Decision Making Research and NIH Peer Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Decision Making Research and NIH Peer Review

Description:

... the bounds of rational decision making with very interesting results. And 2 Nobel Prizes in economics. What is Decision Research? Interesting results showing that: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:33
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: NIM66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Decision Making Research and NIH Peer Review


1
Decision Making Research and NIH Peer Review
  • Jane Steinberg, Ph.D.

National Institute of Mental Health National
Institutes of Health
2
What is Decision Research?
  • The systematic study of how humans come to
    conclusions or a course of action.
  • Tests the bounds of rational decision making with
    very interesting results.
  • And 2 Nobel Prizes in economics

3
What is Decision Research?
  • Interesting results showing that
  • providing information or instructions is not
    enough in complex or high-risk decision making
  • humans turn to certain heuristics or biases to
    simplify complex decisions that may lead to
    non-optimal decisions
  • these biases can be minimized or used to
    strengthen decision making and behavior change

4
Personal Finances
5
Medical Decision Making
6
Security Issues
Military protocols
Screening procedures

7
Decision Research
  • People are much happier using their heuristics or
    biases or intuitions than a structured decision
    making tool.

8
Why Not Peer Review?
9
Decision Research and Review
  • NIH Peer Review can be conceptualized as a
    series of judgments, each one a complex decision
  • Individual decision a reviewer prepares a
    critique and assigns a draft score
  • Group decision the review meeting and
    consideration of reviewers comments
  • Individual decision a reviewer assigns a score

10
Decision Research in Peer Review
  • RGA consultants told us that reviewers are giving
    us a lot of information, but we werent making
    the most of it.
  • NIH implemented one recommendation that was based
    on work in judgment and decision research.

11
Decision Research in Peer Review
  • RGA consultants explained that the more
    structure and simplification provided in a
    complex decision, the more accurate the decision.
  • They recommended that reviewers address each
    criterion specifically in their reviews, rather
    than simply identifying strengths and weaknesses.
  • This was implemented and is the current process
    in grant review.

12
  • What else would be helpful to try or to evaluate?
    What else does decision science tell us?
  • RGA experts recommended going one step further in
    breaking down the complex individual decision
    scoring by criterion.
  • Many possibilities

13
Review Criteria
  • Significance
  • Innovation
  • Approach
  • Investigators
  • Environment

14
Heuristics
  • Accessibility
  • Framing
  • Anchoring
  • Preference for discussing shared information

15
Conclusions
  • People and groups use heuristics to make easy
    work of difficult decisions.
  • Most are successful, but some systematically
    provide less than optimal decisions.
  • Thirty years worth of decision research has
    identified how to minimize these biases and
    strengthen decision making.
  • The review process involves very complex
    decisions that may benefit from applying this
    knowledge base.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com