Lecture 6: 25th September - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Lecture 6: 25th September

Description:

1. Real World. The structure and history of oceans and land masses on Earth. 2. Model. ... The superego had been taught that one should love one's parents. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:31
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Dar966
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lecture 6: 25th September


1
Lecture 6 25th September
2
Whats expected
  • Details of scientific episodes not required.
  • This course is about skills, not facts.
  • The exercises in the book give you the idea.

3
The Revolution in Geology
  • The Contractionist Hypothesis
  • The Earth was formed as a molten sphere that
    gradually contracted as it cooled.
  • Stabilism The hypothesis that oceans and land
    masses do not move around.

4
Mobilism
  • Alfred Wegener (1915) proposed that the original
    cooling produced one land mass - Pangea that
    has since broken up.

5
1920s Evidence for Mobilism
  • 1. The matching coastlines of Africa and South
    America

6
  • 2. There are mountain ranges on the western edges
    of North and South America, but not on the
    eastern edges
  • 3. The similarities among plants and animals in
    places like Africa and South America

7
Analysis 1920s Evidence
  • 1. Real World. The structure and history of
    oceans and land masses on Earth.
  • 2. Model. Wegeners model of a planet with
    drifting continents.
  • 3. Prediction. The model predicts the matching
    coastlines of Africa and S America, the mountain
    ranges along the western edges of North and South
    America, and the similarities of plants and
    animals in places like Africa and S America.
  • 4. Dat. The data match the prediction
  • 5. Negative evidence? No.
  • 6. Positive evidence? Could the contractionist
    model account for the evidence? The similarities
    in plants and animals could be explained by land
    bridges that have sunk. The matching coastlines
    and mountain ranges could be due to chance.

8
Evidence for Mobilism
  • Radioactivity. If there were radioactive decay in
    the Earth, it would be hot enough to produce
    convection currents of molten rock.

9
Geomagnetism
  • The core of the Earth is magnetic, and switches
    poles over millions of years.

10
  • Molten material rising to the surface is free to
    orient itself with the Earths magnetic field.
  • When it gets to surface and spreads out, it cools
    and the magnetized material is locked in place.
  • Researchers in the 1960s found such alternating
    magnetic strips.

11
Analysis 1960s Evidence
  • 1. Real World. The structure and history of
    oceans and land masses on Earth.
  • 2. Model. Wegeners model of a planet with
    drifting continents.
  • 3. Prediction. The prediction is that alternating
    strips of magnetic material will be found
    parallel to oceanic ridges.
  • 4. Data. The data match the prediction
  • 5. Negative evidence? No. The prediction and data
    agree.
  • 6. Positive evidence? Could the contractionist
    model account for the evidence? No.

12
Pseudoscience and Marginal Science
  • Philosophers have tried to find criteria to
    demarcate science from pseudoscience. But the
    search, as ever, has been unsuccessful.
  • So it is better to classify some area as marginal
    science inquiries in which the data is
    consistently inconclusive.

13
Dodgy science Tricks to look for
  • 1. No predictions just accommodate the data.
  • 2. Vague predictions make any possible facts
    look like they were predicted.
  • 3. Cherry-picking the data.
  • 4. Argue by elimination there are no contenders
    other than my theory.
  • 5. Shift the burden of proof. Theres no
    evidence against my theory.

14
Freudian Psychology
  • Conscious Everything of which
  • we are aware
  • Preconscious Everything we
  • can remember. Thoughts of
  • which we can become aware.
  • Unconscious Drives and impulses of which we are
    not aware.

15
Freudian Psychology
  • Superego The moral component of the psyche.
  • Id The impulsive, child-like component of the
    psyche.
  • Ego The rational component that attempts to
    strike a balance between the superego and the id.

16
Superego
Conscious
Ego
Preconscious
Id
Unconscious
17
Defence mechanisms
  • The ego has to balance the conflicting desires of
    the id and superego.
  • It has various mechanisms for coping with the
    stress
  • Denial, repression, and displacement.
  • But repressed desires can surface from the
    unconscious.
  • Bringing the desires into consciousness through
    psychotherapy would resolve the conflict.

18
Case study Little Hans
  • Problem Little Hans irrational fear of horses.
  • Background story The previous summer Hans had
    spent lots of time with just his mother. Now they
    were living with his father, and Hans was
    spending less time with his mother as a result.

19
  • Freuds Hypothesis
  • Hans was afraid of his father (Id). The superego
    had been taught that one should love ones
    parents.
  • So Hans ego repressed his fear of his father and
    projected it onto horses.

20
  • Bringing this conflict into the conscious mind
    should resolve it.
  • The father also re-assured Hans that he was not
    angry with him for wanting to spend time with his
    mother.
  • The symptoms did lessen somewhat over the next
    few days.
  • The symptoms disappeared over the next few
    months.

21
Analysis
  • 1. Real World. The object of study is Little Hans
    and his fear of horses.
  • 2. Model. Freuds model of psychological
    development and structure.
  • 3. Prediction. Freuds model predicts that
    bringing the conflict into consciousness will
    eliminate the abnormal behaviour.
  • 4. Data. After treatment, Hans fear of horses
    lessened and eventually disappeared
  • 5. Negative evidence? No. The data and prediction
    agree. (Time span?)
  • 6. Positive evidence? Would the abnormal
    behaviour have gone away even if Freuds model
    didnt fit the case? Probably. Young children are
    very changeable.

22
Verdict Mixed
  • Freud Set psychiatry back one hundred years
    H. J. Eysenck
  • Freud knew from the very start thathispatients
    were not cured, and yet he did not hesitate to
    build grand theories on these non-existent
    foundations...he disguised fragments of his
    self-analysis as objective cases, that he
    concealed his sources, that he conveniently
    antedated some of his analyses, that he sometimes
    attributed to his patients free associations
    that he himself made up, that he inflated his
    therapeutic successes, that he slandered his
    opponents - Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen

23
Extra-terrestrial visitation
  • Percentage of children aged 6 and 7 interviewed
    by a British researcher who say they believe in
    Santa Claus
  • 31
  • Percentage of Canadians in an Angus Reid /
    Southam News poll who say Earth has been visited
    by aliens
  • 55
  • From Spectrum Statistical lore for everyday
    living by Warren Clements.

24
  • Number of stars in our galaxy 10 11
  • Suppose 10 have planets 10 10
  • Planet not too far or too close to star
  • 10 8
  • Planet not too big or small 10 7
  • Life evolved 10 6
  • Our galaxy has a volume of 10 14 cubic light
    years.
  • On average, each life-supporting planet occupies
    a volume of 10 14 / 10 6 10 8 light years.
  • Estimated distance to next life-supporting
    planet 8th root of 10 8 500 light years.
  • The nearest star is 4.3 light years away.

25
Von Daniken Evidence
  • Many different cultures have myths about gods who
    came from the heavens and performed great feats.
  • The huge temples and pyramids in Egypt and Peru.
  • The carved stones of Easter Island.

26
  • Positive evidence for alien visitation would
    require that no alternative hypothesis can
    reasonably explain the data.
  • But ancient methods for constructing such objects
    is well documented even by the anthropologist
    von Daniken cites.

27
  • 1. No predictions just accommodate the data.
  • 2. Vague predictions make any possible facts
    look like they were predicted.
  • 3. Cherry-picking the data.
  • 4. Argue by elimination there are no contenders
    other than my theory.
  • 5. Shift the burden of proof. Theres no
    evidence against my theory.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com