STRENGTH MATTERS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

STRENGTH MATTERS

Description:

Calvert Foundation. Housing Partnership Fund. NeighborWorks Capital ... Allison Clark, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: davidp57
Category:
Tags: matters | strength

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: STRENGTH MATTERS


1
STRENGTH MATTERS
Friday, September 11, 2009
2
Objectives
  • Introduce the STRENGTH MATTERS initiative
  • Discuss the background of this initiative
  • Highlight the Financial Reporting Best Practice
    Papers produced by the CFO Working Group
  • Going forward

3
STRENGTH MATTERS
  • A national collaborative sponsored by
     NeighborWorks America, Housing Partnership
    Network (HPN), and Stewards of Affordable Housing
    for the Future (SAHF), with ongoing support from
    The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur
    Foundation. 
  • Our partners also include
  • Local Initiatives Support Corporation
  • Enterprise Community Loan Fund
  • Low Income Investment Fund
  • Calvert Foundation
  • Housing Partnership Fund
  • NeighborWorks Capital

4
(No Transcript)
5
  • Matt Perrenod, Chief Lending Officer, Housing
    Partnership Fund
  • Frank Buss, CPA, Partner, Novogradac Company,
    LLP
  • Winell Belfonte, CPA, Principal, Reznick Group,
    P.C.
  • D Valentine, Chief Financial Officer, Bridge
    Housing, Inc.
  • Moderator Frances Ferguson, NeighborWorks America

6
Why now? Lender and Accounting Perspective
7
Increasing Focus on Borrower
  • Emphasis on core strength
  • Supports equity-like lending
  • Reaction to unsteady markets
  • Weakening collateral
  • But borrowers dont look alike!
  • Variety of business lines
  • Complex relationship to real estate
  • Inconsistent approach to reporting
  • a. Consolidation vs. parent-only
  • b. Recognition of developer fees

8
Understanding the Story
  • Different organizations, different narratives
  • Example consolidated vs. core
  • Revenue model access to operating income?
  • Contingent liability exposure
  • Is there residual value in the real estate?
  • What horizon are you trying to understand?
  • Need consistent consolidating principles
    schedules

9
How We Got Here
  • FASB SOP 94-3-1 Omnibus Changes to
    Consolidation
  • FIN 46 (r) Consolidation of Variable Interest
    Entities (VIEs)

10
Down from On-High..
  • EITF 04-05
  • Determining When a General Partner, or General
    Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited
    Partnership or Similar Entity when the Limited
    Partners have Certain Rights

11
Implementation Date
  • June 29, 2005 for new LPs and existing
    partnership for which the partnership agreements
    are modified.
  • No later than the beginning of the first
    reporting period of the fiscal year beginning
    after December 15, 2005 for all other LPs.

12
Presumption of Control
  • Kick out rights
  • Ability to be removed without cause
  • Participating rights
  • Effectively participate in significant decisions
    that would be expected to be made in the ordinary
    course of the limited partnerships business
  • Protective rights
  • Limited partners ability to block certain
    actions of the limited partnership (amendments,
    dissolution, acquisitions and dispositions etc.)

13
Multiple General Partners
  • Who has control?
  • May result in no consolidation

14
Consistency
  • Fiscal Year vs. Calendar Year
  • June 30 Enterprise and 12/31 LIHTC
  • 18 Month Audit or 6 Month Audit?
  • Pros and Cons

15
How? Building Industry Guidance
16
Topic Paper Background and Process
  • Topics selected by CFO group, prioritized for
    detailed review and topic paper release
  • Topic 1 Determination of Parent Organization
    Fiscal Year-End
  • Topic 2 Presentation Comparative Statements
    vs. Non-comparative Statements
  • Topic 3 Consolidation Issues Elimination and
    Presentation of Minority/Non-controlling Interest
  • Continuing to topic 17 currently

17
Acknowledgements STRENGTH MATTERS gratefully
acknowledges the work of staff from Novogradac
and Company LLP and The Reznick Group and the
following individuals that contributed to this
paper Allison Clark, The John D. and Catherine
T. MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL Kent
Hawkins, NeighborWorks America, Kansas City,
MO Caroline Horton, AEON, Minneapolis, MN Joe
Kasberg, National Church Residences, Columbus,
OH Michael Kurtz, Common Ground, New York,
NY Jeff Reed, Community Housing Partners
Corporation, Christiansburg, VA David Seabrook,
Community Preservation Development Corporation,
Washington, DC Scott Seamands, Lindquist, von
Husen Joyce LLP, San Francisco, CA Brian
Shuman, Mercy Housing, Inc., Denver, CO D
Valentine, BRIDGE Housing, San Francisco, CA Mary
White Vasys, Vasys Consulting Ltd, Chicago,
IL Laura Vennard, Preservation of Affordable
Housing, Inc., Boston, MA
18
Disclaimer
  • This document is a product of STRENGTH MATTERS, a
    collaborative initiative among national and local
    organizations in the affordable housing field,
    co-sponsored by NeighborWorksAmerica, Housing
    Partnership Network and Stewards of Affordable
    Housing for the Future.

19
Format of Topic Papers Once a topic is up for
dialogue
  • Discuss topic with CFO group and accounting firms
  • Review CFO Group financial statements and how the
    issue is handled by each organization
  • Novogradac makes a first draft paper on the
    topic based on above discussion and research,
  • Revisions/edits are suggested by the CFO Group
    and Novogradac updates draft and redistributes
  • If CFO Group approves of updated draft, the topic
    is finalized as a product of the STRENGTH MATTERS
    group.
  • Disclaimer on all topic papers

20
Format of Topic Papers
  • Issue
  • Applicable GAAP guidance
  • Analysis/facts on the topic paper
  • CFO input
  • Conclusion
  • Examples, if applicable

21
Format of Topic Papers Conclusion
  • How does the topic paper affect the affordable
    housing industry and non-profit organizations?
  • A conclusion as to how the issue should be
    handled within the framework of GAAP and current
    CFO guidance.

22
What? The Topic Papers
23
CFO Best Practice Papers TOPICS
  • Topic 1 Determination of Parent Organization
    Fiscal Year-End
  • Topic 2 Presentation Comparative Statements
    vs. Non-comparative
  • Statements
  • Topic 3 Consolidation Issues Eliminations
    and Presentation of
  • Minority/Non-controlling Interests
  • Topic 4a Developer Fee Recognition
  • Topic 5 Determination and Presentation of
    Supplemental Information
  • Topic 6 Preparation of the Statement of
    Financial Position
  • Topic 7 Net Assets Section of the Statement of
    Financial Position
  • Topic 8 Statement of Functional Expenses
    Methodologies and Combining
  • Allocation Methodology

24
CFO Best Practice Papers TOPICS (cont.)
  • Topic 9 Issuance of Stand-Alone Financial
    Statements or Parent-Only Financial
  • Statements
  • Topic 10 Allowances for Receivables
  • Topic 11 Capitalization of Fixed Assets
    (Policy)
  • Topic 12 Statement of Activities
  • Topic 13 Statement of Cash Flows
  • Topic 14 Segment Reporting
  • Topic 15 Cash Presentation
  • Topic 16 Footnote Disclosures
  • Topic 17 Contingent Liabilities

25
Topic 1
  • Why was it chosen?
  • Why is it important?
  • Potential pitfalls/issues
  • Benefits

26
Topic 1 Determination of Parent Organization
Fiscal Year-End
  • GAAP
  • CFO Group input
  • Conclusion
  • Applicable authoritative pronouncements

27
Topic 1 Executive Summary
  • It is possible for a parent entity to consider a
    fiscal year-end that is three months before or
    after the year-end of its subsidiary entities.
    Based on GAAP, this would be an acceptable
    practice, but may create practical issues and
    challenges, especially with the reconciliation of
    intercompany accounting. Consolidated financial
    statements prepared where the fiscal year-end of
    the parent and its subsidiaries differs by more
    than three months would not be considered
    prepared in accordance with GAAP.
  • We suggest that the industry change to a
    calendar year-end for their parent and subsidiary
    entities. Each organization should still
    evaluate its individual situation to determine
    the best year end fit based on their company
    requirements and other factors such as staffing
    considerations

28
Topic 3 Consolidation Issues Eliminations
and Presentation of Minority/Non-controlling
Interests
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Wrap-up
32
Contact Information
  • D. Valentine 415-321-3577 or
    dvalentine_at_bridgehousing.com
  • Frances Ferguson (512) 441-5441 or
    fferguson_at_nw.org
  • Frank Buss 330.602.4600 or frank.buss_at_novoco.c
    om
  • Matt Perrenod (617)259-1806 or
    www.housingpartnership.net
  • Winell Belfonte (301) 961-5546 or
    www.reznickgroup.com

33
Next steps
  • Please register at www.strengthmatters.net
  • Contribute to the progress
  • Members Welcome! Here you will find
    Financial Reporting Best Practices papers from
    the STRENGTH MATTERS CFO Working Group. Other
    documents will be posted in the coming months.
    Please send any comments on the papers by email
    to info_at_strengthmatters.net.
  • Immediate feedback Please respond to the survey
    that will appear on your screen as you exit the
    webinar.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com