Operationalizing Social Performance Warsaw, 27th May 2004 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Operationalizing Social Performance Warsaw, 27th May 2004

Description:

Bosnia-Herzegovina. Overview. Work under Imp-Act. Sustaining Social Performance ... Bosnia-Herzegovina. Conclusion. Lessons Still Being Learned ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: SeanK3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Operationalizing Social Performance Warsaw, 27th May 2004


1
OperationalizingSocial PerformanceWarsaw,
27th May 2004
Kenan Crnkic Executive Director kenan_at_prizma.ba
www.prizma.ba
2
OverviewWork under Imp-Act
  • Sustaining Social Performance
  • Pay for pro-poor agenda and sustained service
  • Understanding Social Performance
  • Who are we we reaching? How can we do better?
  • Managing for Social Performance
  • Leadership, culture, incentives, systems
  • Monitoring Social Performance
  • Poverty assessment and impact monitoring

3
Imp-Act ObjectivesDevelopmental Institutional
Imperatives
  • Increase depth
  • Environment in which poor under-served
  • Improve service quality
  • Environment of growing competition
  • Measure and strengthen impact
  • Environment of poverty and growing inequality

4
All Work Driven by Mission
Strengthen Impact
  • Improve the well-being
  • of large numbers of
  • poor women and their families
  • by providing long-term access to
  • quality financial services

Increase depth
Vision To be recognized for giving people choices
to improve their lives and building committed
respectful relationships
Improve service quality
5
Imp-Act Activities
6
Sustaining Social Performance
  • Country context
  • Low middle-income country
  • Philippines, Morocco, Bolivia
  • Small population of 4 million
  • Significant and growing competition 42 MFIs
  • Institution
  • Shelter, enterprise, basic needs focus
  • 10,000 active clients
  • 5 branches
  • Financially self-sufficient
  • Commercial financing
  • Among two largest MFIs in active clients
  • Some Challenges to Poverty Focus in Bosnia
  • Low-population density
  • High labor costs
  • LID/WB primacy of profitability
  • Legal framework allows for business lending only

7
Sustaining Social Performance
8
UnderstandingSocial Performance CGAP Poverty
Assessment
  • Use of PAT questions in national omnibus survey
  • Confirmed poorest regions
  • Highlighted dramatic differences in .poverty
    between regions
  • Management Information
  • 64 of new Prizma clients among moderate poor
    and poorest terciles
  • Affirmed Prizma reaching its mission defined
    target group but highlights scope and areas to
    increase of very poor
  • Confirmed shelter repair loan accessed primarily
    by moderate and less poor clients

9
UnderstandingSocial PerformanceMitigating Bias
Against Poor
See Anton Simanowitzs framework on exclusion for
explanation of these areas
10
ManagingSocial PerformanceDouble Bottom Line
  • Depth
  • Drop Out
  • Breadth
  • Long-term Portfolio Quality
  • Productivity
  • Efficiency
  • Monitor impact

11
MonitoringSocial PerformancePoverty
Assessment/Impact Monitoring System
  • Assessing Poverty
  • Increase and maintain outreach to poor and very
    poor
  • Monitoring outcomes
  • Measure effects cost-effectively
  • Improving Marketing Services
  • Strengthen service to retain clients and remain
    competitive

12
System DesignMeasuring Social Performance
Select indicators
13
System DesignMeasuring Social Performance
Design scorecard
14
System DesignMeasuring Social Performance
Automate system
15
System DesignMeasuring Social Performance
Incorporate into broader social and financial
reporting
Ensure transparency and organization-wide
understanding
16
System DesignMeasuring Social Performance
Compliment Marketing
17
ConclusionLooking Back Ahead
  • Many Steps Taken
  • Numerous operational steps taken in past 12
    months
  • Strengthen depth
  • Culture, reward, leadership, documentation, etc.
  • Monitor depth
  • Monitor outcomes
  • Strengthen market research and services
  • Next steps
  • Complete poverty assessment and impact system
  • Explore savings and other services as legal frame
    allows to address broader needs of poor and very
    poor people
  • Maintain ruthless focus on efficiency

18
ConclusionLessons Still Being Learned
  • Institutional design and commitment, not poverty
    status, determine whether poor people can access
    services
  • Sustained outreach to and impact on large numbers
    of poor people requires
  • Ruthless efficiency
  • Transparency with key stakeholders
  • Absolute clarity about fundamental social purpose
  • No confusion about means and ends
  • Need to understand and differentiate between
  • Poor peoples development needs and market wants
  • Need to carefully balance
  • Developmental and institutional imperatives
  • Strong focused social performance requires
  • Leadership, leadership, leadership
  • Institutionalization of values and incentives
  • Clear translation of commitment into
    actionoperationalization

Kenan Crnkic Executive Director kenan_at_prizma.ba
www.prizma.ba
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com