Childhood Apraxia for Speech - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

Childhood Apraxia for Speech

Description:

... b/ sound would involve activating features like 'labial', 'plosive' and 'voice' ... voice. Feature Geometry. A way of indicating the interdependence of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:186
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: CIS466
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Childhood Apraxia for Speech


1
Childhood Apraxia for Speech
Cherry Hill Apraxia Support Group February 28,
2008
2
Apraxia an SLPs view
Apraxia A motor planning impairment
  • Types Ideomotor, Kinetic, and Developmental
    Apraxia for speech
  • No questioning
  • Assessment no clear distinguishing
    characteristics, using symptom checklists
  • Treatment effect
  • Uncertainty and parents

Longitudinal studies
  • Learning disability - at risk
  • So is it really motor planning? Language?
    Cognition?

3
  • Is it a pure motor planning deficit?
  • Could the underlying causes be different
    deficits?


- Could we explain ALL the features observed? -
Can we suggest more effective therapy
approaches?
4
Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS)
  • Currently there is no single validated list of
    diagnostic
  • features for CAS
  • Difficult to differentiate between CAS and other
    pediatric
  • speech-language disorders
  • Many children with CAS may be misdiagnosed with a
    neuromuscular
  • disorder (dysarthria), phonological delay, or
    even pervasive
  • developmental disorder

5
CAS - definition
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a
neurological childhood (pediatric) speech sound
disorder in which the precision and consistency
of movements underlying speech are impaired in
the absence of neuromuscular deficits. CAS may
occur as a result of known neurological
impairment, in association with complex
neurobehavioral disorders of known or unknown
origin, or as an idiopathic neurogenic speech
sound disorder. The core impairment in planning
and/or programming spatiotemporal parameters of
movement sequences results in errors in speech
sound production and prosody.
ASHA Ad Hoc committee on apraxia of speech (2006)
6
CAS - definition
Cont.
  • Inconsistencies in diagnosis have prevented
    research from moving
  • Forward
  • Children with CAS are at risk for persistent
    speech, expressive
  • language, and literacy problems
  • CAS is currently viewed as a motor planning
    problem
  • However, we have seen clinically that treating
    CAS as a motor
  • problem has not been effective
  • CAS could be a language problem involving speech
    sounds (phonology)

ASHA (2007)
7
CAS as a language problem
  • Phonology how sounds are put together to form
    words in a language
  • Problems with the organization and perception of
    sounds
  • are linguistic in nature
  • Difficulties in both generating and recognizing
  • rhymes (Marion et al., 1993)
  • Difficulties perceiving and comparing syllables
  • (Marquardt et al., 2002)

8
CAS Theoretical Perspectives
  • Input processing deficit
  • Organizational processing deficit
  • Representational processes
  • Output processing deficit
  • Motor programming deficit
  • Prearticulatory sequencing deficit.

9
(No Transcript)
10
Phonological theory
  • Every sound in a language is represented in the
    brain as a set of features
  • E.g., a /p/ sound would involve activating
    features like labial, plosive
  • A /b/ sound would involve activating features
    like labial, plosive and voice
  • A dominant theory at present suggests that all
    these features are not active all the time in
    each language, only a few features are needed
  • One suggestion has been that, in CAS, too many
    features are active
  • This would mean that CAS is primarily a problem
    with the representation of sounds in the brain
  • We can test whether this is a good hypothesis by
    examining brain activity in children with CAS as
    they process and produce sounds

11
Feature Geometry
A way of indicating the interdependence of
features involved in sound structure
representation
Root
sonorant
laryngeal
consonantal
lateral
voice
continuant
nasal
spread glottis
voice
place
constricted glottis
coronal
labial
dorsal
round
anterior
distributed
high
back
low
labiodental
grooved
12
EEG Experiment
  • Noninvasive and extremely safe functional brain
    recording
  • Measures electrical currents naturally produced
    by the brain
  • Recorded by electrodes placed on surface of scalp
  • We can observe the brains natural responses to
    specific stimuli

13
EEG Experiment
  • Consonants such as /p/ and /b/ are distinguished
    by very short bursts of voicing which last only
    around 40 milliseconds
  • EEG has a high time resolution allowing us to see
    neurophysiological responses to stimuli just
    milliseconds after their presentation
  • Using EEG we can measure the childs automatic
    response to the presentation of a speech sound,
    even if the child is not paying attention to the
    sounds

14
What your child will
experience
before the experiment
  • Measure head to determine size of sensor net
  • 128 channel sensor net soaked in a salt water
    solution
  • The Brain Spa seating each of the electrodes
    in the proper position
  • Check contacts

15
What your child will
experience
during the experiment
  • You may be with your child at all times
  • Child will be seated comfortably in our
    soundproof room
  • Child will watch visually stimulating
    age-appropriate material
  • on a computer screen while a series of speech
    sounds are played through headphones
  • The experiment will take about
  • 15 minutes

16
What wed like you to do
  • Please ask questions well tell you anything
    you would like to know about our plans for the
    study
  • Wed like your organization to support this work
  • We need a letter of support from your group
    stating that youre willing for us to recruit
    study participants
  • We will obtain approval from our Institutional
    Review Board to carry out the study, with your
    involvement
  • Then we will write to each of you, asking again
    for you and your child to participate
  • If you agree, please get in touch with us to
    arrange your visit to the lab

17
What well do
  • Protect your confidentiality at all times
  • Make it a fun learning
  • experience for your
  • children
  • Keep you updated with
  • progress as we carry out the
  • study
  • Present our results to you at the
  • end of the study
  • Present our results at professional conferences,
    and publish in scientific journals, to advocate
    for children with CAS

18
Thanks! Questions, comments?
  • Neurocognition of Language Lab
  • Teachers College, Columbia University
  • 212-678 8158 rk2121_at_columbia.edu
  • www.tc.edu/neurocog
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com