Chapters 14 and 15: funding defined benefit plans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Chapters 14 and 15: funding defined benefit plans

Description:

thereby reducing the apparent need for contributions (and also the tax ... the antithesis of the orderly procedure, which is an essential characteristic of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:32
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: jacklva
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapters 14 and 15: funding defined benefit plans


1
Chapters 14 and 15 funding defined benefit plans
  • Last updated 11/6/04

2
Problems in using the current market values of
securities
  • Market values will generally be relatively high
    in periods of high corporate earnings
  • thereby reducing the apparent need for
    contributions (and also the tax deductible
    limits)
  • at times when the employer may be best able to
    make large contributions toward the pension fund
  • Measuring a plan's unfunded liabilities on any
    given date by the current market values of the
    fund's equities could produce a very irregular
    funding pattern
  • the antithesis of the orderly procedure, which is
    an essential characteristic of a satisfactory
    pension funding program.

3
Actuarial valuation of assets
  • The value of a plan's assets must be determined
    by a reasonable actuarial valuation method that
    takes into account fair market value
  • Generally, the Internal Revenue Service has taken
    the position that this condition is satisfied if
    the asset valuation method generates an asset
    value which is within 20 of the fair market value

4
Actuarial cost method
  • Technique for establishing the amounts and
    incidence of the normal costs and supplemental
    costs pertaining to the benefits of a pension
    plan

5
Advance funding can provide a buffer during
periods of financial stress
  • During a period of low earnings or operating
    losses, an employer may find it advisable to
    reduce or eliminate pension contributions for a
    year or even a longer period
  • This can be done in those cases where the
    pension fund is of sufficient size that a
    temporary reduction of contributions does not
    violate the minimum funding requirements imposed
    by ERISA
  • This financing flexibility does not necessitate
    any reduction in or termination of pension
    benefits
  • unlike defined contribution plans

6
Choice of an actuarial cost method and the
ultimate cost of a pension plan
  • Having different actuarial cost methods to
    accumulate annual pension costs is analogous to
    having different methods for determining the
    annual amount of depreciation of plant and
    equipment charged against operations
  • Similarly, the various actuarial cost methods
    will produce different levels of annual cost, but
    the choice of a particular actuarial cost method
    will not affect the ultimate cost of the plan
  • However, if an actuarial cost method is chosen
    that produces higher initial contributions than
    other methods, the asset accumulation will be
    greater in the early years of the plan
  • thereby producing greater investment income

7
Normal cost and supplemental cost
  • The normal cost of a plan is the amount of annual
    cost, determined in accordance with a particular
    actuarial cost method, attributable to the given
    year of the plan's operation.
  • If the normal cost under the particular cost
    method is calculated on the assumption that
    annual costs have been paid or accrued from the
    earliest date of credited service (when in fact
    they have not), the plan starts out with a
    supplemental liability.
  • At the inception of the plan, the supplemental
    liability arises from the fact that credit for
    past service is granted, or part of the total
    benefit is imputed, to years prior to the
    inception of this plan.
  • The supplemental cost is the portion of the
    annual cost that is applied toward the reduction
    of a plan's supplemental liability.

8
amortization periods for single employer plans
that are not underfunded
  • For plans in existence on January 1, 1974, the
    maximum amortization period for supplemental
    liability is 40 years
  • for single employer plans established after
    January 1, 1974, the maximum amortization period
    is 30 years.
  • experience gains and losses for single employer
    plans must be amortized over a five-year period.
  • Changes in supplemental liabilities associated
    with changes in actuarial assumptions must be
    amortized over a period not longer than ten
    years.

9
variances from the minimum funding requirements
  • the secretary of labor may extend, for a period
    of up to ten years, the amortization period for
    supplemental liabilities and experience losses
    for both single employer and multiemployer plans.
  • In those circumstances where an employer would
    incur temporary substantial business hardships
    and if strict enforcement of the minimum funding
    standards would adversely affect plan
    participants, the secretary of the treasury may
    waive for a particular year payment of all or a
    part of a plan's normal cost and the additional
    liabilities to be funded during that year.
  • The law provides that no more than three waivers
    may be granted a plan within a consecutive
    15-year period the amount waived, plus interest,
    must be amortized not less rapidly than ratably
    over five years.

10
exemptions from the mandated minimum funding
standards
  • Government and church plans unless they elect to
    comply
  • Fully insured pension plans funded exclusively
    through individual or group permanent insurance
    contracts, provided all premiums are paid when
    due and no policy loans are allowed
  • Plans that are designed to provide deferred
    compensation to highly compensated employees,
    plans that provide supplemental benefits on an
    unfunded, nonqualified basis and those plans to
    which the employer does not contribute.

11
funding standard account
  • All pension plans subject to the minimum funding
    requirements must establish a funding standard
    account'' that provides a comparison between
    actual contributions and those required under the
    minimum funding requirements.
  • The funding standard account is charged, each
    plan year, for
  • the normal cost for the year
  • the minimum required amortization payment of
    initial supplemental liabilities, increase in
    plan liabilities, experience losses and
    previously waived contributions.
  • an interest adjustment recognizing the period
    between the time each charge is incurred and the
    end of the year.
  • The funding standard account is credited in each
    plan year for
  • the employer contributions
  • the amortized portions of experience gains and
    any decrease in plan liabilities
  • amounts for any waived contributions for that
    year.
  • an interest adjustment reflecting the period
    between the time the contribution or payment is
    credited and the end of the year.

12
impact of (a) a positive balance and (b) a
negative balance for the funding standard account
at the end of the year
  • If the funding standard account has a positive
    balance at the end of the year, such balance will
    be credited with interest in future years.
    Therefore, the need for future contributions to
    meet the minimum funding standards will be
    reduced to the extent of the positive balance
    plus the interest credit.
  • If the funding standard account shows a deficit
    (negative) balance (called the accumulated
    funding deficiency), the account will be charged
    with interest at the rate used to determine plan
    costs. Moreover, the plan will be subject to an
    excise tax of 5 of the accumulated funding
    deficiency. In addition to the excise tax, the
    employer may be subjected to civil action in the
    courts for failure to meet the minimum funding
    standards.

13
plans subject to the additional minimum funding
requirements established by the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1987
  • The additional minimum funding requirements apply
    to plans covering more than 100 participants and
    that are not at least 100 funded for current
    liabilities.
  • the current liability is the plan's liability
    determined on a plan termination basis.
  • the unfunded liability is calculated by
    subtracting the actuarial value of assets any
    credit balance in the funding standard account
    must first be subtracted from the actuarial value
    of assets.

14
Deficit reduction contribution.
  • The deficit reduction contribution is equal to
    the sum of the unfunded old liability amount and
    the unfunded new liability amount.
  • The unfunded old liability amount equals an
    18-year amortization, beginning in 1989, of the
    unfunded current liability, if any, at the
    beginning of the 1988 plan year (called the
    unfunded old liability) based on the plan
    provisions in effect on October 16, 1987.
  • The unfunded new liability amount equals a
    specific percentage of the unfunded new
    liability.
  • The unfunded new liability equals the excess, if
    any, of the unfunded current liability over the
    unamortized portion of the unfunded old
    liability, and without regard to the liability
    for unpredictable contingent events.
  • The percentage of the unfunded new liability
    recognized depends on the funded current
    liability percentage, defined as the ratio of the
    plan's actuarial value of assets, net of the
    credit balance, to its current liability.
  • If this ratio is 35 or less, the percentage of
    the unfunded new liability recognized is 30. For
    every percentage point by which the funded
    current liability percentage exceeds 35, the
    percentage of unfunded new liability recognized
    declines by .25.

15
Additional funding requirements for certain plans
  • Additional contributions may be required under a
    special funding rule for certain single-employer
    defined benefit pension plans.
  • These additional funding requirements were
    enacted in 1987 and amended in 1994 to address
    demands on the PBGC insurance system as a result
    of terminations of underfunded plans.
  • Under the special funding rule, additional
    contributions are generally required if the value
    of the plan assets is less than 90 percent of the
    plans current liability.
  • The value of plan assets as a percentage of
    current liability is the plans funded current
    liability percentage.
  • The minimum required contribution under the
    special rule is, in general, the greater of (1)
    the amount determined under the normal funding
    rules, or (2) the deficit reduction contribution,
    plus the amount required with respect to benefits
    that are contingent on unpredictable events.
  • The deficit reduction contribution is the sum of
    (1) the unfunded old liability amount, (2) the
    unfunded new liability amount, (3) the expected
    increase in current liability due to benefits
    accruing during the plan year, and (4) the amount
    needed to amortize increases in current liability
    due to certain future changes in the mortality
    table required to be used in determining current
    liability.
  • The amount of additional contributions required
    under the special funding rule cannot exceed the
    amount needed to increase the plans funded
    current liability percentage to 100 percent.

16
Unfunded old liability amount
  • The unfunded old liability amount is the sum of
    two amounts.
  • The first amount is, in general, the amount
    necessary to amortize the unfunded old liability
    under the plan in equal annual installments
    (until fully amortized) over a fixed period of 18
    plan years, beginning with the first plan year
    beginning after December 31, 1988.
  • The unfunded old liability with respect to a
    plan is generally the unfunded current liability
    of the plan as of the beginning of the first plan
    year beginning after December 31, 1987,
    determined without regard to any plan amendment
    adopted after October 16, 1987, that increases
    plan liabilities (other than amendments adopted
    pursuant to certain collective bargaining
    agreements).
  • The second amount is, in general, the amount
    needed to amortize the additional old unfunded
    liability over a period of 12 years, beginning
    with the first plan year beginning after December
    31, 1994.
  • The additional old unfunded liability is the
    increase in the unfunded old liability resulting
    from statutory changes made in the interest rate
    and mortality assumptions used to determine
    current liability for plan years beginning after
    December 31, 1994.

17
Unfunded new liability amount
  • The unfunded new liability amount for a plan year
    is the applicable percentage of the plans
    unfunded new liability.
  • Unfunded new liability means the unfunded
    current liability of the plan for the plan year,
    determined without regard to (1) the unamortized
    portion of the unfunded old liability amount, any
    unfunded mortality increases, and certain
    unfunded liabilities under a collectively
    bargained plan, and (2) the liability with
    respect to any unpredictable contingent event
    benefits, without regard to whether or not the
    event has occurred.
  • Thus, in calculating the unfunded new liability,
    all unpredictable contingent event benefits are
    disregarded, even if the event on which that
    benefit is contingent has occurred.
  • If the funded current liability percentage is
    less than 60 percent, then the applicable
    percentage is 30 percent.
  • The applicable percentage decreases by .40 of one
    percentage point for each percentage point by
    which the plans funded current liability
    percentage exceeds 60 percent.

18
Unpredictable contingent event benefits
  • The value of any unpredictable contingent event
    benefit is not considered until the event has
    occurred.
  • In the case of a plan that is subject to the
    additional funding requirements, if the event on
    which an unpredictable contingent event benefit
    is contingent occurs during the plan year and the
    assets of the plan are less than current
    liability (calculated after the event has
    occurred), then an additional contribution (over
    and above the minimum funding contribution
    otherwise due) is required.
  • Unpredictable contingent event benefits include
    benefits that depend on contingencies that, like
    facility shutdowns or reductions or contractions
    in workforce, are not reliably and reasonably
    predictable.
  • The event on which an unpredictable contingent
    event benefit is contingent is generally not
    considered to have occurred until all events on
    which the benefit is contingent have occurred.

19
Uceb continued
  • The amount of the additional contribution is
    generally equal to the greatest of the following
    three amounts
  • (1) the unfunded portion of the unpredictable
    contingent event benefits paid during the plan
    year, including (except as provided by the
    Secretary) any payment for the purchase of an
    annuity contract for a participant with respect
    to unpredictable contingent event benefits
  • (2) the amount that would be determined for the
    year if the unpredictable contingent event
    benefit liabilities were amortized in equal
    annual installments over seven years, beginning
    with the plan year in which the event occurs and
  • (3) the additional contribution that would be
    required if the unpredictable contingent event
    benefit liabilities were included in the
    calculation of the plans unfunded new liability
    for the plan year.
  • In addition, the present value of the additional
    funding contribution with respect to one event is
    limited to the unpredictable contingent event
    benefit liabilities attributable to that event.

20
Required interest rate
  • Specific interest rate and mortality assumptions
    must be used in determining a plans current
    liability for purposes of the special funding
    rule.
  • Nb this will not apply for the general
    calculation
  • The interest rate used to determine a plans
    current liability must be within a permissible
    range of the weighted average of the interest
    rates on 30-year Treasury securities for the
    four-year period ending on the last day before
    the plan year begins.
  • The permissible range is generally from 90
    percent to 105 percent.
  • The IRS publishes the applicable rate on a
    monthly basis.
  • The Department of the Treasury does not currently
    issue 30-year Treasury securities.
  • As of March 2002, the IRS publishes the average
    yield on the 30-year Treasury bond maturing in
    February 2031 as a substitute.

21
Pension Funding Equity Act (April 2004)
  • Temporarily replaces the 30-year Treasury bond
    interest rate with a higher composite corporate
    bond rate as the benchmark for plan funding
    calculations
  • Also provide airlines and steel manufacturers
    relief from contributions required of underfunded
    plans
  • Allows them to select an alternative drc, see
    Announcement 2004-38 for more details

22
Limits on tax-deductible contributions to trust
fund plans
  • permits the employer to deduct the normal cost of
    the plan plus the amount necessary to amortize
    any past service or other supplementary pension
    or annuity credits in equal annual installments
    over a 10-year period.
  • the maximum tax-deductible limit cannot exceed
    the amount needed to bring the plan to its full
    funding limit.
  • defined as the lesser of 100 percent of the
    plan's actuarial accrued liability (including
    normal cost)
  • Obra 87 added a new funding constraint for most
    overfunded plans (150 percent of the plan's
    current liability, reduced by the lesser of the
    market value of plan assets or their actuarial
    value)
  • This has recently been repealed for plan years
    beginning in 2004 and thereafter.
  • the maximum tax deductible limit will never be
    less than the amount necessary to satisfy the
    Code's minimum funding standards.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com