State Performance Plan

1
State Performance Plan

• Stakeholder Meeting
• December 11, 2007

2
Indicator 1Graduation

• Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high
  school with a regular diploma compared to percent
  of youth in the State graduating with a regular
  diploma

3
Indicator 1Graduation

• Graduation Rate
• regular diploma recipients
• divided by
• students expected to complete high school
• Regular diploma recipients
• Certificate/HSED recipients
• Reached maximum age
• Cohort dropouts
• Data Source
• ISES Year End

4
Indicator 2Dropout

• Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high
  school compared to the percent of all youth in
  the State dropping out of high school

5
Indicator 2Dropout

• Dropout Rate
• students who dropped out during the school term
  (grades 7-12)
• divided by
• expected to complete the school term (grades
  7-12)
• Students who completed school term
• Students who dropped out
• Data Source
• ISES Year End

6
Indicator 3Assessment

• Percent of districts that have a disability
  subgroup that meets the States minimum n size
  for meeting the States AYP objectives for
  progress
• of districts meeting the States AYP objectives
  for progress for the disability subgroup
  (children with IEPs)
• divided by
• total of districts that have a disability
  subgroup that meets the States minimum n size

7
Indicator 3Assessment

• Participation rate for children with IEPs in a
  regular assessment with no accommodations
  regular assessment with accommodations alternate
  assessment against grade level standards
  alternate assessment against alternate
  achievement standards
• children with IEPs in assessed grades who took
  an assessment
• divided by
• children with IEPs in assessed grades

8
Indicator 3Assessment

• Proficiency rate for children with IEPs against
  grade level standards and alternate achievement
  standards
• children with IEPs in assessed grades who are
  proficient or above
• divided by
• children with IEPs in assessed grades
• Data Source
• Wisconsin Student Assessment System (WSAS)

9
Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion

• Percent of districts identified by the State as
  having a significant discrepancy in the rates of
  suspensions and expulsions of children with
  disabilities for greater than 10 days in a school
  year

10
Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion

• Suspension/Expulsion Rate
• students suspended/expelled gt 10 days
• divided by
• students enrolled (3rd Friday September)

11
Indicator 4Suspension/Expulsion

• Indicator Percent
• of districts identified as having significant
  discrepancies in the rates of suspensions and
  expulsions of children with disabilities for
  greater than 10 days
• divided by
• of districts in the State
• Data Sources
• ISES Discipline
• ISES Count Date

12
Indicator 5Educational Placements, Ages 6-21

• Percent of children with IEPs aged 6 through 21
• Removed from regular class less than 21 of the
  day (Environment A)
• Removed from regular class greater than 60 of
  the day (Environment C)
• Served in public or private separate schools,
  residential placements, or homebound or hospital
  placements (Environments D, E, F, G, I, J)

13
Indicator 5Educational Placements, Ages 6-21

• Educational Placement Percent
• students in environment category
• divided by
• students with disabilities, ages 6-21
• Data Source
• ISES - Count Date compared/combined with
• ISES - October 1 Child Count Supplement

14
Indicator 6Educational Placements, Ages 3-5

• New Preschool Educational Environment Codes
• Previously focused on where special
  education/related services being provided
• Now focus on whether child is attending a regular
  early childhood program
• Requires State to Establish New Baseline Data
  (2007-08 SY)
• Data Source
• ISES - Count Date compared/combined with
• ISES - October 1 Child Count Supplement

15
Indicator 7Preschool Outcomes

• Percent of preschool children with IEPs who
  demonstrate improved
• Positive social-emotional skills (including
  social relationships)
• Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills
  (including early language/communication and early
  literacy)
• Use of appropriate behaviors to meet their needs

16
Indicator 7Preschool Outcomes

• Percent of preschool children who
• did not improve functioning
• improved functioning but not sufficient to move
  nearer to functioning comparable to same-aged
  peers
• improved functioning to a level nearer to
  same-aged peers but did not reach it
• improved functioning to reach a level comparable
  to same-aged peers
• maintained functioning at a level comparable to
  same-aged peers
• Data Sources
• Child Outcome Summary Form
• Preschool Outcome Reporting Tool

17
Indicator 8Parent Involvement

• Percent of parents with a child receiving special
  education services who report that schools
  facilitated parent involvement as a means of
  improving services and results for children with
  disabilities

18
Indicator 8Parent Involvement

• of respondent parents who report schools
  facilitated parent involvement as a means of
  improving services and results for children with
  disabilities
• divided by
• of respondent parents of children with
  disabilities
• Data Source
• ISES - Count Date compared/combined with
• ISES - October 1 Child Count Supplement

19
Indicators 9 and 10Disproportionate
Representation

• Indicator 9
• Percent of districts with disproportionate
  representation of racial and ethnic groups in
  special education and related services that is
  the result of inappropriate identification

20
Indicators 9 and 10Disproportionate
Representation

• Indicator 10
• Percent of districts with disproportionate
  representation of racial and ethnic groups in
  specific disability categories that is the result
  of inappropriate identification
• Autism
• Cognitive Disability
• Emotional Behavioral Disabilities
• Other Health Impairment
• Specific Learning Disabilities
• Speech/Language Impairment

21
Indicators 9 and 10Disproportionate
Representation

• Criteria
• Total enrollment of at least 100 students for
  racial group
• At least 10 students with disabilities for racial
  group/disability combination
• Weighted risk ratio of 2.0 or greater for racial
  group/disability combination when compared to all
  other races
• Risk for racial group/disability combination at
  least 1 greater than statewide white risk for
  racial group/disability combination
• Meet criteria for three consecutive years

22
Indicators 9 and 10Disproportionate
Representation

• Data Sources
• ISES Count Date
• ISES - Count Date compared/combined with
• ISES - October 1 Child Count Supplement

23
Indicator 11Timely Evaluation

• Percent of children with parental consent to
  evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility
  determined within 60 days

24
Indicator 11Timely Evaluation

• determined eligible whose evaluations were
  completed within 60 days
• plus
• determined not eligible whose evaluations were
  completed within 60 days
• divided by
• of children for whom parental consent to
  evaluate was received
• Data Source
• District Procedural Self-Assessment

25
Indicator 12Transition Part C to Part B

• Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
  age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who
  have an IEP developed and implemented by their
  third birthdays.

26
Indicator 12Transition Part C to Part B

• children found eligible who have an IEP
  developed and implemented by their third
  birthdays
• divided by
• children who have been served in Part C and
  referred to Part B for eligibility determination
• minus
• referred determined to be NOT eligible and
  whose eligibilities were determined prior to
  their third birthdays
• minus
• children for whom parent refusal to provide
  consent caused delay in evaluation or initial
  services
• Data Source
• Local Performance Plan (LPP)

27
Indicator 13Transition Goals, Age 16

• Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP
  that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP
  goals and transition services that will
  reasonably enable the student to meet the
  post-secondary goals.

28
Indicator 13Transition Goals, Age 16

• of youth with disabilities aged 16 and above
  with an IEP that includes coordinated,
  measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
  services that will reasonably enable the student
  to meet the post-secondary goals
• divided by
• of youth with an IEP age 16 and above
• Data Source
• District Procedural Self-Assessment

29
Indicator 14Post High School Outcomes

• Percent of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in
  secondary school and who have been competitively
  employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary
  school, or both, within one year of leaving high
  school.

30
Indicator 14Post High School Outcomes

• of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in
  secondary school and who have been competitively
  employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary
  school, or both, within one year of leaving high
  school
• divided by
• of youth assessed who had IEPs and are no
  longer in secondary school
• Data Source
• ISES

31
Indicator 15General Supervision

• General supervision system (including monitoring,
  complaints, hearings, etc.) identifies and
  corrects noncompliance as soon as possible but in
  no case later than one year from identification.

32
Indicator 15General Supervision

• of corrections completed as soon as possible
  but in no case later than one year from
  identification
• divided by
• of findings of noncompliance
• Data Source
• District Procedural Self-Assessment

33
Indicator 16IDEA Complaints

• Percent of signed written complaints with reports
  issued that were resolved within 60-day timeline
  or a timeline extended for exceptional
  circumstances with respect to a particular
  complaint

34
Indicator 16IDEA Complaints

• reports issued within timelines
• plus
• reports issued with extended timelines
• divided by
• complaints with reports issued

35
Indicator 17Due Process

• Percent of fully adjudicated due process hearing
  requests that were fully adjudicated within the
  45-day timeline or a timeline that is properly
  extended by the hearing officer at the request of
  either party

36
Indicator 17Due Process

• decisions within timeline
• plus
• decisions within extended timeline
• divided by
• hearings fully adjudicated

37
Indicator 18Resolution Sessions

• Percent of hearing requests that went to
  resolution sessions that were resolved through
  resolution session settlement agreements

38
Indicator 18Resolution Sessions

• resolution sessions that resulted in a
  settlement agreement
• divided by
• resolution sessions

39
Indicator 19Mediation

• Percent of mediations held that resulted in
  mediation agreements

40
Indicator 19Mediation

• mediations related to due process that resulted
  in a mediation agreement
• plus
• mediations not related to due process that
  resulted n a mediation agreement
• divided by
• mediations held

41
Indicator 20Timely and Accurate Data

• State reported data (618 and State Performance
  Plan and Annual Performance Report) are timely
  and accurate