Division II NCAA Eligibility Center Academics and Amateurism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Division II NCAA Eligibility Center Academics and Amateurism

Description:

... qualifying grade-point average and test-score combination on the sliding scale. ... High school is a perennial USA Today. top 10 football program. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: athor
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Division II NCAA Eligibility Center Academics and Amateurism


1
Division IINCAA Eligibility CenterAcademics and
Amateurism
2
Case Study No. 1Core-Course Issues and
Nontraditional Coursework
3
Case Study No. 1
  • PSA took an online course titled "British
    Literature."
  • Class taken through the PLATO system.
  • Class was taken to replace another English core
    course.

4
Case Study No. 1
  • British Literature was on the high school's
  • NCAA List of Approved Core Courses.
  • After review of this class, it was
  • determined that the content being taught was
    not British Literature.

5
Core-Course andNontraditional Coursework Tips
  • What to Look for
  • Determine where course is beingtaken and if
    school has an NCAA List of Approved Core Courses.
  • Verify how the course is being used.
  • Look for assignment completion dates and when the
    coursework was finished.
  • If replacing a class, must be comparable (English
    replacing an English).

6
Core-Course andNontraditional Coursework Tips
  • What to Look for
  • Make sure the coursework being completed matches
    the course being taken.

7
Case Study No. 2Multiple or Unknown High
Schools
8
Case Study No. 2
  • PSA attended public High School A forthree years
    and then transferred to private High School B.
  • PSA retook multiple classes.
  • PSA significantly increased his grades after
    transferring to High School B.

9
Case Study No. 2
  • PSA achieved just over the qualifying grade-point
    average and test-score combination on the sliding
    scale.
  • PSA was flagged for PSA review.

10
Multiple High Schools Tips
  • What to Look for
  • Get transcripts from each high school.
  • Review each high school and verify thereis an
    NCAA List of Approved Core Courses.
  • Have a complete history for a PSA.
  • Verify PSA graduated in eight semesters.

11
Unknown High School Tips
  • Have the high school send the Eligibility Center
    a course catalog along with other pertinent
    information.
  • Research high school to see what kindof
    curriculum it offers.
  • Have high school contact the Eligibility Center.

12
Recruit the High School Too
13
Example No. 1
  • New preparatory school with focus on football
    being ran by a former NFL playerfrom the state.
  • School started in 2004-05 therefore, first
    graduating class was May 2008.
  • Enrollment increased after Hurricane Katrina.
  • Eligibility Center heard of the school, buthad
    never received a transcript.

14
Example No. 2
  • High school is a perennial USA Today
  • top 10 football program.
  • PSAs were held up because of an outdated NCAA
    List of Approved Core Courses.
  • The delay affected the high school's other
    sports.

15
Example No. 3
  • American high school in a foreign country.
  • High school has a CEEB code, but
  • no core-course list with the Eligibility Center.
  • The high school has no course catalog.
  • Language barrier caused some issues.
  • Other communication challenges.

16
Recruit the High School Too Tips
  • What to Look for
  • Make sure there is an NCAA List of Approved Core
    Courses. If not, have information and a course
    catalog sent to theEligibility Center as quickly
    as possible.
  • Some U.S. schools overseas do have CEEB codes
    however, it does not guarantee there
  • is a core-course list.

17
Recruit the High School Too Tips
  • What to Look for
  • Make sure the core-course list is accurate.
  • Not all schools are aware of
  • the NCAA initial-eligibility process.
  • Have coaches encourage PSAs, parents and high
    school's to ensure the core-course list is
    current.

18
  • Amateurism

19
Organized Competition Rule
  • NCAA Division II Bylaws 14.2.4.2 and 14.2.4.2.2
  • For each year after high school graduationand
    subsequent to one's first opportunity to enroll
    that a PSA does not enroll full-time at a
    collegiate institution and continues to compete,
    he or she will be subject to the loss of a
    season(s) of competition.
  • Academic year in residence requirement.

20
Graduation Date Determination
  • Bylaw 14.2.4.2 is based on a PSA's expected date
    of graduation.
  • Amateurism certification staff do not determine a
    PSA's high school graduation date.
  • Amateurism certification staff may assist in
    collecting documents and transcripts to determine
    a graduation date.

21
Bylaw 14.2.4.2
  • For team competition If a team providesany of
    its members with expenses.
  • Actual and necessary expenses include meals,
    transportation, lodging, medical insurance and
    expenses and stipends (for food, gas).
  • For individual competition If a PSA competes in
    any kind of event that offers expenses (i.e.,
    prize money) to any of the participants.

22
Exceptions
  • Reasonable expenses and fees.
  • National/international competition.
  • Postgraduate college preparatory school
    exception.

23
Bylaw 14.2.4.2 Analysis
  • Establish expected date of graduation.
  • Determine if there is a delay.
  • Gather athletics participation information during
    delay.
  • Determine if participation constitutes the use of
    a season.

24
Road Blocks to Certification
  • Irregular educational path.
  • Cooperation from third parties.
  • Changing agreed on set of facts.
  • Incomplete and inaccurate information.
  • Institutional involvement/communication in
    preventing "future" organized competition issues.

25
Case Study No. 1
  • PSA completed secondary school in June 2001 and
    enrolled full time at a junior collegein August
    2006.
  • PSA has delayed enrollment for five academic
    years.
  • PSA competed during his delay.
  • PSA competed for two club teams and
  • his national team during the delay.

26
Case Study No. 1 Cont.
  • PSA responds to amateurism certification staff
    request.
  • PSA received bus rides to away games
  • and postgame meals for the team he competed
    for three seasons (2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06).
  • PSA does not meet any exceptions.
  • PSA competed on team in 2001-02 that did not
    provide the PSA or his teammates with expenses.
  • PSA competed for the national team from 2002-06.

27
Case Study No. 1 Cont.
  • Amateurism staff confirms receipt of expenses and
    participation from PSA's former teams.
  • PSA will not be charged a season
  • for his national team participation in 2002.
  • PSA will be charged with three seasons
  • and a year in residence for his participation
    from 2003-06.

28
Case Study No. 2
  • PSA completes secondary school in June 2008.
  • PSA does not enroll fall 2008 and
  • continues to compete.
  • PSA intends to enroll fall 2009.
  • PSA has delayed enrollment for one year
    (2008-09).

29
Case Study No. 2 Cont.
  • Amateurism certification staff e-mails PSA.
  • PSA does not respond and is 'Not Certified Due
    to No Response.'
  • Institution contacts the Eligibility Center and
    asks to have questions re-sent to PSA.

30
Case Study No. 2 Cont.
  • PSA responds to amateurism certification staffs
    e-mail.
  • PSA competed for one team during the 2008-09
    year.
  • PSA received expenses from team.
  • PSA did not pay a fee.

31
Case Study No. 2 Cont.
  • Amateurism certification staff communicates facts
    and decision to institution.
  • PSA is charged with one season of competition and
    must serve a year in residence.
  • Institution agrees to decision.

32
Case Study No. 2 Cont.
  • Institution files an NCAA Division II Committee
    on Legislative Relief (CLR) waiver.
  • Institution and PSA now assert the PSA paid a
    fee for his expenses.
  • Disagreement in facts causes file to return to
    amateurism certification staff for further
    review. Waiver request suspended.

33
Case Study No. 2 Cont.
  • Disagreement in facts results in file returning
    to amateurism certification staff for further
    review.
  • CLR waiver request is suspended.
  • Amateurism staff must determine if PSA paida
    fee.
  • Amateurism staff requests receipts of fee
    fromPSA and team. Reaches out to league
    office/federation for confirmation.

34
Case Study No. 2 Cont.
  • No contemporaneous documentation of fee can be
    located for several weeks.
  • PSA misses first game of the season.
  • Institution and amateurism staff discuss bringing
    case to the NCAA Division II Fact-Finding
    Committee to determine if fee was paid.
  • Institution determines fee was not paid and
    amends waiver request. Amateurism certification
    staff decision stands.

35
Best Practices
  • Keep Institutional Requests Lists up to date.
  • Have PSAs fully complete amateurism
    questionnaire.
  • Encourage PSAs to be prepared to provide
  • amateurism staff with complete participation
    information for delay period.
  • Remind PSAs they must provide accurate and
    complete information to you and amateurism
    certification staff.
  • Have PSAs complete a Student-Athlete Statement
    during recruitment.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com