Title: Amendments to the Woodlot Licence Forest Management Regulation
1Amendments to the Woodlot Licence Forest
Management Regulation
2Course Outline
- The course will go through the Woodlot Licence
Forest Management Regulation and discuss the
significant amendments that have been made in the
order they appear in the regulation. - Feel free to ask questions or provide comments at
any time.
3How to use the WLFMR
- A fast way to find the relevant sections of the
WLFMR on a particular subject is to use the Edit
/ Find function in Microsoft Word to search the
regulation. - Although the WLFMR provides most of the WL
requirements it is always important to look to
the FPC Act for additional requirements.
4WLFMR Definitions
- Definitions of words or terms that appear
throughout the WLFMR are found in section 1. - Additional definitions that appear in only one
Part of the WLFMR are found in section 39 (Roads)
and section 74 (Silviculture). - Section 82 defines terms related to tree seed and
vegetative material.
5Amended WLFMR Definitions
- The following definitions in section 1(1) of the
WLFMR have been amended - fisheries sensitive zone
- free growing date
- greened-up
- intermediate cuttings
- minor harvesting operations
- stocking requirements
- terrain stability field assessment
6Minor Harvesting Operations
- The definition of minor harvesting operations
now makes reference to the term 5 year allowable
cut as defined in the Forest Act. - The 5 year allowable cut is the total of the
AACs that are approved for a 5 year cut control
period and does not consider undercut carry
forwards or overcutting in the previous cut
control period.
7Minor Harvesting Operation Examples
AAC remains constant at 1200 m3/year during a 5
year cut control period, what volume of minor
harvesting operations can occur in the 5 year
cut control period?
Answer 10 of 6000m3 600m3
- If the WL holder was granted a 2000m3 undercut
carry forward and the AAC remains constant at
1200 m3/year during the 5 year cut control
period, what volume of minor harvesting
operations can occur in the 5 year cut control
period?
Answer 600 m3
8Qualified Registered Professional
- The term qualified registered professional is
defined as a person who - has appropriate education and experience to carry
out duties that require a qualified registered
professional, - and is licensed by a regulatory body in BC (i.e.
PEng, RPF, PAg, PGeo).
9Functions Requiring a Qualified Registered
Professional
- terrain stability field assessments and soil
erosion field assessments - measures to maintain slope stability and
statements in road layout and designs - measures to maintain water quality and in road
layout and designs - deactivation prescriptions on sites with moderate
or high likelihood of landslides - statements that road construction, modification
or deactivation was completed as planned
10Amended Definitions that Apply in the FPC Act and
WLFMR
- The following definitions in section 1(2) of the
WLFMR have been amended or added - dispersed disturbance
- stocking requirements
- temporary access structure
- These definitions apply to the FPC Act and the
WLFMR.
11Dispersed Disturbance
- The definition of dispersed disturbance has been
modified to confirm that ruts, gouges, scalps,
and repeated machine traffic associated with
temporary access structures are considered to
be soil disturbance on areas covered by site
plans, even if the temporary access structures
have been rehabilitated.
12Stocking Requirements
- The term stocking requirements is defined two
different ways - for areas covered by a silviculture prescription
using the stocking specifications described in
section 22.1(3)(e)and (f) of the WLFMR - for areas where there is no silviculture
prescription using the stocking specifications
described in sections 77 and 78 of the WLFMR
13Temporary Access Structures
- Silviculture prescriptions are required to
indicate the maximum proportion of the net area
to be reforested that may be occupied by
temporary access structures. - The term temporary access structure is used in
the FPC Act and in the new WLFMR section 22.1
that defines content requirements for
silviculture prescriptions.
14WLFMR Section 3 - Application
- WLFMR applies to WL holders and anyone working
for them on the WL area or a road permit that is
issued to the WL holder and provides access to
the WL. - The FRR, OPR, SPR, and THPR do not apply to WL
holders. - If a DM is responsible to prepare a backlog SP or
SMP on a WL, the WLFMR requirements apply to the
DM.
15Additional FDP Exemptions
- WLFMR section 6.1 allows the DM to exempt a WL
holder from preparing an FDP if harvesting is
proposed by a person other than the WL holder,
for - a seismic line,
- a gravel or rock pit,
- mining or oil and gas exploration,
- constructing, modifying or widening a road,
- a utility right-of-way,
- clearing a fence line, or
- some similar purpose.
16Requirements if the Term of FDP Approval is
Extended
- WLFMR section 9(2.1) states that if the term of
approval of an FDP is extended, the FDP does not
need to be updated to current Code requirements
if the only CPs that the WL holder will apply for
during the period of the extension are for areas
of minor salvage operations or minor
harvesting operations.
17Comprehensive Plans for Wildlife Tree Retention
in the FDP
- WLFMR section 11(5) states that if the FDP
contains a comprehensive plan for wildlife tree
retention, general objectives for wildlife tree
retention do not need to be included in the FDP. - WLFMR section 11(6) allows the DM to request that
an FDP contain a comprehensive plan for wildlife
tree retention.
18General Objectives in the FDP for Riparian
Management Zones
- WLFMR section 13(2) allows general objectives for
riparian management zones to specify the
species of trees to be retained and set minimum
and maximum limits on the quantity of trees that
will be retained using - basal area / ha.
- trees / ha. ( gt a minimum diameter limit)
- trees / ha. (by diameter class)
- trees / length of RMZ (by diameter class)
- another similar indicator
19WLFMR Section 12 - Road Modification Information
in FDP
- WLFMR section 12 requires the following road
modification information in a new FDP - the approximate location of where bridges or
major culverts will be added or replaced by the
WL holder on roads that provide access to
cutblocks as well as roads within proposed
cutblocks.
20WLFMR Section 13.1 - Terrain Stability Field
Assessments
- Terrain stability field assessments are
normally required prior to harvesting or
constructing excavated or bladed trails on
sensitive slopes - WLFMR section 13.1 outlines situations where
terrain stability field assessments are not
required. - This section does not apply to roads.
21Terrain Stability Field Assessments Outside of
Community Watersheds
- A terrain stability field assessment is not
required for a sensitive slope in the
Interior that is outside of a community
watershed if all of the following conditions are
met - terrain stability hazard maps indicate the area
has a moderate likelihood of landslides, or
reconnaissance terrain stability maps indicate
the area is potentially unstable, - the harvest method will be cable or aerial, and
- excavated or bladed trails wont be constructed.
22Terrain Stability Field Assessments (TSFA) in
Community Watersheds
- A TSFA is not required for a sensitive slope in
an Interior community watershed if all of the
following conditions are met - terrain stability hazard maps indicate the area
has a moderate likelihood of landslides, or
reconnaissance terrain stability maps indicate
the area is potentially unstable, - the harvest method will be cable or aerial,
- the silvicultural system for the area will not be
clearcut or clearcut with reserves, and - excavated or bladed trails wont be
constructed.
23Terrain Stability Field Assessments and Site Plans
- If a TSFA is required under WLFMR section 13.1,
WLFMR section 14(1)(n) now requires the site plan
to state that - the TSFA has been carried out in accordance with
the WLFMR, - the proposed harvesting complies with sections
60 and 61 of the WLFMR, and - the plan is or isnt consistent with the TSFA
(provide justification if inconsistent).
24Site Plan Requirements if the FDP Includes a
Comprehensive Plan for Wildlife Tree Retention
- WLFMR section 14(2.1) states that if the FDP
contains a comprehensive plan for wildlife tree
retention, site plans do not need to specify the
selection criteria and level of retention for
wildlife trees and wildlife tree patches.
25Site Plan Information for Riparian Management
Zones
- WLFMR section 14(6) allows site plans to describe
tree retention for riparian management zones by
specifying the characteristics, species and
function of trees to be retained and setting a
minimum quantity of trees that will be retained
using - basal area / ha.
- trees / ha. ( gt a minimum diameter limit)
- trees / ha. (by diameter class)
- trees / length of RMZ (by diameter class)
- trees (by diameter class) for the RMZ , or
- another similar indicator of tree retention
26Site Plan Exemptions
- Amendments to WLFMR section 14(10) increase
opportunities for site plan exemptions. - Previously WLFMR section 14(10) only allowed an
estimated volume of up to 500 m3 to be harvested
under a site plan exemption. - If the harvesting is to facilitate a use of
land that is incompatible with the establishment
of a free growing stand, there is no
restriction on the volume or the area that could
be harvested under a site plan exemption (i.e. a
5 ha. clearcut to facilitate placer mining or a
utility right of way).
27Site Plan Exemptions For Intermediate Cuttings
- Up to 2000m3 can now be approved under a site
plan exemption, if the harvest is an
intermediate cutting for salvage or forest
health reasons. - WLFMR section 14(11) requires that if more than
500 m3 is harvested as an intermediate cutting
under a site plan exemption, the district manager
must impose terms and conditions to ensure the
retention of wildlife trees and wildlife tree
patches, unless the FDP contains a comprehensive
plan for wildlife tree retention.
28Site Plan Exemptions For Volumes up to 500 m3
- The reasons that a district manager may grant a
site plan exemption for up to 500 m3 of timber
have been expanded. - Previously WLFMR section 14(10) allowed the DM to
grant site plan exemptions for the harvesting
of up to 500 m3 of special forest products.
The words special forest products have been
replaced with a minor harvesting operation. - Site plan exemptions can now be granted for
harvesting trap trees.
29Partial Site Plan Exemptions
- WLFMR section 14(10) allows partial site plan
exemptions to be granted. - In certain situations WL holders have requested a
site plan exemption but would still like to
establish a free growing stand on the area. - In these situations a site plan may only need to
specify the net area to be reforested,
preferred and acceptable species, and stocking
requirements for the free growing stand.
30WLFMR Section 17 Protection of Issued Permits
- Where cutting permits and road permits have been
issued the WL has been granted the legal right to
harvest timber. - Areas where these permits have been issued may
show up as proposed cutblocks and roads in a
new FDP that is submitted for review and comment
or approval. Areas for which active cutting
permits or road permits exist are not subject to
re-negotiation with the approval of a new FDP.
31WLFMR Section 19Additional Site Plan Information
- WLFMR section 19 now allows the DM to request
- a time frame for the WL holder to complete the
rehabilitation of excavated or bladed trails - a description or map of areas where excavated or
bladed trails may be constructed - the results of a forest health assessment, or
- measures that will be taken to reduce significant
forest health risks.
32WLFMR Section 22 - Site Plans Without RPF
Signature
- There has been a subtle amendment to WLFMR
section 22 so that site plans prepared by
non-professionals may now cover an area up to 1
hectare in size. - Previously site plans prepared by
non-professionals had to cover an area of less
than 1 hectare.
33WLFMR Section 22.1 - Backlog Silviculture
Prescriptions
- WL holders are not required to prepare new
silviculture prescriptions (SPs) except on
backlog areas. - Any backlog SPs that are required on a WL must be
prepared in accordance with the FPC Act and
WLFMR section 22.1.
34WLFMR Section 22.1 (1) SPs Without RPF Signatures
- WLFMR section 22.1(1) allows persons who are not
RPFs to prepare - WL backlog SPs covering up to 1 hectare, or
- amendments to existing SPs or PHSPs involving
- an area of up to 1hectare
- an extension of time
- minor changes to the harvest method or related
practices, or - minor changes to the location of access
structures.
35WLFMR Section 22.1 - Existing Silviculture
Prescriptions
- WLFMR section 22.1 also applies to existing SPs
and PHSPs approved under the WL by - providing content requirements against which to
judge amendments to existing SPs at time the SP
amendment is submitted for approval, and - defining stocking requirements as required by
section 70(4)(d) and (e) of the FPC Act .
36WLFMR Section 22.1 - SP Content Requirements
- Information requirements for WL SPs attempt to
follow the information requirements for site
plans. - WL SPs now have mandatory information
requirements and discretionary information
requirements. - The discretionary information that can be
required for SPs is almost identical to what can
be required under WLFMR section 19(2) for site
plans.
37Significant Differences Between SPs and Site Plans
- Woodlot licence SPs must not be amended to use
the WLFMR default silviculture stocking
specifications. - Site plans have a single free growing date and
SPs have a free growing assessment period with
early and late dates. - Under no circumstances should an SP amendment be
approved that specifies a single free growing
date.
38WLFMR Section 22.2 Additional Backlog SP
Exemptions
- A backlog SP is not required on a WL as long as
the silviculture treatment - does not involve heavy ground based machinery,
- does not result in the cutting, damaging or
destruction of any tree having a stem diameter
(dbh) of 7.5 cm or greater, and - does not reduce the size, quality or number of
healthy, well spaced trees per hectare of a
commercially acceptable species.
39WLFMR Section 22.3 - Operational Plans for
Unauthorized Harvesting
- Unless the DM provides an exemption from the
requirement to establish a free growing stand,
WLFMR Section 22.3 requires a WL holder who
harvests a Crown or private portion of the WL,
without authorization to prepare either - an amendment to a nearby site plan or SP to
include the unauthorized harvest area, or - a site plan for the unauthorized harvest area.
40WLFMR Section 23.1 SMP Exemptions
- WLFMR Section 23.1(1) allows the DM to exempt a
WL holder (in writing), from the requirement to
prepare an SMP if the WL management plan contains
information similar to a SMP.
41WLFMR Section 36(b) Cutting or Damaging Trees in
a Community Watershed
- WLFMR section 36(b)(ii) now allows trees within
100 meters upslope of a community water supply
intake to be cut or damaged to facilitate the
construction of a range fence, if - there is no other practicable location, and
- the fence is compatible with the use of the
community water supply intake.
42WLFMR Section 39 - Surface Soil Erosion Hazard
- surface soil erosion hazard means the ranking
of the potential for soil erosion as determined
by a soil erosion field assessment. - This is a new definition was added to WLFMR
section 39 to provide consistency with a new
section 60.1 of the FPC Act.
43Road Permits Road Use Permits for Minor Salvage
Operations
- FPC Act section 54(3.1), (3.2) and (3.4) allow
roads on Crown land to be used for minor salvage
operations (under specified circumstances),
without a road permit or road use permit.
44Road Permits Road Use Permits for Minor
Harvesting Operations
- WLFMR section 41(3), (4) and (5) allow roads on
Crown land to be used for minor harvesting
operations under specified circumstances (that
are virtually identical to section 54 (3.1),
(3.2) and (3.4) of the FPC Act). - The period of road use does not need to be less
than 60 days.
45Road Modification Defined
- The word modify is defined in the FPC Act to
mean, when used in relation to the repair of a
road or to a physical change to a road, to carry
out any of the following activities - replacing or adding a stream culvert
- replacing or adding a bridge, or providing
structural repairs to a bridge or major
culvert - relocating an existing road
- re-establishing road subgrade stability
- re-establishing cut slope stability by
re-sloping, buttressing or erecting a retaining
structure along the cut slope.
46Eliminating Road Layout and Design Requirements
for Minor Modification
- If road modification consists of
- replacing or adding a stream culvert or bridge,
or - providing structural repairs to a bridge or
major culvert, - an archaeological impact assessment and the
requirement to demonstrate that visual quality
objectives will be satisfied, do not apply. A
terrain stability field assessment is also not
required unless the road modification may
contribute to slope instability.
47FPC Act Section 60.2Road Layout and Design
Exemptions
- Section 60.2 of the FPC Act specifies conditions
under which a stream culvert that is not a
major culvert can be added or replaced without
requiring the preparation of a road layout and
design or its approval by the district manager. - A cutting permit or road permit must still
provide authority to modify any road on Crown
land within the WL.
48FPC Act Section 60.1 Road Layout and Design
Exemptions
- Section 60.1 of the FPC Act allows the
construction of an on-block road that meets the
criteria outlined in section 60.1 of the FPC Act,
without requiring the WL holder to prepare a road
layout and design and have it approved by the
district manager. - A cutting permit or road permit must still
provide authority to construct any roads on Crown
land within the WL.
49Layout and Designs for Roads With Moderate or
High Likelihood of Landslides
- WLFMR section 44(3)(d) now requires a road layout
and design for an area with a moderate or high
likelihood of landslides to contain either - a statement by a QRP that proposed measures to
maintain slope stability are the least likely to
result in a landslide, or - an analysis by a QRP of the likelihood of a
landslide, remedial actions and potential
consequences.
50Measures to maintain slope stability
- As an example, if a retaining wall was not the
least likely measure to result in a landslide, an
analysis would be required
51Layout and Designs for Roads With Moderate or
High Likelihood of Landslides
- WLFMR section 44(3)(e) now requires a road layout
and design for an area with a moderate or high
likelihood of landslides to contain - a statement signed and sealed by a QRP that the
terrain stability field assessment was carried
out and that proposed measures to maintain slope
stability are included in the geometric road
design.
52Layout and Designs for Roads With Moderate or
High Likelihood of Landslides
- A road layout and design for an area with a
moderate or high likelihood of landslides must - contain measures to maintain slope stability
prepared by a QRP, and - indicate whether or not the resulting road work
requires a signed and sealed statement from a QRP
indicating that the measures to maintain slope
stability has been carried out in general
conformance with the road layout and design.
53WLFMR Section 45 - Soil Erosion Field Assessments
Within Community Watersheds
- WLFMR section 45(1)(a) now requires a soil
erosion field assessment unless - soil erosion potential mapping indicates the area
does not have high or very high soil erosion
potential, and - the DM is satisfied that the risk of sediment
delivery to streams is low.
54WLFMR Section 46 - Bridges and Other Specialized
Structures
- WLFMR section 46 (3) (3.1) have been amended to
provide requirements for the design of bridges,
cattle guards and other specialized structures
that are identical to the requirements in section
10 of the Forest Road Regulation.
55Requirements for designs of bridges
- Site data collection is not regulated
- Design requirements vary depending on which of
three situations apply - Bridge span is less than 6m
- Bridge span between 6m and 12m
- Bridge span is greater than 12m or, exceeds FRR
limitations placed on the above spans
56WLFMR Section 46 - Bridges With Spans Between 6
and 12 Meters
- WLFMR section 46 (3)(b)(i) allows an RPF to
design a bridge spanning 6 - 12 m. if - the bridge is outside of the wetted perimeter at
design high water, - the channel is historically stable,
- the bridge superstructure is non-composite,
- the substructure bears on original ground, a
shallow ballast layer or short cribs or sills,
and - the design is based on standard drawings, tables,
charts, etc. that have been produced by a PEng.
57WLFMR Section 46 - Bridges With Spans less than 6
Meters
- WLFMR section 46 (3)(b)(ii) allows a person
other than an RPF or Peng. to design a bridge
spanning lt 6 m. if - the bridge is outside of the wetted perimeter at
design high water, - the channel is historically stable,
- the bridge superstructure is non-composite,
- the substructure bears on original ground, a
shallow ballast layer or short cribs or sills,
and - the design is based on standard drawings, tables,
charts, etc. that have been produced by a PEng.
58WLFMR Section 46 - Bridges and Other Specialized
Structures
- WLFMR section 46 (3) requires a PEng. to take
design responsibility for - all bridges spanning more than 12 meters or
shorter bridges that dont meet the criteria to
allow others to take design responsibility, - all major culverts,
- cattle guard fabrication,
- retaining walls gt 1.5 meters tall, and
- other specialized structures.
59WLFMR Section 51(d)(e)(f) - Bridge Construction
- General Conformance
- WLFMR section 51 (d)(e) (f) requires the bridge
designer to sign a statement that the bridge was
built in general conformance with the design
drawings and specifications. - If the bridge was designed by a PEng or RPF the
statement must also be sealed with the
appropriate professional seal.
60Removal of Gravel or Fill From Riparian Reserve
Zones
- WLFMR section 47 (b) states that a WL holder,
when constructing or modifying a road, must not
remove gravel or fill from riparian management
zones or riparian reserve zones without the
prior approval of the district manager.
61Removal of Stumps, Roots and Embedded Logs
- WLFMR section 47.1 provides a general
requirement that stumps, roots and embedded logs
must not be left or placed in the road prism
unless - the road is a snow road or involves
overlanding, or - doing so is allowed under WLFMR sections 47.2 or
48(1)
62Snow Road
- Constructed entirely from snow and ice mixtures
- No ground disturbance required
63Overlanding
64- In stable terrain, stumps, roots and embedded
logs may be left or placed in the road prism but,
outside of the road subgrade width.
65- In stable terrain, stumps, roots and embedded
logs may be left or placed under the road
subgrade width.
66In stable terrain, allows inverted stumps,
corduroy or puncheon to be in the road subgrade
width.
67 Can use stumps and logs to retain the fill in
moderate to high hazard terrain if prescribed by
a QRP.
68Removal of Stumps, Roots and Embedded Logs
- WLFMR section 47.2 (2) and 48(1) now provide the
same deactivation requirements for roads where
stumps, roots and embedded logs have been left or
placed in the road prism as section 11(3) and
(4) of the Forest Road Regulation
69WLFMR Section 54 Road Closure Signs for
Deactivated Roads
- WLFMR section 54(3)(a) now states that signs at
appropriate locations on deactivated roads can
now advise that the road is closed to vehicle
traffic if that is the case. - Previously signs were required to advise road
users of the hazards that may be expected due to
deactivation.
70WLFMR Section 57 Deactivation of Bridges and Log
Culverts
- WLFMR section 57
- no longer requires the removal of bridges that
place the users of semi-permanently deactivated
roads at risk, and - now requires, (during permanent deactivation),
the removal of all log culvert superstructures
and those log culvert substructures that would
affect downstream values.
71WLFMR Section 62(1) Excavated or Bladed Trails
- Previously WLFMR section 62(1) allowed the DM to
provide a written authorization to a WL holder
for the construction of excavated or bladed
trails outside of the operational planning
process. - Section 68 of the FPC Act was amended so that the
district managers can provide written consent to
construct excavated or bladed trails under
specified conditions.
72WLFMR Section 62(5) Excavated or Bladed Trail
Rehabilitation
- WLFMR Section 62(5) now requires excavated or
bladed trails (that are not permanent access
structures), and are constructed on or after
Dec. 15, 1999, to be rehabilitated. - Previous wording linked the rehabilitation
requirement to the date when harvesting
commenced on the cutblock and required the
rehabilitation of excavated or bladed trails
that were designated as permanent access
structures.
73WLFMR Section 62(6) Excavated or Bladed Trail
Rehabilitation
- WLFMR section 62(6) continues to provide default
measure that can be followed to rehabilitate
excavated or bladed trails. - WLFMR section 62(6) now requires the
rehabilitation to be completed before or
immediately following the conclusion of
harvesting, or within another time that is
approved in an operational plan or is
authorized in writing by the DM.
74WLFMR Section 62.1 Temporary Road Rehabilitation
- WLFMR section 62.1 requires the WL holder to
complete the rehabilitation of temporary roads
before or immediately following the conclusion of
harvesting, or within another time that is
approved in the operational plan or is
authorized in writing by the DM. - WLFMR section 62.1(2) provides default measures
that can be followed for temporary road
rehabilitation.
75WLFMR Section 67 - Old Growth Management Areas
- WLFMR section 67 previously required the
agreement of the designated environment
official before clearcutting could be authorized
in an ungulate winter range or old growth
management area (OGMA). - This requirement has been eliminated for
ungulate winter ranges and modified for OGMAs.
76WLFMR Section 73 Rehabilitation of Compacted
Areas Corduroyed Trails
- WLFMR section 73 now requires rehabilitation of
compacted areas and corduroyed trails before
or immediately following the completion of
harvesting, or within a time frame specified by
the DM. - Rehabilitation of compacted areas or
corduroyed trails must - allow a free growing stand to be established on
the area, - re-establish natural surface drainage, and
- minimize sediment delivery to streams.
77WLFMR Sections 78 81Maximum Density Spacing
- Amendments to WLFMR sections 78 81 override
operational plan requirements by not requiring
maximum density spacing to be carried out unless
the number of countable conifers exceeds 10,000
/ha. - These requirements are virtually identical to
requirements in the Silviculture Practices
Regulation for major licensees.
78WLFMR Section 81(4) (5)Maximum Density Spacing
- For areas covered by an SP approved before April
1, 1994, where there are more than 10,000
countable lodgepole pine or drybelt Douglas-fir
trees per hectare, the WL holder must reduce the
number of trees to - within a range of post spacing densities
specified in the SP, - within a range of post spacing densities
specified by the DM (in writing), or - a number that is less than the default number in
WLFMR section 81(5).
79WLFMR Section 82(2) Planting Trees on Backlog
Areas
- WLFMR section 82(2) specifies requirements that
must be met by trees that are planted to
establish a free growing stand on an area. - Where the new section 22.2 of the WLFMR allows a
WL holder to plant trees on a backlog area
without an SP, any trees that are planted on the
backlog area must meet the requirements of
WLFMR section 82(2). -
80WLFMR Section 88(4.1) Exemption From Surveys on
Areas of Intermediate Cuttings
- WLFMR section 88(4.1) now allows the DM to exempt
a WL holder from conducting a survey of an area
where an intermediate cutting has removed a
small portion of the stand volume in such a
manner that the inventory label for the area is
not significantly changed.
81WLFMR Section 88(5) Revised Survey Report
Requirements
- WLFMR section 88(5) now requires copies of
regeneration assessments and free growing surveys
to be submitted with the woodlot licence annual
report, unless the district manager requires a
copy at a different time.
82WLFMR Section 89 - Woodlot Licence Annual Report
- WLFMR section 89 has been amended to eliminate
the requirement that WL activities must be
reported on a calendar year basis. - This amendment reflects the fact that some
Interior licensees requested the ability to
report activities based on years that end with
the completion on the winter harvesting season.
83WLFMR Sections 97.1 97.2 Definition of
Greened-up
- WLFMR sections 97.1 97.2 add the definition of
greened-up from the Operational Planning
Regulation that was last amended on December 18,
1998.
84WLFMR Section 97.3 Establishing Ungulate Winter
Ranges
- WLFMR section 97.3 now outlines the process from
section 69 of the Operational Planning
Regulation, for establishing and confirming
ungulate winter ranges and establishing
objectives for ungulate winter ranges.