Title: Improving FDA/Industry Interactions: Suggestions from FDA/CDER Statisticians
1Improving FDA/Industry Interactions Suggestions
from FDA/CDER Statisticians
- Rafia Bhore, Ph.D.
- Janice Derr, Ph.D.
- FDA / CDER / Office of Biostatistics
The views expressed in this presentation are
those of the speakers and not necessarily of the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
2CDER Office of Biostatistics
DB1 Cardiovascular Renal Neurological Psychiatric
DB2 Pulmonary Allergy Metabolism Endocrine Analgesics Anesthetics
DB3 Gastrointestinal Reproductive Urologic Dermatologic Dental
DB4 Anti-Infective Ophthalmology Anti-Viral Special Pathogen Transplant
DB5 Oncology Biologics Oncology Drugs Imaging Hematology
DB6 Generic Pharmacology Toxicology Chemistry Manufacturing Safety Special Projects Clinical Pharmacology
3Communication Dynamics between FDA and Industry
Industry
Project Team
Project Manager
Regulatory Affairs
4Interactions During Drug Development
Clinical Start
NDA/BLA Submission
NDA Review
Pre-clinical Research
Phase II
Phase III
Phase I
Pre-IND Meeting
EOP II Meeting
Pre-NDA Meeting
Labeling Meeting
5Good Meeting Management Practices
- GMMPs Facilitate input from review disciplines
- Prior to internal meeting (draft responses to
industry questions) - Internal meeting (preliminary comments to
sponsor) - Formal meeting (moderated discussion)
- Follow-up (meeting minutes, further discussion)
6Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Good Meeting
Practices)
- Use a meeting with FDA as an opportunity to send
in questions about statistical issues - Ask good questions that will give you useful
answers - Provide sufficient detail to help us give useful
statistical review comments - Use the channels of communication to get a
response from FDA statisticians about statistical
issues
7Investigational New Drug Application (IND) Stage
- Special Protocol Assessment
- Statistical Analysis Plans
8Special Protocol Assessment
SPA Guidance 2002
- Sponsors can submit certain types of protocols
with specific questions prior to start of study
(Guidance recommends 90 days). - FDA determines if SPA process applies to the
request, and if so, responds to questions within
45 days (PDUFA goal). - Protocol agreements under SPA are part of the
administrative record. Regulations describe the
circumstances under which the agreements can be
changed.
9Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Special
Protocol Assessment)
- Ask good questions that will give you useful
answers - Provide sufficient detail to help us give useful
statistical review comments
10Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
- Prospective plan of statistical methods not
detailed in the Protocol - Protocol details design considerations vs. SAP
details analysis considerations - Design Endpoints, type of control, planned
comparisons, multiple testing, interim analyses - Analysis Statistical models, handling of missing
data, nature of censoring, analysis populations,
repeated measurements over time, study windows,
etc.
11Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Statistical
Analysis Plan)
- Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) should be
detailed and prospectively written - Prospectively submit to FDA for Phase 3 studies
and Phase 2 supportive studies - Open-label studies submit before study begins
- Blinded studies submit prior to last patient
enrolled or first interim analysis (whichever
comes first)
12Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Statistical
Analysis Plan contd.)
- Identify critical issues at protocol design stage
or at least Statistical Analysis Plan writing - Examples adjustment for multiplicity, interim
analysis plan, non-inferiority evaluation,
missing data, - Commercial Sponsors should encourage co-operative
trialists to write a Statistical Analysis Plan
13New Drug Application (NDA) Stage
- Integrated Summary of Efficacy
- Labeling
14Integrated Summary of Efficacy (Suggestions from
CDER Statisticians)
- Important component of New Drug Application
Review - Provide clinically meaningful and logically tight
argument whether drug has necessary evidence for
efficacy claim - Provide side by side comparison of studies
- NOT necessarily pooled or meta-analysis of
efficacy - Discuss pooling study results with FDA
15Integrated Summary of Efficacy Example Can YoU
PRove Efficacy and Safety of curevir (CURES)
16Statistical Input on Labeling Text
- FDA Statisticians review labeling text
- Statistical support for study conclusions, claims
and indications - Description of study results, summary statistics
and inferential language - Information in tables and figures
17Labeling Example 1 Statistical Input Provided
CLINICAL STUDIES The NAGLAZYME-treated group
showed greater mean increases in the distance
walked in 12 minutes (12-minute walk test,
12-MWT) and in the rate of stair climbing in a
3-minute stair climb, compared to the placebo
group (Table 2).
18Labeling Example 2 Statistical Input Needed
- Proposed text The combination of A and B is
effective in lowering LDL-C levels beyond that
achieved by either agent alone. - Statistical issue The study was not designed to
support this conclusion. The study had two arms,
(AB) combination product, and A monotherapy.
19Labeling Example 3 Statistical Input Needed
- Proposed table The symbol was used for
plt0.05, and was used to indicate no
statistically significant difference between the
active treatment arm and the placebo arm. - Statistical issue This is not a typical way to
depict this outcome and may be confusing to some
readers.
20Suggestions from CDER Statisticians(Labeling)
- Provide your statistical perspective in the
development of labeling text.
- Labeling Guidance, 2006
- Clinical Studies Section
- Adverse Reactions Section
21Improving Statistical Communication
Industry
- Provide statistical input at all stages
- Ask good questions
- Provide detailed, timely information
- Address critical statistical issues
22Acknowledgments
- FDA Statisticians from
- Divisions of Biometrics 1, Biometrics 2,
Biometrics 3, Biometrics 4, and Biometrics 5 - Industry Statisticians /Programmers
- for their promptness in responding to FDA
questions!