Title: HEP03
1HEP03
Advanced Neutrino Beams
Rob Edgecock RAL
2Candidates.
3Outline
- Introduction
- Proton driver
- Target and capture
- Muon frontend
- Acceleration
- Storage ring
- Conclusions
- Emphasis on problems and RD to be done
- Discussion of options being considered
4Introduction
- Idea for a Neutrino Factory muon collider
- Concept of a muon collider Tinlot (1960),
Tikhonin (1968), Budker (1969), Skrinsky
(1971) Neuffer (1979) - Many advantages over electron collider
- But.luminosity!
- Fast cooling technique ionisation cooling
invented 1981 Skrinsky and Parkhomchuk - Another problem.neutrino radiation!
Enough neutrinos to be a problem Must be enough
to do physics
5Muon Collider
Three stage scenario Neutrino Factory Higgs
Factory Muon Collider Recently, much interest in
Neutrino Factory alone. 5 different
layouts BNL CERN FNAL J-PARC RAL
6RAL Layout
RAL Neutrino Factory layout
7Proton Driver
- Main requirements 4 MW beam power 1 ns bunch
length ?50Hz - Two types Linac RCS
- Range of energies 2.2 to 50 GeV
- RD HIPPI
F1 GP
8Proton Driver
30 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron in the ISR tunnel
9Proton Driver
CERN Super-conducting Proton Linac
10Most advancedJ-PARC
(0.77MW)
J-PARC Facility
JAERI_at_Tokai-mura (60km N.E. of KEK)
Construction 20012006 (approved)
11JHF
Plan to start in 2007
Kobayashi
1GeV n beam
Kamioka
JAERI (Tokaimura)
Super-K 22.5 kt
Hyper-K 1000 kt
0.77MW 50 GeV PS
4MW 50 GeV PS
( conventional n beam)
Phase-I (0.77MW Super-Kamiokande) Phase-II
(4MWHyper-K) Phase-I ? 200
12JHF Superbeam
Conventional neutrino beam
Kobayashi
Off-axis
13Target
Many difficulties enormous power density ?
lifetime problems pion capture
Stationary target
Replace target between bunches Liquid mercury
jet or rotating solid target
Proposed rotating tantalum target ring
CERN
RAL
14Liquid Mercury Tests
Tests with a proton beam at BNL.
- Proton power 16kW in 100ns Spot
size 3.2 x 1.6 mm - Hg jet - 1cm diameter 3m/s
0.0ms
0.5ms
1.2ms
1.4ms
2.0ms
3.0ms
Dispersal velocity 10m/s, delay 40?s
15Magnet Tests
Tests with a 20T magnet at Grenoble.
Mercury jet (v15 m/s)
B 0T
B 18T
Jet deflection Reduction in velocity Reduction in
radius
Smoothing
16Pion Capture
20T
1.25T
17Horn Capture
Current of 300 kA
p
To decay channel
Protons
B 0
Hg target
B?1/R
18Target Facility
19Pion Production Experiments
Data taking 2001-2002 Proton energy 2-15
GeV Targets H2-Pb 2, 5, 100 Xo X-section to
few Optimise beam energy and target material
for NF
The Hadron Production Experiment
20Pion Production Experiments
Data-taking 2003-200? Proton energy 5-120
GeV Targets NuMI Be, C, H2, N2, Be, C, Cu,
Pb Re-use existing detectors
Main Injector Particle Production Experiment
21Phase Rotation
Beam after drift plus adiabatic buncher Beam
is formed into string of 200MHz bunches
Beam after 200MHz rf rotation Beam is formed
into string of equal-energy bunches matched to
cooling rf acceptance
22Transverse Cooling
- Cooling ? gt10 increase in muon flux
- Existing techniques cant be used ? ionsation
cooling
beam in
- Cooling is delicate balance
beam out
23Transverse Cooling
- Cooling cells are complex
- RD essential MuCool, MuScat and MICE
24Transverse Cooling
- Recent development ring coolers
25MuScat
- Measurement of muon multiple scattering only
relevant data e- scattering, Russia, 1942 - Input for cooling simulations and MICE
- First (technical) run at TRIUMF summer 2000, M11
beam
26MuCool
- Design, prototype, test all cooling cell
components - High beam-power test of a cooling cell
- Preparations for MICE
- NCRF cavities with sufficient gradient in
multi-T fields - Be windows
- Up to kW power deposition in absorbers
- Safety considerations
- Low non-absorber thickness in beam -
Absorber windows - Safety windows - RF
windows - Cost effective design and construction
27MuCool
Absorber window development
200MHz cavity development
MuCool Test Area
28MuCool
Original area
Stage 2 construction
What it will look like when it is finished
29MICE
MICE
Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
SC Solenoids Spectrometer, focus pair,
compensation coil
Liquid H2 absorbers or LiH ?
201 MHz RF cavities
T.O.F. I II Pion /muon ID precise timing
Tracking devices He filled TPC-GEM (similar to
TESLA RD) or sci-fi Measurement of momentum
angles and position
T.O.F. III Precise timing
Electron ID Eliminate muons that decay
30MICE
Muon Acceleration
- Needs to be fast muon lifetime
- Needs to be a reasonable cost not linacs all
the way - Baseline Recirculating Linear Accelerators
- Other possibilitiesFFAGs VRCS
31MICE
FFAGs
- Fixed Field Alternating Gradient ? magnets not
ramped
- Cheaper/faster RLAs/RCSs
- Large momentum acceptance
- Large transverse acceptance ? less cooling
required!
32MICE
FFAGs
Proof Of Principle machine built and tested in
Japan. 50keV to 500keV in 1ms. 150MeV FFAG under
construction at KEK.
33MICE
FFAGs
34Staging in Japan
Staging
Physics outcomes at each stage
- High Power Proton Driver
- Muon g-2
- Muon Factory (PRISM)
- Muon LFV
- Muon Factory-II (PRISM-II)
- Muon EDM
- Neutrino Factory
- Based on 1 MW proton beam
- Neutrino Factory-II
- Based on 4.4 MW proton beam
- Muon Collider
35MICE
FFAGs
RD
- Injection and extraction
- Magnets 10-20 GeV ring (120m radius) 6T SC
- RF low frequency (6.5MHz), 1MV/m
36MICE
VRCS
- Fastest existing RCS ISIS at 50Hz ? 20ms
- Proposal accelerate in 37?s ? 4.6kHz
- Do it 30 times a second
- 920m circumference for 4 to 20 GeV
Combined function magnets 100micron laminations
of grain oriented silicon steel
18 magnets, ?20T/m Eddy currents iron 100MW ?
350kW Eddy currents cu 170kW RF 1.8GV _at_
201MHz 15MV/m Muons 12 orbits, 83 survival
37MICE
Storage Ring
Main requirement underground lab(s) at large
distances
Longyearbyen 3520km Pyhasalmi 2290km
Tenerife 2750km
38MICE
Conclusions
- Neutrino oscillations one of most important
physics results - Many new experiments conceived
- New beam neutrino facilities required -
Superbeams - Neutrino Factory - Beta
beams - All require extensive RD
- For Neutrino Factory - proton
driver - target - frontend (MuCool,
MICE) - acceleration - World Design Study (WDS1) planned