True Stories: Research as Praxis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

True Stories: Research as Praxis

Description:

... positive aspects of the neighbourhood ... Experienced stigmatisation of the neighbourhood ... Interpreting and responding to issue of neighbourhood stigma ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: DJW5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: True Stories: Research as Praxis


1
True Stories Research as Praxis
  • Deborah Warr
  • Centre for Health Society
  • University of Melbourne

2
Structure for the presentation
  • Defining research as praxis
  • Describing the example of a research project
  • Developing the project
  • Engaging people in the process of research
  • Collecting the data
  • imagining how the world appears in anothers
    eyes
  • Disseminating the findings
  • To ensure that the research makes a difference

3
(Social science) research as praxis
  • Praxis a Action, praxis spec the practice of a
    technical subject or art, as opp . to or arising
    out of the theory of it. b Habitual action,
    accepted practice, custom.
  • i) The art and craft of research practice
    (skilful, technical, creative)
  • ii) Research that is concerned to understand the
    meaningfulness of everyday practice
  • iii) Orientated to action

4
Eg.- Exploring social capital in contexts of
socio-economic disadvantage
  • Funded by the NHMRC to explore Social contexts
    for health in disadvantaged communities
  • Concepts of social capital and social network
    analysis were used to frame the research and
    interpret findings
  • Studies undertaken in two clusters of
    neighbourhoods Corio/Norlane/Rosewall
    Broadmeadows/Westmeadows/Dallas
  • Produced a Report for the Community summarising
    key findings from the C/N/R site Theres good
    and bad everywhere you go exploring local
    contexts for social capital
  • Report disseminated in worker network meetings,
    to residents and outside the neighbourhoods
    (Local gov. state gov, policy bodies)

5
Engaging communities in the processes of research
  • First things first consulting with service
    providers/stakeholders
  • This is a place where people stay in their
    houses
  • Communities often not interested in research
    cant see the value want to see more
    action/less talk
  • Need to give something back- demonstrate the
    value of research
  • Residents have opportunity to explain aspects of
    their everyday life positive and negative

6
Key issues that emerged
  • Residents related important positive aspects of
    the neighbourhood
  • Dense local social networks that circulated
    important forms of social support (bonding)
  • Experienced stigmatisation of the neighbourhood
  • participants highly involved in
    intra-neighbourhood networks few participants
    involved in extra-neighbourhood networks
    (bridging)
  • High levels of social isolation within the
    neighbourhood keeping to yourself was a
    strategy for managing difficulties in the NB

7
(No Transcript)
8
Collecting research data
  • Exploring culture in social science is like using
    a map to navigate unfamiliar territory- the
    difference between abstract depiction and the
    practical space of journeys actually made
    (Bourdieu, 1977)
  • Embodying and situating oneself in research
    settings
  • Collaborative research design (eg. peer
    interviews, critical reference groups, working
    parties)

9
Analysing research talking behind peoples back
  • Analysis and interpretation of research is
    inevitably fraught with the danger of
    misunderstanding the meaning of peoples words
  • Difficulties of recognising individual
    experiences when they are collectivised
  • Research should be objectively subjective
  • Insights derived through systematic methods
  • Linked to other empirical work
  • Embedded in theoretical understanding
  • Verified through different kinds of evidence
  • - Validating findings through discussions/presenta
    tions

10
Eg. Interpreting and responding to issue of
neighbourhood stigma
  • Key finding from the research (I wasnt expecting
    this issue to arise as frequently as it did in
    residents accounts)
  • Controversial finding
  • Wasnt reflected in everyones experiences
  • Some people felt that I was stigmatising the
    neighbourhood by talking about it (which is a
    real risk)
  • Raised questions of how to talk about the
    research findings without making things worse-
    research findings also stigmatise neighbourhoods
    (even if this isnt the intention)

11
Theoretical insights
  • It matters little that the discourses of
    demonisation that have mushroomed about them
    poor neighbourhoods often have only tenuous
    connections to the reality of everyday life in
    them. A pervading territorial stigma is firmly
    affixed upon the residents of such neighbourhoods
    of socioeconomic exile that adds its burden to
    the disrepute of poverty and resurging prejudice
    against ethnic minorities and immigrants
    (Wacquant, 19961644).

12
  • Bottom of the classThe news that Prince
    William has been dressing up as a member of the
    working class shouldn't surprise us, says John
    Harris. From sneering comedy shows to elitist
    politics, class snobbery is alive and well
    (Feature article in The Guardian on the chav
    phenomenon in the UK,11/4/2006)

13
Disseminating the findings
  • (Where appropriate) participants need accessible
    summaries of research findings
  • Receiving more emphasis in funding applications
  • Facilitates the translation of research into
    effective policy and practice
  • Dissemination activities useful for validating
    findings
  • Also up to researchers to argue for and deliver
    evidence that demonstrates the value of
    dissemination

14
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com