The Age of the Earth 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Age of the Earth 1

Description:

Darwin relied on Lyell's position concerning the age of the earth. ... of England called the Weald (which goes back to the Carboniferous) had taken. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:113
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: bryson3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Age of the Earth 1


1
The Age of the Earth 1
  • Kelvins challenge to geology

2
Kelvin, Huxley
3
Darwin, T.C. Chamberlain
4
Lyell and Darwin
  • Darwin relied on Lyells position concerning the
    age of the earth.
  • He calculated, in the first edition of the
    Origin, how long the denudation (erosion) of a
    region of England called the Weald (which goes
    back to the Carboniferous) had taken.
  • The figure he arrived at was (by our standards
    today) pretty good 300 million years.
  • But he was soon to regret his boldness in
    actually specifying a number.

5
Kelvin
  • The most famous physicist of his time.
  • Kelvin made important contributions to the
    development of thermodynamics.
  • In particular, he identified/contributed to the
    expression of the second law (that entropy always
    increases connected to the fact that heat always
    flows from hotter to cooler).
  • But this brings us back to the kind of
    calculation of the earths age that Buffon
    attempted.
  • Similarly, it suggests the possibility of
    calculating how long the sun could radiate energy
    at its present rate.

6
The Problem
  • Kelvin arrived at a simple model of the earth
  • It had solidified pretty well all at once (until
    that point, it would be kept uniformly hot
    mixed by convection currents).
  • From that point it would behave like any hot
    sphere, beginning at the melting temperature and
    gradually radiating heat outwards to space
    (temperature there is just above absolute zero).
  • There is plenty of evidence that temperature
    increases as we dig or drill deeper into the
    earth this was well-known.
  • The calculations for temperature profiles over
    time of a solid, uniform sphere depend only on
    the initial temperature, the heat capacity and
    conductivity of the material.
  • The upshot is that there are limits to how old
    the earth is on this model, and when he applied
    it, Kelvin arrived first at an upper limit of 400
    million years and a lower limit of 40 million
    years he preferred about 100 million as the best
    estimate

7
The Sun
  • Helmholtz had proposed a gravitational theory of
    the suns energy.
  • Beginning with small bodies spread out through
    space, which then come together under the
    influence of gravity, we can calculate the amount
    of energy available to power the sun.
  • This gravitational theory allows far more energy
    in total than any form of combustion could (the
    sun would go out within some thousands of years
    if it were a burning lump of coal).
  • Kelvin adopted this theory concluded that the
    sun could provide something like the present
    level of energy for something like 100 million
    years, with 500 million as an outside limit.
  • Again, the main point for Kelvin was that the
    time was limitedhe rejected Lyells appeal to
    drafts on the bank of time as irresponsible.
  • Darwin was roundly criticized for his own
    calculation, which non-uniformitarians and fans
    of Kelvin dismissed as absurd.

8
Comparing ways of measuring time
  • Geologists had various processes erosion,
    sedimentation,
  • Each process produces a kind of cumulative
    measure, just like an hour-glass.
  • If we can combine a rate with a measure of how
    much of the process has taken place, we will get
    a time.
  • This kind of measure is pretty elasticits hard
    to say just how fast or slow erosion or
    sedimentation is over the long run (even if we
    measure the sediment carried by a river over a
    year, we still need to know how much area that
    sediment is spread over to build sedimentary
    rock).
  • Its also hard to measure just how much erosion
    or sedimentation has occurred (even if we add up
    the thicknesses of sedimentary rocks to form a
    column, its hard to be sure weve got it all,
    with no overlaps).

9
The Geological Estimates
  • Many of these estimates were made following
    Kelvins initial work.
  • They tended to come out roughly in agreement with
    Kelvins 100 million years.
  • But they are clearly pretty elastic.
  • On the other hand, if we can specify maximum
    rates and minimum accumulations with good
    confidence, we can put a lower limit on the time
    required.

10
The Physical Estimates
  • Kelvins methods depended on Kelvins models.
  • Kelvins model of the earth treated it as solid.
    There was real evidence for this, but the
    evidence was not conclusive.
  • John Perry added convection below the surface to
    Kelvins model of the earth the result was a
    huge increase in the time available.
  • Also, of course, any source of heat that could
    replace the heat lost to space would put the
    calculations out of whack.
  • But Kelvin was right in terms of the physics
    known at the time There was no credible source
    of energy that could do it.

11
The Sun
  • The models of the sun were much simpler they
    didnt depend on solidity. They only depended on
    the gravitational theory of the suns energy. It
    would be quite difficult to find, in 19th century
    physics, a way of packing more energy in.
  • So the limit of 100 million years for the sun,
    which was later reduced to something like 25
    million (1899). Later calculations based on new
    figures, some from King and with support from
    another hard-liner, Tait, reduced Kelvins
    estimate of the age of the earth to 40 million or
    less.

12
Reaction
  • Huxley had resisted Kelvins calculations from
    the outset, pointing out that they depended on
    substantial and unproven assumptions, and that
    even if there were limits to time, nothing in the
    geologists evidence suggested those limits had
    made a difference to the history we now see in
    geological record .
  • These new limits, which were laid down in the
    1890s, sparked a resistance amongst geologists.
  • James Croll and T.C. Chamberlain were supporters
    of this kind of calculation, but they were also
    convinced that the geological evidence showed the
    earth could not be that young.
  • So were at an impasse.

13
Pecking order
  • When two sciences seem to disagree about a
    question that both have something to say about,
    what do we do? Who should we believe?
  • Kelvins view was that geology should take its
    time from physics and make whatever adjustments
    it had to.
  • Chamberlain and Croll held that geology should
    deal with its own evidence, develop and work on
    it independently, and hold its ground.
  • Perry offered a compromise, but it couldnt help
    with the suns energy.

14
Upshot
  • Radioactivity Rutherford
  • Behold, the old boy beamed.
  • The energy released in radioactive decay is much
    much higher than that produced by the burning of
    a similar mass of material.
  • This can replace heat lost by the earth and (much
    more important) provide a source of energy that
    could power the sun for much longer than Kelvin
    had allowed.

15
Better yet
  • As radioactivity came to be better understood
    (including isotopes their relations, nuclear
    physics in general, half-lives etc.) it became
    evident that we could use these elements as
    geological clocks.
  • Holmes and others developed the techniques.
  • The upshot is the present measures of geological
    ages and the overall age of the earth, which have
    been very stable since the middle of the 20th
    Century.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com