Title: Resourcebased View of the Firm
1Resource-based View of the Firm
- (Barney, 1986 S. Hunt, 1990)
2Resource-based Model of Exemplar Returns
1. Strategy dictated by unique resources and
capabilities of the firm (what can the firm do
best?) 2. Find an environment in which to exploit
these assets (where are the best opportunities?)
1. Firms Resources
3Resource-based Model of Exemplar Returns
1. Identify the firms resources-- strengths and
weaknesses compared with competitors
Resource-based Model
Resources inputs into a firms production process
4Resources Examples (Tangible and Intangible)
- Brands
- Brand equity
- Products
- People/Talent
- Business processes
- Innovation
- Learning
- Macro Structure
- Vision Direction
- Strategies
- Core Values
- Market Orientation
- - Relationship Marketing
- - Market Segmentation,
- Positioning and Targeting
- - Marketing Mix
- - Marketing Research
- - Competitive Intelligence
- - Core Competencies
- Increased Capabilities
- Cross-Functional Teams (permanent)
5Resource-based Model of Exemplar Returns
2. Determine the firms capabilities--what it can
do better than its competitors
Resource-based Model
Capability capacity of an integrated set of
resources to integratively perform a task or
activity
6Resource-Based Model of Exemplar Returns
Action required
Determine how firms resources and capabilities
may create competitive advantage.
7Resource-Based Model of Exemplar Returns
Action required
Locate an attractive industry.
8Resource-Based Model of Exemplar Returns
Action required
Select strategy that best exploits resources and
capabilities relative to opportunities in
environs.
9Resource-Based Model of Exemplar Returns
Action required
Maintain selected strategy in order to outperform
industry rivals.
10Resources and capabilities lead to Competitive
Advantage when they are
Valuable
allow the firm to exploit opportunities or
neutralize threats in its external environment
Rare
possessed by few, if any, current and potential
competitors
Costly to Imitate
when other firms either cannot obtain them or
must obtain them at a much higher cost
Nonsubstitutable
the firm must be organized appropriately to
obtain the full benefits of the resources in
order to realize a competitive advantage
11TEACHING STRATEGIC AND GLOBAL STRATEGY EXAMPLES
OF THE FIRMS RESOURCES AS A RESOURCE BASED
VIEW OF THE FIRM
- Environmental scanning
- Market segmentation, targeting, and
- positioning
- Relationship Marketing
- Market orientation
- Brand equity
- Marketing mix strategy
- Product strategy
- Distribution strategy
- Pricing Strategy
- Firm resources
- Firm competences
- Competitive advantage
- Sustainable competitive advantage
- Dynamic competition
- Static-equilibrium competition
- Innovation
- Organizational learning
- Marketing research and
- competitive intelligence
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
12FIGURE 1
Societal Resources
Societal Institutions
A Schematic of the Resource-Advantage Theory of
Competition
Resources
Market Position
Financial Performance
Competitive Advantage Parity Competitive
Disadvantage
Superior/Exemplar Parity Inferior
Comparative Advantage Parity
Comparative Disadvantage
Competitors-Suppliers
Consumers
Public Policy
Read Competition is the disequilibrating,
ongoing process that consists of the constant
struggle among firms for a comparative advantage
in resources that will yield a marketplace
position of competitive advantage and, thereby,
superior financial performance. Firms learn
through competition as a result of feedback from
relative financial performance signaling
relative market position, which, in turn signals
relative resources. Source Hunt and Morgan
(1997)
13Figure
Relative Resource-Produced Value Lower
Parity Superior/
Exemplar
Competitive Disadvantage
Parity Position
Competitive Advantage
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
14Figure Efficiency-Effectiveness Competition
Relative Resource-Produced Value
Parity Superior/
Exemplar
Lower
Competitive Advantage
Lower
Relative Resource Costs
Competitive Disadvantage
Competitive Advantage
Parity
Parity Position
Competitive Disadvantage
Higher
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
15 COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE 1. Marketplace
positions of competitive advantage lead to
superior financial performance. 2. It is a
comparative advantage in resources that leads to
marketplace positions of competitive
advantage. SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE
ADVANTAGE 1. Factors internal to the
firm Reinvest Know thyself
(causal ambiguity) Adapt
Proactively innovate
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
16 SUSTAINABLE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
(CONTINUED) 2. Factors external to the
firm Consumer activities
Governmental actions Competitor
actions a. Acquisition of same
resources b. Imitation of resources c.
Substitution of resources d. Major innovation
(reactive innovation) in resources 3.
Characteristics of offering Offering ?
Consumers (Causal ambiguity) Resources ?
Offering (Causal ambiguity) 4.
Characteristics of resources Mobility
Complexity Interconnectedness Mass
efficiencies Tacitness Time compression
diseconomies
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
17- FIRM COMPETENCES
- Distinct packages or bundles of basic
resources. -
- Definition Socially complex, interconnected,
packages of - tangible basic resources (e.g., specific
machinery) and intangible basic -
- resources (e.g., the skills and knowledge of
specific employees and - specific organizational policies and procedures)
that fit coherently - together in a synergistic manner and enable firms
to produce valued - market offerings efficiently and/or effectively.
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
18- DYNAMIC COMPETITION
- Firms motivation is superior financial
performance, i.e., more than, better - than.
- The constant struggle among firms for
comparative advantages in resources - that will yield marketplace positions of
competitive advantage and, thereby, superior
financial performance. - Renewal Competences The firms ability to renew
itself based on (1) - reacting to changes in its environment and/or
(2) proactively changing its environment. - Dynamic capabilities (Teece and Pisano 1994)
- Higher order learning (Dickson 1996)
- Industry foresight (Hamel and Prahalad 1994)
- STATIC-EQUILIBRIUM COMPETITION
- Competition occurring in the parity cell
of the competitive position - matrix.
- Requires homogeneous resources, homogeneous
products, absence of
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
19 INNOVATION Proactive innovation
Innovations that are not prompted by marketplace
positions of competitive disadvantage, i.e.,
entrepreneurial innovations. Reactive
innovation Innovations that are prompted by
marketplace positions of competitive
disadvantage. ORGANIZATIONAL
LEARNING Firms learn through competition as a
result of feedback from relative financial
performance signaling relative market position,
which, in turn signals relative resources.
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
20 MARKETING RESEARCH AND COMPETITIVE
INTELLEGENCE An organizational competence.
Guides proactive innovation. Informs
reactive innovation. MARKET
SEGMENTATION, POSITIONING, AND TARGETING Competit
ion is segment-by-segment. Proactive innovation
MARKETING MIX (PRODUCT, PRICING,
PROMOTION, AND DISTRIBUTION)
STRATEGIES Firm competences
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
21 RELATIONSHIP MARKETING Relational
resources MARKET ORIENTATION Firm
competence Guides proactive innovation Informs
reactive innovation BRAND
EQUITY Intangible, legal resource
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
22 FIRM RESOURCES Definition The
tangible and intangible entities available to the
firm that enable it to produce efficiently
and/or effectively a market offering that has
value for some market segment(s). Characteristic
s Significantly heterogeneous and imperfectly
mobile. Categories 1. Financial (e.g.,
cash reserves and access to financial
markets) 2. Physical (e.g., plant, raw
materials, and equipment) 3. Legal (e.g.,
trademarks and licenses) 4. Human (e.g., the
skills and knowledge of individual
employees) 5. Organizational (e.g., controls,
routines, cultures, and competences) 6.
Informational (e.g., knowledge about market
segments, competitors, and technology) 7.
Relational (e.g., relationships with competitors,
suppliers, and customers)
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
23Figure Efficiency-Effectiveness Competition
Relative Resource-Produced Value
Lower Parity
Superior/
Exemplar
Competitive Advantage
Lower
Relative Resource Costs
Parity Position
Competitive Advantage
Competitive Advantage
Parity
Competitive Disadvantage
Higher
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
24Figure 2 Competitive Position Matrixa
Relative Resource-Produced Value
Lower Parity
Superior/
Exemplar
1 Indeterminate Position
2 Competitive Advantage
3 Competitive Advantage
Lower Parity Higher
6 Competitive Advantage
5 Parity Position
4 Competitive Disadvantage
Relative Resource Costs
9 Indeterminate Position
8 Competitive Disadvantage
7 Competitive Disadvantage
aRead The marketplace position of competitive
advantage identified as Cell 3 results from the
firm, relative to its competitors, having
a Resource assortment that enables it to produce
an offering for some market segment(s) that (a)
is perceived to be of superior value and (b) Is
produced at lower costs.
Source Hunt and Morgan (1997).
25Figure 2 Competitive Position Matrix
Relative Resource-Produced Value
Lower Parity
Superior/
Exemplar
1 Indeterminate Position
2 Competitive Advantage
3 Competitive Advantage
Lower Parity Higher
6 Competitive Advantage
5 Parity Position
4 Competitive Disadvantage
Relative Resource Costs
9 Indeterminate Position
8 Competitive Disadvantage
7 Competitive Disadvantage
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
26FIGURE
Resources and Performance
Resources
Market Position
Financial Performance
Competitive Advantage Parity Competitive
Disadvantage
Superior/Exemplar Parity Inferior
Comparative Advantage Parity
Comparative Disadvantage
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
27FIGURE
Competitive Advantage and Performance
Market Position
Financial Performance
Competitive Advantage Parity Competitive
Disadvantage
Superior/Exemplar Parity Inferior
Dr. Shelby Hunt, Texas Tech University, 2000
28Perfect Competition vs. R-A
Perfect
Competition Theory R-A Theory