Examples of Electrostatics Calculations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Examples of Electrostatics Calculations

Description:

... Calculations. Nathan A. Baker. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics ... cglen 100 100 100 fglen 50 50 50. cgcent mol 1 fgcent mol 1. chgm ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: nathan83
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Examples of Electrostatics Calculations


1
Examples of Electrostatics Calculations
  • Nathan A. Baker
  • Department of Biochemistry and Molecular
    Biophysics
  • Center for Computational Biology
  • Washington University in St. Louis
  • BME 590 N
  • October 7, 2003

2
Examples
  • What well cover
  • Ion solvation
  • Ion-ion PMFs
  • Ionic screening
  • Ion condensation
  • Ligand binding
  • What we wont cover
  • Protein-protein interactions
  • pKa calculations
  • Force evaluation/dynamics

3
What the user tells APBS
  • Molecule input and calculation data
  • Solver method
  • Grid specifications
  • Resolution
  • Length
  • Center
  • Charge discretization
  • Version of PBE to solve
  • Boundary conditions
  • Mobile ion species
  • Charge
  • Concentration
  • Radius
  • Dielectric values
  • Solute value
  • Solvent value
  • Surface definition
  • Apolar coefficient
  • Temperature
  • read
  • mol pqr mol.pqr
  • end
  • elec
  • mg-auto
  • mol 1
  • dime 97 97 97
  • cglen 100 100 100 fglen 50 50 50
  • cgcent mol 1 fgcent mol 1
  • chgm spl0
  • lpbe
  • bcfl mdh
  • ion 1.0 0.150 2.0 ion -1.0 0.150 2.0
  • pdie 2.0
  • sdie 78.54
  • srfm smol srad 1.4 swin 0.3
  • temp 298.15
  • gamma 0.00072
  • calcenergy yes

4
The Born ion
  • Simple ion model
  • Non-polarizable sphere (e1), embedded point
    charge, high dielectric medium outside
  • Analytical expressions known for potential and
    energy
  • This example
  • Calculate electrostatic potential
  • Calculate solvation energy
  • Software
  • APBS (http//agave.wustl.edu/apbs/)
  • Gnuplot (http//www.gnuplot.info/)

5
Ion-ion potential of mean force
  • Two-ion PMF
  • Illustrates reaction field effects
  • Continuum description of desolvation
  • This example
  • Calculate desolvation energies from PBE
  • Calculate direct interactions from Coulombs law
  • Software
  • APBS (http//agave.wustl.edu/apbs/)
  • Gnuplot (http//www.gnuplot.info/)


6
Ligand binding energies
  • Balanol and protein kinase A
  • Part of a investigation of selectivity of kinase
    inhibtors
  • See
  • Wong CF, et al. J. Med. Chem. 44 1530-1539,
    2001.
  • Hünenberger PH, et al. Biochemistry 38
    2358-2366, 1999.
  • Used PB and SASA methods
  • Ranked inhibitor binding (??G)
  • This example
  • Calculate electrostatic potential for complex,
    PKA, and balanol using PBE
  • Calculate binding energy
  • Visualize interaction of balanol potential with
    PKA binding site
  • Software
  • APBS (http//agave.wustl.edu/apbs/)
  • VMD (http//www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/)

7
Non-specific ion interactions screening
  • Mouse acetylcholinesterase electrostatics
  • Hydrolyzes acetylcholine
  • Diffusion-limited reaction rate
  • Highly-sensitive to ionic strength
  • This example
  • Calculate electrostatic potential for AChE using
    PBE
  • Look at 1 kT/e isocontours at 0 mM and 150 mM
    NaCl
  • Implied effect on binding rate
  • Simulations of binding rate
  • Software
  • APBS (http//agave.wustl.edu/apbs/)
  • VMD (http//www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/)

8
Non-specific ion interactions condensation
  • Examine DNA 36-mer (B form)
  • Look at NaCl condensation (typical of other
    cations as well)
  • 67 of ions at 17 Ã…
  • This example
  • Calculate electrostatic potential for DNA in 100
    mM NaCl
  • Convert to charge density
  • Visualize charge density contours
  • Software
  • APBS (http//agave.wustl.edu/apbs/)
  • VMD (http//www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/)

9
Computational Electrostatics State of the Art
  • Computational methods have varying strengths and
    weaknesses
  • Usually trade efficiency for accuracy
  • Implicit solvent methods
  • Much faster than explicit approaches
  • In the ??G regime (at best) for prediction
  • Very sensitive to model and parameters
  • Poor treatment of ion effects
  • Explicit solvent methods
  • More accurate ?G-quality predictions
  • Only as good as the force field
  • Very slow limited by rate of sampling
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com