Title: Health Information Exchange and the National Agenda
1Health Information Exchange and the National
Agenda May 2008 Kelly Cronin Director,
Programs and Coordination Office of the National
Coordinator for
Health Information Technology (ONC)
2HIE and the National HIT Agenda
- Where are we?
- Challenges
- Overcoming the barriers
- Moving toward a connected network of networks
the NHIN - Trial implementations
- Accreditation and certification
- Develop the business case
- Where do we go from here?
3Key Health IT Components to Enable Transformation
A Robust, Interoperable, Health IT Environment
that brings together
- Electronic Health Records (EHR)
- Personal Health Records (PHR)
- Population Health Information (Public
Health, Quality Improvement, Research)
- Standards (Data, Technical and Security)
- Interoperable Health Information Exchange Network
- (Nationwide Health Information Network -
NHIN)
4Pieces of the Puzzle Necessary for Transformation
of Health and Care through HIT
Governance
5Status of HIE Findings from eHI Survey
- 125 initiatives reported on stage of development
in the 2007 survey - 20 are just getting started (stage 1 or 2)
- 68 are in the process of implementation (stage 3
or 4) - 32 are operational (stage 5, 6 or 7)
- 5 are no longer moving forward
- 15 fewer participating than in 2006
- 32 HIEs exchanging data (Stages 5-7)
- 25 dependent on grants (or dont know)
- 75 rely on results delivery (but other sources
important as well)
6Funding Sources for RHIOs in 2007
Funding Source Overall Advanced
Hospitals 24 58
Public Payors 21 38
Physician Practices 16 46
Laboratories 13 33
Private Payors 10 46
Philanthropic 9 29
7Services Offered in 2007
Service Overall Advanced
Results Delivery 30 75
Clinical Documentation 27 63
Enrollment or Eligibility Checking 26 54
Consultation/Referral 21 54
Alerts to Providers 19 48
Disease or Chronic Care Management 18 32
Disease Registries 14
QI Reporting for Clinicians 12
Reminders 12 33
832 Operational Initiatives Sources of Revenues
Funding Source 2007 2006
Hospitals 58 54
Payers Private 46 19
Physician Practices 46 33
Payers Public 38 18
Laboratories 33 42
Federal Government 29 17
Philanthropic Organizations 29 21
State or Local Government 21 26
Purchasers/Employers 17 0
Pharmacies 13 11
Pharmaceutical Companies 4 6
9State Level HIE - An Evolving Landscape
10Major Challenges for All HIE Initiatives
Challenge 2006 2007
Developing Sustainable Business Model 88 91
Securing Funding 88 80
Defining Value for Users of the HIE 89 81
Privacy 79 85
Engaging Clinicians 80 82
11Challenges Sustainability of HIE
- No silver bullet to get to viable business model
- Need to be market savvy and develop HIE services
that meet a customer need and deliver value - No obvious demand for HIE with current
reimbursement system - But an increasing number of RHIOs are in the red
- Successful RHIOs are inducing demand by providing
services that demonstrate value - Know your customer dont build it and expect
they will come - Need business acumen and good market research to
develop a viable, marketable services - Social capital is essential for effective
governance and sustainability
12Challenges Value Proposition
- Needs to be defined according to type of service
and from each stakeholders perspective - i.e., results reporting for hospitals
- Are the costs and benefits of each
function/service for each stakeholder different
at a regional and state level? - Some providers, employers or plans might only
have a regional interest - Data suggests that hospitals are deriving value
more often than other stakeholders - Employers seem least likely to be engaged
13Value from a higher level perspective
- Health information exchange can
- Produce cost savings from decreased redundancy
- In duplicated care
- In the costs of data sharing
- Enable quality improvement and Medicare payment
reform by making clinical (not just claims) data
available for performance measurement and
reporting - Support public health and emergency preparedness
including situational awareness and response
management
14What is the problem we are trying to solve?
- Market forces have not realized the potential of
electronic health information exchange - Fee for service payment system provides no
incentives to share data - Cost savings dont accrue to those who need to
invest - Proprietary, one to one, relationships are easier
to create technically and legally - Public health does not get the data it needs
its viewed as a government, not a private sector
responsibility - The tipping point for participating in data
exchange has not been achieved
15Different models for exchanging health information
Network Type Examples Example Benefits Biggest Challenge
Organizational Integrated delivery systems, hospital chains Effort of exchanging data internally is aligned with business outcomes Extra-organizational exchange is needed for care provided in other organizations
Geographic RHIOs, jurisdictional HIEs Non-proprietary exchange Struggle to achieve sustainable business models
Personally Controlled Health data banks Microsoft, Google, Intel Consumer access to, and control of, health information Based on point to point connections, have challenges in supporting provider data access
16Collaborative Governance Needed Across
Jurisdictions
- With varying approaches to HIE, multi-stakeholder
governance is needed at the regional, state and
national level - There is currently no coordination of HIE
governance across jurisdictions to eventually
reach interoperability on a technical and policy
level - Some state level governance entities coordinate
with RHIOs but not all - No explicit coordination exists between national
and state level governance - National governance has been informal through
AHIC and Secretary Leavitts leadership - No oversight mechanisms exist to ensure
accountability of HIE - State governments are increasingly interested in
accountability and mechanisms to protect
consumers - Accreditation and model data sharing agreements
could support trust among stakeholder involved
with HIE and protect consumer interests -
-
17Some Solutions to Challenges
- Improve business case at regional, state and
national level - Stakeholder specific value propositions
- State and federal policy changes
- Advance governance of HIE
- Establish national level governance
- Promote effective governance models at state
level - Consider oversight mechanisms such as
accreditation to support interoperability of
policies/data sharing agreements - Identify and adopt common standards and
specifications for health information exchange
18Where are we going?
- What projects and efforts are advancing HIE?
19State-level Health Information Exchange Consensus
Project
- State-level HIE governance role is primary
- Ensure that HIE develops as a public good
- Serves all statewide stakeholders and data needs
- Reduces technology investments and other costs
- State-level HIE governance entity is a
public-private partnership entity - Sits between state government and the health
sector and industry - Involves state government, but independent of
state government - Addresses public and private sector interests,
blends investments - Mechanism for coordination of HIE policies and
practices - State governments play important roles
- Designating authority to a state-level HIE
governance entity - Providing resources start up and ongoing
- Leveraging public programs, policy levers to
create incentives for HIE - Statewide technical approaches can vary and will
likely evolve - Size, market characteristics, resources, stages
20State-level HIE Leadership Forum
- In 2008, a forum will be established for all
states to share information among peers who are
responsible for leading state level efforts to
advance HIE - Enable peers to learn from each other and share
progress, challenges, and creative ways to
advance statewide agendas - The forum will foster better understanding and
coordination of many related but separate
projects to advance HIE including HISPC, HITSP,
NHIN, CCHIT, and AHIC 2.0
21State Alliance for e-Health
- Examination of Financing, Accountability and
Oversight Models to Sustain Health Information
Exchange - To inform Governors and State Legislators about
the various models for financing and ensuring
accountability - A key financial consideration appropriate role
for states in providing oversight and support - Final report to the Alliance in August 2008
22The AHIC Successor Why Change?
- Continuity of leadership is needed to sustain the
momentum gained over the past 24 months - Government transition occurs every four years
- Uncertainty under new leadership places momentum
at risk - Sustainable business model is needed to support
perpetual operation - Congressional appropriations are a cyclical model
- Decisive action is needed keep pace with large
scale innovation and transformation - Government is necessarily a deliberate process
23AHIC 2.0 What It Will Do
- Provide continuity -- accelerate and coordinate
current AHIC interoperability initiatives - Provide strong leadership in
- determining priorities
- harmonizing interoperability standards
- certifying products and systems to those
standards - overseeing and facilitating the NHIN
- establishing criteria for assuring
interoperability, privacy and security - Construct and champion a balanced view
- that takes into account the needs of all
stakeholder groups
24NHIN Trial Implementations
- Awards to 9 state regional Health Information
Exchanges (HIEs) and another 6 grants to other
entities - Forming the NHIN Cooperative to implement, test,
and demonstrate core services by September 2008 - Support of consumer access controls
- Lookup and retrieval of clinical information
- Exchange of patient summary records
- Test implementations of the first 7 priority
scenarios - Lab result reporting medication history
exchange quality and public health, etc. - Expanding to include other types of HIEs, such as
- Multi-community Integrated Delivery Systems
- Health plans
- Health data banks
25NHIN Business Model
- Contract awarded to nine HIEs for trial
implementations of inter-HIE connectivity - Contract requirement to develop business model
- Emphasis on HIE-to-HIE sustainability.
Considerations may include - What are the business drivers for inter-HIE
connectivity? - Sourcing of core services (in-house, outsource,
some services being provided by a state-level
HIE, etc.) - Costs to obtain core services
- Source of funds for start-up costs and ongoing
funding options - What is the value proposition for each
participant in the transaction? - How does cost and benefit distribution work for a
transaction that has participants residing in
more than one HIE?
26Other Federal Activities Addressing Sustainability
- Six state HIE initiatives with State and Regional
Demonstration Project contracts from AHRQ are
informing business model development using the
eHI Value and Sustainability Model - AHRQ sponsored case studies of stakeholder
engagement in HIEs and the impact on
sustainability - Thirteen state Medicaid agencies are using their
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Medicaid Transformation Grant awards to advance
HIE efforts within their states. - State-level HIE Consensus project will address
the Value Proposition for each Stakeholder
participating in a state-level HIE
27Important Next Steps to Advance Sustainable HIE
- Coordinated research agenda
- NGA, eHI, AHIMA, HHS, and other partners work
together to answer key questions - State and federal policy development to support
sustainability - Commonwealth report called for mandates for
providers to participate in interoperable
networks - AHIC 2.0 established - national governance
- State Forum established to facilitate state level
approached to HIE governance
28The Ultimate Reason for Health IT
Health IT is a key enabler for us ALL to get
The quality of health we want and deserve The
quality and value of health care services we
demand
29For More Information
www.hhs.gov/healthit