Title: INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO REFORMING PUBLIC SERVICES IN TANZANIA
1INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO REFORMING PUBLIC
SERVICES IN TANZANIA
- By
- Hon. Dr. Mary Nagu (MP)
- Minister of State, Presidents Office, Public
Service Management
2Global Public Service Reform Movement
- The Drivers of Reform
- While there are specific pressures making
Governments to adopt public service reforms - Globally there are generic pressures that make
the adoption of the reform an imperative by all
countries, these are - Budgetary pressures
- Lack of responsiveness to public demands
- Ineffective programmes
- Need to compete in the world economy
- Internationalisation of many issues that
previously were solely domestic concerns and - The over expansion of the scale of government and
its intervention all spheres of society
3- Responses to Drivers/Pressures
- To a large measure there are commonalities in the
responses adopted by most countries. The most
common measures include - Re-examination of what government should do and
not do - Re-examination of the costs of running government
business, followed by cost cutting measures as
necessary - Decentralisation and devolution of authority
within government
4- Consideration of more cost-effective ways of
service delivery including privatisation or
corporatisation of activities - Introduction of management ideas from the private
sector into public sector including - Giving responsibility to public service managers
to manage and become accountable using tools
derived from the private sector including
strategic planning etc - Partnership between the government and the
private sector in the provision of services to
the public
5Focus on Reform in Tanzania
- Reform of public service in Tanzania is not new.
- Soon after independence major efforts to build
capacity of Government machinery to take on new
responsibilities resulting from independent
statehood and contribute to social economic
development were taken. - These efforts contributed significantly to some
of the positive elements of the Tanzania state
including the fact that the country is an island
of peace and security in this part of the world. - On the negative side the reform measures
contributed, in some measure, to the problems of
public administration which have had to be
addressed in the period between the early 80s and
today.
6The Civil Service Reform Phase
- The present Public Service Reform Programme
(PSRP) originates from the Civil Service Reform
Programme (CSRP) 1991-1998. - The CSRP focused on
- Redefining the role of the state
- Rightsizing Government , and
- Controlling public expenditure including the
wagebill.
7The Civil Service Reform Phase (Continued)
- It also focused on
- Motivating public service employees
- Enhancing public service pay levels
- Introducing initial measures to a return to
meritocratic principles - Capacity building, and
- Improving the policy and legislative environment
for managing the public service.
8The Civil Service Reform Phase (Continued)
- The results of those measures included
- Reducing public service employment levels from
355,000 in 1992 to 264,000 in 1998. - Effective controls on new Hiring and Wagebill
expenditure.
9The Public Service Reform Phase
- CSRP Drawbacks
- While CSRP helped to redefine the role and
functions of the state and share responsibilities
with the private sector, NGOs and decentralised
delivery of services to Local Government by 1998
it was apparent that its effectiveness would
remain limited for a number of reasons - There was limited political support for the
reforms both at the level of the politicians and
the general public - It was not sufficiently owned by public service
organisations including ministries, departments
and agencies
10CSRP Drawbacks (Continued)
- It was not adequately linked to other public
service reform programme - The support from development partners was not
well harmonised and coordinated.
11- Addressing the Drawbacks
- In recognition of the foregoing, Government
adopted a new strategy to reform its public
service called the Public Service Reform
Programme (PSRP) - PSRP had the following features
- Recognised that reform is a long term phenomenon,
therefore, PSRP was planned to be implemented
under three phases, over an 11 year period, from
2002-2011. - The reform entailed going beyond structural and
process changes in the operation of public
service organisations to a cultural orientation
of the public servants as well as the general
public in Tanzania.
12Addressing the Drawbacks (Continued)
- It was to be comprehensive and cover all aspects
over public service management - It shifted primary responsibility for
implementation of the reforms to ministries,
departments and agencies - It ensured it is linked with other public sector
reforms - It recognised the importance of incentives by
addressing seriously pay reform and - It had a strong focus on service delivery
improvements
13- Review of PSRP Experience The First 3 Years
- Two years into the implementation of PSRP
internal and external reviews revealed the need
to improve the implementation strategy. - In July 2003 a Revised PSRP Strategy and Action
Plan covering the period 2003/4 2005/6 was
adopted with the following features
14Review of Experience The First 3 Years
(Continued)
- Took stronger measures to integrate and
coordinate PSRP with other public sector reforms - Link the reform measures to support poverty
reduction strategies - Develop and adopt a more robust monitoring and
evaluation system and - Encourage development partners to coordinate
their actions in supporting PSRP.
15Review of Experience The First 3 Years
(Continued)
- It is too early to comment on whether the Revised
Strategy is addressing the problems which led to
the review of the PSRP. Already internal reviews
and an anecdotal evidence suggest that while
implementation may be slower than anticipated
good and sure progress is being made.
16- Ladies and Gentlement,
- I found it necessary to describe the context and
content of Tanzanias recent reforms to give a
backdrop to the subject of my contribution to
this forum. - I will now focus on the main thrust of my paper
which is INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO REFORMING
PUBLIC SERVICE IN TANZANIA
17- A Decade of Transformation and Innovation in
Tanzania - A decade ago, Tanzania economic situation was
pathetic, in both absolute and comparative terms.
- Per capita income was low, about 180
- Economic growth was stagnant
- Budget deficit were huge
- Inflation was 60 and above
- Macro and fiscal instability were the norm
- Supply of goods and services was tight and
inaccessible for the majority of people, and - The regulatory framework was chaotic although
formerly it was tight - Political and social order was tightly controlled
through the one party political system.
18- The economy is growing at more than 6 (last year
it grew at 6.2) - Per capita income has nearly doubled
- Budget deficits are minimal
- Inflation has fallen to about 5 per annum and
- Pluralistic political and social institution are
thriving.
19- In terms of public institutions we had
- A bloated public sector
- No reliable systems and guidelines
- Indiscipline in its many facets was common
- Ghost workers on Government Payroll were regular
- Wagebill and other public expenditure were out of
control - Ministries could not produce accounts on timely
basis.
20- To day the public service has turned the above
problems around and in some respects we hear we
are market leaders in approaches to managing
state functions. - We have a clear vision and mission to propel
Tanzania to prosperity in the 21st century.
21Innovations
- You miss 100 of the shots which you do not
take. - Ladies and Gentlemen those are words of a wise
person. - I do not want to go into the definition of
innovation but I subscribe fully to the above
saying. Innovation involves daring and not
fearing to fail and always trying new things. - In this conceptual context I will discuss six
areas in which Tanzania has approached public
service reform in an innovative manner
22Innovations (continued)
- These include
- Indigenising and mainstreaming program leadership
and management - Building an Incentive framework under severe
budgetary constraints - Integrating public sector reform processes
- Service delivery re-engineering
- Radical reorganization of Government, and
- Building smart partnerships with a variety of
stakeholders.
23- Indigenising and Mainstreaming Program Leadership
and Management - Today our PSRP
- is a home-grown and locally driven effort
- it is managed by Tanzanian public service team
with some technical assistance from both local
and international consultants - it has no enclave secretariat
- it is mainstreamed into regular PSM management
systems, and - it is increasingly mainstreamed into regular
management systems of MDAs. - For that reason it facilitates capacity building
and ownership and sustainability
24- Building an Incentive Framework under Severe
Budgetary Constraints - Our approach to reform recognises the critically
of incentives in mobilising the energies of
institutions and managers to support reform - The reform has adopted a Medium Term Pay Policy
aimed at - achieving competitive pay for technical and
professional civil servants - achieving a living wage for all civil servants
- It has also adopted a Selective Accelerated
Salary Enhancement Scheme (SASE) consisting of
top-up of salaries of critical managerial and
professional personnel, based on the difference
between current pay and the Medium Term Pay
Targets. THIS IS OUR INNOVATION NUMBER TWO. - While this scheme is politically controversial
given the legacy of egaritarianism in Tanzania
it is contributing to a greater motivation and
better performance for the staff involved.
25- Integrating Public Sector Reform Processes
- As our Innovation number three an Integrated
approach to Public Service Reform using a
uniquely Tanzanian Performance Improvement Model
(PIM) has been adopted (see Figure 1). The Model
is a process that links Strategic Planning with
Performance Budgeting, Staff Appraisal, Client
Service Charters, Monitoring and Evaluation, the
installation of the scheme is well advanced in
our Ministries, Departments and Agencies.
26Figure 1 Integrated Performance Improvement Model
ANNUAL PLANNING PERFORMANCE BUDGET ING
STRATEGIC PLANNING
Services Delivery Options Decentralization
Private Sector Participation Plans
Mission Vision
Gap analysis
- Implementation of
- restructuring and
- Decentralization
- Capacity Building
- Incentives for Performance
- Proposal for PIF support
Efficiency Improvement Capacity Building Plan New
Policy Environment
National and Sectoral Goals and Priorities
Performance Benchmarks Strategic Plan Budget
Medium Term Expenditure Framework
EVALUATION OF PLANS
MONITORING, EVALUATION AND REPORTING
Review and endorsement of plans and budgets
EXECUTION OF PLANS
Reviews Repeat Client Surveys Audits Staff
Performance Appraisals
Deploy resources from PIF and appropriations
Take action, track status and communicate
progress
27- Service Delivery Re-engineering
- We have approached this by what we describe as
Quick-Wins. - We have concentrated on dealing with red-tape
and bureaucratic attitude. This has transformed
a number of organisations that were the worst
performers, including the immigration service.
THIS IS OUR INNOVATION NUMBER FOUR.
28- Radical Reorganization of Government
- This has entailed
- the rationalisation of Government roles,
functions and institutions - Decentralisation and embracing institutional
pluralism in service delivery - Undertaking this pragmatically and objectively
exploring all feasible options available given
our conditions. - In this regard we have launched 20 Executive
Agencies using a home grown framework which we
created for the concept and we regard this as our
innovation number five.
29- Building Smart Partnerships with a Variety of
Stakeholders - Using the same pragmatic perspective we developed
a home grown policy framework and implementation
strategy in outsourcing non-core activities in
MDAs to the private sector. - As part of this my own ministry has outsourced
Cleaning, Security, Reception and Ground
Maintenance functions and we have since helped
other ministries to do the same.
30Challenges
- Leading innovations in public services has many
challenges. These include - First, the broadness of its range of clients
which include the general public. Their
expectations are rising, they are becoming more
aware of their rights and more able to demand
them. - Reforms are of course increasing awareness even
more and leaders have to decided how to manage
the situation. - Second, the private sector which we now recognise
to be the engine of growth has its needs and
wants. - Skillful leadership is required when deciding on
the balance between freedom to do business and
state responsibility to regulate their activities.
31Challenges (continued)
- Public Sector leaders need to develop their
skills to match their business sector
counterparts, and to have the capacity to
distinguish between real red-tape issues and
bids for excessive license. - Third, there is a group that was dormant but it
is growing first and tends to be skeptical of
government and its reform efforts, and often
believe in their causes with passion. This is
yet another area that requires competent
leadership. - Finally, but not least, are our development
partners. Given the scarcity of financial
resources on our part we can only make
significant progress with their assistance.
32Challenges (continued)
- In doing so however, the leadership of the
recipient countries should - set their agenda
- build trust and encourage flexible approaches
- In this regard, we have been able to work with
our partners through dialogue to increasingly
move away from the project mode which made it
difficult to plan implementation reforms in an
integrated manner to sector-wide approaches.
This is our Innovation Number Six.
33Challenges (continued)
- I am glad to say that we have recently signed a
Memorandum of Understanding with a number of
development partners undertaking to provide their
support to the PSRP using this mode. - I am informed that the host of this meeting is
also taking steps to move to the same
arrangement.
34The Imperatives
- Leading change that is based on innovations
requires a difference mind-set, additional
technical skills, and a lot of concentration. - The role of the leader is
- Sale the reforms by promoting them at every
opportunity - Deal with the difficult and controversial issues
- Provide their people with some stability when
they are surrounded by certainties - Know the limit of their peoples abilities and
respect them - Realise the skill and resource limitations and
take these into account - Leaders need to be ambitious while remaining
realistic and pragmatic.
35Conclusion
- A lot of resources have gone into financing
reform in Tanzania over the last 20 years and a
significant proportion has been deployed on
reforming the public service. - Questions that are being asked and rightfully are
- Where is the return on that investment?
- Are those reforms contributing to improvement in
service delivery and poverty reduction? - Why should reform be treated as a priority in the
allocation of budgetary resources by both the
Government and our development partners.
36Conclusion (continued)
- My response to these is that while many of the
sector reform measures could have a direct impact
on service delivery improvement and poverty
reduction the public service reform measures may
not have a direct impact on the same. - However, a well functioning public service and
therefore is reformed is a necessary condition
and prerequisite for achieving improvements in
service delivery and reducing poverty. - That is why my Government and I are prepared to
devote resources to fund PSRP and related
activities. - For the same reason we encourage and urge our
development partners to do the same.