Computational study of light stabilized structures comprising of nanoparticles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 60
About This Presentation
Title:

Computational study of light stabilized structures comprising of nanoparticles

Description:

We shall see that an inhomogeneous plane wave (or an evanescent ... Evanescent wave excitation for size selective manipulation of microspheres ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:43
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 61
Provided by: Phys199
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computational study of light stabilized structures comprising of nanoparticles


1
Computational study of light stabilized
structures comprising of nano-particles
  • C.T. Chan
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Collaborators Light induced forces Jack Ng,
Z.F. Lin, P. Sheng
International Workshop on Computational Methods
for Nanoscale Systems Dec. 11 13, 2006
2
Outline
  • Force of light on matter
  • Use light to organize matter

3
Light ? Structure
  • Use structured material to manipulate light.
  • Can we use light to manipulate structure ?
  • Light can induce force to manipulate
    nano-particles into designed structures
  • Light has energy, momentum and angular momentum
  • Force is small, but significant for very small
    particles
  • May be the method of choice to organize nano
    particles

4
  • Well known
  • Photon pressure
  • Gradient force (force due to inhomogeneous light
    intensity

Less well known Homogenous light field can
induce long range inter-particle forces to bind
clusters into a stable structure (from multiple
scattering of light) Short range forces due to
near field coupling of resonances
5
The optical forcein classical electrodynamics
  • Matter modifies the flow of light Maxwell
    Equations
  • Light exerts forces on matterLorentz Force
    Equation, the definition of the EM fields

Point Charge
Arbitrary Particle
6
The Maxwell Stress Tensor for computing the
optical force
The optical force acting on a particle can be
found by integrating the Lorentz force over the
particles volume
It can be shown, after a lot of mathematics
The motion of the particles are small, therefore
we take time averaged
7
Understanding the nature of optical force (using
a dipole as an example)
A neutral particle with size ? illuminated by
an incident field
d ?
will develop an electric dipole moment
Electric dipole polarizability (an intrinsic
property of the particle)
8
Understanding the nature of optical force
The optical force acting on a dipole can be
derived most easily by treating the dipole as a
pair of equal and opposite charges
Lorentz Force acting on a point charge
9
Electrical force acting on a dipole
10
q
Magnetic force acting on a dipole
-q
11
Total force acting on a dipole
12
The Gradient Force the Scattering and
Absorption Force
The force can be separated into two physically
and mathematically distinct components
(1) The Conservative Gradient Force
Induced by the gradient of amplitude
The electromagnetic free energy
(2) The Nonconservative Scattering and Absorption
Force
Induced by the gradient of phase
13
Optical Tweezers
D.G. Grier, Nature 424, 810 (2003).
  • Near the focus, gradient force dominates ,
    dielectric particles can be trapped.
  • In typical experiments, the optical force
    pico-Newton
  • Greater than or at least comparable to weight of
    small particles
  • In principle, anything that scatter light can be
    trapped, which includes (1) Metal(2) Atoms(3)
    Bacteria(4) Red blood cells(5) Many more

14
Optical Binding
  • The first dipole scatters the light
  • Modifying the fields striking the second dipoles
  • The force acting on the dipoles depend on their
    relative positions!

Optical binding force in the far field
The scattered field from one dipole interact with
the dipole moment on the other particle
15
Optical Binding
Optical binding force (in the limit of R-gt8)
Oscillatory force
Long range force(inverse distance),since the
radiationfield decays as inverse distance
16
Gradient Forces microspheres move to high
intensity of light
17
  • Interference of coherent beams makes optical
    standing waves
  • Gradient force can organize particles into
    pattern

Burns et al, Science 249, 749 (1990).
18
Optical Binding Force
  • Homogeneous intensity force due to scattering
  • Demonstrated experimentally in 1989. (Burns et
    al, PRL Vol. 63 P.1233 1989)




19
Attractive/Repulsive optical forces between 2
plastic spheres
20
Optical Binding Force
Lorentz Force
Approximate Interaction Energy (far field,
lowest order in 1/r)
21
Calculation of optical forces on
nano/micro-spheres cluster MS-MST formalism
Compute EM-field by Multiple scattering theory
Compute time-averaged EM-force Torque by
Maxwell Stress Tensor
Integration can be performed in closed form (in
terms of the scattering coefficients)
Force
Torque
22
Formalism (MS-MST)Maxwell Tensor and
Multiple-Scattering Approach
  • Advantages
  • Efficient (1,000 Mie scatters in a PC), rigorous
    and exact in principle.
  • Applicable to any cluster of spheres.
  • Not limited to small particle size (comparable to
    wavelength).
  • Arbitrary dielectric function (dispersive,
    absorption)
  • Coated sphere is ok

23
Optical Binding
?2.53 rs0.414 ?m
Radial optical force
Ng et. al., PRB 72, 085130 (2005)
Transverse optical force
Fournier et. al., PRL 63, 1233 (1989)
?
van der Waals force(non-retarded)
Spheres in contact
24
  • Multiple Stable points exist on both axis
  • The force has a angular dependence

25
(No Transcript)
26
Vibration Frequency Each stable equilibrium is
stable against perturbation,with well defined
vibration frequencies
-Radial force is stronger, higher frequency
27
Photonic Molecules ofNano-spheres (krs0.4)
Light-induced organization of nano-particles Refr
active index 1.59 mass density 1050
kg/m3 Wavelength 0.52 micron 2 Beams coming
from z and z direction, x-polarized and in
phase at xy-plane.
Polarization Direction
Note multiple equilibriums for same number of
spheres
28
Molecule of nano-spheres bounded by optical
forces
  • Ordinary molecules
  • Made with atoms
  • Scale nanometer
  • Bounded by electrostatic forces QM
  • States Schrodinger equation
  • Forces H-F Theorem
  • Small number of stable metastable states
  • Optical clusters
  • Made with nano-particles
  • Scale micro/nano
  • Bounded by light exchange of real photons
  • States Maxwell equation
  • Forces Maxwell-tensor
  • Large number of stable metastable states
    quasi-meta-stable states

29
Photonic clusters microspheres bound by light
(krs5.0, radius0.414 ?m, ?0.52 ?m)
  • Incident field is homogeneous
  • Stability solely induced by optical binding

Ng et. al., PRB 72, 085130 (2005)
Polarization Direction
30
Multiple scattering induced optical force can
bind microsphere into clusters with distinct
geometries and exotic dynamical characteristics.
  • Long range force
  • Multiple equilibriums
  • Pinned in orientation
  • Drifting equilibrium (if no inversion symmetry)
  • Non-symmetric force matrix Complex dynamics

31
Stability Analysis
  • The eigenvalues of the force constant matrix
    gives the stability of a photonic molecule
  • We have neutral, stable, unstable, and drifting
    and quasi-stable
  • Drifting All molecules have same force, move as
    an entity
  • Quasi-stable Force not conservative (open
    system), force matrix can have pairs of complex
    eigenvalues, conditional stable in presence of
    friction
  • Full molecular dynamics needed in some cases

32
Dynamics of photonic molecule with complex
frequency
Force matrix can have complex eigenvalues Compli
cated dynamical behavior depending on damping of
the environment
33
(No Transcript)
34
Polystyrene Spheres R 0.331 micron
kR 4.0 Intensity 1010 W/m2
Wavelength0.52 micron B-critical43.1
pN/ms-1 Time interval 1 ms
Small damping Quasi-stable
No damping Unstable
Large damping Stable
35
Resonant optical force at the whispering gallery
mode of microsphere-cluster
Microsphere High Q-factor EM Cavity
  • High-Q microsphere-cluster


Incident light at resonant frequency
--------------------------------------------------
---------------------------- Very strong
interparticle optical force
Opt. Lett. 30, 1956 (2005)
36
Geometric interpretation of the WG mode Light
trapped inside a sphere by total internal
reflection. Very strong field near the
surface.
Sharp resonance peaks Whispering Gallery (WG)
modes. At WG mode Surface field can be enhanced
by gt1000 times. But photon pressure is enhanced
by 25 ONLY. Reason EM fields are equally
strong on both sides of a sphere, their effects
cancel.
37
Resonant radiation pressure in dielectric
microspheres
  • Resonant radiation pressure has been observed in
    optical levitation.
  • Despite the high-Q, the optical force is
    enhanced only by 30-50.
  • We shall see that an inhomogeneous plane wave
    (or an evanescent wave) can induce an
    extremely strong force.

A. Ashkin, Science 210, 1081 (1980).
38
Strong resonant optical force excited by
evanescent waves
Force along the incident wavespropagating
direction
e2.53 a 2.5 µm
Evanescent waves (Inhomogeneous plane wave)
Light Intensity (at the bottom of the
sphere) 104 W/cm2
Plane waves
Light Intensity 104 W/cm2
39
Evanescent wave excitation for size selective
manipulation of microspheres
  • Sharp WGM ? accurate size selective
    manipulation is possible (better than 0.05 for a
    5-µm-diam sphere)

At low intensity, only those with a particular
size, which happens to be at resonance, will
experience a noticeable optical force.
  • Pick up microspheres that has exactly the size
    you want.
  • Sorting microsphere by size, in an automatic,
    parallel, accurate, and high throughput
    manner.

40
Resonant optical force
Intensity
Bonding mode Strong attraction Q-factor 104
Anti-bonding mode Strong repulsion Q-factor 103
5-micron-diameter Weight 1 pN Plane
wave, Light Intensity 104 W/cm2
2 spheres ?2.5310-4i Realistic e.g. glass
Top sphere
Bottom sphere
Hybridization
Single Sphere ?2.53
41
Robust against size dispersion
2 Identical Spheres 2 X (5-?m-diameter)
2 Spheres differ by 2 in diameter
?2.5310-4i Light Intensity (Plane wave) 104
W/cm2
42
The effect of absorption and gain
Small gain, Q7 x 105. (using an simple
anti-absorption model)
No loss, Q5.6 x 105.
Small loss, Q1.5 x 104
Re(e)2.53 a 2.5 µm
43
Recent Experiments observing resonances
  • Microsphere cluster
  • Very high quality factor, high internal field

Probe
  • Resonant fluorescence in bisphere.
  • T. Mukaiyama et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4623
    (1999).Y.P. Rakovich et. al., Phys. Rev. A 70,
    051801 (2004).

Polystyrene sphere
  • Lasing in the resonant modes of a bisphere.
  • Y. Hara et al, Opt. Lett. 28, 2437 (2003).

44
Extended structures
  • Light can bind particles into a cluster, can it
    stabilize an extended structure ?
  • In 1D Yes, if the particle is small enough
  • These structures have special vibrational
    excitations

45
Bain et. al.Polystyrene particles formed a
linear chain upon illumination by
counterpropagating waves. The spacing of the
chain matches that of the laser interference
patterns.
46
C.D. Mellor et. al., Opt. Exp. 14, 10079
(2006). Colloidal particles formed arrays as a
result of laser induced optical force. The
geometry of the array depends on particle size
and light polarization.
47
Garces-Chavez et. al., PRB 73, 085417 (2006). By
increasing the incident light power, the optical
forces dominate and bind the particles into an
array.
48
Unstable regime
For point particles, an infinite chain is
stable For finite size particles, there is a
maximum number of spheres that can be made stable
Stable regime
Sphere size normalized to wavelength ?
49
Unstable regime
Stable regime
50
Localized vibrational modes in optically-bound
structure of extended size
  • Light can stablize an extended 1D
    optically-bound lattice
  • Lattice constant defined by external field
  • Optical binding provides transverse stability
  • Such lattice support intrinsically localized
    modes (no defect, no disorder, no non-linearity)

51
Characteristic vibration modes
I0106 W/cm2
?2.53 radius ? /10
Characteristic vibrational modes derived from
linear stability analysis
?/2260 nm
Diagonalization
Figures not draw to scale !!
Characteristic vibration amplitude and frequency
52
Inverse Participation Ratio an indication of
the no. of participating particles
  • Optically-bound structures are more localized
  • P.E. model captures the salient features of the
    MS-MST calculation.

53
Localized modes in 2D structures
  • Localization induced by the long ranged optical
    binding
  • Not restricted to the particular geometry or
    incident wave

Vibration Amplitude of individual particle
Localized on the boundary
Localized in center
?2.53 rs0.414 ?m ?0.52 ?m
Polarization Direction
54
Summary
  • Formalism (similar to ab-initio dynamics) has
    been developed for light-induced dynamics
  • Light can be used to organize nano-particles into
    stable configuration (optical matter)
  • The dynamics and lattice dynamics of optical
    matter are interesting and different from
    electronic material
  • Local modes for periodic system

55
Thank You
Acknowledgement Funding HK-RGC Collaborators L
ight induced forces Jack Ng, Z.F. Lin, P. Sheng
56
Formalism (MT-MS)Maxwell Tensor and
Multiple-Scattering Approach
57
Formalism (MT-MS)Maxwell Tensor and
Multiple-Scattering Approach
58
Only eigenmodes with azimuthal quantum number
equal to 1 or -1 are excited.
59
(No Transcript)
60
Quasi-stable photonic cluster
  • Light-matter interaction nonconservative
  • quasi-stable photonic clusters gt vibrational
    frequency ??Complex Re( ?2)gt0stability depends
    damping

Conclusion is qualitatively insensitive to the
form of damping
  • Dynamics simulations
  • bltbcritical unstable
  • Particles go into another more stable structure
  • bgtbcritical stable
  • Particles return to equilibrium
  • b bcritical
  • Particles will be orbiting around the
    equilibrium.
  • The energy loss by damping is counter-balanced
    by light absorption.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com