External%20Forces%20Driving%20ISU

1
External Forces Driving ISUs Future

National Trends and Hoosier Realities
2
The World is Changing
Year 2000 is less than 30 Months away
3
Six External Forces are Helping Drive Changes at
ISU
Public Perception
Accountability
Economy/Fiscal
Competition
Demographics
Technology
4
Public Perception as a Driving Force
Themes
Public Confidence Going Down
Colleges Arent Delivering
Confidence Going Down
Faculty Arent Teaching
Colleges Are Charging Too Much
Education not Worth the Cost
5
Public Perception as a Driving Force
The NewsHour with Jim LehrerMay 1, 1997
Rep. Buck McKeon, Chairman, Committee on Education
6
Accountability as a Driving Forceat the National
Level
National Panel to Study Higher Ed Costs Named
Student Right-to-know Act in full swing
Faculty Tenure being Questioned
Department of Justice impacting International
Enrollments
Florida forces articulation and limits subsidies
to set number of credit hours
7
The Impact of Accountability on Indiana and on ISU
Greater Scrutiny ISU asked to provide
information n
Student Success (Graduation Retention)
Enrollment
Finances
Faculty Workload
Student Mix
8
The Impact of Accountability on Indiana and on ISU
Greater Involvement - ICHE sets performance
objectives for ISU
Increase matriculation of high school students in
service area Accept high percentage of students
completing CORE 40 Increase 21st Century
Scholars Retention and graduation rates
Asks for justification of financing
Legislators becoming more involved
9
The Impact of Accountability on Indiana and on
ISU An Example
Student Success in College a National Concern
Student Right to Know Public Law 101-542 1990
10
The Impact of Accountability on Indiana and on
ISU An Example
ICHE Begins to Gather Graduation Retention Data
Retention Graduation Report
ICHE sets performance objectives by
school Commission proposing funding formulas take
into account student success.
11
Accountability in the Future
Greater Demands for Information
Areas of Interest to ICHE
Fall Sections per Faculty FTE School Credit Hours
per Faculty FTE Staff FTEs per Faculty
FTE Instructional Expenditures as of Total and
of Student FTE Tuition Fees Percent on campus
students Percent of Hoosier Students
12
Accountability in the Future
The point to remember
We are going to be held increasingly accountable
for What Were Doing
How Were Doing It
There will be a bottom line Show Success
Whom We are Doing It To
Where Were Doing It
13
Demographics as a Driving Force at the National
Level

• Growth in Number of Traditional Students
• Students will be more Ethnically Diverse
• Students will be more Age Diverse

14
Demographics as a Driving Force at the National
Level
15
The Impact of Demographics on Indiana and Indiana
State
Projected H.S. Graduates 2007
Increase 1997-2007
Number Projected
IUPUI 19.25
17,559
3,353
Purdue 17.48
2,764
IU Bloomington 14.64
2,109
ISU 7.06
Ball State .59
3,923
USI - .55
5,109
16
The Impact of Demographics on Indiana and Indiana
State
The Point to
ISU is not going to grow if it relies on its
traditional markets a. Numbers in markets are
small b. Competition is increasing
17
Fiscal Factors as a Driving Force at the National
Level
Growth of Costs to Higher Education Institutions
Source Breaking the Social Contract The Fiscal
Crisis in Higher Education, p.8
18
Fiscal Factors as a Driving Force for ISUISUs
Operating Budget vs. CPI
19
Fiscal Factors as a Driving Force at the National
Level
20
Fiscal Factors as a Driving Force for
ISUFunding from Appropriations
Resource Trend, 1992-1995
Source Annual Financial Reports, FY92 to FY
21
Fiscal Factors as a Driving Force for ISUFunds
Expended by the ISU Foundation on Behalf of the
University
22
Fiscal Factors as a Driving Force for ISU
Expenditure Allocation Ratio
Fiscal Year 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 Instr.
Acad. Sup. 57.17 55.43 55.46 58.80 59.15 Public
Service .69 1.20 1.07 .88
1.02 Student Services 2.86 4.01 4.25 5.91
5.33 Oper. Maint. Plant 13.47 12.15 12.06 10.94 1
1.09 Institutional Support 15.82 16.69 16.06 11.70
12.32 Student Aid 4.78 5.29 5.57 5.43
5.08 Mandatory Transfers 5.21 5.23 5.54 6.34
6.00
Source Annual Financial Reports FY92 to FY96
23
Fiscal Factors as a Driving Force for ISU
Increase Efficiency of Finances
Utilities as a of Total EG Expenditures
24
The Future Impact of Fiscal Forces

• Revenue sources will remain relatively constant

• New ongoing activities will have to be funded
  with existing resources

25
The Impact of Instructional Technology Two
Important Distinctions
26
The Impact of Instructional Technology Two
Propositions
Proposition 1
Instructional Technology driven Market forces
will affect ISUs CoreTechnology (Teaching
Learning)
Proposition 2
Instructional Technology driven expectations for
flexibility will affect ISUs Access
Mission Instructional Technology gt Flexibilitygt
Access No Instructional Technology lt Flexibilitylt
Access
27
Technology as a Driving Force at the National
Level

• Instructional Technology is changing Classrooms
  - on andoff Campus
• Satellites are linking classrooms across
  universities

Websites are being used to disseminate
information as well as being used as a teaching
tool
Email is becoming a standard way of communicating
between students and teachers
Virtual classrooms are a reality
28
Technology as a Driving Force at the National
Level
Technology is Changing Educational Institutions
Virtual Universities are attracting students
Private Businesses are creating universities
Role of Higher Education in society is being
debated
Pedagogy is being debated
Keep up with the Jones Syndrome
29
The Impact of Technology on Indiana and ISU
Technology is here IU-Bloomington is rated the
best prepared technological public campus in the
country.
Competitors are using technology to access new
existing markets
Legislators are interested in funding technology
to increase access
Long distance vs. on campus education is an issue
throughout the state
30
The Impact of Technology on the Future of ISU
?
Technology is a Potent Tool Being Used in
Education
Its Use in Every Classroom is Expected and
Supported by National and Hoosier policymakers
31
Competition National International
32
Competition Indiana
33
Competition Indiana
34
Six Driving Forces in Review
Competition Competitors are Changing in Shape
and Number
Public Perception Public are Interested and
Skeptical
Accountability Colleges are going to be held
accountable for Success
Demographics Traditional markets do not equal
tremendous growth
Economics ISU traditional revenue sources
fiscally constrained environment
Technology Is a Tool that Is Expected to be Used
35
Demographics as a Driving Force at the National
Level
Percent Change in number of Public High School
Graduates, by State 1994-95 to 2006-07

-15.0 to 0 Growth
0.1 to 14.9
15.0 to 29.9
30 to 105
36
Demographics as a Driving Force at the National
Level
37
Demographics as a Driving Force at the National
Level
Projected Minority Growth Rates to Total
Population
Source, Current Population Reports Census Bureau