8' Scientific Concepts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

8' Scientific Concepts

Description:

... who are proficient in science: know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world; generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: psycholog4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 8' Scientific Concepts


1
8. Scientific Concepts
  • Outline
  • Importance of science
  • Childrens scientific knowledge
  • 3 areas
  • Physics
  • Biology
  • (Psychology)
  • Theories
  • Piagetian
  • Theory-revision
  • Domain-specificity
  • Learning Outcomes

2
What is science? (Duschl, Schweingruber Shouse,
2006)
  • A body of knowledge that represents current
    understanding of natural systems
  • The process whereby that body of knowledge has
    been established and is being continually
    extended, refined, and revised.
  • Students who are proficient in science
  • know, use, and interpret scientific explanations
    of the natural world
  • generate and evaluate scientific evidence and
    explanations
  • understand the nature and development of
    scientific knowledge and
  • participate productively in scientific practices
    and discourse.

3
Why teach science?
  • Science is a significant part of human culture
    and represents one of the pinnacles of human
    thinking capacity.
  • It provides a laboratory of common experience for
    development of language, logic, and
    problem-solving skills in the classroom.
  • A democracy demands that its citizens make
    personal and community decisions about issues in
    which scientific information plays a fundamental
    role, and they hence need a knowledge of science
    as well as an understanding of scientific
    methodology.
  • For some students, it will become a lifelong
    vocation or avocation.
  • The nation is dependent on the technical and
    scientific abilities of its citizens for its
    economic competitiveness and national needs.
  • (Duschl et al., 2006)

4
Scientific knowledge
  • Not just accumulation of facts, but ways of
    thinking
  • E.g. Primary school children know world is round,
    but their thinking reflects the idea that world
    is flat (Nussbaum and Novack, 1976 Nussbaum,
    1985)

5
Infants Young Children
  • Surprisingly knowledgeable
  • 4/5 months use contiguity to infer that events
    are related
  • Expect collision to make object move
  • Dont expect object to move without force
    (Leslie, 1982)
  • 4-6 months understand principles of gravity
  • Falling object will fall even if cant see it
    (Spelke, 1991)
  • Look longer when an object passes through another
    (Baillargeon et al., 1985)
  • 3-4 years understand causation
  • Causes occur before effects (Bullock Gelman,
    1979)

6
Older children
  • Surprisingly unknowledgeable
  • 11 yr olds when we see an object, energy or rays
    come out of our eyes (Winer Cottrell, 1991)
  • Children/college students car doors move at same
    speed on oval track (Levin et al., 1990)
  • 8 yr olds predict trajectory of ball from curved
    tube incorrectly (Kaiser et al., 1986)
  • 11 yr olds object dropped from moving vehicle
    falls straight (Kaiser et al., 1985)

7
Understanding Physics
  • Time Speed
  • Trains (Piaget,1946)
  • Trajectories
  • C-Shaped tube (Kaiser et al., 1986)
  • Falling Objects (McCloskey et al., 1983
    McCloskey et al. 1980)
  • Force Weight
  • Balance scale (Inhelder Piaget, 1958 Siegler,
    1976)
  • Force table (Pauen, 1996)

8
Trajectories
(Kaiser et al., 2000)
9
Force table
(Pauen Wilkening, 1997)
10
Understanding Biology
  • Animacy
  • 3yrs start to distinguish between
    animate/inanimate
  • Bodies (Johnson Wellman, 1982)
  • Based on psychology? (Carey, 1985)
  • Death (Slaughter et al., 1999).
  • Health Illness
  • Illness as immanent justice (Piaget, 1932 Kister
    Patterson, 1980)

11
Understanding Biology
  • Genetics
  • Inheritance of acquired characteristics
  • Belief can survive until adulthood
  • Tailless mice (Clough Driver ,1991)

12
Perspectives on the development of science
  • Science as a process of logical reasoning about
    evidence
  • Inhelder Piaget (1958)
  • Wason (1960, 1968)
  • Will be covered in lecture 11
  • Science as a process of theory change
  • Carey (1985)
  • Wellman Gelman (1992, 1998)

13
Child as Scientist
  • Inhelder Piaget (1958)
  • Understanding of scientific methods develops in
    adolescence as part of formal operational stage
  • Predicts
  • 1) children should be able to discover scientific
    concepts on their own
  • 2) children should be able to generalise across
    contexts
  • Support
  • Correlation between success in science and
    reasoning ability (Piburn, 1990)
  • Against
  • conditional reasoning research

14
How does change take place?
  • Piaget
  • Radical restructuring of knowledge
  • conflict ? disequilibrium ? cognitive change
  • Preoperational stage
  • Construct rudimentary concepts
  • Concrete operational stage
  • Concepts become systematic hierarchical classes
  • Formal operations stage
  • Second-order relations between categories
  • Errors result from domain-general cognitive
    limitations (e.g., metacognition)

15
Health illness (Bibace Walsh, 1981)
  • Based on Piagets ideas
  • Preoperational stage (2-7 years old)
  • Superstition or magical causes.
  • Contagion catch colds from magic, the sun,
    trees, God
  • Concrete-operational stage (7-11 years old)
  • Contagion (catch illnesses from other people)
  • Immanent justice-based
  • Formal operational stage (11 years onwards)
  • More sophisticated understanding
  • Differentiate between internal and external
    causal agents.
  • A cold may be transmitted externally
  • The illness is in the body (internal) -
    malfunctioning of specific organ or process.

16
Problems with Bibace Walsh
  • Piagets theory is domain general
  • Logical structures which do not contain knowledge
  • Why would domain-specific knowledge follow
    domain-general logical abilities?
  • Adults do not necessarily have a scientific
    understanding of illness
  • The role of experience
  • Charman Chandiramani (1995)

17
Conceptual change
  • Continuum of developmental change (Carey, 1991)
  • Weak restructuring
  • Start with basic assumptions
  • Add/modify information
  • Changing concepts
  • Strong restructuring
  • Old theory incompatible with new
  • Change in scientific thinking
  • Errors result from domain-specific
    misinterpretations (e.g. interpreting biological
    processes as psychological)

18
Theory of biology (Carey, 1985)
  • Preschool 6 years
  • Learn facts
  • Animals are alive
  • Babies come from inside mothers
  • Can get sick from dirty food or playing with a
    sick friend
  • Medicine makes people get better
  • From around 7 years
  • Develop a framework theory
  • Process of conceptual change/strong restructuring
  • E.g., living things category

19
Core Knowledge
  • Theory-theory (e.g., Gelman, 2003 Carey
    Spelke, 1994, 1996 Wellman Gelman, 1992, 1998)
  • Children start with innate knowledge
  • Form naïve theories differ between domains
  • Theory revised if does not account for
    experiences
  • Stage-like, qualitative shifts in concepts
  • Because of innate knowledge, earlier
    knowledge/ability than Piaget predicted

20
Domain-specific or domain-general?
  • Domain-specific
  • Entities and explanations go together (Carey
    Spelke, 1994)
  • People psychological explanations
  • Inanimate objects physical explanations
  • Plants/animals biological explanations
  • e.g. Voluntary vs reactionary movement (Smith,
    1978)
  • 4 yr olds all movement is intentional
  • 5 yr olds distinguish reflex from intention

21
Domain-specific or domain-general?
  • Humans physicsbiologypsychology
  • Explanations of human behaviour in 3/4 yr olds
    (Wellman et al., 2000)
  • 4 types of story
  • intended, mistake, biological, physical
  • 3 types of explanation
  • Psychological, biological, physical
  • Causal reasoning across 3 domains interchangeable
    and flexible

22
Domain-specific or domain-general?
  • Evidence from autism
  • Impaired intuitive psychology
  • Intact (advanced?) intuitive physics
  • Limited intuitive biology? (Gopnik, Capps
    Meltzoff, 2000 )
  • Or intact intuitive biology? (Binnie Williams,
    2000)

23
Learning Outcomes Reading
  • Understand childrens scientific concepts.
  • Understand and be able to evaluate theories of
    conceptual change.
  • Know and be able to evaluate current research on
    scientific thought and the implications this
    research has for theories.
  • Essential Reading (on Digital Resources)
  • Garnham, A. Oakhill, J. (1994). Thinking and
    reasoning. Oxford Blackwell. Ch 17. pp.317-339
  • Wellman, H. M., Hickling, A. K. Schult, C. A.
    (2000). Young children's psychological, physical,
    and biological explanations. In K. Lee (Ed),
    Childhood cognitive development the essential
    readings. Malden, Mass Oxford
  • Further Reading
  • See lecture webpage or .pdf handout

24
Questions to ask
  • What are childrens scientific concepts?
  • How do these change over time?
  • Are scientific concepts domain-specific or
    domain-general?
  • What do the theories say about the development of
    concepts?
  • What research evidence is there in support of or
    against these theories?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com