The Acts of the Holy Spirit

1 / 52
About This Presentation
Title:

The Acts of the Holy Spirit

Description:

Gamaliel's Irononic Observation. Gamaliel (5:33ff) ironically and unintentionally interprets the whole story ... that provided the foundation for the faith and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 53
Provided by: eaglenet

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Acts of the Holy Spirit


1
The Acts of the Holy Spirit
  • Or of the Apostles

2
Acts and Luke
  • second volume or companion edition
  • prologue of Luke 11-4 applies to Acts
  • In order that you might know the security
    concerning the things of which you were
    instructed.
  • Theophilus can be confident that the same HS at
    work in Christ is at work in Christs church.

3
Jewish Expectations
  • Acts 16 why this same question?
  • the resurrection had all kinds of end of times
    and coming kingdom ramifications
  • jingoistic tenor of question is deflected.
  • Jesus reaffirms the expectation, but alters the
    interpretation in v. 8
  • you will receive power . . .
  • movement from Judea to the ends of the earth
  • not just a kingdom in Israel

4
Ascension of Jesus
  • read 18-11
  • Ascension is tied to Dan 713
  • Son of Man lifted up . . . all nations worship
    him
  • this provides the structure for the rest of the
    book
  • recounts the spread of the gospel from Judea
    ending in Rome
  • Many traditions state that when Messiah comes,
    all the earth will be blessed

5
A Peek at the End
  • look at Acts 2830-31
  • Paul is under arrest but able to preach without
    hindrance
  • Jesus, Israels God, is the sole king of the
    world
  • This is Lukes full answer to the question in 16
  • God has restored this kingdom to his people
  • Based on Abrahamic Covenant, all the nations of
    the earth shall be blessed.

6
Acts 3 Decades of History
  • Starts in Jerusalem and ends in Rome (33-63)
  • two main protagonists Peter and Paul
  • Peter Leads church in Jerusalem, Judea and
    Samaria (chs 1-12)
  • Paul leads church into the rest of the world
    (13-28)
  • both sections can be sub-divided into three
    subsections marked by summary statements
  • 67 931 1224 165 1920

7
Basic Outline
  • 11 241 Foundations of the church/mission
  • 242-67 Church in Jerusalem
  • 68-931 Stephen, Samaria, Saul
  • 932-1224 Peter and the first Gentile Converts
  • 1225-165 Paul turns to the Gentiles
  • 166-1920 Deeper into Gentile world
  • 1921-2831 Paul on to Rome

8
Highlights
  • Prologue Foundations (11-227)
  • Luke wants to make something clear
  • the church and its mission are rooted in the
    ministry of Jesus
  • Jesus prepares apostles for the Spirits coming
  • Jesus gives worldwide mandate (18)
  • 19-11 ascension shift from Jesus to church
  • choosing Matthias to replace Judas (115-26)
  • Pentecost (21-13)

9
Relationship of 5 and 6 (last slide)
  • contrast church w/o HS
  • operating without divine directive,
  • Matthias never mentioned later,
  • Paul the real hero
  • Luke 2230 says the 12 apostles are to rule over
    the new Israel ruled by the HS
  • Judas must be replaced for full 12
  • only then could promise of the father be completed

10
Reversal of Babylon
  • Pentecost is a reversal of Babel (Gen 11)
    directly before Abraham (Gen 12)
  • This is the fulfillment of Gods promise to bless
    the whole world through Abraham
  • the promise to Abraham is fulfilled and now all
    the world hears the praises of God in their own
    languages.
  • funnel of redemptive history turned upside-down

11
First Missionary Sermon
  • 214-41 Spirit of Jesus now moving through the
    apostles.
  • The Joel citation shows that the outpouring of
    the Spirit is prophesied a new broader
    outpouring at the end of the age for all people
  • Peter demonstrates Ps 168-11, 1101 and 13211
    point not to David but to Jesus (229f)
  • Peter declares God made Jesus Lord and Christ
    (236)

12
What shall we do?
  • People ask this in 240
  • If they will repent and believe, they will
    receive the HS
  • promised to you and your children (239)
  • Joel 228 promises outpouring on all flesh
  • those who respond make up the new people of God

13
A Jewish Church
  • yet Luke emphasizes the Jewish nature of the
    early church (242ff)
  • in principle, the people of God are restored
    within a historical Israel
  • Yet who are these leaders of the new church
    Jewish or of another religion?
  • a struggle between the apostles and Sanhedrin
    ensues who gets to define Israel?

14
The Church in Jerusalem (31-67)
  • 31ff Peter heals a crippled man which leads to
    another missionary sermon (313-26)
  • vv 13-16 You people rejected the Messiah!
  • v. 17 ameliorates the culpability acted in
    ignorance
  • Jesus a prophet like Moses v. 22
  • through whom all the families of the earth shall
    be blessed Abrahamic promise of Gen 12.
  • Many respond positively but leaders to not (41-3)

15
Opposition from the Sanhedrin
  • 41-22 Peter and John boldly resist the request
    to stop speaking in Jesus name
  • apostles directly accuse the leaders of
    responsibility for Jesus death (411)
  • church continues to grow and share possessions
    432f
  • Ananias and Sapphira lie and are judged (51-11)
    showing HS demands holiness

16
Great Reversal
  • Sanhedrins second attempt in 517ff
  • they are now jealous of apostolic success
  • cannot hold the apostles in prison freed by an
    angel (519)
  • they fear being stoned by the people and are
    reduced to simply inviting the apostles in for a
    hearing (526)

17
Gamaliels Irononic Observation
  • Gamaliel (533ff) ironically and unintentionally
    interprets the whole story
  • if the movement is from God, you cannot stop it
  • if it is human, it will collapse on its own
  • Readers know the movement will not collapse
    therefore it is of God
  • v 42 Christians still meeting in the temple
  • complete separation comes later

18
The Word of God Increased
  • 67 notes increase
  • Sanhedrin is loosing control over people
  • 12 apostles are vindicated as new leaders of a
    New Israel

19
Stephen a Pivotal figure
  • is convicted on trumped charges (612f)
  • he gives a speech in self-defense
  • retells the Jewish story from Abraham on
  • indicates that Luke didnt think Xianity
    constituted a fundamental break w/Israel
  • he only tells the ending differently (v 51ff)
  • v. 56 a clear reference to Dan 7 Son of Man
  • charges the Sanhedrin with resisting God

20
Gospel to the Gentiles (ch 8)
  • Saul, apostle to the Gentiles, introduced (81)
  • Philip preaches in Samaria in 84
  • Progression Judea, Samaria
  • Ethiopian eunuch (826f) uttermost regions
  • Philip preached in Samaria due to persecution and
    led by the Spirit to the eunuch
  • Gods work can work in either way.

21
Peter and Cornelius (932-1224
  • Often called the Gentile Pentecost
  • Sets the pattern for all Gentile conversions
  • referred to several times later (ch. 11)
  • Peter opens the doors to Gentiles before Paul
  • has a vision of his being commanded to eat
    unclean animals
  • Dont call unclean what God calls clean.
  • God called them unclean in Leviticus!!

22
Peters Preaching
  • Peter goes to preach, his sermon is interrupted
    by the Spirits coming (1044)
  • shows special interest of God in reaching
    Gentiles
  • Peter had to recognize that God was accepting
    Gentiles
  • Peter uses the whole amazing story to help Jewish
    believers accept gentile believers (111ff)

23
Their New Name
  • mix of Jews and Gentiles are called Christians
    (1126)
  • Cornelius conversion isnt settled in 11
  • issue stews until the Jerusalem council (ch. 15)
  • a major watershed from which point Paul is the
    focus of the book
  • He has already completed his first missionary
    journey (chs 13 and 14)

24
Council of Jerusalem (ch 15)
  • dispute about outreach to Gentiles
  • council endorses a law-free gospel for Gentiles
    (read 1523-29)
  • no burden is placed on Gentile converts other
    than what was necessary for table fellowship
    between Gentile and Jewish believers.
  • releases the church for further growth

25
The Rest of the Story
  • After Pauls views are endorsed by the Jerusalem
    church (ch. 15) Paul begins his second missionary
    journey (1536)
  • Paul arouses significant opposition among Jews
    and at their instigation is arrested as a
    troublemaker (ch. 21)
  • chapters 21-28 show Paul on trial on various
    occasions

26
Paul on Trial
  • Paul defends himself as someone who has never
    renounced Judaism or created any problems for the
    state
  • His Roman judges are invariably convinced, but
    they refuse to release him for fear of the Jewish
    Nation
  • Paul is sent to Rome to stand trial before
    Caesar. The book ends with him in Rome, under
    house arrest, preaching to everyone who will hear.

27
1st and 2nd Missionary Trips
28
Pauls Last two missionary Journeys
29
Paul on Mars Hill Acts 1716-34
  • Paul is portrayed as a Christian philosopher
  • drawing in Stoic and Jewish arguments
  • 1728 first quote is patterned on Epimenidies
    (6th Cen poet) or Posidonius (a Stoic
    Philosopher)
  • second on Aratus 3rd Cen Stoic
  • Philosophers reject resurrection idea and seem
    to think Resurrection is the name of Pauls
    God.
  • minimal impact of this sermon
  • Paul being All things to all people?

30
Historical Issues
  • famous we passages
  • at four points, Luke speaks of we and us
  • 1610-21, 205-15, 211-18 and 271-2816
  • these passages appear without any obvious reasons
    other than the historical one
  • not a literary trope of the time!!
  • Big problem for those who argue for late
    authorship
  • we passages evidence of eyewitness evidence

31
Ehrmans Historical Challenge
  • Argues that the we passages are a travel diary
    Luke has used
  • Problems w/Ehrmans View
  • absolutely no change in style of language
  • Luke has a very distinctive style
  • you would expect Luke to easily change these
    passages to they to clear up confusion
  • no reason to suspect the we passages are
    anything other than what they seem to be
  • Indications that Luke was Pauls companion

32
Ehrmans other points
  • After Paul converted, did he go right to
    Jerusalem to meet with the apostles (Acts 9) or
    did he intentionally stay away for three years
    (Gal 1)?
  • But Acts and Galatians fit quite well here
  • Acts 923 after some time (Arabia trip of Gal.
    117?)
  • Pauls point in Gal 1 isnt necessarily that he
    didnt go to Jerusalem, but that he didnt go to
    consult with the apostles there.
  • Maybe Paul had taken a trip there to greet the
    apostles but not to consult with them which he
    leaves unmentioned in Galatians

33
Luke the Historian
  • Luke takes great pains to place his story in
    secular history
  • names Roman Caesars
  • many references to Roman officials Felix, Galio,
    Aggrippa
  • he exposes himself to investigation
  • marked by a high degree of accuracy

34
Luke and History
  • he knows that at the time with which he deals in
    Cyprus, Achaia and Asia, senatorial provinces
    were governed by proconsuls
  • Philippi was administered as a colony by
    collegiate praetors who were attended by lictors
    (1620ff, 35ff)
  • Thessalonica and other Macedonian cities ruled by
    politarchs

35
Gallio Proconsul of Achaia
  • Acts 1812 has Gallio as proconsul of Achaia when
    Paul encountered him in Corinth
  • an inscription at Delphi says he was proconsul
    from 50-51
  • an absolute chronology can be determined

36
Acts and Pauls Letters
  • Ehrman presents Luke as a freely-inventive
    theologian who freely invents historical events
    as he goes along to support his theological
    agenda.
  • other opinions
  • By the measure of ancient historical writings,
    the disparity between the sources is not
    remarkable and confirms more than it calls into
    doubt (L.T. Johnson).

37
  • The radical redaction-critical approach so
    popular today, which see Luke as a freely
    inventive theologian, mistakes his real purpose,
    namely that as a Christian historian he sets
    out to report the events of the past that
    provided the foundation for the faith and its
    extension. He does not set out primarily to
    present his own theology (Martin Hengel).

38
Serious Challenges
  • most serious challenges to Luke are theological
    discrepancies
  • four key areas of contrast between Luke and Paul
  • or between the Paul of Acts and the Paul of the
    Pauline Epistles

39
1. Natural Theology on Mars Hill
  • in Acts 17, the Paul of Acts liberally uses Stoic
    notions about God, the world, and the
    relationship of human beings to God
  • something of a natural theology
  • nature and the world are constituted to serve as
    a preparation for the gospel
  • Acts 1726-28
  • Paul in Rom 1 views natural revelation has having
    only a negative purpose
  • to confirm the responsibility of people for their
    sins.

40
The Culpability of Idolatry??
  • Acts 1729-31
  • God excuses idolatry (an understandable sin which
    he overlooks)
  • Rom 118-25
  • God does not excuse idolatry (an inexcusable sin)
  • Is there any possible reconciliation?
  • Is there a nuanced solution?

41
1. Natural Theology in Paul?
  • Could the Paul who wrote Rom 1, when arguing with
    sophisticated pagans, have used as many contacts
    with their culture as possible?
  • being all things to all men to save some (I Cor
    919f)
  • in an evangelistic context, he seeks to find
    common ground
  • Romans teaches that the ultimate effect of nature
    by itself is negative (people cannot be saved by
    nature)
  • Mars Hill speech is preparation of the gospel,
    but Paul got cut off.

42
A few observations
  • Luke does emphasize Gods divine forbearance on
    sins of ignorance (Acts 317, 1327, 1416)
  • speech writing tended to allow for some
    interpretive guesswork What they were likely
    to say under those circumstances.
  • huge point of agreement Justification is by
    faith alone
  • evangelism/teaching distinction
  • Pauls purpose in Romans is to lay groundwork for
    the universality of atonement all stand in
    need

43
2. Loyalty to the Law?
  • Paul of Acts is loyal to the law
  • he agrees to impose ritual requirements on
    Gentile Christians (1522-35)
  • he circumcises Timothy who had a Gentile father
    (163)
  • he claims to be a loyal Pharisee who participates
    in temple rites (2117f)
  • Paul in Gal 52-4 circumcision severs you from
    Christ!
  • The Law is so much refuse to be discarded (Phil.
    35-8)

44
2. Loyalty to the Law
  • Pauls view of the law has been characterized as
    more negative than it actually was (New Paul
    understandings)
  • Timothy was circumcised, not to enable him to be
    a part of Gods people, but to enable him to
    carry out his mission.
  • Paul claims circumcision in itself is indifferent
    (Gal 615)
  • Pauls claim to be a Pharisee means he adheres to
    the Pharisaic doctrine of resurrection
  • Participation in Jewish purification rites again
    relates to mission and being all things to all
    people.

45
3. Union with Christ?
  • Paul of Acts lacks emphasis on union with Christ
    (being in Christ) and the expiatory benefits of
    Christs death
  • These are central themes in Paul of the Pauline
    Epistles

46
4. Eschatology?
  • The Paul of Acts is non-eschatological.
  • No emphasis on the impending return of Jesus.
  • were here for the long haul, folks!
  • Connected to this is a heightened concern for
    Church order in Acts
  • Yet Pauls epistles emphasize the sovereign
    freedom of the Spirit in the church (I Cor 12).

47
3/4 Differences in Teaching
  • Distinctive Pauline teachings are absent in Acts
  • in terms of Christology and eschatology
  • but this may be because of the evangelistic
    context
  • Also, many scholars discount Ephesians and
    Pastoral Epistles from being by Paul
  • They then eliminate teaching from Paul that is
    factually much closer to the Paul of Acts

48
Therefore
  • No good reason from denying the author of Acts
    was also a companion of Paul
  • this is the natural implication of the we
    passages
  • this companion was Luke the beloved physician
    the unanimous opinion of the early church.
  • The book was written before Paul died in Rome
    before 70 AD
  • note last 8 chapters detail Pauls judicial
    proceedings, one would expect him to include the
    outcome if he knew it.

49
Various Overall Purposes
  • Acts is a defense of the church to Rome
  • a defense of Pauls notion that the church is the
    true successor to Judaism
  • to provide eschatological corrective
  • to reassure believers with the reliability of the
    Christian message
  • to help the church legitimate itself over against
    Judaism

50
Complexities
  • The answer may be complex main and minor
    purposes of the writing
  • seems to highlight the centrality of Gods
    purpose to bring salvation to all
  • main question How could the Christian message,
    with its emphasis on the exaltation of a
    crucified man, and on the inclusion of Gentiles,
    attract such heightened opposition from Jewish
    leadership and yet be a faithful accounting of
    Gods work in the world (INT, 266).

51
Main Purpose
  • Against this backdrop, the purpose of Luke/Acts
    is clear
  • to strengthen the Christian movement in the face
    of opposition by
  • confirming Christians in their interpretation and
    experience of the redemptive purpose of God and
  • calling them to continued faithfulness and
    witness in Gods salvific project.
  • Purpose is ecclesiological

52
Treatment of Judaism
  • insists on a continuity between the church and
    Judaism
  • yet Luke is interested in interpreted Judaism
  • Judaism is to be embraced only when understood
    faithfully with respect to Gods redemptive
    purpose.
  • Israels religion must cohere with the purpose of
    God as articulated through Gods chief
    spokespersons.
  • Jesus, now witnesses empowered by the Holy
    Spirit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)