Interreg III B Northern Periphery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Interreg III B Northern Periphery

Description:

Only lead partners need to be audited. Annual audits for projects that do not send ... The projects cost only include VAT if the project actually bore this cost ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: Tuo8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Interreg III B Northern Periphery


1
Interreg III B Northern Periphery
  • Scottish Partner Seminar
  • Inverness Sept 2-3, 2004

2
NPP Auditing
  • Auditing requirements
  • System audit
  • Financial audit
  • Who can audit your project?
  • Other types of audit

3
Auditing Requirements
  • Only lead partners need to be audited.
  • Annual audits for projects that do not send
    ledgers with each claim to the PA.
  • System audit replacing midterm-audit for projects
    that send ledgers and in addition to the annual
    audit for projects that do not.
  • Internal or national auditors may be used, but
    must be pre-approved by the PA.

4
Auditors
  • The Lead Partner should appoint a project
    auditor
  • Auditors must be INDEPENDENTfrom the project
  • Auditors must have sufficient experience of EU
    PROGRAMME AUDITING and be familiar with EU rules
    and regulations
  • The auditor may be external or internal
  • External auditors must be certified
  • Internal/national auditors must be pre-approved
    by the PA

5
System audit
  • The Project Organisation
  • The Lead Partner Role
  • Accounting system
  • Salary costs
  • Accounts payable
  • Evaluation of the projects internal control
    system
  • - responsibilities and authorities- competence
    and skills
  • - Lead Partner responsibilities- The accounting
    system, salaries/ timesheets, accounts
    payable 
  •  The reliability of the project from an internal
    control perspective.
  •  

6
Financial audit (1)
  • The auditor should confirm that
  • Costs are project related
  • Activities are in accordance with the project
    description
  • The project can assure good internal control
  • Costs are in accordance with the Commission
    regulation (448/2004)
  • The project is administered in accordance with
    the Grant Letter and the Conditions

7
Financial audit (2)
  • The auditor should confirm that
  • Separate project accounting has been used
  • The information in the entries file corresponds
    to the separate accounts
  • Income is accounted for
  • The projects cost only include VAT if the project
    actually bore this cost
  • The relevant public procurement rules have been
    applied.

8
Financial audit (3)
  • The auditor should include a memo containing
  • How the auditing has been carried out (sample
    checks etc)
  • Comments to the above-mentioned issues
  • Accounts for any observations (N.B!)

9
Internal/national auditors
  • An approved internal/national auditor can be
  • An external auditing firm
  • A separate auditing department within the
    organisation. Describe the organisation!
  • The auditing department of another
    organisation
  • A national auditing body
  • The PA will not approve the financial/economy
    department of your organisation.

10
Description
  • In order to be approved by the Paying Authority,
    the appointed auditor should describe in written
  • - the nature and tasks of the auditing body
  • - how the impartiality and externality to the
    project is guaranteed
  • - qualification concerning ERDF rules

11
Other Types of Audit
  • 438/2001 Art. 10 5 -control
  • 5 of eligible expenditure
  • representative sample
  • professional independent auditors
  • 438/2001 Art. 4 on- the-spot checks
  • verify delivery of products and services
  • verify the reality of expenditure
  • MA/PA/JPS
  • The grey men from Brussels

12
Closing Projects
  • Final report
  • Auditors certificate
  • Time schedule

13
Final report (1)
  • Not much guidance in the PGPM
  • No form available, will be published on the
    website before the end of 2004
  • Will probably not differ much from the progress
    report
  • Interact?

14
Final report (2)
  • Focus on outputs and results
  • Both positive and negative resultsand
    experiences
  • Dissemination of information
  • Indicators- how have they been measured- what
    was the starting value?- use the indicators for
    your measure (please!)

15
Time schedule
  • The project should be finished by the date set in
    the decision (example 31.12.2005)
  • Activities should stop no later than the
    finishing date in the decision (31.12.2005)
  • After that projects have three additional months
    that should be used for- final reporting-
    allowing for costs to be paid(until
    31.03.2005)Costs after these three months will
    not be accepted (exception auditing costs)
  • Report should be sent within six months from the
    date of the project. (30.06.2005)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com