Title: Outline
1Outline
- Control of src kinase activity by Csk, CD45
- Control of CD45 activity by dimerization
- Evidence for TCR/CD3 conformational change
- zeta, CD3 epsilon TCR a/b?
- Partial activation and antagonism
- Lipid rafts and T cell activation
- Immune synapse or SMAC
2Proximal TCR signaling
1
2
3
3
3The yin and yang of src kinase regulation
Partially Active Fully Active Transition
Inactive
394 in Lck
Csk
P
Y
505 in Lck
CD45
Y
Y Kinase
P
SH3
SH2
4Control of Lckby CD45 and Csk
Lipid Raft
5CD45 isoforms and phosphatase activity
- CD45 is a transmembrane phosphatase
- Dimerization appears to inhibit activity
- There are different size isoforms, created by
alternative splicing of exons in the ecto domain - These isoforms have different quantities of
glycosylation, which may affect the degree of
homo-dimerization - Issue of potential ligand(s) is controversial
6CD45 isoforms
7CD45 isoform expression on B and T cells
8Summary CD45 isoforms and control of lymphocyte
activation
9Initiation of TCR SignalingClustering or
Conformation?
10Irving and Weiss expt. demonstrating that z
crosslinking can be sufficient for T cell
activation
CD8a ecto and t.m.
transfect into T cell line
X-link with anti-CD8 Ab
z intracellular
IL-2, etc.
11Models of TCR/CD3 Stoichiometry - Resting State
from Alarcon et al., EMBO Reports 7490
12TCR/CD3 Pre-clustering increases sensitivity to
natural peptide/MHC ligands
contribution of self peptides to activation
from Alarcon et al., EMBO Reports 7490
13What about a conformational change?
Evidence from GPCRs for conformational change
transmitted through transmembrane domains to
cytoplasm
Structural evidence so far has not demonstrated
such a change in TCR itself
141 - Evidence for zeta conform. change
- zeta assumes folded conformation in the presence
of acidic phospholipids at P.M. - phosphorylation frees zeta to assume
less-structured conform., whereupon it presumably
interacts with effectors
from Aivazian and Stern, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000
152 - Indirect evidence for conformational change
in CD3?, leading to recruitment of adaptor
protein Nck
JNK (MAPK) Activation --gt AP-1 transcription
16Inducible binding of Nck to CD3 e
- Expt. setup GST fusion with Nck SH3 domain
- Pull-downs from lysates of T cells (unstim. or
stimulated w/different abs - APA 1/1 or APA 1/2) - Blot for CD3 e
--gt Either Ab can crosslink TCR, so difference
may be in ability to induce a CD3
conformational change
from Gil et al., Cell 109901
17Model from Gil et al. paper
Nck SH3 domain CD3 e proline-rich
from Gil et al., Cell 109901
18Crosslinking the TCR With a Modified ? Chain
Antigens for stimulation
NIP hapten
Thus the conformational change in CD3 that
allows Nck binding can be induced by clustering
TCR/CD3 complexes that are close to one
another (but w/out a change in TCR ???
conformation
from Minguet et al., Immunity 2643
19Butfull T cell activation requires both the
conformational change and clustering
conform. change
clustering (distant)
from Minguet et al., Immunity 2643
20New model conformation and clustering
pre-formed clusters
from Minguet et al., Immunity 2643
21Altered peptide ligands (APL)
- analogs of antigenic peptides
- usually single amino acid change (TCR contact
residue) - antagonists can inhibit antigenic peptide when
mixed - partial agonists stimulate subset of T cell
responses - e.g. cytokine release but not proliferation
- what properties determine differences?
22Antigenic vs. altered peptides
Kd On-rate Off-rate Structural changes
CD3,zeta phosphor. Signaling pathways Transcriptio
n factors
23Lipid rafts
- Distribution of lipids in p.m. not uniform
- High concentration of sphingolipids and
cholesterol in rafts - regions of reduced
mobility - Proteins with certain lipid modifications
partition preferentially to lipid rafts
24Lipid modifications of proteins (acylation)
- palmitoylation, myristoylation and prenylation
- double acylation (e.g. myristpalmit or
palmitpalmit) leads to lipid raft localization - some src family kinases myristoylated and
palmitoylated - LAT double palmitoylated
- Ras palmitylated and prenylated
25Lipid rafts and TCR signaling
26Isolation of lipid rafts
Lipid rafts
27Work of Seed and colleagues linking lipid rafts
to T cell activation distribution /- activation
anti-CD3? Ab
large increase in tyrosine phosphorylation in
lipid rafts and recruitment of proteins to lipid
rafts
western blot for tyrosine phosphorylation
C cytoplasm M membrane D detergent-insoluble
(rafts)
from Xavier et al., Immunity 8723
28LAT palmitylation is required for TCR signaling
Experiment conducted in LAT-deficient T cell line
no lipid raft localization
from Lin et al., J Biol Chem 27428861
29Immune Synapse (or SMAC) Model of Monks and
Kupfer
SMAC supra-molecular activation
cluser
30Immunological Synapse and SMAC
Live T cells on lipid bi-layers
Fixed T cellAPC conjugates
LFA-1
PKC q
ICAM (LFA-1)
MHC/peptide (TCR)
from Monks et al., Nature 39582
from Grakoui et al., Science 285221
31Possible functions for the immune synapse
32ButSignaling can occur in the first few minutes
of T cellAPC contact (no mature synapse)
from Lee et al., Science 2951539
33Questions about the immunological synapse/SMAC
- Is it actually required for early signaling
events or more important for later activation? - What kind of structures are associated with early
signaling? - Is it required for down-regulation of signaling?
- Internalization of TCR
- Recruitment of phosphatases
- What cell biological and signaling processes
control its formation?