The alcohol industry and its weaknesses - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The alcohol industry and its weaknesses

Description:

Industry hegemony adrift. Overcapacity. Pricing power. Ownership (share holder power) ... Industry hegemony lost (prise, production, products, politics) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:218
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: andersu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The alcohol industry and its weaknesses


1
The alcohol industry and its weaknesses
  • - A (European) discussion -
  • Anders Ulstein, ACTIS
  • Dublin, 15-16th May 2008

2
  • Partnership strategy increasingly challenging
  • Fragmenting business environment

3
Board room list of problems
  • Health consciousness
  • Consumption stagnating, falling
  • Overcapacity
  • Loss of value less power of pricing
  • Growing policy agenda
  • More and different actors distributors,
    retailers, advertisers, NGOs.
  • Advertising to LDA-24 increasingly difficult
  • Demographic developments
  • Partnership strategy increasingly problematic for
    them
  • Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility
  • Globalisation tragedy of the commons
  • Where does CSR lead when the political agenda is
    broadening?
  • Share holder power growth vital for value of
    shares and of company
  • Big Tobacco haunting, while business
    environment very competitive

4
Overcapacity
  • Crises distillation of wine 5,6 mill hectolitre
    wine from Italy and France in 2006. (quality and
    table)
  • Brewery closures in Europe
  • Scottish Newcastle closed one brewery with 362
    jobs in February. Only 3 left in UK.
  • 48 major brewery to close in UK since 1990 (the
    Beer and Pub Association)
  • German beer market oversaturated by at least 30
    (Radeberger Group spokesman)

5
Public approval rating
  • global public opinion of different industry puts
    alcohol producers at 18below the chemical and
    oil industry, with only tobacco beneath it.
  • Mr Rijn urges individual companies to invest
    in credibility through visible proactive action
    based communication (my italics). (Alcohol in
    Moderation 11.3.2005.)
  • Mark van Rijn, Public Affairs Manager of Heineken
  • Fear of sharing tobacco industry fate

6
Private labels
  • The growth of private label spirits in Europe has
    been particularly substantial, rising from
    10.2bn in 2001 to 16.5bn in 2006.
  • Industry executives believe the second highest
    growth will come from premium private label
    brands (53.6 rated it as such). (BI 2007)
  • 40 of UK market in 2011, 26 in Europe,
  • Spirits and wine leading. Beer reversing trend.

7
Marketing response
  • Spirits brand producers will have to innovate.
  • Branded products squeezed, must respond by
    focusing on brand uniqueness.
  • Private label producers now positioning
    themselves to grow in premium segment. To
    challenge brands for premium position.

8
Growing Alcohol Policy Agenda
  • Global advertising opportunities will become more
    limited
  • Taxation has made it increasingly difficult for
    alcoholic drinks manufacturers to promote such
    drinks to a younger audience. (Business Insights
    2006)
  • LDA- 24 age group will continue to be the most
    important target group for alcoholic drinks
    manufacturers to 2010 restrictions constitute a
    real threat. Increasingly risky to target them.
  • Growing gap between policy agenda and CSR.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Industry hegemony adrift
  • Overcapacity
  • Pricing power
  • Ownership (share holder power)
  • Production (Private labels)
  • Political environment
  • Collective action more difficult

11
Growth is vital
  • the value of the company depends on the
    attractiveness of their shares.
  • Profit not enough for a public company growth is
    vital to keep value of shares up and thus
    increase value of company.
  • Politics may hit stock value before company
    sales, or even without having an direct effect on
    sales at all

12
The industry partnership strategy
  • Geneva Partnership on Alcohol, Towards a Global
    Charter, May 2000.
  • The objective was to formulate general
    principles mutually acceptable to all parties
  • ICAP has adopted the view that partners can and
    should have different biases, different
    approaches and even some different goals. This
    diversity of perspective is part of what makes
    partnerships stronger than any single entity
    acting on its own. (ICAP 2005.)

13
European failure after 2001?
  • Stakeholder dialogue
  • European Forum for Responsible Drinking
  • When not the process manager, partnership becomes
    a quagmire the more they engage with the agenda
    the deeper they sink.

14
This is Partnership success
  • Millions of us enjoy drinking alcohol with few,
    if any, ill effects. Indeed moderate drinking can
    bring some health benefits. But, increasingly,
    alcohol misuse by a small minority is causing
    (Tony Blair's foreword, Alcohol Harm Reduction
    Strategy for England, 2004
  • Portman Group mentioned 16 times
  • Alcohol Concern not at all

15
Producer self regulation failing?
  • Alcohol industry failed after 2001 to get EU
    endorsement of self regulation UK style.
  • UK and EU moving towards co-regulation
  • ART Hard law and SR should interact
    transparency, integrity independence,
    accountability, cooperation with statutory
    bodies, responsive regulation
  • Advertisers taking over from producers
  • EU Commission is process manager

16
Partnership with public companies?
  • Can a multinational publicly listed company
    possibly be a reliable partner?
  • A publicly listed company who is in charge, the
    board (share holders) or the management? Who is
    the short term thinker, the CEO or the share
    holders?
  • Share holder cannot appreciate CSR that slow
    growth (global warming etc). Limits of CSR.

17
Reflections Beyond CSR?
  • If the aim of CSR is damage control and PR. Where
    is CSR taking us if damage is not controlled and
    governments/public is not impressed?
  • Is someone in the industry thinking beyond CSR?
  • Will the idea of a settlement appear?

18
Reflections II
  • Industry hegemony lost (prise, production,
    products, politics)
  • Collective action increasingly difficult
  • Political partnership difficult because of
    competition for controversial target group and
    share holder demands

19
Reflections III
  • Partnership and dialogue is increasingly
    difficult and dangerous for the producers
  • Thats why we may welcome it, given the right
    context, since it will expose industry and CSR
    weakness.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com