Title: Optimized design of frequencydomain acoustic waveform tomography experiments
1Optimized design of frequency-domain acoustic
waveform tomography experiments
- Hansruedi Maurer and Stewart GreenhalghETH
Zurich, Switzerland
2Outline
- Waveform sensitivities
- Experimental design of waveform tomography
experiments - Suitable data representations
- Choice of temporal frequencies
- Temporal frequencies vs. spatial sampling
- Tests with synthetic data
- Conclusions
3Time-domain sensitivities
Acoustic waveform inversion
- Solution of the forward problem
- finite differences
- finite elements
- spectral elements
- ...
Solution of the inverse problem
Although not necessarily computedexplicitly, the
sensitivities containedin J are essential for
the solution ofthe inverse problem.
4Frequency-domain inversions
Frequency-domain sensitivities
- Seismic data generally band-limited
- Computationally less demanding compared with
time-domain inversions - Stationary problem to be solved
5Optimized design of frequency-domain acoustic
waveform inversions
- How can we set up an experiment, with which
maximum subsurface information can be extracted
at minimal (field efforts AND computational
expenses) costs?
6Eigenvalue spectra and model resolution
Threshold
Eigenvalue
Eigenvalue index
Resolved model space
Null space
Characterizes informationthat can be extracted
frominversions!
Characterizes data information content!
7Test model
P-wave velocity 2000 m/sFinite element
mesh 0.15 mInversion mesh 0.30
mFrequencies 100, 200, 500, 750, 1000, 1250,
1500 HzSource-receiver spacings 0.25, 0.5, 1,
2, 5 m
30 m
20 m
8Data representation
- Complex-valued spectra
- Hartley spectra
- Amplitude
- Phase
Which representation is most appropriate?
9Data representation
If possible, full complex-valued spectra should
be considered!
10Choice of temporal frequencies
- Single frequency is likely inappropriate
- Many frequencies offer better resolution, but at
computationally higher costs - Large bandwidth may be difficult to achieve
Which combination of frequencies offer best
benefit-to-cost-ratio?
11Choice of temporal frequencies
If the bandwidth is sufficiently wide,
highfrequencies are becoming particularly useful!
12Model resolution of single and cummulative
frequencies
- Model resolution of single frequencies is
substantially lower than those of cummulative
frequencies - Acoustic waveform inversion may be capable to
resolve features outside of the tomographic plane!
13Temporal frequencies vs. spatial sampling
- Frequency content is more important than spatial
sampling - Trade-off between selection of temporal
frequencies and spatial sampling exist
14Inversion tests
- Cumulative frequencies superior to single
frequency inversion - Trade-off between temporal frequencies and
spatial sampling confirmed - Features outside of tomographic plane resolved
15Conclusions
- Complex-valued spectra offer substantially more
information than other data representations. - Combination of some bandwidth and high
frequencies is most useful. - Trade-off between choice of temporal frequencies
and spatial sampling exists.