PHL105Y Introduction to Philosophy Wednesday, September 20, 2006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

PHL105Y Introduction to Philosophy Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Description:

For Wednesday's class, read chapters 4 and 5 of Vaughn's Writing Philosophy ... David Dedourek: TUT201, TUT204, TUT207. Catherine Manoukian: TUT206, TUT205 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: jennife63
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PHL105Y Introduction to Philosophy Wednesday, September 20, 2006


1
PHL105Y Introduction to Philosophy Wednesday,
September 20, 2006
  • Announcements
  • If you are new in the class today, welcome.
    Please take a syllabus from the desk at the
    front.
  • For Wednesdays class, read chapters 4 and 5 of
    Vaughns Writing Philosophy
  • Philosophy Party TODAY North Building Lounge (NB
    262) 300-430 pm. All philosophy students
    welcome. Snacks and games.
  • Tutorials begin Friday. Your first tutorial
    assignment is due, in hard copy, at the beginning
    of your tutorial.

2
Your tutorials
  • David Dedourek TUT201, TUT204, TUT207
  • Catherine Manoukian TUT206, TUT205
  • Suzan Poyraz TUT202, TUT203
  • Contact information on your TAs (including
    emails) is available by clicking the office
    hours link on the main CCNet menu for the
    course. http//ccnet.utoronto.ca/20069/phl105y5y02
    01/
  • Do ensure that you are signed up for a tutorial
    on CCNET (ROSI tutorial registration doesnt
    matter). As of today, about 90 of students had
    signed up. Students who sign up on CCNet also
    receive weekly update emails.
  •  
  • TUT201 FR1100-1200NE 297    
  • TUT202 FR1200-1300NE 259     
  • TUT203 FR1000-1100NE 257     
  • TUT204 FR1400-1500NE 269     
  • TUT205 FR1500-1600NE 295     
  • TUT206 FR1200-1300NE 295     
  • TUT207 FR1300-1400NE 297

3
Checking in
  • I sent out a weekly update email at 945 am
    today. If you didnt get it, you might be one of
    the 16 people who hasnt yet clicked in to the
    CCNet site for the course to register (follow the
    link at http//www.erin.utoronto.ca/jnagel/105/in
    tro.htm) or you might be one of the 17 people
    who gave an invalid email address when
    registering. Check your CCNet profile if you
    didnt get the message.

4
Style and content in philosophical writing
5
Common sense
  • Why avoid highly complex and pretentious ways of
    saying things?

6
How should we speak of Plato?
  • When paraphrasing a famous author, what is the
    appropriate attitude to take towards that author?
  • Respect (but not fawning reverence).

7
Fallacies to avoid
  • What is the straw man fallacy?
  • What is the ad hominem fallacy?

8
Fallacies to avoid
  • The straw man fallacy is committed when you
    attack a reduced version of your adversarys
    position instead of the real thing.
  • The ad hominem fallacy is committed when you
    attack the personal characteristics of your
    opponent rather than her position itself.

9
Clarity and coolness
  • To keep your writing clear, it helps to read it
    out loud, and then fix anything that sounds
    awkward.
  • Loaded emotional language is generally avoided in
    philosophy papers. (Why?)
  • The Academic Skills Centre can help you learn to
    write (more) clearly drop in and see them (Room
    2115B, South Building)

10
Assumptions
  • Philosophy often involves raising questions about
    things commonly taken for granted. Be careful
    about letting your argument rest on popular
    sentiments that might not be shared by the
    philosopher you are discussing.

11
The first person
  • Yes, you can use the first person pronoun in your
    philosophy papers in fact, its often very
    useful to mark the boundaries between your
    thought and the ideas of the philosopher you are
    criticizing. (According to Descartes, the idea
    of God is innate in us. In this paper I will
    argue that)
  • Claims you make in the first person still need to
    be backed up by rational argument.

12
Defending a thesis
13
What is a thesis statement?
14
What is a thesis statement?
  • Its a declaration of the position you are going
    to take, and defend, in the course of your essay.
  • In order to get a passing grade on a philosophy
    essay, you need to ensure that your essay has a
    clear thesis statement (preferably in the first
    paragraph), and that this thesis statement really
    is an answer to the assigned question.

15
Arguments supporting your thesis
  • Make your premises as clear (and as
    uncontroversial) as possible. In many philosophy
    papers, your premises will include claims about
    what the assigned author says about various
    issues you have to paraphrase the author
    clearly and accurately on these points.

16
Assessment of Objections
  • Any good argumentative paper will consider what
    could be said against the thesis being defended,
    and respond to those possible objections.
  • If you dont feel that there are any reasonable
    objections to your thesis, that is a bad sign.
    (Why?)

17
Keep your voice clear
  • Always keep it clear for your reader when you are
    raising a possible objection and when you are
    responding to it. You can flag objections by
    putting it in the mouth of a hypothetical
    adversary (Here, a defender of Platos view
    might say According to the advocate of a
    divine command theory of morality). You can
    use the first person in the following paragraph
    when you are responding to the objection.
  • Ensure that your response really answers the
    objection.

18
Fallacies
19
What is wrong with this argument?
  • Nothing is better than eternal happiness.
  • A bag of pretzels is better than nothing.
  • Therefore, a bag of pretzels is better than
    eternal happiness.

20
Equivocation
  • The bag-of-pretzels argument appears to have the
    form
  • A is better than B.
  • C is better than A.
  • Therefore, C is better than B.
  • If it really did have that form, it would be
    valid (better than is a transitive relation).

21
Equivocation
  • The bag-of-pretzels argument really has the form
  • A is better than B.
  • C is better than D.
  • Therefore, C is better than B.
  • Nothing means something different in the first
    and second line of the argument (In one line it
    means There is nothing that and in the other
    it means having nothing)
  • When you see what the real form of the argument
    is, you see why its not valid.

22
Fun with fallacies
  • Straw man
  • Appeal to the person (aka ad hominem)
  • Appeal to popularity
  • Appeal to tradition

23
Fun with fallacies
  • Genetic fallacy
  • Equivocation
  • Appeal to ignorance
  • False Dilemma

24
Fun with fallacies
  • Begging the question
  • Hasty generalization
  • Slippery slope
  • Composition
  • Division
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com