Title: Maintaining student engagement with formative assessment using Questionmark
1Maintaining student engagement with formative
assessment(using Questionmark)
- Tracey Wilkinson
- Centre for Biomedical Sciences Education
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical
Sciences
2Plan
- why use objective assessments?
- advantages of regular formative assessment
- Questionmark
- types of questions available
- examples
- have a go!
- exchange ideas
- final word
3Why use objective assessments?
- diagnostic (often early)
- self-assessment (feedback to students)
- continuous, formative (feedback to students and
teachers) - summative (counted towards final mark)
4Formative assessment
- improves academic performance
- feedback element particularly important
- allows both teacher and student to monitor
progress - engagement summative element
- increasing requirement for online /
computer-assisted assessment
5Advantages of online tests
- advantages for lecturer
- reduced time commitment
- logistics of individual feedback (especially for
large classes) - allow testing of wide range of subjects
- more frequent assessment possible
- analysis of questions
- advantages for student
- convenient access
- immediate feedback (individual)
- monitor progress
6Disadvantages of online tests
- time and effort to construct good questions
- higher order questions (Blooms taxonomy)
- written communication skills or creativity not
easily tested
7Questionmark Perception Assessment Management
System
- Queens pilot project
- easy to use online assessment tool
- more question types available (than QOL)
8Examples from Questionmark
9Have a go!
In pairs, or on your own, discuss the types of
questions that might be suitable in your
particular discipline. - true-false -
multiple choice / response - matching -
ranking - fill in / select a blank - text
match - hotspot / drag and drop - Likert
Now try constructing a few simple questions in
your own discipline(s).
Compare the questions you have constructed with
your neighbour. Any suggestions for improvement?
Any questions that might test higher cognitive
ability?
10Logic and reasoning
- Train service suffers when a railroad combines
commuter and freight service. By dividing its
attention between its freight and commuter
customers, a railroad serves neither particularly
well. Therefore, if a railroad is going to be a
successful business, then it must concentrate
exclusively on one of these two markets. - For the argument to be logically correct, it
must make which one of the following assumptions? - Commuter and freight services have little in
common with each other. - The first priority of a railroad is to be a
successful business. - Unless a railroad serves its customers well, it
will not be a successful business. - If a railroad concentrates on commuter service,
it will be a successful business. - Railroad commuters rarely want freight services
as well.
Answer c
American LSAT (Law School Admissions Test)
11Logic and reasoning
- A small software firm has four offices, numbered
1, 2, 3 and 4. Each of its offices has exactly
one computer and one printer. Each of these eight
machines was bought in either 1987, 1988 or 1989.
The eight machines were bought in a manner
consistent with the following conditions - the computer in each office was bought either in
an earlier year than, or in the same year as, the
printer in that office - the computer in office 2 and the printer in
office 1 were bought in the same year - the computer in office 3 and the printer in
office 4 were bought in the same year - the computer in office 2 and the computer in
office 3 were bought in different years - the computer in office 1 and the printer in
office 3 were bought in 1988 - If the computer in office 3 was bought in an
earlier year than the printer in office 3, then
which one of the following statements could be
true? - The computer in office 2 was bought in 1987.
- The computer in office 2 was bought in 1988.
- The computer in office 4 was bought in 1988.
- The printer in office 4 was bought in 1988.
- The printer in office 4 was bought in 1989.
American LSAT (Law School Admissions Test) Sample
Test, June 1999
Answer b
12Regular assessments
Have any of you used regular formative assessment
(paper, personal response, Queens online, other)
with feedback? In groups of two to three,
discuss the ways in which you have used, or may
be planning to use, regular formative assessment
to enhance the learning in your classes. Be
prepared to give feedback to the whole workshop.
Feedback any areas of good practice?
13Final word
- the students
- uptake
- find them useful
- ask for more
- pressure to do well as teacher sees them
- good revision for tests
14References
- Brown G, Bull J and Pendlebury M (1997) Assessing
student learning in higher education. London
Routledge. - Bull J and McKenna C (2004?) Good practice guide
in question and test design. - Fry H, Ketteridge S and Marshall S (2003) A
handbook for teaching and learning in higher
education. London RoutledgeFalmer. - Miller T (2009) Formative computer-based
assessment in higher education the effectiveness
of feedback in supporting student learning.
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education
34181-192. - Nicol D (2007) E-assessment by design using
multiple choice tests to good effect. Journal of
Further and Higher Education 31 53-64. - Wiliam and Black (2003) In praise of educational
research formative assessment. British
Educational Research Journal 29623-637.