Title: Chapters 14 and 15: funding defined benefit plans
1Chapters 14 and 15 funding defined benefit plans
2Problems in using the current market values of
securities
- Market values will generally be relatively high
in periods of high corporate earnings - thereby reducing the apparent need for
contributions (and also the tax deductible
limits) - at times when the employer may be best able to
make large contributions toward the pension fund
- Measuring a plan's unfunded liabilities on any
given date by the current market values of the
fund's equities could produce a very irregular
funding pattern - the antithesis of the orderly procedure, which is
an essential characteristic of a satisfactory
pension funding program.
3Actuarial valuation of assets
- The value of a plan's assets must be determined
by a reasonable actuarial valuation method that
takes into account fair market value - Generally, the Internal Revenue Service has taken
the position that this condition is satisfied if
the asset valuation method generates an asset
value which is within 20 of the fair market value
4Actuarial cost method
- Technique for establishing the amounts and
incidence of the normal costs and supplemental
costs pertaining to the benefits of a pension
plan
5Advance funding can provide a buffer during
periods of financial stress
- During a period of low earnings or operating
losses, an employer may find it advisable to
reduce or eliminate pension contributions for a
year or even a longer period - This can be done in those cases where the
pension fund is of sufficient size that a
temporary reduction of contributions does not
violate the minimum funding requirements imposed
by ERISA - This financing flexibility does not necessitate
any reduction in or termination of pension
benefits - unlike defined contribution plans
6Choice of an actuarial cost method and the
ultimate cost of a pension plan
- Having different actuarial cost methods to
accumulate annual pension costs is analogous to
having different methods for determining the
annual amount of depreciation of plant and
equipment charged against operations - Similarly, the various actuarial cost methods
will produce different levels of annual cost, but
the choice of a particular actuarial cost method
will not affect the ultimate cost of the plan - However, if an actuarial cost method is chosen
that produces higher initial contributions than
other methods, the asset accumulation will be
greater in the early years of the plan - thereby producing greater investment income
7Normal cost and supplemental cost
- The normal cost of a plan is the amount of annual
cost, determined in accordance with a particular
actuarial cost method, attributable to the given
year of the plan's operation. - If the normal cost under the particular cost
method is calculated on the assumption that
annual costs have been paid or accrued from the
earliest date of credited service (when in fact
they have not), the plan starts out with a
supplemental liability. - At the inception of the plan, the supplemental
liability arises from the fact that credit for
past service is granted, or part of the total
benefit is imputed, to years prior to the
inception of this plan. - The supplemental cost is the portion of the
annual cost that is applied toward the reduction
of a plan's supplemental liability.
8amortization periods for single employer plans
that are not underfunded
- For plans in existence on January 1, 1974, the
maximum amortization period for supplemental
liability is 40 years - for single employer plans established after
January 1, 1974, the maximum amortization period
is 30 years. - experience gains and losses for single employer
plans must be amortized over a five-year period. - Changes in supplemental liabilities associated
with changes in actuarial assumptions must be
amortized over a period not longer than ten
years.
9variances from the minimum funding requirements
- the secretary of labor may extend, for a period
of up to ten years, the amortization period for
supplemental liabilities and experience losses
for both single employer and multiemployer plans. - In those circumstances where an employer would
incur temporary substantial business hardships
and if strict enforcement of the minimum funding
standards would adversely affect plan
participants, the secretary of the treasury may
waive for a particular year payment of all or a
part of a plan's normal cost and the additional
liabilities to be funded during that year. - The law provides that no more than three waivers
may be granted a plan within a consecutive
15-year period the amount waived, plus interest,
must be amortized not less rapidly than ratably
over five years.
10exemptions from the mandated minimum funding
standards
- Government and church plans unless they elect to
comply - Fully insured pension plans funded exclusively
through individual or group permanent insurance
contracts, provided all premiums are paid when
due and no policy loans are allowed - Plans that are designed to provide deferred
compensation to highly compensated employees,
plans that provide supplemental benefits on an
unfunded, nonqualified basis and those plans to
which the employer does not contribute.
11funding standard account
- All pension plans subject to the minimum funding
requirements must establish a funding standard
account'' that provides a comparison between
actual contributions and those required under the
minimum funding requirements. - The funding standard account is charged, each
plan year, for - the normal cost for the year
- the minimum required amortization payment of
initial supplemental liabilities, increase in
plan liabilities, experience losses and
previously waived contributions. - an interest adjustment recognizing the period
between the time each charge is incurred and the
end of the year. - The funding standard account is credited in each
plan year for - the employer contributions
- the amortized portions of experience gains and
any decrease in plan liabilities - amounts for any waived contributions for that
year. - an interest adjustment reflecting the period
between the time the contribution or payment is
credited and the end of the year.
12impact of (a) a positive balance and (b) a
negative balance for the funding standard account
at the end of the year
- If the funding standard account has a positive
balance at the end of the year, such balance will
be credited with interest in future years.
Therefore, the need for future contributions to
meet the minimum funding standards will be
reduced to the extent of the positive balance
plus the interest credit. - If the funding standard account shows a deficit
(negative) balance (called the accumulated
funding deficiency), the account will be charged
with interest at the rate used to determine plan
costs. Moreover, the plan will be subject to an
excise tax of 5 of the accumulated funding
deficiency. In addition to the excise tax, the
employer may be subjected to civil action in the
courts for failure to meet the minimum funding
standards.
13plans subject to the additional minimum funding
requirements established by the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1987
- The additional minimum funding requirements apply
to plans covering more than 100 participants and
that are not at least 100 funded for current
liabilities. - the current liability is the plan's liability
determined on a plan termination basis. - the unfunded liability is calculated by
subtracting the actuarial value of assets any
credit balance in the funding standard account
must first be subtracted from the actuarial value
of assets.
14Deficit reduction contribution.
- The deficit reduction contribution is equal to
the sum of the unfunded old liability amount and
the unfunded new liability amount. - The unfunded old liability amount equals an
18-year amortization, beginning in 1989, of the
unfunded current liability, if any, at the
beginning of the 1988 plan year (called the
unfunded old liability) based on the plan
provisions in effect on October 16, 1987. - The unfunded new liability amount equals a
specific percentage of the unfunded new
liability. - The unfunded new liability equals the excess, if
any, of the unfunded current liability over the
unamortized portion of the unfunded old
liability, and without regard to the liability
for unpredictable contingent events. - The percentage of the unfunded new liability
recognized depends on the funded current
liability percentage, defined as the ratio of the
plan's actuarial value of assets, net of the
credit balance, to its current liability. - If this ratio is 35 or less, the percentage of
the unfunded new liability recognized is 30. For
every percentage point by which the funded
current liability percentage exceeds 35, the
percentage of unfunded new liability recognized
declines by .25.
15Additional funding requirements for certain plans
- Additional contributions may be required under a
special funding rule for certain single-employer
defined benefit pension plans. - These additional funding requirements were
enacted in 1987 and amended in 1994 to address
demands on the PBGC insurance system as a result
of terminations of underfunded plans. - Under the special funding rule, additional
contributions are generally required if the value
of the plan assets is less than 90 percent of the
plans current liability. - The value of plan assets as a percentage of
current liability is the plans funded current
liability percentage. - The minimum required contribution under the
special rule is, in general, the greater of (1)
the amount determined under the normal funding
rules, or (2) the deficit reduction contribution,
plus the amount required with respect to benefits
that are contingent on unpredictable events. - The deficit reduction contribution is the sum of
(1) the unfunded old liability amount, (2) the
unfunded new liability amount, (3) the expected
increase in current liability due to benefits
accruing during the plan year, and (4) the amount
needed to amortize increases in current liability
due to certain future changes in the mortality
table required to be used in determining current
liability. - The amount of additional contributions required
under the special funding rule cannot exceed the
amount needed to increase the plans funded
current liability percentage to 100 percent.
16Unfunded old liability amount
- The unfunded old liability amount is the sum of
two amounts. - The first amount is, in general, the amount
necessary to amortize the unfunded old liability
under the plan in equal annual installments
(until fully amortized) over a fixed period of 18
plan years, beginning with the first plan year
beginning after December 31, 1988. - The unfunded old liability with respect to a
plan is generally the unfunded current liability
of the plan as of the beginning of the first plan
year beginning after December 31, 1987,
determined without regard to any plan amendment
adopted after October 16, 1987, that increases
plan liabilities (other than amendments adopted
pursuant to certain collective bargaining
agreements). - The second amount is, in general, the amount
needed to amortize the additional old unfunded
liability over a period of 12 years, beginning
with the first plan year beginning after December
31, 1994. - The additional old unfunded liability is the
increase in the unfunded old liability resulting
from statutory changes made in the interest rate
and mortality assumptions used to determine
current liability for plan years beginning after
December 31, 1994.
17Unfunded new liability amount
- The unfunded new liability amount for a plan year
is the applicable percentage of the plans
unfunded new liability. - Unfunded new liability means the unfunded
current liability of the plan for the plan year,
determined without regard to (1) the unamortized
portion of the unfunded old liability amount, any
unfunded mortality increases, and certain
unfunded liabilities under a collectively
bargained plan, and (2) the liability with
respect to any unpredictable contingent event
benefits, without regard to whether or not the
event has occurred. - Thus, in calculating the unfunded new liability,
all unpredictable contingent event benefits are
disregarded, even if the event on which that
benefit is contingent has occurred. - If the funded current liability percentage is
less than 60 percent, then the applicable
percentage is 30 percent. - The applicable percentage decreases by .40 of one
percentage point for each percentage point by
which the plans funded current liability
percentage exceeds 60 percent.
18Unpredictable contingent event benefits
- The value of any unpredictable contingent event
benefit is not considered until the event has
occurred. - In the case of a plan that is subject to the
additional funding requirements, if the event on
which an unpredictable contingent event benefit
is contingent occurs during the plan year and the
assets of the plan are less than current
liability (calculated after the event has
occurred), then an additional contribution (over
and above the minimum funding contribution
otherwise due) is required. - Unpredictable contingent event benefits include
benefits that depend on contingencies that, like
facility shutdowns or reductions or contractions
in workforce, are not reliably and reasonably
predictable. - The event on which an unpredictable contingent
event benefit is contingent is generally not
considered to have occurred until all events on
which the benefit is contingent have occurred.
19Uceb continued
- The amount of the additional contribution is
generally equal to the greatest of the following
three amounts - (1) the unfunded portion of the unpredictable
contingent event benefits paid during the plan
year, including (except as provided by the
Secretary) any payment for the purchase of an
annuity contract for a participant with respect
to unpredictable contingent event benefits - (2) the amount that would be determined for the
year if the unpredictable contingent event
benefit liabilities were amortized in equal
annual installments over seven years, beginning
with the plan year in which the event occurs and
- (3) the additional contribution that would be
required if the unpredictable contingent event
benefit liabilities were included in the
calculation of the plans unfunded new liability
for the plan year. - In addition, the present value of the additional
funding contribution with respect to one event is
limited to the unpredictable contingent event
benefit liabilities attributable to that event.
20Required interest rate
- Specific interest rate and mortality assumptions
must be used in determining a plans current
liability for purposes of the special funding
rule. - Nb this will not apply for the general
calculation - The interest rate used to determine a plans
current liability must be within a permissible
range of the weighted average of the interest
rates on 30-year Treasury securities for the
four-year period ending on the last day before
the plan year begins. - The permissible range is generally from 90
percent to 105 percent. - The IRS publishes the applicable rate on a
monthly basis. - The Department of the Treasury does not currently
issue 30-year Treasury securities. - As of March 2002, the IRS publishes the average
yield on the 30-year Treasury bond maturing in
February 2031 as a substitute.
21Pension Funding Equity Act (April 2004)
- Temporarily replaces the 30-year Treasury bond
interest rate with a higher composite corporate
bond rate as the benchmark for plan funding
calculations - Also provide airlines and steel manufacturers
relief from contributions required of underfunded
plans - Allows them to select an alternative drc, see
Announcement 2004-38 for more details
22Limits on tax-deductible contributions to trust
fund plans
- permits the employer to deduct the normal cost of
the plan plus the amount necessary to amortize
any past service or other supplementary pension
or annuity credits in equal annual installments
over a 10-year period. - the maximum tax-deductible limit cannot exceed
the amount needed to bring the plan to its full
funding limit. - defined as the lesser of 100 percent of the
plan's actuarial accrued liability (including
normal cost) - Obra 87 added a new funding constraint for most
overfunded plans (150 percent of the plan's
current liability, reduced by the lesser of the
market value of plan assets or their actuarial
value) - This has recently been repealed for plan years
beginning in 2004 and thereafter. - the maximum tax deductible limit will never be
less than the amount necessary to satisfy the
Code's minimum funding standards.