Title: Childhood Apraxia for Speech
1Childhood Apraxia for Speech
Cherry Hill Apraxia Support Group February 28,
2008
2Apraxia an SLPs view
Apraxia A motor planning impairment
- Types Ideomotor, Kinetic, and Developmental
Apraxia for speech - No questioning
- Assessment no clear distinguishing
characteristics, using symptom checklists - Treatment effect
- Uncertainty and parents
Longitudinal studies
- Learning disability - at risk
- So is it really motor planning? Language?
Cognition?
3- Is it a pure motor planning deficit?
- Could the underlying causes be different
deficits?
- Could we explain ALL the features observed? -
Can we suggest more effective therapy
approaches?
4Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS)
- Currently there is no single validated list of
diagnostic - features for CAS
- Difficult to differentiate between CAS and other
pediatric - speech-language disorders
- Many children with CAS may be misdiagnosed with a
neuromuscular - disorder (dysarthria), phonological delay, or
even pervasive - developmental disorder
5CAS - definition
Childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) is a
neurological childhood (pediatric) speech sound
disorder in which the precision and consistency
of movements underlying speech are impaired in
the absence of neuromuscular deficits. CAS may
occur as a result of known neurological
impairment, in association with complex
neurobehavioral disorders of known or unknown
origin, or as an idiopathic neurogenic speech
sound disorder. The core impairment in planning
and/or programming spatiotemporal parameters of
movement sequences results in errors in speech
sound production and prosody.
ASHA Ad Hoc committee on apraxia of speech (2006)
6CAS - definition
Cont.
- Inconsistencies in diagnosis have prevented
research from moving - Forward
- Children with CAS are at risk for persistent
speech, expressive - language, and literacy problems
- CAS is currently viewed as a motor planning
problem - However, we have seen clinically that treating
CAS as a motor - problem has not been effective
- CAS could be a language problem involving speech
sounds (phonology)
ASHA (2007)
7CAS as a language problem
- Phonology how sounds are put together to form
words in a language - Problems with the organization and perception of
sounds - are linguistic in nature
- Difficulties in both generating and recognizing
- rhymes (Marion et al., 1993)
- Difficulties perceiving and comparing syllables
- (Marquardt et al., 2002)
8CAS Theoretical Perspectives
- Input processing deficit
- Organizational processing deficit
- Representational processes
- Output processing deficit
- Motor programming deficit
- Prearticulatory sequencing deficit.
9(No Transcript)
10Phonological theory
- Every sound in a language is represented in the
brain as a set of features - E.g., a /p/ sound would involve activating
features like labial, plosive - A /b/ sound would involve activating features
like labial, plosive and voice - A dominant theory at present suggests that all
these features are not active all the time in
each language, only a few features are needed - One suggestion has been that, in CAS, too many
features are active - This would mean that CAS is primarily a problem
with the representation of sounds in the brain - We can test whether this is a good hypothesis by
examining brain activity in children with CAS as
they process and produce sounds
11Feature Geometry
A way of indicating the interdependence of
features involved in sound structure
representation
Root
sonorant
laryngeal
consonantal
lateral
voice
continuant
nasal
spread glottis
voice
place
constricted glottis
coronal
labial
dorsal
round
anterior
distributed
high
back
low
labiodental
grooved
12EEG Experiment
- Noninvasive and extremely safe functional brain
recording - Measures electrical currents naturally produced
by the brain - Recorded by electrodes placed on surface of scalp
- We can observe the brains natural responses to
specific stimuli
13EEG Experiment
- Consonants such as /p/ and /b/ are distinguished
by very short bursts of voicing which last only
around 40 milliseconds - EEG has a high time resolution allowing us to see
neurophysiological responses to stimuli just
milliseconds after their presentation - Using EEG we can measure the childs automatic
response to the presentation of a speech sound,
even if the child is not paying attention to the
sounds
14What your child will
experience
before the experiment
- Measure head to determine size of sensor net
- 128 channel sensor net soaked in a salt water
solution - The Brain Spa seating each of the electrodes
in the proper position - Check contacts
15What your child will
experience
during the experiment
- You may be with your child at all times
- Child will be seated comfortably in our
soundproof room - Child will watch visually stimulating
age-appropriate material - on a computer screen while a series of speech
sounds are played through headphones - The experiment will take about
- 15 minutes
16What wed like you to do
- Please ask questions well tell you anything
you would like to know about our plans for the
study - Wed like your organization to support this work
- We need a letter of support from your group
stating that youre willing for us to recruit
study participants - We will obtain approval from our Institutional
Review Board to carry out the study, with your
involvement - Then we will write to each of you, asking again
for you and your child to participate - If you agree, please get in touch with us to
arrange your visit to the lab
17What well do
- Protect your confidentiality at all times
- Make it a fun learning
- experience for your
- children
- Keep you updated with
- progress as we carry out the
- study
- Present our results to you at the
- end of the study
- Present our results at professional conferences,
and publish in scientific journals, to advocate
for children with CAS
18Thanks! Questions, comments?
- Neurocognition of Language Lab
- Teachers College, Columbia University
- 212-678 8158 rk2121_at_columbia.edu
- www.tc.edu/neurocog