Peter MacNeice NASAGSFC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Peter MacNeice NASAGSFC

Description:

Ice core records suggest one Carrington like' event or bigger impacts Earth every 500 years. ... Telegraph Disruption. Observations made at Pittsburgh, Pa. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: peterma52
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Peter MacNeice NASAGSFC


1
SOLAR MAGNETOGRAM SYNTHESISA Vital Component in
Space Weather Forecasting
  • Peter MacNeice (NASA/GSFC)
  • Joel Allred (Drexel Univ.)
  • Kevin Olson (Drexel Univ.)
  • Sandro Taktakishvilli (NPP)
  • Marlo Maddox (NASA/GSFC)
  • AISRP Workshop May 5-7, 2008
  • Peter.J.MacNeice_at_nasa.gov

2
My Talk in One Slide
  • Space Weather is hot!
  • Forecasting model chains start with solar
    magnetograms
  • New generation of models will demand much more
    from the magnetogram data
  • No single magnetogram source can satisfy them
  • Need to synthesize magnetograms from multiple
    sources !
  • Who is going to create the infra-structure for
    this ? Modelers ? Observatories ? No ! - We
    will !
  • Developing GUI driven CAD-like tool
  • First check arrived two weeks ago.

3
Space Weather Primer
  • Sun is the source of all transients driving space
    weather
  • Most severe cases - Highly stressed coronal
    magnetic fields relax explosively
    Flares/Coronal mass ejection
  • Resulting hazards
  • Prompt radiation (8 minutes)
  • Fast particles (e- gt 30 mins, p gt 60mins)
  • CME shock driven particles ( gt 12 hours)
  • Mass Ejecta (gt18 hours)
  • Resulting magnetic storm

Credit SOHO Project
4
Societal Impact of Space Weather
  • Power Grid failures
  • Blackouts (eg Quebec, Mar 13 1989)
  • long term, if high voltage transformers damaged
  • Satellite failures (and over long term, reduced
    lifetimes)
  • Communication and GPS blackouts
  • Particle hazards to astronauts and polar flight
    passengers

5
Space Weather Primer (contd)
  • Worst Case Scenario Carrington event, Sept
    1,1859
  • Aurora in Havana
  • No solar event of comparable magnitude in the
    technological era, by factor of 4 !
  • Ice core records suggest one Carrington like
    event or bigger impacts Earth every 500 years.

Shea et al 2006
6
Space Weather Primer (contd)
  • Carrington Event, Sept 1,1859
  • Telegraph Disruption
  • Observations made at Pittsburgh, Pa.,
    communicated by E.W. CULGAN, Telegraph manager.
  • During the Aurora of Aug. 28th the
    intensity of the current evolved from it varied
    very much, being at times no stronger than an
    ordinary battery, and then suddenly changing the
    poles of the magnets it would sweep through them,
    charging them to their utmost capacity, and
    compelling a cessation of work while it
    continued. On the morning of Sept. 2nd, at my
    request the Philadelphia operator detached his
    battery, mine being already off. We then worked
    with each other at intervals as long as the
    auroral current continued, which varied from
    thirty to ninety seconds. During these working
    intervals we exchanged messages with much
    satisfaction, and we worked more steadily when
    the batteries were off than when they were
    attached. On the night of Aug. 28th the
    batteries were attached, and on breaking the
    circuit there were seen not only sparks (that do
    not appear in the normal condition of a working
    line) but at intervals regular streams of fire,
    which, had they been permitted to last more than
    an instant, would certainly have fused the
    platinum points of the key, and the helices
    became so hot that the hand could not be kept on
    them. These effects could not have been produced
    by the batteries. Boteler(2006)
  • Estimates 70 billion impact on satellite
    industry (Odenwald et al 2006) - (equiv 6 months
    in Iraq, or, quarterly profits for the 3 biggest
    oil companies, or 1 Bill Gates)
  • more than 80 satellites would be disabled
  • Approx 100 LEO would reenter prematurely

7
Current Forecasting Models
Models begin with synoptic maps of photospheric
magnetic field static field for a given solar
rotation.
  • Typical model chain
  • model coronal field
  • Coronal solution sets inner boundary to
    heliospheric model
  • CCMC has 4 model chains (WSA, WSA/ENLIL, CORHEL,
    SWMF SC/IH)
  • Principal role to model ambient corona and
    heliosphere
  • Only beginning to dabble in transients

GONG
8
SWMF SC/IH (Univ. Mich)
Corona
CCMC Realtime run for April 30, 2008 using GONG
magnetogram
Inner Heliosphere
Solution at 1AU
9
WSA/ENLIL
Cone model approximation for CME
10
ENLIL-WSA Fieldline Tracing
11
Advances in Space Weather Models
  • Current Generation
  • use static synoptic magnetograms at 1o
    resolution
  • create ambient corona and heliosphere solutions
  • Next Generation
  • will benefit from much better
  • data sources,
  • model algorithms
  • computer hardware
  • will create time dependent coronal models
  • will use time dependent vector magnetogram data
    at 0.05o resolution
  • the models physics, not the data, will define
    the resolution.

12
Next Generation Space Weather Models
  • Coronal models will be
  • Global
  • Time dependent
  • 3D MHD with adaptive mesh refinement
  • Driven by observed surface flows
  • Models will need to support both forecasting and
    research
  • Function with latest data and archived data
    regardless of data limitations
  • Models will define spatial resolution and cadence
    of magnetogram data at inner boundary
  • eg global vector fields with maximum resolution
    of 1, cadence of 1 second

Where will these models get their data ?
13
Magnetogram Problems
  • Magnetogram source limitations include
  • Cadence and duty cycle
  • Resolution
  • Field of view
  • Quality, particularly horizontal components of
    vector data
  • Systematic errors associated with line fittings
  • No coverage of far side
  • Very poor polar fields
  • No single source provides enough coverage !
  • eg SDO 1 resolution data
  • Limited FOV Vector data every 10 minutes
  • Full Disk Line of Sight data every 10 minutes
  • Full disk vector data every 6 hours

Need a CAD-like tool to synthesize magnetograms
from multiple sources
14
A Hypothetical Modeling Challenge
  • Active Region evolution Model
  • Suppose we need a model for slow evolution of
    Active Region A
  • There is a second active region B on disk
  • Synoptic vector magnetogram data is available
    from Kitt Peak along with individual vector
    magnetograms taken 3 times per day. However data
    for region B is poorly sampled due to instrument
    problems.
  • Marshall Vector Magnetogram has data for B but at
    different times and resolution than Kitt Peak.
  • Also have LOS magnetograms at selected times from
    Kitt Peak, Mt Wilson and MDI.

B
A
  • How do we provide global surface vector fields
    and flow fields to an active region model at the
    spatial and temporal resolution required by the
    model?

15
Modeler Requirements
  • Using this data requires,
  • Ability to synthesize datasets into a greater
    whole
  • More than just stitching images together
  • Nobody knows what it will take to make
    synthesized maps accurate
  • this really is a separate modeling challenge.
  • We are not solving this problem just building
    the infra-structure to support it
  • Also incorporates determination of surface flows
    to drive coronal field evolution
  • Why? is it better to determine velocities from
    each magnetogram and then combine velocities,
    or combine magnetograms and determine a single
    velocity map? Not clear yet!

16
Tool Requirements
  • Ability to interpolate in space (on a sphere) and
    in time
  • Ability to handle many file formats
  • Data usually fits, sometimes ascii
  • Model customized at whim of developer
  • Graphics IDL, TecPlot, OpenDx etc
  • Ability to support complex processing algorithms
    (with many yet to be defined)
  • Our tool is called MAGIC (MAGnetogram Integration
    and Composition)

17
MAGIC Design
  • Modular design 6 components
  • GUI (Python/TkL)
  • A magnetogram database manager (MySQL)
  • VSO interaction ?
  • Lightweight magnetogram processing layer,
    executing interactive single line calls to
    Kameleon functions and simple canned Python
    routines for frequently used processing tasks (eg
    monopole subtraction)
  • A third-party program execution interface
  • Small suite of basic visualization tools (IDL and
    OpenDx)
  • A command recorder function to facilitate batch
    processing.
  • Open Source Linux Application

18
Typical Basic Use
  • User requests a menu of all available data for
    time frame from database
  • User selects their preferred data for each time
  • User imports their model surface grids for all
    required times
  • MAGIC does default (x,t) interpolation for each
    dataset to the appropriate grid
  • User calls basic composition function for first
    grid - at prompt they input requested dataset
    weights or weighting rule
  • MAGIC returns a composed surface vector field
    with a set of default images (Br, B?, B?, J)
  • MAGIC asks if this synthesized magnetogram is
    acceptable
  • No - go back and rework
  • Yes - move on to next grid
  • MAGIC reads in second grid
  • Etc
  • MAGIC outputs synthesized magnetograms in
    KAMELEON format files

19
MAGIC Design
  • Backbone already in hand in CCMCs Kameleon
    Tool.
  • KAMELEON (Maddox)
  • two components, a file formater and an
    interpolator
  • handles many file formats
  • handles many model coordinate systems
  • has both spatial and temporal interpolation
    functions
  • portable an interactive interface and a
    callable library (from C, Fortran and IDL).

20
STATUS
  • First funds only arrived in last few weeks
  • Initial focus on defining a generic magnetogram
    format inside Kameleon
  • Kameleon can now read, reformat, and interpolate
    on
  • LOS data from Kitt Peak, Mt Wilson, SOHO/MDI
  • vector data from Kitt Peak and Marshall Vector
    Magnetograph.
  • Have begun initial GUI construction
  • Added first python processing widget a monopole
    removal function
  • Added graphics calls to compare initial data,
    interpolated data and data after processing.

21
Importing and Converting Datafiles
22
Processing Data
Example Interpolation of synoptic map onto test
model grid followed by removal of any monopole
signal.
23
Summary
  • Developing a magnetogram synthesis tool
  • using KAMELEON as the low-level manager of the
    data structures, I/O interfaces and basic
    interpolation layer
  • Upon this foundation we add two processing layers
    (lightweight and heavyweight)
  • Have added ability to ingest and interpolate most
    current magnetogram files
  • Have begun building GUI and lightweight
    processing layer
  • Have begun developing visualization tools to
    display different stages of data processing.

24
Modeler Requirements
  • A tool is needed to do this synthesis.
  • Who will develop it ?
  • Not the data providers
  • Not the modelers
  • This is middleware but every bit as important
    as the data acquisition and the modeling.
  • This infrastructure element is very much IT in
    nature.
  • What will it take to eliminate this need?
  • Full globe high resolution high cadence vector
    magnetograms in both photosphere and
    chromosphere! not within the next decade (or
    two?) !
  • Even this does not facilitate future scientific
    analysis of historical events or older archived
    data.

25
ENLIL Heliosphere Model (Odstrcil)
  • 3D MHD equations solved from 21.5rs to 2 AU
  • Input at rotating inner boundary
  • MHD parameters
  • Output
  • Magnetic field
  • Velocity
  • Density
  • Temperature
  • Two operating modes
  • Ambient solution
  • CME modeling using Cone model approximation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com