Critical Appraisal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Critical Appraisal

Description:

09.30 10.15 Critical Appraisal Skills for Quantitative Research- Mark Mullee ... of effectiveness (e.g. Cochrane Database of systematic reviews, Bandolier) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:317
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: rachelt2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Critical Appraisal


1
Critical Appraisal Evidence Based Practice
Introduction
  • Mark Mullee
  • RDSU Director

2
Critical Appraisal Morning Programme
  • 09.0009.30 Introduction to Critical Appraisal
  • Helen Elsey
  • 09.3010.15 Critical Appraisal Skills for
    Quantitative Research- Mark Mullee
  • 10.1510.45 Workshop Critical Appraisal of a
    Published Paper Mark Mullee
  • 10.4511.00 Tea/Coffee Break
  • 11.0011.30 Feedback and Discussion
  • Mark Mullee
  • 11.3012.15 Critical Appraisal Skills for
    Qualitative Research Helen Elsey
  • 12.1512.40 Workshop Critical Appraisal of a
    Published Paper Helen Elsey
  • 12.4013.00 Feedback and Discussion
  • Helen Elsey

3
Learning outcomes
  • Learning outcomes by the end of the day
    participants will be expected to
  • To understand how critical appraisal can inform
    evidence based practice
  • To be able to use critical appraisal tools for
    both quantitative and qualitative research
    studies.

4
Plan of the day
  • Introduction
  • Critical appraisal skills for quantitative
    research.
  • Workshop quantitative study
  • Feedback and discussion
  • Lunch
  • Critical appraisal skills for qualitative
    articles
  • Workshop qualitative study
  • Feedback and discussion
  • Final summary

5
Why do we read papers?
  • Literature search- research proposal/study
  • Evidence based practice
  • Personal development/ interest

6
What is Critical Appraisal?
  • Process of systematically examining research
    evidence to assess its validity, results and
    relevance before using it to inform a decision
  • Essential part of evidence-based practice.
  • Enable us to draw conclusions from and act on the
    evidence presented.

7
Critical appraisal attempts to
  • Identify the strengths and weaknesses of studies.
  • 1. The internal validity of the information. I.e.
    how the information was collected and/or
    summarised.
  • 2. The external validity of the information. I.e.
    how relevant information is to any specific
    question posed by the reader.

8
Pros of critical appraisal
  • A systematic way of assessing the validity,
    results and usefulness of papers.
  • One step in the process of evidence-based
    practice, along with finding the evidence and
    changing practice.
  • Encourages objective assessment of the usefulness
    of information.
  • Common sense approach, user friendly tools are
    available

9
Cons of critical appraisal
  • Time-consuming initially, although with time it
    becomes automatic.
  • Does not always provide the reader with the
    easy answer or the answer one might have hoped
    for it may highlight that a favoured
    intervention is in fact ineffective.
  • It highlights a lack of good evidence.

10
CASP
  • CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme)
  • aims to enable individuals to develop the skills
    to find and make sense of research evidence
  • http//www.phru.nhs.uk/casp/casp.htm

11
CASP
12
Critical Appraisal
  • Part of a continuum

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP)
  • Asking an answerable question
  • Searching for the best evidence
  • Critically-appraising the evidence
  • Acting upon the evidence

13
Literature search question
  • Answerable
  • In three parts
  • Population / patients
  • Intervention / treatments / tests
  • Outcomes

14
Literature searching
  • Using electronic sources
  • National Electronic Library for Health
  • Summarised evidence of effectiveness (e.g.
    Cochrane Database of systematic reviews,
    Bandolier)
  • Individual studies using databases through
    Dialogue (e.g. Medline, Embase, CINAHL)
  • Current issues of journals

15
Information required within seconds
  • Systematic reviews, periodically updated, of
    randomised trials of the effects of health care
    (from all sources, and in all languages)

16
Information required within seconds
  • Evidence-based journals of 2º publication
  • screen 50-70 clinical journals per week for
    clinical articles that pass critical appraisal
    quality filters è conclusions likely to be true
  • selects subsets that are clinically relevant
  • summarised as more-informative abstracts
  • added commentaries from clinical experts
  • introduced with declarative titles

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
CASP Learning Resources
20
CASP Critical Appraisal Tools
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com