Title: the potential cost of a failed doha round
1the potential cost of a failed doha ?round
- Antoine Bouet, IFPRI CATT/UPPADavid Laborde
Debucquet, IFPRI
2The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- after seven years of negotiations, WTO
participants could not reach a final agreement on
the Doha Round liberalization modalities - incentives to conclude the Doha Round are weak
- large market access gains have already been
achieved in the manufacturing sectors of
developed country markets - remaining issues are more difficult to negotiate,
- the political costs are high
- the gains are more difficult to assess
3The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- in parallel, impact assessments using a
computable general equilibrium (CGE) model have
pointed out shrinking gains associated with the
Doha Round - do the real gains go far beyond tariff-reduction
effects and can they be found outside the
standard model? - the goal of this study is to re-examine the value
of an agreement by considering potential gains
and losses in a moving landscape of trade policies
4The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- traditional impact studies compare the
consequences of the negotiation modalities to the
status quo baseline - we study five protectionist scenarios which are
characterized - by different approaches in the way protectionism
is implemented - and by various orders of magnitude
5The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- another point of view is to consider the WTO
agreement as an insurance scheme against
potential trade wars. - so we compare
- a resort to protectionism when the DDA is
implemented - with a resort to protectionism when the DDA is
not implemented
6The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- the purpose of this section is to provide a
detailed background - we consider the recent wave of protectionist and
beggar-thy-neighbor policies adopted since
early 2008 - we examine historical data on world protectionism
and point out that trade policies offer a moving
landscape - a worldwide resort to protectionism is a
realistic scenario, but there is no
straightforward evidence that the threat of trade
wars has recently increased
7The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- Border measures have been recently implemented
- non-automatic licensing requirements by
Argentina - tariffs on steel products by India
- Numerous bail-out measures, apparently related
to the banking and financial crisis theBuy
American provision - Big publicity around these measures
- Most of the figures do not make any temporal
comparisons or compare it with 2007 as a year of
reference ??
8The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- Moving landscape of trade policies in the very
long term - US Protectionism 1891-2005
- (Amount of import duties divided by dutiable
imports US Source US ITC)
9The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- economic theory of protectionism
- Big countries
- Strategic trade policy
- Stolper Samuelson theorem
- political economy of trade policy trade policies
are less supportive of free trade in times of
economic recession - economic theory of trade retaliation
- a worldwide resort to protectionism is today a
realistic scenario
10The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?RoundTrade
disputes handled at the WTO Dispute Settlement
Body 1995-2009 Q1 by quarters - Cumulated on
four consecutive quarters
11The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- Moving landscape of trade policies in the medium
term - Frequency of MFN tariff augmentation from 1995
until 2006 defined as the number of
augmentations/(eleven yearsnumber of HS6
products) - Source TRAINS and authors calculations
12The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
Frequency of MFN tariff augmentation from 1995
until 2006 by groups of countries (WTO vs. non
WTO level of income LDC/MIC/OECD) Source
TRAINS and authors calculations
13The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- we intend to study
- - what the gains of trade cooperation are when
the alternative is noncooperation, - - but also how a negotiated DDA can protect the
world trading system from a rise in protectionism - scenarios
- DDA July 2008 modalities (detailed
implementation) - Up to Bound Non FTA applied tariffs increased to
existing bound levels. - BoundDDA Implementation of July 2008 modalities
plus non FTA applied tariffs increased to new,
post DDA, bound level. - Up to Max Non FTA applied tariffs increased to
their last 10 years maximum level, capped by
existing bound tariffs. - MaxDDA Implementation of July 2008 modalities
plus non FTA applied tariffs increased to their
last 10 years maximum level, capped by new, post
DDA, bound tariffs.
14The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- use of the MIRAGE Computable General Equilibrium
model of the world economy - protection data comes from the MAcMapHS6 database
- tariff reforms are implemented at the level of
5,113 products, 170 importing countries, and 208
exporting countries - the interaction between bound duties and MFN
applied duties is taken into account. Same for
preferential duties. - a new historical database on MFN applied
protection
15The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- a baseline is implemented from 2008 to 2025,
which depicts the world without a new
multilateral agreement. - concerning trade reform, several agreements since
2004 have been included in the baseline (EPAs,
FTA in Asia) - twenty-seven regions are identified in the model
- the sectoral decomposition is highly detailed in
terms of agriculture and agrifood business
(twelve sectors) thirteen industrial sectors and
two service sectors.
16The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- in the Up-to-Bound scenario, for unbound lines,
the existing average binding overhang is applied
to compute new tariff targets - technically, we estimate the following relation
for each country Bound_Rate a MFN_rate b - reciprocal agreements are maintained
- the only non-reciprocal program that is
maintained is the EU Everything but Arms
17The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- in the Up-to-Max scenario, calculation of the
Maximum non FTA tariff applied on each line
during the period 1995-2006 - a new database on applied protection during the
period 1995-2006 has been developed source
TRAINS - a special procedure was adopted to ensure
comparability of MFN tariff rates between
MacMapHS6 and TRAINS
18The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- World Average Tariffs by scenario (2025 level)
- the Doha scenario will reduce world protection by
22 percent - moving to bound tariffs will nearly double the
level of protection on average. - if the DDA is implemented, current protection
increases by only 41 percent when countries
resort to bound levels - the variations in protection are more contrasting
when focusing on agriculture
19The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- Protection applied by category of countries
- Implementation of the DDA gives a better access
to HICs markets - while variation in protection applied by MICs is
small - the DDA gives world exporters an insurance
against potential rise in applied protection by
HICs and MICs, in particular in agriculture
20The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- Protection faced by category of countries
- the Doha scenario delivers homogeneous market
access gains with an average decrease by 20
percent - the two protectionist scenarios have similar
effects for HICs and MICs - the LDCs are more severely affected due to
losses of nonreciprocal preferences - consequently, the implementation of a DDA is of
great interest for LDCs as it locks unilateral
schemes and in particular the most recent
initiatives
21The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- Global results led by tariffs and domestic
support changes Change compared to the
baseline in 2025 - under the Doha scenario, world trade is augmented
by a mere 1.9 percent (US 363bn) and world real
income by US 59bn in 2025 - in case of the Up to Bound scenario, world trade
would contract by 9.9 percent (US 1,899bn) and
world real income by US 353bn - the DDA implementation can prevent a potential
loss of US 809bn of trade
22The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- variations in welfare by countries Percentage
change compared to the baseline in 2025 - the Doha scenario implies gains for all regions
except Mexico - a rise of protectionism would mainly hurt MICs
and LDCs (in particular Asian Dg Countries) - the implementation of the DDA is important for
these countries as an insurance against the risk
of trade wars
23The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- relative impacts of foreign and domestic policies
on welfare results Up to Max scenario - a country will be affected by both changes in its
own tariffs (domestic policy effect) and in its
partner tariffs (foreign policy effect) - for domestic tariff increase
- a positive effect on welfare related to the
optimal tariff argumentation - a negative effect on welfare led by increasing
distortions in domestic economy - for foreign tariff increase
- a positive effect for exporters benefiting from
preferences on increasingly protected markets - a negative effect for exporters facing increased
barriers.
24The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- variations in factor remunerations by countries
Percentage change compared to the baseline in
2025 - the Doha scenario implies gains for landowners
and agricultural unskilled workers in Brazil, and
skilled workers in the EU, Japan and the US - and losses for landowners and agricultural
unskilled workers in the EU, Japan and the US - the opposite holds in case of Up-to-Bound
scenario
25The Potential Cost of a Failed DohA ?Round
- recent studies assessing the potential impact of
the DDA have concluded that there would be modest
augmentation in world trade and world real income - the failure of a WTO agreement would be a clear
sign of international noncooperation - the WTO is a public good offering insurance
mechanism against potential trade wars