Title: Human Research Protection Program 101
1Human Research Protection Program 101
- March 19, 2007
- Cincinnati, OH
2The Common Rule and VHA 1200.5 One and the Same?
- Presented by
- Marisue Cody
3Objectives
- Evaluate applicability of the Common Rule
- Define the scope of regulations described in VHA
1200.5 - Describe the areas of overlap between the Common
Rule and VHA 1200.5
417 Federal Agencies that Signed the Common Rule
- Dept of Agriculture
- Dept of Energy
- Dept of Commerce
- Dept of Justice
- Dept of Defense
- Dept of Education
- Dept of Transportation
- Dept of HHS
- HUD
- National Science
- Foundation
- NASA
- AID
- Social Security Administration
- CIA
- Consumer Product Safety
- EPA
- Dept of Veterans Affairs
5Code of Federal Regulations
- 38 CFR 16 refers to the VA
- 21 CFR 56 (IRB) and 50 (informed consent) refers
to the FDA - 45 CFR 46 refers to DHHS
6Subparts
- B Additional Protections for Pregnant Women,
Human Fetuses and Neonates involved in Research - C Additional Protections Pertaining to
Biomedical and Behavioral Research Involving
Prisoners as Subjects - D Additional Protections for Children Involved
as Subjects in Research
7What are the Common Rule and VHA 1200.5?
- Common Rule
- Federal Policy for the Protection of Human
Subjects - Originally issued in 1974 as Part 46 of Title 45
of the Code of Federal Regulations (Subpart A) by
DHEW - Adopted in 1991 by 17 agencies
- VA Part 16 of Title 38 of the Code of Federal
Regulations
8What is VHA Handbook 1200.5?
- Handbook describing procedures for the protection
of human subjects - VHA 1200.5 issued July 15, 2003
- Handbook vs. Federal Regulations
- Same regulatory weight (not optional)
- Applicability
-
9Common Rule and VHA 1200.5
- Common Rule
- Establish IRBs
- Ensure Informed Consent of Subjects
- VHA Handbook 1200.5
- Medical Center Responsibilities
- IRB Composition Responsibilities
- Investigator Responsibilities
- Investigational Drugs Devices in VA
10IRB Composition Responsibilities
11IRB Membership (.107)
- At least 5 members with varying backgrounds
- Gender balance, more than one profession
- At least 1 scientist, at least 1 non-scientist
- At least 1 member not affiliated
- May not participate if has a COI
- Invite consultant if require expertise
12IRB Composition VHA 1200.5
- Licensed Physician for FDA regulated products
- ACOS/AO/RCO
- MAY serve as non-voting members
- Members of a VA IRB
- Appointed by the Medical Center Director
- Initial appointment 3-years
- Chair of a VA IRB
- Initial appointment 1-year
- Affiliate IRB (Paragraph 5)
- Two VA IRB voting members
- One VA IRB voting member must have scientific
expertise
13IRB Functions Operations
- Follow written procedures
- Review must take place at a convened meeting with
a majority present, including a non-scientist.
Approval must be by the majority present.
14VHA 1200.5 Written procedures for operation (turn
to page 13-14)
- More detail, plus some extras
- Reporting to the RD Committee
- Projects needing verification from sources other
than the investigator - Reporting requirements
- Conducting audits
- Education requirements
- Reporting to Privacy Officer
- Reporting to VHA Information Security Officer
15IRB Review of Research (.109)
- Authority to Approve, require modifications to
seek approval, or disapprove - Require that information given to subjects is in
compliance with .116 - Shall require documentation of informed consent
or waive documentation - Notify investigators in writing of its decision
- Conduct continuing review and have authority to
observe consent process and research
16Additional VHA 1200.5 requirements
- Prior to initiation
- Research reviewed and approved by IRB AND RD
- If approval is contingent on substantive
modifications, subsequent review must be by the
convened IRB - If approval is contingent on specific minor
conditions, the IRB chair or designee may approve
it on behalf of the IRB
17Continuing Review in VHA 1200.5
- Requires submission of a written progress report
that includes - Brief summary
- Number of subjects entered and withdrawn
- Gender and minority status
- Number of subjects vulnerable populations
- Copy of proposal and all approved amendedments
- Copy of current consent document for the IRB to
review
18Continuing Review
- Written Progress Report (cont.)
- Copy of current HIPAA Authorization document
- Information that may impact on risk benefit ratio
- Research findings to date
- Summary of DSMB or DMC meetings
- Assurance that all SAEs and UAEs have been
reported - New scientific findings in the literature, or
other relevant findings
19Lapse of approval
- Automatically suspended
- Local research office to notify the PI
- IRB in consultation with COS may allow
continuation of research interventions if it is
in the best interest of individual subjects - Inform other agencies as appropriate
- Re-approval must occur prior to re-initiation
20Expedited Review (.110)
- List of categories is published in the Federal
Register (on OHRP website is the same as
Appendix B) - Must be no more than minimal risk, OR minor
change in already approved protocol - Carried out by IRB Chair or designee, cannot
disapprove the research - Have a process to inform the IRB members
- May be restricted by agency head
21VHA 1200.5
- No differences except the labeling of the
expedited categories
22Criteria for IRB Approval (.111)
- Risks to subjects are minimized
- Risks are reasonable in relation to benefits
- Selection of subjects is equitable
- Informed consent will be sought prospectively
- Informed consent is appropriately documented
- Research plan makes adequate provisions for
safety monitoring - There are adequate provisions to protect privacy
and confidentiality - Protection of Vulnerable Subjects
- 9. Conflict of Interest
- 10. Ensure Investigator educational requirements
and certifications
23Review by institution (.112)
- Research approved by an IRB may be subject to
further review by official of the institution - Those officials MAY NOT approve the research if
it is not approved by the IRB
24Suspension or termination of IRB approval (.113)
- IRB has authority to suspend or terminate a
project not being conducted in accordance with
its requirements or is associated with unexpected
harms to subjects - Must be reported
25Cooperative research (.114)
- With approval of the department or agency head,
an institution participating in a cooperative
project may enter into a joint review
arrangement, rely upon the review of another
qualified IRB, or make similar arrangements for
avoiding duplication
26IRB records (.115)
- Proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations (if
any), sample consent documents, progress reports,
reports of injuries - Minutes of IRB meetings
- Continuing review activities
- Correspondence
- List of IRB members
- Written procedures
- Statements of significant new findings
- Shall be retained for at least 3 years
27Extras in IRB records (1200.5)
- Minutes must include
- Minutes available in 3 weeks
- Additional safeguards to protect vulnerable
subjects - Determination of level of risk
- Correspondence with RD Committee
- Retain records for 5 years
- Records are the property of the VA
- Non-redacted minutes of affiliate IRB
28Informed Consent
29General requirements for informed consent (.116)
- Basic elements
- Study involves research
- Description of risks
- Description of benefits
- Disclosure of alternative procedures
- Extent of confidentiality
- If more than minimal risk, compensation for
injury - Whom to ask questions of
- Statement that it is voluntary
30General requirements for informed consent (.116)
- Additional elements
- Unforeseeable risks
- Anticipated circumstances where participation may
be terminated - Additional costs
- Consequences of withdrawal
- Significant new findings
- Approximate number of subjects
31General requirements for informed consent (.116)
- Alteration or waiver (c)
- The research is conducted by or subject to the
approval of state or local government officials
and is designed to study, evaluate or otherwise
examine a public benefit program, AND - It could not practicably be carried out without
the waiver or alteration
32General requirements for informed consent (.116)
- Alteration or waiver (d)
- Involves no more than minimal risk
- Will not adversely affect the rights and welfare
of subjects - Could not be practicably carried out without the
waiver, AND - Whenever appropriate the subjects will be
provided pertinent information
33Documentation of informed consent (.117)
- Written consent
- Approved by the IRB
- Signed by the subject or LAR
- Copy given to person signing the form
- Must be read to the subject or LAR, who is given
adequate opportunity to read it before it is
signed, or given a short form
34Documentation of informed consent (.117)
- Waiver of requirements (c)
- Only record linking the subject with the research
and breach of confidentiality would be harmful,
OR - Research presents no more than minimal risks and
involves no procedures for which written consent
is normally required outside of the research
context
35VHA 1200.5 Appendix C
- 10-1086 must be used
- Signed, dated by
- Subject or LAR
- Witness (to signature only)
- Person obtaining consent
- Progress note
- Consent
- Entry
- Termination
- Flag medical record
- Filed in Case History
36Subparts B-D
37Subpart B-Additional Protections for Pregnant
Women, Human Fetuses and Neonates
- Definitions
- Duties of the IRB
- Risks and benefits
- Consent
38VHA Handbook 1200.5 Appendix D
- Paragraph 4
- Forbids research with a fetus, in-utero or
ex-utero (including human fetal tissue) - Forbids research related to in vitro
fertilization - Allows participation of pregnant women, rules are
consistent with Sub-part B section 204
39Subpart C-Additional Protections Pertaining to
Biomedical and Behavioral Research Involving
Prisoners as Subjects
- Definitions
- Duties of the IRB
- Permitted Research
40VHA Handbook 1200.5 Appendix D
- Paragraph 5
- Requires a waiver from the CRADO
- If waiver is granted, must follow Subpart C
regulations
41Subpart D-Additional Protections for Children
Involved as Subjects in Research
- Definitions
- Duties of the IRB
- Risks of Research
- Requirements for permission by parents or
guardians and for assent by children
42VHA Handbook 1200.5 Appendix D
- Paragraph 7
- Requires a waiver from the CRADO
- VHA Directive 2001-028
- Guidance for waiver process
- Requires IRB to have specific policies and
procedures regarding children in research - IRB must have expertise
- If waiver is granted, must follow Subpart D
regulations
43Research Involving Human Subjects with Surrogate
Consent
- Common Rule
- Section 117 subjects legally authorized
representative - VHA Handbook 1200.5
- Paragraph 11
- Appendix D Paragraph 6
44Paragraph 11
- Under appropriate conditions
- Research problem must be unique
- Priority of who can sign consent
- How determination is made regarding capacity
(turn to page 21) - IRB must find that the research meets the
conditions in Appendix D
45Appendix D, Paragraph 6
- c. Conditions for approval
- Only persons with impaired decision making
capacity are suitable as research subjects - Research entails no significant risks or if
possibility of harm, there must be at least a
greater probability of direct benefit - Procedures assure participants representatives
are well informed about their roles and
obligations
46Investigational Drugs Devices
47Investigational Drugs
- VHA Handbook 1108.04
- VA differs from FDA on how it defines
investigational drugs - Yields to FDA on investigational drug regulatory
jurisdiction when there is conflict
48Investigational Devices
- Conducted according to FDA regulations at 21 CFR
Part 812 - Significant risks (SR) vs. Nonsignificant risk
(NSR) - Receipt, control, custody and dispensing
49Investigator Responsibilities
50Investigators Responsibilities
- There is NOTHING regarding investigators in the
Common Rule - VHA 1200.5 Paragraph 10
- Training and credentialing
- Research plan
- Consent process
- Reporting of SAEs and/or AEs
- Amendments
- IRB Review
- Record retention
- HIPAA
51QUESTIONS