Title: Indexes, Scales, and Typologies
1Chapter 6
- Indexes, Scales, and Typologies
2Can complex concepts be measured with single
variables?
- Example Religiosity
- Religion - a set of cultural ideas, symbols, and
practices that focus on the meaning of life and
the nature of the unknown - Religiosity - the extent to which a person
believes in and practices a religion
3Some aspects of religiosity
- Attending religious services
- Personal participation in religious rituals when
not at services (e.g., prayer) - Assisting or leading meetings of religious
organizations - Having religious visions or experiences
- Believing in religious dogma
- Giving material support to religious organizations
4Survey measurement of religiosity
- Measure each aspect of religiosity with a
separate question. - Analysis options
- Analyze each question separately
- Develop an index or scale as a single measure
which summarizes the results of the separate
questions.
5What is an index?
- A composite measure, combining responses to two
or more separate variables - A survey respondents score on an index is
determined by the responses given to two or more
questions, each of which measures an aspect of
the concept. - An index is constructed through the simple
summation of numerical scores received on each
component variable.
6Index Construction
- 1. Item selection
- 2. Index scoring
- 3. Examination of empirical relationships
- 4. Handling missing data
71. Item selection Criteria
- (1) Face validity
- (2) Unidimensionality
- (3) Variance
81. Item selection criteria (1) Face/logical
validity
- Each item on the face of it should appear to
measure the concept - Examples
- Dont include an item measuring level of fear of
walking outside at night in your index of
religiosity. - Dont include an item measuring attitude toward
abortion in your index of religiosity.
91. Item selection criteria (2) Unidimensionality
- Babbie (p. 150) the index should represent
only one dimension of a concept (e.g., one index
for religious participation another index for
religious beliefs). - From Ch. 5 Dimensions - different facets or
aspects of the concept - However, Babbies next point (General or
Specific) indicates that something more general
than a single dimension could be measured e.g.,
religiosity as a combination of different types
of religiosity (so, one index combining religious
participation and belief).
10- This is confusing. In index construction, many
researchers use the term unidimensionality to
mean that all the items should measure a single
concept. (Note, however, that this meaning
differs from the use of dimension in the
conceptualization process.) - Therefore, I use the term here to mean that all
items in my index must measure religiosity and
not some other concept, such as alienation,
anomie, or political ideology.
111. Item selection criteria (3) Variance
- The resulting index should rank respondents from
low to high with regard to the concept. - (NOTE You will not know this until you actually
construct the index and run a frequency
distribution on it.) - The index should show decent variance e.g., not
classify almost everyone as high on religiosity. - (NOTE Or this!)
- Thus, as a group, the items must rank some
respondents as low on religiosity and some as
high.
12Sample item selections for Religiosity Index from
GSS 2000
- How often do you attend religious services?
(ATTEND) - I am going to name some institutions in this
country. As far as the people running these
institutions are concerned, would you say you
have a great deal of confidence, only some
confidence, or hardly any confidence at all in
them? Organized religion (CONCLERG) - Which of these statements comes closest to
describing your feelings about the Bible? (BIBLE) - About how often do you pray? (PRAY)
- How good would you say your local church worship
services are? (WORSHIP)
13Index Construction
- 1. Item selection
- 2. Index scoring
- 3. Examination of empirical relationships
- 4. Handling missing data
142. Index scoring
- Determine how each item should be scored
- All items need to be scored in the same
direction. A high value on one item must mean
the same thing conceptually as a high value on
all others. - If not, the coding of an offending item(s) needs
to be reversed, using SPSS recode feature - Consider
- Range of measurement vs. adequate number of cases
at each point in resulting index - Equal item weights or differing item weights
15Item scoring - ATTEND
Low Religiosity (0)
High Religiosity (1)
16Item scoring - CONCLERG
17Item scoring - BIBLE
18Item scoring - PRAY
19Item scoring - WORSHIP
20Open SPSS and relindex.sav (in the class data
files directory)
- The variables have been recoded
- ATTEND ATTENDR
- CONCLERG CLERGR
- BIBLE BIBLER
- PRAY PRAYR
- WORSHIP WORSHIPR
- Examine frequency distributions for these to
assess variance
21Index Construction
- 1. Item selection
- 2. Index scoring
- 3. Examination of empirical relationships
- 4. Handling missing data
223. Examination of empirical relationships
- Generally, responses to index items should be
related. - For example, in survey data, respondents who
answered a certain way (e.g., LR) on one question
should tend to answer the same way (LR) on others
in the index. - Examine all possible bivariate relationships to
assess this (e.g., SPSS crosstabulation).
23- If items are not related to one another
empirically, they probably do not measure the
same concept. - If two items are perfectly related, only one
needs to be included in the index.
24Gamma Values for Bivariate Relationships Between
Items
25Index Construction
- 1. Item selection
- 2. Index scoring
- 3. Examination of empirical relationships
- 4. Handling missing data
264. Handling missing data
- If there are few cases with missing data on one
or more items, they can be excluded from the
index (e.g., Ch. 6 exercise). - A value can be assigned to missing data according
to some rule (e.g., mean of the variable, random
assignment). - If relatively few items have missing data for a
case, an index score can be assigned on the basis
of the items with non-missing data. - The structure of the data collection instrument
may allow you to impute responses (e.g., checking
yes for some items on a list and leaving others
blank blank probablyno). - Analysis of other questions among those who had
missing data may suggest probable answers to the
missing ones.
27Creating the index
RELINDEX - Reliogisity Index
RELINDEXattendrclergrbiblerprayr
28Creating the index in SPSS
- In Data Editor window Transform Compute
- Type index name (8 characters or fewer first
character must be alphabetic) in Target Variable
box - Highlight first variable in variable list and
move to Numeric Expression box (or type in box) - Type or use keypad to insert after first
variable - Continue until all variables have been entered
- Click TypeLabel and enter a variable label for
your index under Label do nothing with Type - Click OK to create the index and return to the
Data Editor window (index will be the last
variable) - Click Variable View and enter Value Labels for
the index (e.g., 0-Lowest, 4-Highest)
29After index creation - Frequency distribution
- Run a frequency distribution in SPSS using the
new index variable to assess one aspect of index
scoring Range of measurement vs. adequate number
of cases at each point. - Both should be adequate, but it is not possible
to define this precisely. - In general, the index should have a sufficiently
broad range of measurement to distinguish
extremes of the concept. - However, there should be sufficient
representation of cases at each point and no one
point should have an extremely large number of
cases.
30Index validation
- From Ch. 5 Validity - Does the measurement
technique reflect the nominal definition? - Aspects of validity in index construction and
use - 1. Internal validation - Item analysis
- 2. External validation
311. Internal validation - Item analysis
- Examine the relationship between each individual
item and the composite index variable - E.g. in SPSS Crosstabulate ATTENDR, CLERGR, etc.
with RELINDEX - Usually better to make the item (ATTENDR) the
column variable and the index (RELINDEX) the row
variable, since the resulting chart will be
easier to read that way - If item analysis is successful, all items should
be fairly strongly related to the index variable. - If not, reconsider item selection
32Example of Internal Validation
332. External validation
- The index variable should be related to another
variable measuring the same or a similar concept - E.g., an index of religiosity should be related
to - belief that the U.S. would be a better country if
religion had less influence (RELIGINF-not in GSS
2000) - place of faith in God in respondents value
structure (IMPGOD-not in GSS 2000) - whether somebody who is against all churches and
religion should be allowed to teach in a college
or university (COLATH-in GSS 2000) - If not, either the index is a poor measure of the
concept or the other variable (the validating
item) is a poor measure of the concept.
34Example of External Validation
35Index and scale construction logic
36How indexes and scales are different
- If we know a respondents index score, we cant
tell how individual items in the index were
answered, unless the score is at one of the two
extremes. - Index scores are assigned by simply summing
scores to the individual items. - RELINDEX - 4 items, where 0all LR 4all HR
- But if RELINDEX1, we dont know which one was
HR. If RELINDEX2, we dont know which two were
HR. Same for 3. - If items form a scale, and we know a respondents
scale score, we can tell how each individual item
was answered. - Scale scores are assigned to ideal patterns of
attributes. - Data analysis determines whether items form a
scale in a particular sample.
37Index and scale construction logic
38How indexes and scales are similar
- Both are composite measures (more than one item).
- Both rank cases from low to high with regard to
the concept (ordinal).