Title: Private sector roles
1Private sector roles
OzProspect Windows on Economics 2005
150 330pm, 9 February 2005
2Session content
- A brief history
- Private sector roles
- Case 1 Citylink
- Case 2 Electricity
- Case 3 Public rail transport
- Public private partnerships
3Some potted history
- Early in Australias history, private provision
of infrastructure was common - In the late 19th - early 20th centuries,
governments took over for financial or political
reasons - The private sector role has now increased
- At first it was largely construction, with
in-house government provision phasing out
4Some potted history (contd)
- Then outsourcing (of cleaning, maintenance and
later IT, HR and some management functions)
became common - From the 1980s privatisation, concessions
- In the last few years, through Public Private
Partnerships
5Types of private sector investment
- Privatisation
- Private Sector Infrastructure development
- Build-Own-Operate (BOO)
- Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT)/Concession
- Design-Build-Fund-Operate (DBFO)
- Build-Own-Lease-Back (BOLB)
- Public Private Partnerships (PPP)
6Reasons for private sector involvement
- Public sector difficulties with construction cost
overruns, operating inefficiency and lack of
innovation - due to poor incentives faced by public servants,
conflicting objectives and political interference - Experience with private provision, starting
originally with the French water concessions,
indicated scope for efficiency and innovation
7Reasons for private sector involvement (contd)
- Financial markets have become more flexible
- Private sector is often better at managing risk
8(No Transcript)
9Claimed Pros and Cons of Private Sector
Investment
- Pros
- Innovation, efficiency
- Transfer of risk
- Private sector capital available
- Reduced public spending/borrowing
- Cons
- Government can borrow more cheaply
- Residual taxpayer risk
- Need (sometimes) for regulatory intervention
10The myth of cheaper government borrowing..
- It's a myth that governments have access to
'cheaper' finance to undertake projects a
government's ability to borrow more cheaply is
purely a function of its capacity to levy taxes
to repay borrowings (Secretary, Victorian
Department of Treasury and Finance)
11The myth of cheaper government borrowing
(contd)
- Private investment requires assessment and
carrying of risk - Public investment risk shed onto taxpayers.
Example Concorde
12Some problems..
13Private sector investment will continue
- Expanding role and understanding of private
sector investments - The private sector is improving its expertise
with public projects - Financial markets are improving their ability to
service such investments - Scope for increased use of PPP, especially in
social infrastructure
14Opportunities Australia
- National
- Transport (AusLink)
- Electricity interconnectors
- Gas pipelines
- Water and wastewater
- Environment/renewables
15Opportunities Victoria
- Infrastructure Planning Council cited needs in
- Water (eg Melbourne -Geelong link, irrigation
infrastructure, water sewage treatment) - Energy (eg extension of gas reticulation)
- Transport (eg rail and road bottlenecks)
- Communications (eg broadband)
16Opportunities Other States
- NSW flagged 5bn in next 5 years esp schools,
major roads (eg Orbital), prison, courthouses,
water sewerage) - Qld water resource development (eg Burnett),
energy, transport - WA water, electricity plant, transmission, gas
17Case 1 Citylink
- A BOOT concession
- Private sector built, owns, operates - and will
later transfer to the government - The government negotiated the framework/rules
(including pricing), and facilitated land
acquisition, local connections etc
18Citylink... continued
19Case 2 Electricity Reform in Victoria
- Poor investment record
- Low operating efficiency
- Low power station availability
- Little customer focus
- Performance deteriorating
- SECV had great political power
- State finances in crisis through late 1980s
20Electricity Reform Objectives
- Improve operating efficiency
- Better investment practices
- Empower and benefit customers
- Reduce State debt, improve States budget
position - Transfer risk away from taxpayers
- Enhance electricity sector contribution to the
State economy
21Structural Framework
- Generation, Fuel Supply and Retailing
- Competition through competitive spot market (for
dispatch), hedge contracts - Competitive retail market, competitive
electricity sourcing - Distribution and Transmission (wires)
- Monopolies regulated by Victorian ESC and the
ACCC (Wholesale)
22Roles
- Government Role
- Planning
- Regulation (monopoly functions, safety etc)
- Creating open access where possible
- Private Sector
- Operations
- Investment
- Risk management
23Roles (contd)
- Financing
- Long term private equity and debt
- Risk Allocation
- Assign risks to parties best able to manage
- Commercial risks assigned to private sector
- Sovereign risk to government
- Minimal residual exposure to government (but now
debated)
24Reform Agenda Main Features
- Disaggregation to ensure adequate competition in
competitive segments (generation, retail), with
cross ownership rules - Capital markets were sufficiently mature to
evaluate the businesses and provide financing - Cross subsidies (eg to rural distribution)
25Reform Agenda Main Features (contd)
- An independent regulator was established aim
for tariffs to balance consumer and investment
objectives (ongoing debate about this) - Political intervention in investment and
operations to be avoided.
26(No Transcript)
27Second Stage of Reform (1994) - Corporatisation
28(No Transcript)
29Labour Force Reductions
- The SECV became highly overmanned by the mid
1980s - Labour force reductions started from the late
1980s in response to financial pressures - Industry staff numbers
- 1988 25,000
- 1995 9,000
- 1999 7,000
30Labour Force (contd)
- Labour productivity in generators rose sharply.
GWh/employee - 1994/95 12.8
- 1997/98 - 19
- Voluntary departure packages there were no
compulsory departures - Protection of entitlements (super etc)
- However there was a large regional impact
31Reform Outcomes
- Reduction in State debt and risks
- Lower average prices
- Better service
- Greater efficiency
- New investment
32Outcomes Debt reduction
- Energy privatisation (1995 1999) proceeds A28
billion - Net interest savings A1200 million per annum
- State net debt
- 1992 - A32 billion
- 1999 - A5 billion
33Outcomes Lower Prices
- Households
- Average electricity charge fell by 20 in real
terms from 1989-1999 - Savings for most business customers
- Debate about electricity prices versus asset sale
prices
34Outcomes Efficiency Investment Gains
- Over A 1 billion in new Victorian investment
planned as new capacity required in response to
forward pricing signals - Gas Turbine (Peaking), Combined Cycle Gas
Turbine, Wind - Research continuing to improve competitiveness of
coal
35Outcomes Efficiency Investment Gains (contd)
- Brown coal power station availability
- Up from 70 to 95
- Better industrial relations
- Upgrade of inter-state interconnections
36Substantial risk transfer from taxpayers
- Interest risk on State debt reduced
- Taxpayer ownership risk removed (cf. NSW which
remains in government ownership - has experienced
losses) - Taxpayers freed from future investment risk and
trading risk - Environmental risk (Kyoto etc) substantially
transferred
37Substantial risk transfer from taxpayers (contd)
- Ministers political exposure significantly
reduced - Investment decisions
- Operational performance
- Labour relations issues
- Supply continuity issues
- Acknowledgment most slides in this section are
modified excerpts from a presentation by Farrier
Swier Consulting
38Case 3 Trains Trams Private Franchising
- Performance of PTC, although improved in 1990s,
was well short of best practice - Hard to achieve more under the cumbersome PTC
structure - Policy to introduce private sector disciplines
and innovation - Tram strikes around 1990 and 1997 Grand Prix
39Objectives of transport reform
- Progressive improvement in quality of service
- Substantially increased patronage
- Minimisation of long term taxpayer costs ie
reduce but not eliminate losses - Transfer of risk to private sector
- High safety standards
40Features of Victorian Passenger Rail Privatisation
- Competition for passenger markets, rather than
competition within - Horizontal separation and vertical integration
- 12-15 year franchise length allows for trade-off
between competition and investment - Operators own rolling stock and lease
infrastructure
41Franchise Agreements
- Specify what operators must do in exchange for
subsidies - Tension between prescription and encouraging
innovation - Maximum fares and minimum levels of service
- Incentives for punctuality and reliability
42Gains from privatisation
- Subsidy reductions based on improved efficiency
and increased patronage - Bids showed subsidy reduction of 1.8b NPV but
much lower in practice - Government shed most of the operating cost and
investment risk - Improved services refurbished and new rolling
stock, increased reliability and frequency, some
facility upgrades
43Difficulties encountered
- Poor franchisee financial performance patronage
increases well below forecasts - Only partly shed revenue risk
- Disputes over revenue allocation
- Continuing fare evasion
- Little incentive to improve service mix or
infrastructure
44Difficulties encountered (contd)
- National Express pulled out
- Refranchising Connex and Yarra
- Net benefit to Victoria remains substantial
despite bailout costs (and NX took a large
write-off)
45Some lessons and questions
- Private franchising can save subsidies, finance
new equipment, and improve services - The government is involved as subsidiser and
regulator so has borne some of the winners
curse - But the expected financial gains have been
reduced. Franchisees offered subsidy cuts they
couldnt sustain
46Lessons and questions (contd)
- Some risks have moved back to the government
- How to maintain competitive bidding yet reduce
overbidding? - Wrong to conclude that networks should not have
been divided in two. If they hadnt been, NX
would have won the lot, and present difficulties
would have been worse
47Public private partnerships
- PPP Private sector planning, financing,
construction and operation of a facility
providing public services - Central component risk sharing
- Example courthouse (private operator provides
accommodation services to Justice Department
Department provides justice services to the
people)
48What is a PPP (contd)
- Used for providing public infrastructure and
related services - Economic infrastructure (eg roads, water)
- Social infrastructure (eg schools, hospitals)
- Private sector provides capital assets
- And bears associated risks
- Government procures services, not infrastructure
49Rationale for PPPs
- Value for money in delivery of public
infrastructure services - Partnerships Victoria identifies key drivers
- Risk transfer
- Whole-of-life-costing
- Innovation
- Asset utilisation
50Overview of Vic PPP Policy
- Value for money as prime objective
- Value risk management, innovation and efficiency
- Applies to public infrastructure projects gt10m
- Specific principles processes
- Neutral accounting
51Overview of Vic PPP Policy (contd)
- Detailed guidance on identifying and allocating
risk - Model documents
- Approval processes
- In some cases (eg where cannot specify outputs,
or likely to require frequent changes) PPP
inappropriate
52Public Sector Comparator (PSC)
- Mechanism for assessing value for money
- Hypothetical risk-adjusted cost if project
financed, owned and implemented by government - Based on a best public procurement option to meet
specifications - Competitive neutrality
53Economic theories underlying PPPs
- Market failure
- Rationale for govt involvement - but not
necessarily direct provision - Private sector incentives
- Strong commercial incentives for efficiency
- Public sector incentives less clear-cut
- Competition and contestability
- Harnessing competition for the market to
encourage efficiency
54Economic theories underlying PPPs (contd)
- Contract theory
- Optimal allocation of risk
- Principal-agent problem and need to align
incentives in contract - Ways to address incomplete contracts
(relational contracting) - Minimisation of transaction costs
55Value for money?
- Typical estimates of 15 to 20 per cent cost
savings - Transaction costs reduce but do not negate
savings - Improved project delivery times
- But mainly ex-ante estimates largely based on
value of transferred risk
56Value for money (contd)
- Overall costs reduced if risks allocated
optimally - Eg Citylink Burnley Tunnel
- Facilitation of greater third-party utilisation
of assets - However some failures
- Private sector failure to perform
- Public officials may lack contract negotiation
skills
57Competing views on PPP
- Enabling better infrastructure services versus
privatisation by stealth - Benefits
- Risk-sharing
- Opportunities for revenue generation from third
party asset utilisation - Improved project delivery times, efficiency, costs
58Competing views (ctd)
- Costs
- Reduced budget flexibility constraints on
Government from long-term contracts