Title: Brief History
1- Brief History
- Launched in 2005 as an inexpensive secure
connectivity solution for any provider in the
South Sound area patients invited to join - Provider-Patient portals managed by Siemens
communications functionality by RMD Networks
- Currently 1,500 users 250 patients 250,000
communications sent - ROI demonstrated at clinic level
- Interfaces with 1 national lab and 2 radiology
groups - SSO relationships with many community partners
2The Network
- November 2007 Siemens decided to pull back from
community focus - NPN received Appropriations award in December
2007 to build out a health information
resource. - NPN and RMD Networks start a joint building
venture - Phase 1 (January June 08) Model
- Shared care plan within a medical home framework
- Registry functionality at the core of information
organizing and communication for diabetes,
asthma, heart failure and preventive services.
Disease management for HF is an integrated
adjunct function. - Begin upload of 3,000 diabetes and 400 asthma
registry patients into The Network registry
recruit patients to use the platform (free) - Continue to recruit more physician users
- Connect Puget Sound Health Partners as the first
Plan with secure communication and information
sharing with providers and patients. - Phase 2 (July and Beyond)
- Build links to community data sources to more
fully automate populating the shared care record.
3Rationale for Approach
- Since 2004 we have been trying to recruit
patients to use the existing communication
service (free). We have gathered 250 hardy
souls. Few use it. - We have concluded that consumer use is driven by
current medical need (duh). The number of people
with a perceived medical need may be smaller than
we think. - Those who do people living with a chronic
condition needing active management adults with
parents living with many medical conditions
parents with children who have a chronic medical
condition. - These three population groups are our marketing
targets.
4Shared Care Plan and PHR
5Patient Views
6Patient Inbox
7PHR Content
8Family Provider Roster
9Patients View of Shared Care Plan
10Patient to-do List
11Patient Instructions
12Patient Reminder from Care Team
13Patient Self Tracking on Targets
14Request an Appointment
15Refilling Meds
16Referral Requests
17Updating Insurance Coverage Information
18Patient Account Information
19Care Team Views
20Provider Team Patient Flow Sheet
21Patient Care Plan Dashboard with Guidelines
22Care Team View of Patients Self Monitoring Log
23Provider-Patient Tracking on Targets
24Roster of Patients with Established Care Plans
25Patient reminder letter setup
26E Mail/letter reminder to patient
27Summary
- Our experience since 2004 suggests the following
- The Network solution represents the front end
of a health banking service. It is designed to
engage people with medical problems in a way that
facilitates care with their providers, making
care coordination and continuity easier and
safer. It is not a health bank. - What is missing is the infrastructure to capture
and provide data (e.g. labs, meds, imaging,
hospitalizations) for this end-user tool,
eliminating multiple interfaced feeds mixed with
manual entry. Feeds from such a utility should
serve this application or any other user
interface solution, of which there are several in
2008. - If health banks are going to be useful, they need
to remove the heavy lifting of data gathering.
Data gathering and safe storage are distinctly
different market functions than user interface
solutions developed by provider institutions for
consumer use and shaped to some extent by local
market needs and conventions.