of several inputs with
  programmable time windows
• Technical issues
• Algorithms not yet defined. Complexity unknown

119
Service systems

• Trigger supervisor (1.2.7.12)
• Realign partial trigger conditions
• Parallel trigger formation, enabling and
  prescaling
• Send trigger information to clock system for
  broadcast to front end electronics (F.E.E.)
• Clock system (1.2.7.13)
• Master clock, phase locked to extraction RF or
  free running
• Clock drivers (fan out to subsystems)
• Clock receivers in F.E.E. crates

120
Other items

• Infrastructure (1.2.7.14)
• Crates, cables, VME interfaces, readout
  interfaces, control PCs
• Note does not include racks (water cooled?)
• Interconnection boards (1.2.7.2)
• Developed for test of intercommunication.
• Assume equipped with input and output memories to
  turn them into a general testing tool

121
Trigger summary (1.2.7)
Total k
1693 939 2277 4909

122
Cost growth (3667k)

• Increased complexity
• New finding rate from decays outside of fiducial
  region
• Fully digital pipelined system, mostly custom
  designed
• Large increase in development costs (2116)
• 9.1 engineer m ? y 7.6 technician m ? y
• Labor costs 30k ? 2146k
• New systems not present in old estimate (893
  matls only)
• Digitizers (210k378k)
• Also provide redundancy for veto systems
• Clock (191k385k)
• Trigger supervisor (405k130k)
• Infrastructure (605k)
• Vme crates,readout controllers, cables etc.
  60k605k
• Per channel cost of Digitizers 246/channel

123
Time schedule a first try

• See notes on next slide

124
Notes on time schedule

• Assume 4 independent teams (none available today)
• Definition of architecture preliminary to any
  hardware development
• For completion by end july 2005, from today we
  need 2 FTE physicists ½ FTE engineer on this
  task
• If this is unrealistic, schedule will shift
  accordingly
• Trigger digitizers critical item
• Digitizer fabrication assumed to start in 2006
• Duration determined by task interdependency
• Other durations and placements conditioned by
  digitizers (technicalresource dependencies)
• Design anticipated for early PDR
• Fabrication delayed for test with preproduced
  digitizers
• Clock system delayed due to arbitrary assumption
  that one engineer is shared between digitizer and
  clock development
• Reconsider on the basis of WFD option and its
  time schedule

125
1.2.7 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Preconceptual
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? Specification of architecture,
  algorithms
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review Scrub current inputs
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission
• No advances expected
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system? System development impeded by lack of
  scientific and technical manpower

126
1.2.8 DAQ
127
DAQ Cost Summary (k)

• Costs updated following comments from 11/09/04
• Contingency re-estimated

128
1.2.8.1 Event Builder

• Receives event fragments from the front-end
  electronics and builds complete events. Based
  on a cluster of PC's communicating through a
  network switch
• Cost drivers are Infiniband network switch (150
  ports, 10 Gbit/sec per port), and event builder
  computers (160 CPU's)
• Data rate from Geant with assumptions. Needed
  processing power estimated by scaling up from
  E949. Computer costs from Dell website. Network
  switch cost from chatting with vendors at
  trade shows.
• Labor by physicists
• Issues
• More careful estimates of event size
• Measurements of real-time performance
• Risk factors
• Design and cost risks from lack of information on
  event size, L1output rate, real-time performance
  of hardware

129
1.2.8.2 Level 3 Trigger

• Receives complete events from Event Builder,
  applies software trigger, sends survivors to
  mass storage. May also perform detector
  calibrations in real-time. Based on a cluster of
  PC's communicating with the Event Builder
  computers.
• Cost driver is computer farm (400 CPUs). Cost
  estimated from vendor web pages.
• Assumed processing time of 200µs/event per CPU.
• Labor is by physicists
• Issues
• Development of trigger algorithms, coherent
  picture of trigger/DAQ across all levels
• Measurements of real-time performance
• Risk factors
• Design and cost risks from lack of information on
  L3 input rate, real-time performance ofhardware

130
1.2.8.3 Hardware co-processor

• Custom hardware to perform CPU-intensive trigger
  calculations
• Cost drivers are FPGA costs and
  engineering/technician labor. FPGA costs from
  arrow.com
• Issues
• Need for this system depends on performance of
  software trigger
• No design, no engineer working on this (yet)
  some prospects of collaboration with BNL
  Instrumentation. Number of FPGA's needed
  estimated by pure speculation.
• Risk factors
• Design and cost risks from lack of information on
  L3 input rate, real-time performance ofL3
  software
• Lower contingency than EB and L3 because some of
  the costs are labor costs that arethought to be
  better known. Also lower schedule risk since
  fully working system likelynot needed at start
  of beam.

131
1.2.8.4 Online Software

• Online software is the glue that holds the DAQ
  system together. It includes a run controller,
  a user interface, event logger, interfaces to
  the event builder, to the L1/L3 trigger systems,
  to the slow control and to online
  monitoring/calibration tasks.
• Based on free software plus our own code. Labor
  is mostly by physicists. One software
  engineer is added.
• Issues
• None. Just needs to get done
• Risk factors
• Some schedule risk

132
1.2.8.5 Administration

• System Administrator to look after networking
  and PC farms.
• Issues none
• Risk factors none, except that if we do not
  have an administrator, a physicist will take on
  the tasks, resulting in some schedule risk

133
Schedule

• Event builder, L3 trigger and online software.
• I assume a core of 3 physicists (with hopefully
  some help from postdocs and perhaps students,
  neither of whom I have costed).
• RD phase of roughly 1.5 years for EB and L3.
• Event builder throughput
• L3 trigger algorithm development, speed
  measurements
• I'm assuming we will have a beam test at some
  point of the PRCAL system. Would like to test
  prototype DAQ system in that environment.
  Earliest time we could have this ready is Fall
  2006.
• First major purchsse (25 of final system)
  around mid-2007.
• Refinement of design, test with the 25 system
  (1 year, 3 physicists 1 software engineer)
• Purchase of remaining hardware around mid-2008.
• Installation/integration 1 year, 3 physicists
  1 software engineer
• Complete by July 2009

134
Spending profile
k
Sys Admin
DAQ/L3 complete 7/1/09 in current schedule
135
Cost Growth

• TDR cost 1585k gt new base cost 4562k
• Not terribly meaningful to compare due to major
  change in architecture and in scope e.g. L1
  accept rate 25 kHZ gt several hundred kHz
• Bulk of TDR cost was from buffer modules and
  readout controllers (1513k). These no longer
  exist their function was moved down to the
  front-end electronics.
• On the other hand, we added or expanded as
  follows

136
Contingency analysis
In the following table, the dominant risk factors
for each WBS item are shown. The column marked
contingency is calculated by properly weighting
over all the elements of that WBS item.

• Comments
• Technical risk set to 1 for all items since we
  will use off-the-shelf components
• Weighting factors set to 1. Uncertainties are
  in material cost and in design.
• Costs for EB and L3 estimated by scaling from
  E949 requirements. Cost for co-processor
  comes from engineering judgment overall
  contingency is lower than EB and L3 because
  co-processor has significant contribution from
  engineering/technical labor cost, which has
  lower uncertainty

137
Manpower

• Currently only G. Redlinger (physicist) and H.
  Diaz (electronics technician)
• Ultimately we will need a core of 3 physicists
  and one software engineer for EB/L3 and online
  software. For the co-processor project, we need
  in addition one electronics engineer, one
  electronics technician and one physicist.
• We need more manpower!

138
Trigger/DAQ Status

• What has been accomplished
• First pass at simulation of L1 trigger
  algorithms.
• First pass at breakdown of L1 trigger into
  individual components for implementation in
  hardware
• First pass at measuring data transfer bandwidth
  through new networking technology
• Open issues
• Coherent picture of L1 and L3 trigger algorithms
  and data flow
• Engineering help with L1 hardware and with the
  custom hardware part of L3.

139
1.2.8 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Good
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? Needs scientific and technical
  manpower
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review Some scrubbing
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission OK
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system? Needs scientific and technical manpower

140
1.2.9 Off-line
141
Offline Computing Cost Summary
142
1.2.9.1 Offline Computing Hardware
143
1.2.9.1 Offline Computing Hardware

• Two components compute farm workstations
• Compute farm
• Assume we will need 100 x more power than needed
  for E949 (20 dual CPUs in 2001) based on expected
  trigger rates for Kopio.
• Estimates based on costs of DAQ Online farm.
• CPU power should be 10 x more by 2009 which means
  a farm of 200 dual CPUs
• This farm should be purchased as late as possible
  to take advantage of increased CPU power. It is
  planned to get 10 of the farm setup two years
  before physics data, 40 one year before and the
  last 50 just in time.
• Workstations
• Individual workstations needed by visitors. These
  workstations will also act as servers for web
  applications and databases needed by the
  experiment. Costing is made assuming 15 typical
  current desktop computers.

144
1.2.9.2 Offline Computing Software
145
1.2.9.2 Offline Computing Software

• Simulations includes development and
  exploitation of various Monte Carlo codes in the
  areas of beam, fast MC and full detector MC.
• Event reconstruction includes input of raw data
  and calibration values from databases, decoding
  of data, preparation of hit lists, in
  preradiator and calorimeter, processing of veto
  information from the charged and neutral veto
  counters, production of ROOT trees output and
  event display.
• Analysis includes processing the ROOT trees for
  calibrations, physics studies and monitoring the
  detector.

146
1.2.9.2 Offline Computing Software

• Tools includes work with various software
  packages needed for detector geometry
  description, data format, data bases, data
  management schemes, analysis framework,
  documentation. In each case, there is need to
  study the various packages developed by HEP
  groups. to select one suitable to Kopio and to
  adapt it to the needs of this experiment.
• Integration make all of the above work together
  as seamlessly as possible. Coordinate all the
  offline computing efforts.
• Workshops organize workshops every year to
  educate the collaborators in using the tools, 24
  K to pay for instructors

147
Cost evolution

• 
  in thousand
• 7/2001 estimate
  0
• 1/2003 estimate
  0
• 1/2004 estimate
  0
• The present estimate
  2,694
• This WBS item was not included before because it
  was believed that remote computer resources would
  be sufficient. With the increase in the trigger
  rate, it has become clear that a local compute
  farm will be necessary.
• The collaboration has also realized that some of
  the software projects can be better handled by
  computer programmers rather than physicists.
  

148
Spending Profile
149
1.2.9 Overall Level of PM confidence

• ?? How would you characterize overall status of
  this sub-system? Early state of evolution, but
  critical to KOPIO success
• ?? What outstanding work remains, and what kind
  (technical, cost estimating, scheduling,
  resources, etc.)? Significant effort directed at
  simulations, event reconstruction, etc
• ?? Anticipated status of this sub-system for
  January 18 review
• Some scrubbing
• ?? Timelines for remaining work for May
  submission OK
• ?? Personnel levels inhibiting convergence for
  system? Need increase in scientific manpower
  professional computing support

150
1.2.10 Detector Systems
151
Strategy

• Detector lags in engineering development
  integration
• Initiate project with detail design on AGS Mods
  and Beam
• Start with procurements and AGS floor prep
• Baseline all detector interfaces (i.e. pit)
  before cutting steel
• Complete systems engineering and detail designs
  initiate detector construction 9-12 months later
• Neutral beam tests in 2008, engineering runs
  start in 2009, first data in 2010/11

152
KOPIO Subsystem Technical Status(March 2004)
153
Manpower to Baseline

• Estimate 7M of EDIA needed to initiate
  construction (FDR/PRR)
• 30 - 40 FTE of engineers designers
• Estimate half this to properly baseline and do
  interface controls with AGS construction (i.e.
  pit and beam-line)
• 4-5 FTE working now
• Need dramatic increase of physicists FTE as well

154
Global
155
Detectors
156
http//www.kopio.bnl.gov/Project_Office/Estimates/
KOPIOEstimates.html
157
RLS Status

• Schedules have been entered but wide variations
  in level of detail
• Internal logic conceptually understood but in
  most cases not substantiated
• Essentially no linkages between subsystems
  established except at very basic levels
• No constraints funding or resources applied
  (or understood!)
• Needs professional (i.e. engineering) review to
  do better resources not generally available yet

158
Key AGS Milestones

• Construction Start- 10/05
• Detector Pit Complete- 4/07
• Neutral Beam Complete- 9/08
• Beam Operations Start- 10/08
• D-4 Magnet Installed- 2/09
• Detector Complete- 9/10

159
KOPIO Installation Timeline

• 4/07- Experimental floor with extended pit D/S to
  U/S face of D/S Veto Vacuum Vessel. Two utility
  trenches in floor to pit.
• 10/07- Target station in place with U/S
  shielding. AC power transformers, breaker panels,
  and conduit runs in trenches. Access stairs into
  pit. Start Photon Veto, Preradiator Calorimeter
  floor supports.
• 1/08-