Cutaneous Reactions to Tick Bites and Antigens in Bovines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Cutaneous Reactions to Tick Bites and Antigens in Bovines

Description:

1: Delayed cutaneous cellular responses to antigens delivered as naked DNA in ... Is protein really expressed by transfected cutaneous cells? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: isa784
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cutaneous Reactions to Tick Bites and Antigens in Bovines


1
Reverse Immunology Screening procedures
  • 1 Delayed cutaneous cellular responses to
    antigens delivered as naked DNA in TOPO VR2001
    vector
  • Macroscopic erythema and edema
  • Histology Basophils, CD3/CD4 mononuclear cells
  • Molecular expression of IGF-1, MIP-1alpha, MCP-1
  • 2 Th1 responses
  • Molecular expression of IFN-?, IP-10
  • 3 Antibodies (IgG1 and IgG2, not IgE) and
    recognition of tick salivome with sera from
    naturally immune hosts

2
FEATURES OF TOPO VR2001 VECTOR FOR DELIVERY OF 48
ANTIGENS AS DNA FOR IN VIVO SCREENING
  • TOPO TA 5 minutes cloning
  • Strong Vical CMV promoter
  • Signal peptide from tissue plasminogen activator.
  • makes expressed protein get secreted by
    transfected cells and thus antigen will be
    processed by the class II pathway
  • Because of what is known about immune correlates
    of resistance against ticks, we want to favor the
    Class II pathway.
  • Developed by Jesus Valenzuela, NIAID-NIH

3
Incidence of positive skin reactions in bovines
naturally immune to ticks and inoculated with
naked DNA coding for different salivary antigens.
Antigens were inoculated in duplicates in same
host and some antigens induced opposite
reactions in the same host erratic expression of
protein from naked DNA?
4
Further Work - Some Questions
  • Erratic responses to Antigens delivered as DNA
  • Is protein really expressed by transfected
    cutaneous cells?
  • Should we go for recombinant proteins?
  • Should we rely on in vitro transfection of DCs
    followed by in vitro readouts?

5
Reverse Immunogenomics

6

Resistant
Susceptible
  • Contrasting phenotypes in bovines
  • Is composition of tick saliva affected by S and R
    host immune responses?
  • Is this phenomenon accompanied by differential
    expression of genes in Salivary Glands of ticks?
  • Does this phenomenon affect choice/performance of
    candidate antigens?

7
  • Hypothesis Different levels of host anti-tick
    immunity affect expression of genes in salivary
    glands of cattle ticks
  • Objectives identify genes of larvae and of
    salivary glands, the expression of which is
    affected by immune responses of susceptible and
    resistant hosts

8
Experimental Design
R
Nymphs Males Females
Unfed Larvae (UFL)
Salivary Glands (SG)
S
Nymphs Males Females
mRNA isolation
mRNA isolation
cDNA Library (SMART-Clontech/BD) in ?
TriplEx2 Mass sequencing of ESTs Bioinformatics
9
RESULTS General profile of individual cDNA
Libraries
General profile of combined Transcriptomes
RMallSxR 3,342 contigs 7,923 ESTs 312
Contigs SP (9.3) 648 contigs no match
(19.4)
10
RESULTS Some clusters with interesting matches
11
1 clone female SG e value 5e-004 plancitoxin I
Acanthaster planci starfish (Echinoderma) GRPs
are more abundant in salivary glands of
Dermacentor andersoni females than in those of
Rh. microplus heteroxene tick X monoxene tick?
12
RESULTS Statistics of important transcripts for
tick blood meals (?2 test)
13
Uninfested skin
Infested skin
14
  • Unfed male ticks already express IGBPs B and C,
    but not IGBP A (2 clones each from S and from R
    SGs)
  • Host response does not affect expression of
    IGBPs, but levels of total IgG and of anti-saliva
    IgG antibodies decrease in S hosts during heavy
    infestations
  • - Frequencies of IgG allotypes differ in R and S
    hosts

Kashino S, et al. Exp Parasitol, 2005
15
Further Work - Some Questions
  • Confirm findings with qRT-PCR
  • Significance of differential responses
  • Are the responses of R hosts more efficient
    against tick anti-coagulants?
  • If S hosts do not make efficient responses
    against tick anti-coagulants, can a vaccine for S
    hosts achieve this?
  • Inefficient feeding inhibits gene expression, but
    does reverse immunogenomics identify the correct
    targets?
  • ??ltThe products of genes that are affected by
    host responses may be further down a cascade of
    events, the beginning of which contain the bona
    fide targets for a vaccinegt??

16
Other Applications of the CAS Bioinformatics Tools
  • Count Tables of cDNA libraries of salivary glands
    from females of
  • Rhipicephalus microplus
  • monoxene bovines short hipostome
  • Rhipicephalus sanguineus
  • heteroxene dogs - short hipostome
  • Amblyomma cajennense
  • heteroxene many species of mammals long
    hipostome

17
Other Applications of the CAS Bioinformatics Tools
Significant differences, P lt 0.05, chi square
test
  • Relative abundance of glycine rich-proteins
    correlates with biology of life cycle and size of
    hipostome

18
Universidade de São Paulo Sandra Regina
Maruyama Lucinda Bandão Daniela Moré Elen
Anatriello Antonio Abatepaulo Wanessa
Carvalho Gustavo Rocha Alessandra Franzin Profa.
Dra. Beatriz Rossetti Ferreira Prof. Dr. João
Santana da Silva NIH José Marcos Chaves
Ribeiro Jesus G. Valenzuela Jennifer M. Anderson
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com