Title: Non-Markovian%20dynamics%20of%20small%20genetic%20circuits
1Non-Markovian dynamics of small genetic circuits
- Lev Tsimring
- Institute for Nonlinear Science
- University of California, San Diego
Le Houches, 9-20 April, 2007
2Outline
- Deterministic and stochastic descriptions of
genetic circuits with very different time scales - Non-Markovian effects in gene regulation
- transcriptional delay-induced stochastic
oscillations
3Gene regulatory networks
- Proteins affect rates of production of other
proteins (or themselves) - This leads to formation of networks of
interacting genes/proteins - Different reaction channels operate at vastly
different time scales and number densities - Sub-networks are non-Markovian, even if the whole
system is - Compound reactions are non-Markovian
B
B
A
A
C
D
E
D
4Transients in gene regulation
- Genetic circuits are never at a fixed point
- Cell cycle volume growth division
- External signaling
- Intrinsic noise
- Extrinsic noise
- Circadian rhythms ultradian rhythms
5Interesting design (modeling) issues arise
naturally
- Separation of timescales multiple time-scale
analysis - Nonlinearity due to multimerization,
cooperativity and feedback bifurcation analysis
- Time delays
- Spatial compartments and cell signaling -
spatial models - Cell-to-cell variations are large
In order to build gene circuits to perform
cellular tasks, we need to understand the
origins of the variability
6External signaling ?-Phage Life Cycle
M.Ptashne, 2002
7Engineered Toggle Switch
Construction/experiments
Gardner, Cantor Collins, Nature 403339 (2001)
8Circadian clock in Neurospora crassa
P.Ruoff
WC-1
WCC
FRQ
WC-2
9Ultradian clock at yeast
Klevecz et al, 2004
Synchronized culture
5,329 expressed genes
Respiratory phase
Average peak-to-trough ratio 2
Reductive phase
10The Repressilator
Model
Construction/experiments
Elowitz and Leibler, Nature 403335 (2001)
11Auto-repressor A cartoon
DNA
promoter
gene
RNAP
RNAP
Binding/unbinding rate lt1 sec Transcription
rate 103 basepairs/min Translation rate 102
aminoacids/min mRNA degradation rate
3min Transport in/out nucleus 10 min Protein
degradation rate 30min ..hours
12Oscillations in gene regulation
DNA
promoter
gene
RNAP
RNAP
13Single gene autoregulation
Fast
Slow
Binding/unbinding rate (k-1,k-2) 1
sec-1 Transcription rate (kt) 1 min-1..0.01
min-1 Protein degradation (kx) 0.01 min-1
?
14Single gene autoregulation
Fast
Slow
?
15Quasi-steady-state approximation (naïve approach)
Correct?
Fixed points yes, Dynamics no x is a fast
variable also!
16Separation of scales(Correct projection)
Kepler Elston, 2001 Bundschuh et al,
2003 Bennett et al, 2007, in press
slow variable
- Prefactor is important if x2/x1,
- i.e. lots of dimers
- Prefactor makes transients slower
17Genetic toggle switch
Gardner, Cantor, Collins, Nature 2000
GFP
Protein A
On
Gene A
on
Gene
B
off
Reporter
Protein B
Off
Gene
A
Gene
on
off
B
Reporter
18Multiple-scale analysis
Fast reactions
19Multiple-scale analysis (contd)
Local equilibrium for fast reactions
Nullspace of the adjoint linear operator
2 eigenvectors
From orthogonality conditions
20Prefactor
w/o prefactor
with prefactor
full model
21Stochastic gene expression Master Equation
approach
Two reactions
production
degradation
Probability of having x molecules of X at time t,
Dynamics of
Continuum limit (xgtgt1)
Fokker-Planck equation
22Stochastic gene expression Langevin equation
approach
Two reactions
production
degradation
Deterministic equation
Each reaction is a noisy Poisson process,
meanvariance
Separately
Langevin equations
Since reactions are uncorrelated, variances add
From Langevin equation to FPE (van Kampen,
Stochastic Processes
in Chemistry
and Physics,1992)
or from FPE to Langevin!
23Autoregulation stochastic description
n total of monomers u of unbound dimers
b - of bound dimers
Master equation for
Projection using
24Back to ODE
In the continuum limit (large n) Fokker-Planck
equation
(no prefactor)
Corresponding Langevin equation
with
Fast reaction noise is filtered out
25Multiscale stochastic simulations(turbo-charged
Gillespie algorithm)
- The computational analog of the projection
procedure stochastic partial equilibrium (Cao,
Petzold, Gillespie, 2005) - Identify slow and fast variables
- Fast reactions at quasi-equilibrium
- distribution for fixed is
assumed known - Compute propensities for slow reactions
Easy for zero- and first-order reactions,
more tricky for higher
order reactions
26Regulatory delay in genetic circuits
27Single gene autoregulation transcriptional delay
Fast
Slow
cf. Santillán Mackey, 2001
Delayed
After projection
28Genetic oscillations Hopf bifurcation
Fixed point
Complex eigenvalues
Instability
29Transcriptional delay a non-Markovian process
Stochastic simulations (modified Gillespie
algorithm)
update
update
- Markovian reactions dimerization, degradation,
binding - exponential next reaction time distribution
- which reaction to choose?
Non-Markovian channels transcription,
translation Gaussian time
distribution
30Scheme of numerical simulation
delay
time steps
Modified Direct Gillespie algorithm (Gillespie,
1977)
- Input values for initial state , set t0
- Compute propensities
- Generate random numbers
- Compute time step until next reaction
- Check if there has been a delayed reaction
scheduled in - a) if yes, then last steps 2,3,4 are
ignored, time advances to , - update in accordance
with delayed reaction - b) if not, go to the step 6
- Find the channel of the next reaction
- Update time and
31Stochastic simulations
32Analytical results
Deterministic model
Reactions
(no dimerization)
No Hopf bifurcation!
probability to have n monomers at time t given
the state s at time t-?
Stochastic model (Master equations)
Approximation
33Boolean model
Two-state gene
at time t depends on the state at t-T
Transition probability
if
if
positive feedback
negative feedback
For double-well quartic potential
-1
1
34Master equations
the probability of having value s(t) ?1 at time
t
s ?1 to 1
within (t,tdt)
probability of transition from
s 1 to ?1
Delayed master equation
35Autocorrelation function
Linear equation!
36Autocorrelation function
T1000, p10.1 p20.3
Stochastic oscillations!
37Power spectrum two-state model
38Analytical results
Deterministic model
Reactions
(no dimerization)
No Hopf bifurcation!
probability to have n monomers at time t given
the state s at time t-?
Stochastic model (Master equations)
Approximation
39Analytical results
Correlation function
Result
40Effect of stochasticity and delay on regulation
Standard deviation/mean
Time delay increases noise level
41Conclusions
- Fast binding-unbinding processes can be
eliminated both in deterministic and stochastic
modeling, however an accurate averaging procedure
has to be used leads to prefactors affecting
transient times and noise distributions - Multimerization increases time scales of genetic
regulation - Deterministic and stochastic description of
regulatory delays developed, delays of
transcription/translation of auto-repressor may
lead to increased fluctuations levels and
oscillations even when deterministic model shows
no Hopf bifurcation - Modified Gillespie algorithm is developed for
simulating time-delayed reactions
L.S. Tsimring and A. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.,
87, 2506021 (2001). D.A. Bratsun, D. Volfson,
L.S. Tsimring, and J. Hasty, PNAS, 102,
14593-12598 (2005). M. Bennett, D. Volfson, L.
Tsimring, and J. Hasty, Biophys. J., 2007, in
press.