Kitcher, Against Creationism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 7
About This Presentation
Title:

Kitcher, Against Creationism

Description:

If Creationism is an article of religious faith, then Creationism may not be taught in schools. ... should not be taught as science in public schools. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: ast4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kitcher, Against Creationism


1
Kitcher, Against Creationism
  • P1. Creationism is either an article of religious
    faith or a scientific theory.
  • P2. If Creationism is an article of religious
    faith, then Creationism may not be taught in
    schools.
  • P3. If Creationism is a scientific theory, then
    it is false and inferior to the theory of
    evolution currently held by modern biology.

2
Kitcher, cont.
  • P4. Only theories that are currently well
    accepted theories or approximations thereto
    should be taught as science.
  • C. Therefore, Creationism should not be taught as
    science in public schools.

3
Gish, Creationist Science and Education
  • Theses
  • I. Evolution and Creationism are epistemically on
    a par, and neither is scientific.
  • II. Evolution theory is refuted by the facts.

4
Creationism
  • Creationism holds
  • 1. Creation at once of all plants and animals
    that now exist or ever did exist by Creator.
  • 2. There was a world-wide catastrophic flood.

5
Evolution
  • Evolution holds
  • 1. All living things have arisen by naturalistic
    processes from inanimate life.
  • 2. These natural processes of change have
    occurred over hundreds of millions of years and
    continue at present.

6
Argument for Thesis I
  • P1. Creation was not observed and is
    unrepeatable, hence unfalsifiable, therefore
    non-scientific.
  • P2. Evolution has never been witnessed and is not
    subject to the scientific method, and hence is
    not falsifiable, therefore non-scientific.
  • C. Evolution and creation are both religious
    hypotheses

7
Argument for Thesis II
  • P1. Random mutation and natural selection could
    not explain progressive change.
  • P2. Evolution contradicts the Second Law of
    Thermodynamics
  • C. Therefore, the fossil record and physical law
    refute evolution.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com