Title: Foundations%20of%20Selection
1CHAPTER 7
2CHAPTER 7 TOPICS
- 1 Selection process
- 2 Purpose of selection activities
- 3 Application forms
- 4 Performance simulation tests
- 5 Job interviews
- 6 Realistic job previews
- 7 Background investigations
- 8 Validity
- 9 Determining validity
31 SELECTION PROCESS
- Standard pattern
- Skip some steps
- Inform applicants
- Get more information
- Background
- Motivation
- Abilities
- Multiple decision makers
41 SELECTION PROCESS STEPS
- 1. Initial screening interview
- 2. Complete application form
- 3. Employment tests
- 4. Comprehensive interview
- 5. Background investigation
- 6. Conditional job offer
- 7. Physical exam
- 8. Permanent job offer
52 PURPOSE OF SELECTION ACTIVITIES
- Needs careful planning and thought
- Successively higher hurdles
- Provide decision makers with information to
determine that applicant will be a successful
performer
63 STEP 1 - INITIAL SCREENING
- Two parts
- Screening applications
- Screening interview
- Result???
- Applicant pool
- HRM can describe job
- Identify salary range
73 INITIAL SCREENING
- Applicants eliminated due to
- Inappropriate skills, experience
- Red flags
- Gaps in employment history
- Courses instead of degrees
- Lots of brief jobs
83 STEP 2 - APPLICATION FORMS
- Provides basic information
- Must be work related
- EEO requirement
- Work history
- Indicates ability to follow directions
- Documents employment at will
93 APPLICATION FORMS
- Signature on form
- Grounds for later dismissal if falsified
- Permission to check background and work history
- Communicates employment at will
103 WEIGHTED APPLICATION FORMS
- Differentiate between successful and unsuccessful
job performers - Weighted more heavily in hiring decision
- Potential outcomes
- Performance
- Organization tenure
113 WEIGHTED APPLICATION FORMS
- Possible weighted factors
- Education
- Prior work experience
- Salary data
- Military experience
- Which ones to use???
123 GOOD APPLICATION FORMS
- Useful for a number of jobs
- Good predictive ability
- Legal
- Validated for each job
134 STEP 3 - EMPLOYMENT TESTS
- Historical uses - intelligence, aptitude,
ability, honesty, interest - Legal issues caused decrease in use- job
relatedness - 60 of companies use some form of employment test
144 TYPES OF EMPLOYMENT TESTS
- Performance simulation tests
- Engage in actual job behaviors
- Avoid criticism about aptitude, psychological or
other paper and pencil tests - Work sampling
- Assessment centers
154 WORK SAMPLING
- Based on job analysis
- Work sample element matched to job performance
element - Content validity EEOC
- Difficult to construct appropriate actions
- Not applicable to all levels (managers)
164 ASSESSMENT CENTERS
- Manager potential
- Group and individual exercises
- Evaluated by peers, supervisors, psychologists
- Good indicators of job performance potential
17 5 STEP 4 - JOB INTERVIEWS
- Multiple people - HR managers, supervisors,
colleagues - Probe areas not accessed by application forms or
employment tests - Questions must be job related
185 INTERVIEW RELIABILITY
- Types
- Individual
- Panel
- Technical
- Stress
- Situational
- Almost all jobs have the 1on1 aspect in selection
- HOWEVER.
195 INTERVIEWS ARE BIASED
- Impression management
- Interviewers have bad, inaccurate memories
- When are decisions made??? First few minutes
- SO..
205 INFLUENCING AN INTERVIEW
- Prior knowledge
- Stereotype
- Order of interviews is important
- Order of information presented is important
- Negatives get high weight
- See Exhibit 7-3
- see page 199 more stuff here
21Exhibit 7-3 Conclusions About Interviewing
225 GOOD INTERVIEWERS
- Take meaningful notes
- Use structured interviews
- Same questions
- Same order
- Are aware of their bias
- Use multiple decision factors
236 REALISTIC JOB PREVIEWS
- Reduce voluntary turnover
- Present favorable and unfavorable job features
- Part of interview
- Create work expectations
- Best use with good jobs
247 STEP 5 - BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS
- Accuracy of application form
- Contact former employers
- Contact references
- Verify education
- Legal status to work
- Credit history
- Criminal records
257 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
- Performed by
- Internal - HR staff (cheaper)
- External - Third party investigators - (more
thorough)
267 BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION
- Nearly half of all applicants exaggerate
something - Qualified privilege legal
- Documentation is important
277 STEP 6 - CONDITIONAL JOB OFFER
- So far, so good
- Usually made by HR
- Depending on medical, drug, or other remaining
tests
287 STEP 7 - PHYSICAL EXAM
- Only used to identify people physically unable to
perform jobs - ADA issues
- Baseline for health insurance (after employment)
- Drug testing
297 STEP 8 - PERMANENT JOB OFFER
- Decision made by manager
- Best able to decide
- No one else to blame
- Offer made by HR for administrative purposes
- EEO compliance
307 COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
- All applicant put through all steps
- Most people have strengths and weaknesses
- Good candidates are not eliminated early
317 COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH
- Expensive
- Time
- Money
- People
- ANY TECHNIQUE NEEDS TO STAND UP TO ALLEGATIONS
OF DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICE
327 JOB CHOICE - THE CANDIDATE
- Match job to personality
- Attractiveness of company
- Meet goals
- Positive expectations
- Treat those you dont select well - image for
later years and friends
337 SELF-MANAGED TEAMS SELECTION
- STRENGTHS
- Workers empowered to select potential coworkers
- Two (many) heads are better than one!
- AND.
347 SELF-MANAGED TEAMS SELECTION
- Commitment to new worker
- Focus on
- Technical skills
- Personal traits (reliability, communication)
357 SELF-MANAGED TEAM SELECTION
- WEAKNESSES
- Legal issues
- Interview techniques
- Friction about decision made
368 GOOD PREDICTORS
- Reliable - consistent (A yard is a yard with a
yardstick) - Valid - meaningful, related to relevant criteria
- (How about using eye color to determine course
grades?)
378 VALIDITY
- Content
- What is measured is relevant
- Typing test
- Typing - good
- Spelling - maybe not
- Construct
- Complex, abstract
- SAT
- College success???
388 AND.MORE VALIDITY
- Criterion-related (relevance to doing A Job)
- Predictive
- Test now for later performance
- Concurrent
- Test current employees employees
- PREDICTIVE IS BETTER
399 DETERMINING VALIDITY
- Correlation coefficient
- Validity coefficient
- Cut scores
- Raise - better quality
- Lower - more applicants
- See Exhibit 7-6
40Exhibit 7-6 Validity Correlation Analysis After
Cut Score Is Raised
419 VALIDITY GENERALIZATION
- Meta analysis
- Useful for multiple jobs
- Consistency
- Efficiency
429 GLOBAL SELECTION ISSUES
- Broader issues
- Family
- Culture
- Personal (health)
- American women.
43QUICK REVIEW CHAPTER 7
- ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS ON A SHEET OF PAPER.
- 1. THE MOST IMPORTANT THING WE DID IN CLASS
TODAY _______. - 2. I STILL HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT_______.
- 3. THE BEST THING IN CLASS TODAY WAS ____.
- 4. DONT D0 ____________ ANYMORE.
- TURN IN YOUR PAPERS, PLEASE. NO NAMES. WELL
TALK NEXT CLASS SESSION
44PREVIEW CHAPTER 8
- Remember what you did the first day on a job?
- What did you do on the first day of the job you
have liked the best? - What did you do on the first day of the job you
have liked the least? - Not enough experience on your own? Ask a friend
or family member - Bring these with you to class next time.
45Exhibit 7-1 Selection Excellence at Toyota
46Exhibit 7-2 The Selection Process
47Exhibit 7-4 Immigration Reform and Control Act
of 1986
48Exhibit 7-5 Predictive v. Concurrent Validation
49Exhibit 7-7 Validity Correlation Analysis After
Cut Score Is Lowered