EVM Issues From the Eyes - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

EVM Issues From the Eyes

Description:

Agencies that have effective capital programs often use Exhibit 300s as a driver ... For new and existing programs, it is the one document to justify a program's ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: kel7150
Category:
Tags: evm | aret | eyes | issues

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EVM Issues From the Eyes


1
  • EVM Issues From the Eyes
  • of an OMB Examiner

November 6, 2006 Meredith Romley David Muzio
2
Exhibit 300s and EVMS
  • EVM is a vital element in capital planning and an
    Exhibit 300 however, you cannot just look at EVM
    data to get a sense if the program is on track
    and well-justified.
  • Agencies that have effective capital programs
    often use Exhibit 300s as a driver in their
    capital programs.
  • Exhibit 300s are not a paper exercise. For new
    and existing programs, it is the one document to
    justify a programs existence (new or steady
    state).
  • OMB often reviews EVM data to ensure oversight
    after funds are appropriated.

3
The Elements of an Exhibit 300 Examiners Care
About the Most
  • Summary Justification
  • Summary of Spending
  • Acquisition/Contract Strategy
  • Performance Measures
  • Security Privacy
  • Enterprise Architecture
  • Alternatives Analysis
  • Risk Management
  • Cost, Schedule and Performance

4
Part I, Section A Overview
  • Summary and justification for the investment
  • Take this section seriously.
  • Be very clear what performance gap you propose to
    close. Make a case.
  • Tie the performance gap to your mission.
  • Include specific performance information to make
    your case.
  • State how the investment will reduce costs and
    improve efficiency and effectiveness.

5
Section B Summary of Spending
  • Include total, risk adjusted life cycle costs for
    the investment.
  • Use common sense
  • If the justification indicates the lifecycle is
    20 years, dont show costs for the first 8.
  • Shifting from acquisition to OM should be
    gradual.
  • FTE costs should be consistent with similar
    agency acquisitions.

6
Section C Acquisition/Contract Strategy
  • Must outline each acquisition vehicle and provide
    data on each, including date of award, start/end
    date, performance based, competitively awarded,
    EVMS, security and privacy.
  • Should demonstrate that the strategy mitigates
    risk to the Government to the maximum extent.
  • If EVMS is not used, you must clearly explain
    why.
  • Red flags are TM, single award ID/IQ with
    unpriced follow-on Task Orders, and No EVMS.
  • Total value of contracts must match Summary of
    Spending chart.

7
Section D Performance Information
  • Must articulate quantifiable performance measures
    and demonstrate how they are linked to the
    agencys strategic goals.
  • Must identify the performance gap you need close
    by year. The baseline should be included as that
    is your gap. For example, for a new aviation
    screening system Decrease passenger screening
    time by 20/year. Baseline in 2006 is 8 minutes.
    2007 target is 6 min 40 sec.
  • Many goals are often presented in the
    justification section.

8
Section E Security and Privacy
  • Easy test
  • For a system already deployed, are all systems
    CAed? Is there a PIA and SORN?
  • For systems under development, are appropriate
    resources (people and dollars) included to ensure
    security and privacy compliance? What are your
    plans to be compliant?

9
Section F Enterprise Architecture
  • Another Easy Test
  • Is the investment part of the EAs target
    architecture?

10
Part II, Section A Alternatives Analysis
  • Should demonstrate that three new options were
    evaluated, and status quo was reengineered.
  • Status quo and the option chosen is insufficient.
  • Must demonstrate that the agency conducted a
    rigorous alternatives analysis.

11
Section B Risk Management
  • A risk management plan is required and must be
    performed at the initial concept.
  • Must include mandatory risk elements and
    demonstrate active management of the risk
    throughout the life-cycle of the investment.
  • Life cycle costs must be risk adjusted.
  • Although OMB does not require agencies to submit
    a risk management plans anymore, if the data are
    questionable, we will ask for it.

12
Section C Cost and Schedule Performance
  • Must use an ANSI/EIA Standard EVM System.
  • Must include all indictors PV, EV, AC, SPI, CPI
    SV, CV.
  • CPI and SPI should not equal 1. This is a red
    flag.
  • Compare OMB approved baseline and actual outcomes
    for phase/segment/module by milestone.
  • Show real milestones that make sense to decision-
    makers. Dont show 300 line items, pick the
    major critical milestones.
  • The agency might have a new baseline, but it
    cannot be depicted in an Exhibit 300 until OMB
    approves it.

13
Section C Cost and Schedule Performance (cont.)
  • Analyze cost and schedule variances of 10 or
    more.
  • Must include corrective actions to explain
    problems. Be honest, clear and specific.
  • Include a new EAC. This is used to determine if
    program should continue programs are shut down.

14
Part III, Steady State Investments
  • Most concerned about the risk management plan and
    operational analysis
  • When was the risk management plan developed? It
    is effective in mitigating risk?
  • When was an operational analysis conducted? Are
    you meeting your planned goals on schedule and
    within cost?
  • OMB often seeks EVM data on a quarterly basis for
    critical programs.

15
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com