Family matters: Families experiences in ICU - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Family matters: Families experiences in ICU

Description:

Functioned in preparing families for a possible course of action or development ... Study findings relating to theses changes correlated with a number of other ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: suse1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Family matters: Families experiences in ICU


1
Family matters Families experiences in ICU
  • Susanne Kean
  • PhD, MSc, Dip in Nursing Management Education,
    RN
  • School of Health in Social Science
  • University of Edinburgh
  • Susanne.kean_at_ed.ac.uk

2
Background What is already known about families
experiences in ICU?
  • Paucity of research examining families
    experiences in ICU and ICU nurses experiences
    with families.
  • The Critical Care Family Needs Inventory (CCFNI)
    has dominated research for three decades.
  • However, the focus of these studies remains on
    one family member.
  • The definition of family or relative is
    inconsistent across studies.
  • Excludes children and young people from the
    family unit.
  • Is not based on a theoretical family framework
  • It fails to explain what identified needs
    actually mean.
  • It fails to identify effective family
    interventions in ICU (see also Simpson 1989,
    Hupcey 2000).

3
Background What is already known about families
experiences in ICU?
  • Qualitative Studies
  • Small in numbers
  • Impact of critical illness on family
  • E.g. Hupcey Penrod (2000), Titler et al (1991),
    Craft et al (1993)
  • Experiences of families in ICU
  • E.g. Walter (1995), Hughes et al (2005), Lam
    Beaulieu (2004), Ågård, Harder (2007)
  • Limitations exclusion of children young
    people, most focus on one family member
    (exception Titler et al)

4
The study
  • Purpose of the study was to advance
    understanding and gain new insights into
    families experiences with critical illness and
    the care of families in ICU.
  • Aims (1) gain a deeper understanding of a
    critical illness event in families (2) include
    the childrens perspective and (3) uncover ICU
    nurses perception of families.
  • Questions
  • How do families process a critical illness?
  • How do children process a critical illness within
    their family?
  • How do ICU nurses perceive families within their
    unit?
  • What is, from the nurses viewpoint, the role of
    the family within an ICU?
  • Sample
  • 9 families 12 adults, 12 children/ young people
    (aged 8 -25 years)
  • 20 ICU nurses in 5 focus groups (range of ICU
    nursing experience 6 months 20 years)
  • Ethics approved by Local Research Ethics
    Committee

3 June 2009, ICU Study Day, Edinburgh
4
Susanne Kean
5
Study overview
3 June 2009, ICU Study Day, Edinburgh
5
Susanne Kean
6
The ICU One space two worlds.
  • Moonscape the surgical intensive care unit
  • The first impact is like finding oneself on the
    moon, or a planet, light years away from the
    dissatisfactions and delights of everyday life.
    Everything is strange, different. The landscape
    is unrecognizable. The rules are dissimilar. It
    even smells different.

  • (Cassell 2005 1)

7
Do families matter?
  • ICUs are the domain of specialities, and
    decisions about a patient's care often involve as
    many as six or eight specialities in various body
    systems, but no one who specialises in family
    systems or in the relations between family
    systems and complex health care systems.

  • (Chesla Stannard, 1997 70)

8
Family.what is family?
  • Families are familiar, but also elusive.

  • (Wasoff Dey, 2000)

9
Family.what is family?
  • There is no agreed definition of what exactly
    constitutes a family (see for example Gubrium
    and Holstein 1990, Bernardes 1997, Greenstein
    2006).
  • Families are characterised by
  • Sharing a history, tradition and future (Daly
    1992, Gilgun 1992, White Klein 2002).
  • Having a built in power hierarchy that is less
    obvious in other groups (Larzelere Klein 1987,
    Copeland White 1991).
  • Being intergenerational as well as gendered
    (Broderick 1993, White Klein 2002).
  • Much of their behaviour is private and hidden
    (Daly 1992, Greenstein 2006).
  • In essence, families can be conceptualised as
    systems of intergenerational individuals that are
    situated in time, cultural and societal context.
    They are self-defined units.

10
Findings Critical illness, families and the
emergence of uncertainty
  • And to be fair Ive got to say, we were not
    prepared for what we saw but I dont think
    anybody could have prepared us. They could have
    sat down with us for an hour and tried to
    describe and explain. Nothing! I just remember
    being just completely overwhelmed and shocked and
    distraught. (Susan, F4)
  • Family members spoke of their shock and
    disbelief at the onset of critical illness.
  • For example, Beth (F2) commented that her
    husbands admission was coming out of the blue,
    Jacky (F6) expressed her disbelief and shock at
    her husbands stroke at the age of 45, while
    Fiona (F8), Kierans (17) mother, described her
    experiences following his head injury as life
    has stopped.
  • (All names are pseudonyms)

11
Findings Critical illness, families and the
emergence of uncertainty
  • Sudden and unexpected admission of family member
    to an ICU had an profound and immediate impact on
    the family.
  • Roles and responsibilities shifted towards
    healthy partner/ parent.
  • Organizing time off work and child care young
    people were cared for by others at some point.
  • Families expressed that they felt overwhelmed
    with emotions and uncertainty.
  • Feelings of confusion, fear and shock were
    reported across families at the time of the ICU
    admission.
  • These emotional reactions are also reported in
    other studies (e.g. Jamerson et al 1996, Hupcey
    Penrod 2000, VanHorn Tesh 2000, Hughes et al
    2005).

12
Findings Critical illness, families and the
emergence of uncertainty nurses perspective
  • G1 Unfortunately. And I think we all feel that
    post ICU care for patients and relatives is sadly
    neglected. In - well thats my personal feeling.
    (group agreement mhms) I dont think we, we do
    enough to follow these patients and relatives up
    because its a post traumatic stress! You know,
    all the literature, all the evidence says, you
    know, for patients ICU can be considered trauma
    and stress and yet there is not the conventional
    post traumatic stress counselling for these
    patients and their families out there.
  • G3 Ideally, there should be follow-up.

13
Findings Critical illness, families and the
emergence of uncertainty
  • ICU admission can be seen as an traumatic event
  • Was as such recognized by families and nurses
    across the sample.
  • Insight is in line with other studies e.g. Jones
    et al (2004) who found high anxiety levels in
    patients and relatives 6 months after ICU
    discharge
  • Results relate to managing the resulting stress
    and clinical uncertainty from an unexpected
    critical illness and refers to strategies
    families used to cope with an otherwise uncertain
    and ambiguous situation.

14
Findings Clinical functional uncertainty
  • Core experiences of families during critical
    illness evolved around the different aspects of
    uncertainty.

15
Findings Clinical uncertainty - seeking
information
  • With onset of critical illness immediate need for
    information evident.
  • Strategy of seeking and getting information
  • Linked to familys ability to cope with and mange
    uncertainty
  • Through observing the patient
  • Susan (F4) talked about her need to speak to
    him
  • Ross (25, F2) commented that being able to talk
    to them (ICU patients) seems to take some of the
    stress and frustration away.
  • Families constructed from their observation the
    meaning and purpose of ICU.
  • Beth (F2) only patients who are really, really
    seriously ill go to intensive care.
  • Sarah (F7) they (her children aged 11 8) kind
    of understood, you know, youre in intensive care
    if youre actually that sick.

16
Findings Clinical uncertainty - staying near the
patient
  • Strategy of staying near the patient for
    prolonged times served families as a means to
    gather information and cope with the ambiguity of
    the situation.
  • Through observing the patient in the clinical
    situation
  • Interactions with health care staff.
  • Lynn (F 9) just being here and just checking
    out every so often to make sure he is okay.
  • Describes a typical response of families in
    managing clinical uncertainty.

17
Findings Clinical functional uncertainty
  • Clinical uncertainty refers to the unknown and
    sometimes unknowable aspects of critical illness.
  • Functional uncertainty differs from clinical
    uncertainty in that this aspect of uncertainty
    focuses on managing a clinically uncertain
    situation.
  • Functional uncertainty is used as a means to
    manage individuals and groups during an illness
    situation for ones own functional gain.
  • Communication strategy used is one of ambiguity,
    in an attempt to keep all possibilities open for
    the future.
  • Functional uncertainty was evident in
    communications between health care professionals
    and families and in interactions within families.

18
Findings Functional uncertainty the families
perspective
  • Strategy of withholding information or evasion
    were evident in family interactions.
  • Fay (12) Actually mum, whats got dad wrong with
    him?
  • Mona (10) I smashed the clock.
  • Fay Whats got dad wrong with him?
  • Mona Yeh, I want to know that too!
  • Mother We dont really know he is, he is
    heavily sedated. Well, theyre trying to keep his
    brain quiet.
  • While clinical uncertainty prevented any precise
    outcome prognosis, parents at times did not tell
    the whole story in an attempt to protect their
    children or getting some time for their own
    coping with an uncertain situation.

19
FindingsFunctional uncertainty the nurses
perspective
  • F1 I find if you- you know, we do tracheotomies
    and things, and particularly with Neuro patients,
    I find that if you are talking to relatives and
    you know yourself youve got a gut feeling that
    in the next 3-4 days theres no way theyre going
    to be extubated, their conscious level is not
    good enough, I find that if you slip in things
    like, you know, possibly you heard that man
    down there got a tracheotomy the other day and I
    mean they might think about something like that,
    just be very vague about it. I find that if then
    in 3-4 days time it comes to something like that
    and somebody goes to speak to the relatives they
    go thats right, (name of nurse) mentioned that
    the other day. Do you know what I mean? And
    theyre much more receptive to stuff like that.
    So, if you sort of try to/
  • F3 /Yeh, I think its/
  • F1 /test the water a wee bit./
  • F2 /your confidence and you knowledge as well.
  • F1 F3 Mhmm. Thats right.
  • F1 Its like dealing with patients that are
    dying or transplantations, you know. All these
    things, you know exactly because youve done it
    before.

20
Findings Functional uncertainty
  • Communication strategies
  • slipping in things
  • Being vague about possibilities
  • Functioned in preparing families for a possible
    course of action or development in the situation.
  • Communication strategy is based on a gradual
    build-up to a required intervention (McIntosh
    1977)
  • The functional gain is clearly linked to families
    being more receptive and hence compliant in
    accepting a suggested or necessary procedure.
  • Being honest and open but at the same time
    ambiguous and vague in the communication is of
    importance in order to allow for different
    outcomes.
  • In preserving a certain degree of uncertainty,
    health care professionals maintain flexibility in
    their approach to treating critically ill
    patients, instill hope in family members and help
    to construct new meaning of the situation (e.g.
    Komesaroff 2005).
  • Conclusion An important aspect of clinical
    communications is not to resolve all
    uncertainties but to preserve them for the
    functional gain of health care professionals and
    the systems within which they work.

21
Summary
  • Uncertainty emerged with the admission to ICU.
  • Family life changes from the moment a patient is
    admitted.
  • Study findings relating to theses changes
    correlated with a number of other studies (e.g.
    Titler et al 1991, Craft et al 1993, Hupcey
    Penrod 2000)
  • Clinical uncertainty emerged in situations where
    the aetiology, diagnosis or the prognosis
    remained uncertain for the foreseeable future.
  • Clinical uncertainty refers to the unknown and
    unknowable aspects of critical illness.
  • Families found it difficult to accept and adjust
    to sustained clinical uncertainty inherent in
    critical illness.
  • Functional uncertainty describes aspects of
    managing clinically ambiguous situations.
  • Functional uncertainty was used as a means to
    manage individuals or groups during critical
    illness for ones own functional gain.
  • Ambiguity and remaining vague were the
    communication strategies.
  • Functional uncertainty aims at preserving a
    degree of uncertainty and thus providing
    flexibility in the approach to critical illness.

22
Families in ICU one space two worlds?
  • Weve talked on and on about resentment on the
    families side but its a big problem. Relatives
    are a big problem from our point of view and they
    cause a lot of resentment from our side of it.
    But nobody seems to care about that. Everybody
    cares about how the families feel rather than how
    we feel.

  • (Intensive care nurse)
  • You know, I really, really believe that people in
    intensive care, if the family can cope with being
    there and helping out, it can only be good for
    the patient, the family and staff.

  • (Susan, F 4)

23
Conclusion
  • One space two worlds the admission of the
    patient brings both worlds, that of the family
    and that of nurses together.
  • ICU is the nurses turf (Heimer Staffen 1998).
  • Do families matter? Yes!

    Study provides the evidence that underlines
    the importance of integrating the family into
    ICU.
  • However, focusing exclusively on the needs of
    families marginalized the need of nurses to care
    in privacy.
  • Way forward negotiated family care in intensive
    care under the leadership of nurses.
  • Nurses must take leadership because
  • Family care is part of nursing
  • Nurses are the health care insiders while
    families are outsiders (power issues)
  • Nursing is the only profession that is based at
    the bedside around the clock and is affected by
    the presence of families directly.

24
and finally
  • Many thanks for your time!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com