Title: Global Growth, Current Account Imbalances and Exchange Rates
1Global Growth, Current Account Imbalances and
Exchange Rates
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
- Pedro Barrie Lectures (3)
- November 22, 2005
- Vigo, Spain
2We take up one piece of adjustment Asian
exchange rates
- We focus on China, which today is the lynchpin of
the system. - US Treasury has put tremendous pressure on China
to revalue (appreciate) its currency. (IMF NEEDS
TO PLAY LEAD ROLD.) From a global perspective,
an essential element of the adjustment process.
But what about from Chinas perspective? Complex
question
3- Summary of recent research on exchange rates,
growth and inflation -
- For poor developing countries -- especially
financially underdeveloped countries with a low
degree of international capital market
integration, fixed exchange rate regimes have
performed reasonably well, highly durable. - For rich countries, true floating exchange rates
works best - For emerging markets --countries more integrated
with international markets -- an intermediate
flexible system is desirable.
4- Intermediate exchange rate regimes where some
exchange rate movements are permitted but extreme
volatility is avoided are already most popular.
In 1975, almost 2/3s of all countries had a
pegged exchange rate. Today, almost 2/3s of all
countries have an intermediate regime. Likely
many more by 2020. - Few countries have pure floats (euro-dollar,
pound dollar, Austrialian dollar and South
African Rand are examples of pure floats.)
5Regimes of the Future(?)
6Where should the world exchange rate system be in
2050?
- Mundell One world currency!
- My view At least three to four major currencies
(to ensure competition). Yuan, Dollar, Euro,
plus commodity linked currencies for oil
exporters and major commodity exporters. Also,
there will always be problem countries on
periphery.
7What about China today?
- Recent move to greater flexibility is both
necessary and desirable. - Over long term, as Chinas financial markets
develop and as trade expands, fixed exchange rate
is not a viable option if China wants to retain
any autonomy over its own monetary policy
8Why is flexibility inevitable?
- Effectiveness of capital controls will weaken
over time as financial sector develops and as
trade expands. This is experience of European
countries in the 1950s. - As capital controls weaken, China will
increasingly be forced to follow US monetary
policy to maintain peg. But a large region like
China needs to be able to choose its own monetary
policy
9Why have more flexibility now?
- Pressures on Chinas exchange rate may turn some
day. Even Chinas vast foreign exchange reserves
(over 700 billion dollars) can still be
overwhelmed by global foreign exchange markets
(where trade is over 2 trillion per day.) - It is better to exit a fix from strength
- Better too soon than too late
10China no longer needs exchange rate as an
inflation anchor
- Improvements in monetary policy independent
central banks, inflation targetting have made
it possible for most countries to control
inflation without exchange rate anchor. - (In 1992, over 40 countries had inflation over
40. Today, only Zimbabwe does. Even the Republic
of the Congo has single digit inflation now.)
11Risk of immediate financial crisis not large
- Big problems occur when countries are forced to
drop pegs from weakness. Sharp drop in the
exchange rate raises burden of foreign debts, can
cause crisis. But Chinas exchange rate will
likely need to go up in the short run. (It the
long run, it will sometimes move down, trend
unclear)
12Comparisons with 1980s Japan are questionable.
- McKinnon, Mundell and others have suggested that
Japans economic malaise in the 1990s was caused
by the mid-1980s Plaza accord on exchange rates.
(An idea muted earlier by Posen.) - But Japans economic problems did not follow
until many years later. Catastrophic mishandling
of macroeconomic policy almost certainly the main
driver.
13Governments often fear allowing some exchange
rate flexibility
- But adverse effects of exchange rate volatility,
while perhaps present, are in fact very difficult
to detect empirically - Based on other countries experiences, likely
case is that country will adjust to exchange rate
flexibility very quickly without major negative
consequence
14Rise in unemployment? No significant
macroeconomic effect.
- Economy is creating over 10 million jobs per
year. Trade policy will not affect more than a
very small fraction of these. - A stronger exchange rate may weaken demand for
exports but only slightly. However, a lower
cost of capital goods imports will fuel
investment. - Production and investment outside export sector
is enhanced.
15Is long-term trend upwards for Yuan?
- Probably, but not simple. Current upward
pressure on yuan is driven not only by trade
balance surplus, but by capital inflows. Capital
controls are assymmetric money can get in more
easily than it can get out. If controls were
symmetric, pressure might be downwards.
16True, by many measures Yuan is currently
undervalued.
- TRADE BALANCE SURPLUS IS GROWING. Official
surplus likely over 100 billion dollars for 2005.
(True surplus probably 25-50 larger.) - Foreign Exchange Reserves are over 700 billion
and will soon pass Japan. 1,000 billion by mid
2006? (Can China invest reserves more
productively??)
17Purchasing Power By some indices, Yuan is very
low
- Euro Area 3.58
- United States 3.06
- Canada 2.63
- Mexico 2.58
- Brazil 2.39
- Japan 2.34
- China 1.27
18The rate of growth in Chinas trade has been
typical of countries after economic
liberalization (the following graphs dates
Chinas economic liberalization from 1979, and
looks at trade growth versus years from
liberalization.
19Chinas Opening Up--Real Export Growth (Log of
exports divided by U.S. GDP deflator beginning
period 1)
NIEs (19661)
Japan (19551)
China (19791)
5
25
40
20
0
10
15
30
35
45
20- BUT REAL EXCHANGE RATE PICTURE IS QUITE ATYPICAL.
Chinas real exchange rate (inflation adjusted
exchange rate) has moved in the opposite
direction as Japans did post liberalization.
21Chinas Opening Up--Exchange Rate (Log real
exchange rate, beginning period 1)
Solid line Real exchange rate Dashed line Real
effective exchange rate
Japan (19551)
NIEs (19661)
China (19791)
5
25
40
20
0
10
15
30
35
45
22- Normally, richer countries have higher price
levels, adjusted for exchange rates, as the
following graph illustrates
23(No Transcript)
24But normal Belassa Samuelson effect may not hold
in China
- Normally, a fast growing country experiences an
appreciating real exchange rate, as high
productivity growth bids up wages. But the
globalized part of China is still experiencing
huge labor inflows from the non-globalized part
of China. Labor inflows keep down wage growth,
restrain price increases.
25Regardless of Chinas policies, over longer term,
financial crises are difficult to avoid entirely.
26External Debt Defaults in Emerging Markets
1824-2001
.
27China default
- China defaulted on external debt 1924-1936
- Earlier financial crises?
28Todays Emerging Markets didnt invent serial
default
29An Early History of Default Number of defaults
30So why the upward pressure on the Yuan?
- Giant US current account and trade balance
deficits are overwhelming other factors. There
is significant trend upward pressure on dollar
exchange rates in most countries. - US Federal Reserves aggressive policy of raising
very short-term interest rates is putting
short-term upward pressure on the dollar.
TEMPORARY EFFECT.
31- Current situation where United States is
absorbing 3/4s of global savings cannot be
ideal - Poor developing countries should not be paying
for profligacy in the worlds richest country.
32China is only a small share of overall US trade
imbalances
33Yes, Yuan flexibility will help global trade
imbalances
- .but by only a modest amount.
- Obstfeld and Rogoff (2005) find that a halving of
global trade imbalances, if driven by a
generalized rebalancing of global demand, would
be accompanied by an 18 appreciation of ALL
Asian currencies. - BUT if Asian currencies appreciate by 20
without accompanying policy adjustments, global
imbalances would decline by much less
34Although other regions can help
- Faster growth in Europe will raise investment
there and lower surpluses - High oil prices have made OPEC surpluses a
growing factor but past experience suggests
these countrys expenditures will adjust and/or
prices will fall. - Latin America will surely not run surpluses much
longer.
35Exchange rate flexibility and capital market
integration closely related
36Summary on Exchange Rates
- Pegged exchange rates problematic everywhere? NO
- poorer developing countries fixed regimes
associated with lower inflation and relatively
high durability. - Emerging and advanced economies
- absence of robust relation between economic
performance and regime. - However, emerging markets have
- less durable regimes (in general) and
- more frequent crises under pegged regimes
37Exchange Rate Regime perhaps less important than
- Quality of Financial Regulation
- Maintaining Low Levels of Corruption
- Independence and Transparency of Central Bank
- Controlling Level of Government and International
Debt
38Where does China fit in?
- Arguably, fasting growing coastal China is an
emerging market that clearly benefits from a
relatively flexible exchange rate. But interior
is much less economically developed, might
benefit more from a less flexible rate. - Difficult tension
39But only if extremes avoided
- Multiple Exchange Rate Practices (Dual and
Parallel Rates) are deeply problematic for
growth, inflation, corruption. - Heavy-handed capital controls are similarly
problematic - Fixed exchange rate regimes are an extremely
risky strategy for most emerging market economies
40Conclusion
- Contrary to prevailing empirical and theoretical
literature, exchange rate regime does seem to
matter. - No one size fits all, but a useful baseline
formula As a country becomes richer, and as
institutions become better developed, presumption
that a move to greater exchange rate flexibility
and greater capital market integration is highly
advisable.
41Background Papers by Kenneth Rogoff
- Exchange Rate Durability and Performance in
Developing versus Advanced Economies, (with A.
Husain and A. Mody) Journal of Monetary Economics
52 (Jan. 2005), 3 - "The Modern History of Exchange Rate
Arrangements A Reinterpretation," (with C. M.
Reinhart) Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(1)
Feb. 2004. - Evolution and Performance of Exchange Rates
Regimes, (with A. Husain, A. Mody, R. Brooks, and
N. Oomes), IMF Occasional Paper 229, 2004. - The Effects of Financial Globalization on
Developing Countries Some Empirical Evidence
(with E. Prasad, S. Wei and A. Kose), IMF
Occasional Paper 220, 200 - Exchange Rate Regimes and Growth, with P. Aghion,
P. Bacchetta, and R. Ranciere