Research - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

Research

Description:

To give you a brief summary of the requirements for the assessment of the ... Incorrect referencing can also lead to penalisation of marks. This is essential. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: hop54
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research


1
Research Development Project
  • Project Reporting
  • March 2007

2
Session Objectives
  • To give you a brief summary of the requirements
    for the assessment of the Research Development
    Project, so that you understand what is required
    of you, and what sorts of things you need to do.

3
Submission Requirements
4
What exactly should I be submitting and when?
  • By the deadline of 9th May 2007 you will need to
    submit
  • A Project Report
  • A Project File
  • During the following 2 weeks (w/b 14th May and
    21st May 2007), you will be given a 30 min slot
    in which to undertake
  • A Project Viva

5
What is the Project Report?
6
What is the Project Report?
  • Your Project Report is a 6000 word narrative on
    your entire Project, documenting it from start to
    finish. It has a carefully designated structure
    which is clearly-defined in Appendix C of the
    handbook
  • The appendices of the report must contain the
    relevant documentation for the end product(s),
    user guides, etc.
  • The project report provides the opportunity for
    you to critically assess the outcome of the
    project activity.

7
What is in the Project Report?
  • An Introductory section, outlining the purpose
    and objectives of the work undertaken
  • The Literature Review, discussing the theoretical
    and contextual background of the project.
  • The Methodology, discussing the approach you
    adopted, the reasons for this, and the
    difficulties encountered, and how these were
    addressed.
  • The Outcomes, discussing the results of your
    project and how you arrived at these results.
  • Conclusions and Recommendations, consisting of a
    reflection on the project, and the process by
    which you achieved it.

8
The Audience for the Report
  • You will have two markers one of whom is your
    project supervisor, and another course tutor who
    is unfamiliar with your project.
  • You will therefore need to produce two hard
    copies of the report as well as an electronic
    version.
  • To ensure that the second tutor is familiar with
    the project, you will need to clearly define the
    project setting and the parameters for the
    project, as well as what you have ultimately
    produced.

9
Report Presentation Format
  • Your Project Report must be
  • word-processed, on A4 paper
  • bound with a spiral binding.
  • enclosed in a soft cover.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
10
Report Presentation Format
  •  Headings
  • Arial Bold 16pt
  • Arial Bold 14pt
  • Arial Bold 12pt
  • Body text
  • Times new Roman 12pt
  • 1½ line spacing
  • Header
  • Name, ID, Pathway
  • Footer
  • Page Numbers

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
11
Style of the Report
  • The writing style should be formal, and written
    in the third person and the past tense (refrain
    from using I, me, mine etc.), but rather The
    procedure was carried out it was decided
    that etc.
  • Do not use slang or jargon any non-obvious
    acronyms e.g. JISC, MANET should be explained on
    first encounter, but CPU can be taken as
    understood.
  • Formal Report Layout with Chapter Headings and
    numbering 1, 1.1. 1.1.2 etc, and sub-headings
    where appropriate.
  • Check Grammar, Spelling, Punctuation. The report
    needs to be in Good English.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
12
The Summary (or Abstract)
  • This section should follow the title page on a
    single page of A4 (single spacing). It is a
    statement of the aims, methods of research and
    results of the work. Those students familiar with
    writing abstracts may wish to include one instead
    of a summary.
  • An extract of the main points of the report.
  • The situation at the time that the project was
    ended.
  • What was achieved and what remains to be done.
  • Significant reasons for not producing all the
    deliverables
  • Any change in emphasis or direction during the
    project

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
13
Contents
  • list of abbreviations
  • illustrations/figures/tables and materials
    contained in pockets
  • Individual chapters with titles

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
14
Chapter 1 Introduction
  • An overview of the nature of the project, what
    was to be attempted and the deliverables to be
    produced.
  • A guide to the remainder of the report and
    appendices
  • Acknowledgements. It is a courtesy to express
    thanks for assistance given in preparation of the
    research (e.g. for access to schools, private
    archives, experts etc.).

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
15
Chapter 2 Literature Review
  • A critical analysis of different approaches to
    your subject area.
  • A conclusion with how your work fits within the
    body of knowledge on your topic.
  • Reflection upon how this research influences the
    development of your product.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
16
Chapter 3 Methodology
  • The next section of your report is where you
    describe in detail how the work was carried out,
    in which the work carried out is described in
    detail. This will be different according to the
    type of Project you are undertaking.
  • Type 1 Product Development Implementation
  • Type 2 Research Development Implementation

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
17
Methodology- Type 1Product Development
Implementation
  • This is a description of the methods you used in
    order to create your software product.
  • Clarify the Product Specifications (these will
    normally have been decided and agreed in the
    Design Proposals)
  • The developmental approach adopted / methodology
  • Resources and facilities used.
  • Set backs The problems encountered and their
    solutions

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
18
Methodology- Type 2Research Development
Implementation
  • This is a fully justified account of the methods
    used to carry out the research
  • Specify the Research Questions to be answered
  • Specify your methodology what methods did you
    adopt why what research instruments did you
    devise how was any sampling done?
  • Implementation of the Research problems
    encountered and their solutions.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
19
Chapter 4 Outcomes
  • In this section of the report, you describe in
    detail what you have produced as a result of all
    this activity. Again, this will depend on the
    type of project you are undertaking
  • Type 1 Product Development Implementation
  • Type 2 Research Development Implementation

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
20
Outcomes - Type 1 Product Development
Implementation
  • This is the main section where you describe your
    product, and give examples of screenshots etc.
    The main product will be produced on a CD ROM,
    DVD, or installed on a machine or website.
  • A full description and explanation of the main
    project deliverables.
  • An exposition on how the deliverables satisfy the
    objectives outlined in the Product Specification.
  • How it was established that the deliverables meet
    the objectives.
  • Evaluations of the deliverables by users or other
    parties.
  • Involvement of the project sponsor and reaction
    to the product.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
21
Outcomes - Type 2 Research Development
Implementation
  • This is the main section of the research where
    you present the data, summarise, analyse and
    interpret the results
  • Results, Analysis and Interpretation
  • Conclusions and how these relate to expectations
    from the literature.
  • Involvement of the project client/sponsor and
    their reaction to the outcomes.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
22
Chapter 5 Conclusions Recommendations
  • A critical assessment with hindsight of the
    project activity. 
  • A brief summary of findings
  • A self-assessment on the quality of deliverables,
    in relation to the original terms of Reference of
    Your Project in the NLA.
  • Any recommendations for future improvements? e.g.
    could the findings of your research be worked on
    by next years students?
  • A summary of what you have learnt on this module,
    incorporating an evaluation of the extent to
    which you have met each of the Learning Outcomes,
    and Lessons to be learned from the process

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
23
References Bibliography
  • References must be presented using the Harvard
    referencing system (see guide on the website).
  • Full reference section for all sections.
  • Bibliography in Harvard Style
  • Remember
  • Cases of unattributed direct quotations or
    paraphrasing can constitute plagiarism and will
    be regarded as a serious breach of academic
    discipline.
  • Incorrect referencing can also lead to
    penalisation of marks

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
24
Appendices (1)
  • Titled as Appendix A, Appendix B etc.
  • These may include any relevant material to
    support the report, which if presented in the
    main body of the report would interfere with its
    flow e.g.
  • Terms of Reference
  • Project Schedule
  • Record of Work
  • Raw data sets
  • Design and program documentation
  • Trial plan, test data and expected results.
  • User Guide
  • Operating instructions.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
25
Appendices (2)
  • If the project contains programming (or the
    creation of an application) then the following
    should be included
  • Annotated listings of key parts of the source
    code.
  • An overview of the structure of the software as
    created
  • A description of the strategy used for testing
    and evidence of that testing
  • A description of the software development
  • An analysis of the resulting software
  • Plans for future development
  • A disk(s), together with a user guide

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
26
What is the Project File?
27
The Project FileHow are the elements related?
File of Evidence
Written Report An account of the project
demonstrating that you have achieved all of the
Learning Outcomes in the NLA..
1. Negotiated Learning Agreement Learning Outcomes
Action Planning Evidence that you have been able
to plan and execute a complex project
Project Reporting
Viva Demonstration of the product, and whether
it has met its specifications.
Literature Review Portfolio of Practical
Work Documents related to the project itself
exemplifying what you have achieved
28
The Purpose of the File
  • The file serves two purposes
  • Firstly, to establish a trail of project
    development where markers are able to see how the
    project has progressed, what stages it has gone
    through and how you have managed the project over
    the year.
  • Secondly, in the case where things have not gone
    to plan, to see how you have coped with this, and
    to allow markers to allocate marks in those cases
    where you maybe not have achieved what you set
    out to do at the start for example if software
    does not run, or your if your client changed the
    spec on you at the last minute.

29
Possible File Contents
  • Essential
  • Negotiated Learning Agreement
  • Project planning and monitoring documentation
    (inc. Project Logs)
  • Documentation for results of Project Reviews
  • Documentation for results of Quality Assurance
    Reviews
  • Design Study for the Project
  • Annotated bibliography
  • Literature Review Notes (essential only if
    original has been amended)
  • Non-Essential
  • Research Seminar papers
  • Background information
  • Specimens of documents collected during
    investigation
  • Records of interviews, meetings etc.
  • Correspondence
  • Evidence of skill development
  • Examples of Research Instruments
  • Notes to the file
  • Raw data preliminary analysis
  • Draft product documentation
  • Research findings
  • Investigations undertaken to explore ideas.
  • Product testing Evaluation

30
How should the the Project File be presented?
  • You should present
  • A coherent file, fully labelled, well-sectioned
    with dividers and a contents page.
  • There should be a contents section which gives
    the structure of the file.
  • Each section should have a clear purpose.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
31
Essential File Elements 1 The Negotiated
Learning Agreement
  • The Negotiated Learning Agreement is submitted as
    evidence that you have been able to negotiate a
    project, and to plan it effectively.
  • You have already submitted this and have an
    Advisory Grade as part of this process you may
    have been told that certain elements might be
    amended.
  • If you choose to amend the NLA, you should
    include the original NLA, and the original Mark
    Sheet together with the section (or sections)
    which have been rewritten, clearly indicated.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
32
Essential File Elements 2Project Management
  • The Project Planning and Management section is
    submitted as evidence that you have been able to
    plan, organise, manage, monitor and evaluate your
    own performance effectively.
  • The Action Planning consists of three parts
  • The Initial Planning Documents
  • Project Logs
  • A Final Evaluation.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
33
Essential File Elements 2Project Management-
Planning
  • This should consist of
  • Project Tasks derived from the original Terms of
    Reference with estimated completion times
  • Planning Charts showing what will be done and
    when. (i.e. Gantt Chart or
    equivalent)
  • You will already have an advisory grade for this
    element within your NLA. You may, if you wish
    replace any of these items with an improved copy.
    However, please ensure that any change to the TOR
    has been signed, and if there has been a
    substantial change from the NLA or original TOR,
    you need a Change of Control form signed by the
    supervisor.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
34
Essential File Elements 2Project Management-
Project Logs
  • At regular intervals during the project, you
    should have completed a project logs documenting
    your progress and evaluating what you have done .
  • You may have amended your Gantt Chart as a result.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
35
Essential File Elements 2Project Management-
Evaluation
  • There is one essential element here
  • Final Gantt Chart showing what was actually done
    and when.
  • In addition, you may have
  • A Review of Targets Achieved
  • Evaluation of Deliverables
  • Evaluation by your client or sponsor.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
36
Essential File Elements 3Project Reviews
  • In this section you should document the Project
    Reviews that you have undertaken, how you
    prepared for them, and what you have done as a
    result.
  • As a minimum, it must contain four fully
    documented and graded Project Review Sheets.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
37
Essential File Elements 4Quality Assurance
Reviews
  • In this section you should document the Quality
    Assurance Reviews that you have undertaken, how
    you prepared for them, and what you have done as
    a result.
  • As a minimum, it must contain three fully
    documented QA Walkthrough Sheets.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
38
Essential File Elements 5Design Study
  • In this section you should have the Design Study
    that you created prior to undertaking the
    development work. It should consist of
  • Design Brief
  • Product Brief
  • Any additional material which is associated with
    the design brief, such as navigation charts,
    questionnaires etc. should be included.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
39
Essential File Elements 6Bibliography
  • Your file should incorporate an extended
    bibliography, which includes material used for
    the Literature Review, additional material used
    within the Report, material used to develop
    skills, other material consulted but not cited or
    quoted explicitly (e.g. it was on your original
    reading list at the start of the Literature
    Review Preparation).

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
40
Possible Essential File Elements 7Literature
Review Section
  • The Literature Review is submitted as evidence
    that you have been able to research an aspect of
    your study to a sufficiently high standard, and
    produce a piece of critical academic writing, of
    depth an quality.
  • You have already submitted this and have an
    Advisory Grade as part of this process you may
    have been told that certain elements might be
    amended.
  • If you choose to amend the LR, you should include
    the original LR, the original Mark Sheet together
    with a copy of the rewritten review, clearly
    indicating the section (or sections) which have
    been rewritten and why.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
41
What else do do I need to submit for the Project
File?
  • The Project File is submitted as the major part
    of the evidence on which you will draw to
    demonstrate that you have achieved the learning
    outcomes, and have successfully completed the
    workplace project.
  • It is impossible to state clearly what will be
    the content of your file. It will depend on the
    project that you have done, and your learning
    outcomes.
  • The File you submit should contain work from
    almost all the stages of your project, from the
    initial planning to the completed items.
  • In addition it should go beyond what you might
    have done in the workplace to evaluate the worth
    of the project
  • An important rule is that everything in your
    portfolio must be written, or annotated by you.

42
Some possible contents of the File
  • Client/Sponsor-Related Material
  • Work you have undertaken for the client
  • Commentaries on the organisation and management
    of the clients business
  • Material you have consulted in order to
    understand the sponsors research focus.
  • Analysis commentary on a clients workplace
    practices or the sponsors research.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
43
Some possible contents of the File
  • Project Related Material
  • Background Material for the Project
  • Working Documents towards the project
  • The Completed Project
  • Technical Details of the Product
  • Product User Guide
  • Results of testing and/or critical analysis of
    the Product

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
44
Some possible contents of the File
  • Other Material
  • Evidence of material studied in order to enhance
    your knowledge and skills
  • Summaries of authoritative academic material you
    have consulted
  • Reading Lists, Draft Bibliographies
  • Notes and other evidence

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
45
A Word of Caution
  • You should not
  • Rewrite handwritten working notes, type up
    results of interviews etc.
  • Include everything but the kitchen sink. (For
    example, if you have done lots of questionnaires,
    you should include only one or two. If you have
    completed exercises towards achieving your
    current level of HTML, include summary examples
    to show the highpoints.)
  • Photocopy lots of journal or trade articles that
    you have not read or not consulted, or include
    hundreds of screen dumps of websites just to pad
    out the file.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
46
Sectioning Your File
  • You will need to section your file carefully, and
    decide what will go where.
  • As your file will consist of a lot of diverse
    elements, some of which may be hand-written, you
    will need to ensure that the structure is
    coherent, and the purpose of each element is
    explained.
  • It is a good idea to provide a brief summary at
    the start of each section.

This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
47
Sample Portfolio Section
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
48
The use of Academic Source Material
  • One of the important criteria in assessing the
    report and the accompanying Project File is its
    academic rigour, which includes the use of
    academic source material to critically evaluate
    the worth of your project.
  • In addition to the Literature Review, it is to be
    expected that you will have used academic source
    material during at least two phases of the
    project
  • During the development phase, when you were
    trying to find out what to do, or learning new
    skills.
  • During the evaluation phase when you are
    assessing whether or not what you have produced
    is any good.

49
What is the Viva?
50
What is the Viva about?
  • In your Viva you will
  • Give a presentation on your project
  • Be questioned about the project.
  • This is actually the final marking process for
    the module. More about this later.

51
The Audience for the Viva
  • You will have the same two markers who have
    examined your project file.
  • When you enter, the markers will have already
    decided on a provisional grade on the basis of
    your report and project file.
  • They will be looking for evidence to raise this
    to a higher grade, rather than be looking to
    catch you out so they can drop grades.

52
The Structure of the Viva
  • Your Viva should ideally consist of four parts
  • A brief walk through of the project,
    demonstrating its major features
  • A reflective account of the process, discussing
    the extent to which you have achieved the
    learning outcomes in the NLA
  • A wider personal account of the journey.
  • Time for questions (possibly during, but if not,
    at the end)

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
53
The Viva Questions
  • The questions asked during or at the end of the
    Viva will probably feel very searching, and you
    may be finding yourself unable to supply the
    answers required by the examiners.
  • You should not feel worried by this the
    examiners will be trying to decide whether you
    deserve the higher of two grades, and therefore
    will ask you questions at the boundaries of your
    understanding.
  • Good answers will gain you the higher grade poor
    answers will not lose you marks.

54
R D Assessment
55
How is RD Assessed?
  • The Marking Breaks down as follows
  • NLA 10
  • Literature Review 30
  • Process 30
  • Product 30
  • Very approximately, you could say that the File
    is worth 30 (process mark), and the Report plus
    any Software or Data Analysis is worth 60
    (Literature Review plus Product)

56
The RD Assessment Process
  • Two tutors (one of whom will be your supervisor)
    examine your project file and are present at the
    viva.
  • One of the tutors will be looking specifically to
    see to what extent you have met the Process
    Requirements and the Learning Outcomes agreed in
    the NLA.
  • The other tutors role is to focus on the Product
    elements, and the extent to which the project
    deliverables achieve the criteria of usefulness
    and quality.
  • Your grade will be decided at the end of the viva.

57
Advisory Grades
  • At the start of the Viva, the tutors will
    provisionally agree a set of 4 grades (NLA, LR,
    Process and Product).
  • You have already been given advisory grades for
    two of these elements the NLA and the LR.
  • If you have amended any of these elements your
    grade may have improved as a result. However,
    please be aware that it is possible (though not
    likely) that advisory grades be reduced.
  • NB. This is very unlikely, but cannot be ruled
    out, and would occur where, for example, a
    student introduces errors in a rewrite
    plagiarism or major errors or omissions are
    detected by the second marker important events
    have occurred which render parts of the
    Literature Review obsolete, and these have not
    been addressed, or where a mark was borderline in
    the first place, and on the advice of the second
    marker or external examiner this grade is
    moderated downwards.

58
Marking Criteria (NLA)
  • Three criteria are used
  • Targets Set detail and aspirational level
  • Project Planning Quality, level of detail and
    use of tools
  • Documentation Literacy, adherence to guidelines
    and professionalism.
  • Evidence Base NLA Section in the File

59
Marking Criteria (LR)
  • Four criteria are used
  • Surface Quality Literacy, Grammar, structure
    presentation
  • Quality of Content Range relevance of material
    used manner in which it is incorporated.
  • Quality of Arguments Levels of rigour and
    critical evaluation achieved. Use of source
    material
  • Standard of Bibliography Surface features, such
    as Harvard Style, and range and currency of
    material.
  • Evidence Base The LR in the Report and the
    Report Bibliography

60
Marking Criteria (Process)
  • Five criteria are used
  • Project Management Degree to which the project
    has been managed developmental audit trail
    apparent, and effectiveness of project management
    tools used.
  • Quality of Resources Identified Used Level and
    quality of resources identified and used.
  • Use of Meetings Quality of Preparation for and
    Documentation of meetings, Use of meeting
    follow-up, and grades for Project Reviews
  • Quality Assurance Monitoring evaluation of
    work use of QA procedures, documentation of QA
    Walkthroughs.
  • Process Documentation Literacy, adherence to
    guidelines and professionalism
  • Evidence Base Project File, Supervisors
    Records, Viva, QA ref in Report

61
Marking Criteria (Product)
  • Five criteria are used
  • Quality of Deliverables Standard achieved in
    deliverables as a whole level of originality
    demonstrated.
  • Meeting of Objectives Level reached in terms of
    client/sponsor expectations, and initial targets
    set.
  • Technical Intellectual demands of the project
    Level of skills, knowledge and understanding
    required both to attempt the project and in the
    product as delivered.
  • Look Feel of final product Quality of the
    finish to the final product level of
    professionalism achieved.
  • Quality of Final Report Match to academic
    requirements adherence to guidelines, quality of
    associated materials.
  • Evidence Base Report, Associated Deliverables,
    Viva, File elements

62
How to Pass the Module
  • The module has been designed so that if you have
    actually worked throughout the year on a
    worthwhile project, and you have achieved some
    kind of end-product, and documented it
    effectively, you will pass. You should therefore
    ensure that
  • You submit two copies of a Report, and a project
    File, together with any associated deliverables
    by the deadline.
  • If your deliverables do not function
    effectively, or your results are not what you
    intended, that the documentation reflects this,
    and offers a critical evaluation of what went
    wrong.
  • Attend the Viva, and give a good account of your
    years work.

63
How to Fail the Module
  • Each year, some students seem determined to fail
    the module. If you are one of these students,
    just to make your life easier, here is what to do
    in order to more easily achieve your goal
  • Do not seek advice from your supervisor, and do
    not attend any more Project Reviews or QA
    Walkthroughs.
  • Fail to submit a Final Report.
  • Ignore the advice on how to structure your
    report.
  • Fail to submit a File.
  • Omit from the file all the required elements.
  • Plagiarise your Literature Review or any other
    part of the report or File
  • Fail to rewrite a Literature Review which has
    been awarded an advisory grade of F.

64
The Final Hurdles
65
The Final Few weeks
  • Ideally you should now be stopping all project
    work, and concentrating on the write-up of your
    draft report and assembling your project file
  • Following this, there are two important tasks
    prior to submission
  • QA Review 3
  • Project Review 4

66
QA Walkthrough 3
  • This Walkthrough is meant to allow you to
    undertake a review of your deliverables with
    another student. On this occasion you have
    potentially four different elements which you
    might wish to review
  • Any software or other product developed
  • Your final report
  • Your project file
  • Your viva presentation.
  • You may therefore wish to undertake an extended
    version of the walkthrough on this occasion to
    cover several of these elements.

These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
67
Project Review 4
  • The purpose of Project Review 4 is twofold
  • to ensure that the project has been completed
    successfully, and that project documentation has
    provided effective monitoring
  • to ensure that you have a clear understanding of
    the the requirements for submission, and a clear
    plan for what you will will produce for the
    report and the file.
  • Your supervisor will give you guidance on the
    report structure and on the file organisation.
  • It is therefore crucial that you attend this
    meeting.

68
What do I do now?
  • Firstly, ensure that you complete the project
    work.
  • Secondly, go back to the module handbook, and
    read Section 5 and Appendix C on how to present
    the Report and the Project File.
  • Thirdly, make arrangements with your partner to
    undertake QA Walkthrough 3
  • Finally meet with your project supervisor to
    prepare for and attend Project Review 4.
  • Submit the File by the Deadline
  • Prepare for and attend the Viva.

69
The Timetable for Presentations and Vivas
  • This will be published on the Website at the
    start of May, and you should ensure that you
    attend the session at the correct time and place.
    If the time allocated causes problems, contact
    Tony Fleet at the earliest opportunity.
  • This time is allocated as part of your
    assessment. If you fail to turn up without
    medical evidence you will definitely lose marks
    and may fail the module as a result.
  • While we will make every effort to keep to time,
    the times allocated can only be approximate.

70
Finally
  • Good luck in finishing your project, and
    obtaining your degree.
  • Submission Deadline
  • 3.00pm Wednesday 9th May 2007
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com