Title: Research
1 Research Development Project
- Project Reporting
- March 2007
2Session Objectives
- To give you a brief summary of the requirements
for the assessment of the Research Development
Project, so that you understand what is required
of you, and what sorts of things you need to do.
3Submission Requirements
4What exactly should I be submitting and when?
- By the deadline of 9th May 2007 you will need to
submit - A Project Report
- A Project File
- During the following 2 weeks (w/b 14th May and
21st May 2007), you will be given a 30 min slot
in which to undertake - A Project Viva
5What is the Project Report?
6What is the Project Report?
- Your Project Report is a 6000 word narrative on
your entire Project, documenting it from start to
finish. It has a carefully designated structure
which is clearly-defined in Appendix C of the
handbook - The appendices of the report must contain the
relevant documentation for the end product(s),
user guides, etc. - The project report provides the opportunity for
you to critically assess the outcome of the
project activity.
7What is in the Project Report?
- An Introductory section, outlining the purpose
and objectives of the work undertaken - The Literature Review, discussing the theoretical
and contextual background of the project. - The Methodology, discussing the approach you
adopted, the reasons for this, and the
difficulties encountered, and how these were
addressed. - The Outcomes, discussing the results of your
project and how you arrived at these results. - Conclusions and Recommendations, consisting of a
reflection on the project, and the process by
which you achieved it.
8The Audience for the Report
- You will have two markers one of whom is your
project supervisor, and another course tutor who
is unfamiliar with your project. - You will therefore need to produce two hard
copies of the report as well as an electronic
version. - To ensure that the second tutor is familiar with
the project, you will need to clearly define the
project setting and the parameters for the
project, as well as what you have ultimately
produced.
9Report Presentation Format
- Your Project Report must be
- word-processed, on A4 paper
- bound with a spiral binding.
- enclosed in a soft cover.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
10Report Presentation Format
- Headings
- Arial Bold 16pt
- Arial Bold 14pt
- Arial Bold 12pt
- Body text
- Times new Roman 12pt
- 1½ line spacing
- Header
- Name, ID, Pathway
- Footer
- Page Numbers
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
11Style of the Report
- The writing style should be formal, and written
in the third person and the past tense (refrain
from using I, me, mine etc.), but rather The
procedure was carried out it was decided
that etc. - Do not use slang or jargon any non-obvious
acronyms e.g. JISC, MANET should be explained on
first encounter, but CPU can be taken as
understood. - Formal Report Layout with Chapter Headings and
numbering 1, 1.1. 1.1.2 etc, and sub-headings
where appropriate. - Check Grammar, Spelling, Punctuation. The report
needs to be in Good English.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
12The Summary (or Abstract)
- This section should follow the title page on a
single page of A4 (single spacing). It is a
statement of the aims, methods of research and
results of the work. Those students familiar with
writing abstracts may wish to include one instead
of a summary. - An extract of the main points of the report.
- The situation at the time that the project was
ended. - What was achieved and what remains to be done.
- Significant reasons for not producing all the
deliverables - Any change in emphasis or direction during the
project
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
13Contents
- list of abbreviations
- illustrations/figures/tables and materials
contained in pockets - Individual chapters with titles
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
14Chapter 1 Introduction
- An overview of the nature of the project, what
was to be attempted and the deliverables to be
produced. - A guide to the remainder of the report and
appendices - Acknowledgements. It is a courtesy to express
thanks for assistance given in preparation of the
research (e.g. for access to schools, private
archives, experts etc.).
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
15Chapter 2 Literature Review
- A critical analysis of different approaches to
your subject area. - A conclusion with how your work fits within the
body of knowledge on your topic. - Reflection upon how this research influences the
development of your product.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
16Chapter 3 Methodology
- The next section of your report is where you
describe in detail how the work was carried out,
in which the work carried out is described in
detail. This will be different according to the
type of Project you are undertaking. - Type 1 Product Development Implementation
- Type 2 Research Development Implementation
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
17Methodology- Type 1Product Development
Implementation
- This is a description of the methods you used in
order to create your software product. - Clarify the Product Specifications (these will
normally have been decided and agreed in the
Design Proposals) - The developmental approach adopted / methodology
- Resources and facilities used.
- Set backs The problems encountered and their
solutions
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
18Methodology- Type 2Research Development
Implementation
- This is a fully justified account of the methods
used to carry out the research - Specify the Research Questions to be answered
- Specify your methodology what methods did you
adopt why what research instruments did you
devise how was any sampling done? - Implementation of the Research problems
encountered and their solutions.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
19Chapter 4 Outcomes
- In this section of the report, you describe in
detail what you have produced as a result of all
this activity. Again, this will depend on the
type of project you are undertaking - Type 1 Product Development Implementation
- Type 2 Research Development Implementation
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
20Outcomes - Type 1 Product Development
Implementation
- This is the main section where you describe your
product, and give examples of screenshots etc.
The main product will be produced on a CD ROM,
DVD, or installed on a machine or website. - A full description and explanation of the main
project deliverables. - An exposition on how the deliverables satisfy the
objectives outlined in the Product Specification. - How it was established that the deliverables meet
the objectives. - Evaluations of the deliverables by users or other
parties. - Involvement of the project sponsor and reaction
to the product.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
21Outcomes - Type 2 Research Development
Implementation
- This is the main section of the research where
you present the data, summarise, analyse and
interpret the results - Results, Analysis and Interpretation
- Conclusions and how these relate to expectations
from the literature. - Involvement of the project client/sponsor and
their reaction to the outcomes.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
22Chapter 5 Conclusions Recommendations
- A critical assessment with hindsight of the
project activity. - A brief summary of findings
- A self-assessment on the quality of deliverables,
in relation to the original terms of Reference of
Your Project in the NLA. - Any recommendations for future improvements? e.g.
could the findings of your research be worked on
by next years students? - A summary of what you have learnt on this module,
incorporating an evaluation of the extent to
which you have met each of the Learning Outcomes,
and Lessons to be learned from the process
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
23References Bibliography
- References must be presented using the Harvard
referencing system (see guide on the website). - Full reference section for all sections.
- Bibliography in Harvard Style
- Remember
- Cases of unattributed direct quotations or
paraphrasing can constitute plagiarism and will
be regarded as a serious breach of academic
discipline. - Incorrect referencing can also lead to
penalisation of marks
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
24Appendices (1)
- Titled as Appendix A, Appendix B etc.
- These may include any relevant material to
support the report, which if presented in the
main body of the report would interfere with its
flow e.g. - Terms of Reference
- Project Schedule
- Record of Work
- Raw data sets
- Design and program documentation
- Trial plan, test data and expected results.
- User Guide
- Operating instructions.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
25Appendices (2)
- If the project contains programming (or the
creation of an application) then the following
should be included - Annotated listings of key parts of the source
code. - An overview of the structure of the software as
created - A description of the strategy used for testing
and evidence of that testing - A description of the software development
- An analysis of the resulting software
- Plans for future development
- A disk(s), together with a user guide
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
26What is the Project File?
27The Project FileHow are the elements related?
File of Evidence
Written Report An account of the project
demonstrating that you have achieved all of the
Learning Outcomes in the NLA..
1. Negotiated Learning Agreement Learning Outcomes
Action Planning Evidence that you have been able
to plan and execute a complex project
Project Reporting
Viva Demonstration of the product, and whether
it has met its specifications.
Literature Review Portfolio of Practical
Work Documents related to the project itself
exemplifying what you have achieved
28The Purpose of the File
- The file serves two purposes
- Firstly, to establish a trail of project
development where markers are able to see how the
project has progressed, what stages it has gone
through and how you have managed the project over
the year. - Secondly, in the case where things have not gone
to plan, to see how you have coped with this, and
to allow markers to allocate marks in those cases
where you maybe not have achieved what you set
out to do at the start for example if software
does not run, or your if your client changed the
spec on you at the last minute.
29Possible File Contents
- Essential
- Negotiated Learning Agreement
- Project planning and monitoring documentation
(inc. Project Logs) - Documentation for results of Project Reviews
- Documentation for results of Quality Assurance
Reviews - Design Study for the Project
- Annotated bibliography
- Literature Review Notes (essential only if
original has been amended)
- Non-Essential
- Research Seminar papers
- Background information
- Specimens of documents collected during
investigation - Records of interviews, meetings etc.
- Correspondence
- Evidence of skill development
- Examples of Research Instruments
- Notes to the file
- Raw data preliminary analysis
- Draft product documentation
- Research findings
- Investigations undertaken to explore ideas.
- Product testing Evaluation
30How should the the Project File be presented?
- You should present
- A coherent file, fully labelled, well-sectioned
with dividers and a contents page. - There should be a contents section which gives
the structure of the file. - Each section should have a clear purpose.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
31Essential File Elements 1 The Negotiated
Learning Agreement
- The Negotiated Learning Agreement is submitted as
evidence that you have been able to negotiate a
project, and to plan it effectively. - You have already submitted this and have an
Advisory Grade as part of this process you may
have been told that certain elements might be
amended. - If you choose to amend the NLA, you should
include the original NLA, and the original Mark
Sheet together with the section (or sections)
which have been rewritten, clearly indicated.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
32Essential File Elements 2Project Management
- The Project Planning and Management section is
submitted as evidence that you have been able to
plan, organise, manage, monitor and evaluate your
own performance effectively. - The Action Planning consists of three parts
- The Initial Planning Documents
- Project Logs
- A Final Evaluation.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
33Essential File Elements 2Project Management-
Planning
- This should consist of
- Project Tasks derived from the original Terms of
Reference with estimated completion times - Planning Charts showing what will be done and
when. (i.e. Gantt Chart or
equivalent) - You will already have an advisory grade for this
element within your NLA. You may, if you wish
replace any of these items with an improved copy.
However, please ensure that any change to the TOR
has been signed, and if there has been a
substantial change from the NLA or original TOR,
you need a Change of Control form signed by the
supervisor.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
34Essential File Elements 2Project Management-
Project Logs
- At regular intervals during the project, you
should have completed a project logs documenting
your progress and evaluating what you have done .
- You may have amended your Gantt Chart as a result.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
35Essential File Elements 2Project Management-
Evaluation
- There is one essential element here
- Final Gantt Chart showing what was actually done
and when. - In addition, you may have
- A Review of Targets Achieved
- Evaluation of Deliverables
- Evaluation by your client or sponsor.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
36Essential File Elements 3Project Reviews
- In this section you should document the Project
Reviews that you have undertaken, how you
prepared for them, and what you have done as a
result. - As a minimum, it must contain four fully
documented and graded Project Review Sheets.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
37Essential File Elements 4Quality Assurance
Reviews
- In this section you should document the Quality
Assurance Reviews that you have undertaken, how
you prepared for them, and what you have done as
a result. - As a minimum, it must contain three fully
documented QA Walkthrough Sheets.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
38Essential File Elements 5Design Study
- In this section you should have the Design Study
that you created prior to undertaking the
development work. It should consist of - Design Brief
- Product Brief
-
- Any additional material which is associated with
the design brief, such as navigation charts,
questionnaires etc. should be included.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
39Essential File Elements 6Bibliography
- Your file should incorporate an extended
bibliography, which includes material used for
the Literature Review, additional material used
within the Report, material used to develop
skills, other material consulted but not cited or
quoted explicitly (e.g. it was on your original
reading list at the start of the Literature
Review Preparation).
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
40Possible Essential File Elements 7Literature
Review Section
- The Literature Review is submitted as evidence
that you have been able to research an aspect of
your study to a sufficiently high standard, and
produce a piece of critical academic writing, of
depth an quality. - You have already submitted this and have an
Advisory Grade as part of this process you may
have been told that certain elements might be
amended. - If you choose to amend the LR, you should include
the original LR, the original Mark Sheet together
with a copy of the rewritten review, clearly
indicating the section (or sections) which have
been rewritten and why.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
41What else do do I need to submit for the Project
File?
- The Project File is submitted as the major part
of the evidence on which you will draw to
demonstrate that you have achieved the learning
outcomes, and have successfully completed the
workplace project. - It is impossible to state clearly what will be
the content of your file. It will depend on the
project that you have done, and your learning
outcomes. - The File you submit should contain work from
almost all the stages of your project, from the
initial planning to the completed items. - In addition it should go beyond what you might
have done in the workplace to evaluate the worth
of the project - An important rule is that everything in your
portfolio must be written, or annotated by you.
42Some possible contents of the File
- Client/Sponsor-Related Material
- Work you have undertaken for the client
- Commentaries on the organisation and management
of the clients business - Material you have consulted in order to
understand the sponsors research focus. - Analysis commentary on a clients workplace
practices or the sponsors research.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
43Some possible contents of the File
- Project Related Material
- Background Material for the Project
- Working Documents towards the project
- The Completed Project
- Technical Details of the Product
- Product User Guide
- Results of testing and/or critical analysis of
the Product
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
44Some possible contents of the File
- Other Material
- Evidence of material studied in order to enhance
your knowledge and skills - Summaries of authoritative academic material you
have consulted - Reading Lists, Draft Bibliographies
- Notes and other evidence
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
45 A Word of Caution
- You should not
- Rewrite handwritten working notes, type up
results of interviews etc. - Include everything but the kitchen sink. (For
example, if you have done lots of questionnaires,
you should include only one or two. If you have
completed exercises towards achieving your
current level of HTML, include summary examples
to show the highpoints.) - Photocopy lots of journal or trade articles that
you have not read or not consulted, or include
hundreds of screen dumps of websites just to pad
out the file.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
46Sectioning Your File
- You will need to section your file carefully, and
decide what will go where. - As your file will consist of a lot of diverse
elements, some of which may be hand-written, you
will need to ensure that the structure is
coherent, and the purpose of each element is
explained. - It is a good idea to provide a brief summary at
the start of each section.
This is essential. You will lose
marks if you do not follow these instructions.
47Sample Portfolio Section
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
48The use of Academic Source Material
- One of the important criteria in assessing the
report and the accompanying Project File is its
academic rigour, which includes the use of
academic source material to critically evaluate
the worth of your project. - In addition to the Literature Review, it is to be
expected that you will have used academic source
material during at least two phases of the
project - During the development phase, when you were
trying to find out what to do, or learning new
skills. - During the evaluation phase when you are
assessing whether or not what you have produced
is any good.
49What is the Viva?
50What is the Viva about?
- In your Viva you will
- Give a presentation on your project
- Be questioned about the project.
- This is actually the final marking process for
the module. More about this later.
51The Audience for the Viva
- You will have the same two markers who have
examined your project file. - When you enter, the markers will have already
decided on a provisional grade on the basis of
your report and project file. - They will be looking for evidence to raise this
to a higher grade, rather than be looking to
catch you out so they can drop grades.
52The Structure of the Viva
- Your Viva should ideally consist of four parts
- A brief walk through of the project,
demonstrating its major features - A reflective account of the process, discussing
the extent to which you have achieved the
learning outcomes in the NLA - A wider personal account of the journey.
- Time for questions (possibly during, but if not,
at the end)
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
53The Viva Questions
- The questions asked during or at the end of the
Viva will probably feel very searching, and you
may be finding yourself unable to supply the
answers required by the examiners. - You should not feel worried by this the
examiners will be trying to decide whether you
deserve the higher of two grades, and therefore
will ask you questions at the boundaries of your
understanding. - Good answers will gain you the higher grade poor
answers will not lose you marks.
54R D Assessment
55How is RD Assessed?
- The Marking Breaks down as follows
- NLA 10
- Literature Review 30
- Process 30
- Product 30
- Very approximately, you could say that the File
is worth 30 (process mark), and the Report plus
any Software or Data Analysis is worth 60
(Literature Review plus Product)
56The RD Assessment Process
- Two tutors (one of whom will be your supervisor)
examine your project file and are present at the
viva. - One of the tutors will be looking specifically to
see to what extent you have met the Process
Requirements and the Learning Outcomes agreed in
the NLA. - The other tutors role is to focus on the Product
elements, and the extent to which the project
deliverables achieve the criteria of usefulness
and quality. - Your grade will be decided at the end of the viva.
57Advisory Grades
- At the start of the Viva, the tutors will
provisionally agree a set of 4 grades (NLA, LR,
Process and Product). - You have already been given advisory grades for
two of these elements the NLA and the LR. - If you have amended any of these elements your
grade may have improved as a result. However,
please be aware that it is possible (though not
likely) that advisory grades be reduced. - NB. This is very unlikely, but cannot be ruled
out, and would occur where, for example, a
student introduces errors in a rewrite
plagiarism or major errors or omissions are
detected by the second marker important events
have occurred which render parts of the
Literature Review obsolete, and these have not
been addressed, or where a mark was borderline in
the first place, and on the advice of the second
marker or external examiner this grade is
moderated downwards.
58Marking Criteria (NLA)
- Three criteria are used
- Targets Set detail and aspirational level
- Project Planning Quality, level of detail and
use of tools - Documentation Literacy, adherence to guidelines
and professionalism. - Evidence Base NLA Section in the File
59Marking Criteria (LR)
- Four criteria are used
- Surface Quality Literacy, Grammar, structure
presentation - Quality of Content Range relevance of material
used manner in which it is incorporated. - Quality of Arguments Levels of rigour and
critical evaluation achieved. Use of source
material - Standard of Bibliography Surface features, such
as Harvard Style, and range and currency of
material. - Evidence Base The LR in the Report and the
Report Bibliography
60Marking Criteria (Process)
- Five criteria are used
- Project Management Degree to which the project
has been managed developmental audit trail
apparent, and effectiveness of project management
tools used. - Quality of Resources Identified Used Level and
quality of resources identified and used. - Use of Meetings Quality of Preparation for and
Documentation of meetings, Use of meeting
follow-up, and grades for Project Reviews - Quality Assurance Monitoring evaluation of
work use of QA procedures, documentation of QA
Walkthroughs. - Process Documentation Literacy, adherence to
guidelines and professionalism - Evidence Base Project File, Supervisors
Records, Viva, QA ref in Report
61Marking Criteria (Product)
- Five criteria are used
- Quality of Deliverables Standard achieved in
deliverables as a whole level of originality
demonstrated. - Meeting of Objectives Level reached in terms of
client/sponsor expectations, and initial targets
set. - Technical Intellectual demands of the project
Level of skills, knowledge and understanding
required both to attempt the project and in the
product as delivered. - Look Feel of final product Quality of the
finish to the final product level of
professionalism achieved. - Quality of Final Report Match to academic
requirements adherence to guidelines, quality of
associated materials. - Evidence Base Report, Associated Deliverables,
Viva, File elements
62How to Pass the Module
- The module has been designed so that if you have
actually worked throughout the year on a
worthwhile project, and you have achieved some
kind of end-product, and documented it
effectively, you will pass. You should therefore
ensure that - You submit two copies of a Report, and a project
File, together with any associated deliverables
by the deadline. - If your deliverables do not function
effectively, or your results are not what you
intended, that the documentation reflects this,
and offers a critical evaluation of what went
wrong. - Attend the Viva, and give a good account of your
years work.
63How to Fail the Module
- Each year, some students seem determined to fail
the module. If you are one of these students,
just to make your life easier, here is what to do
in order to more easily achieve your goal - Do not seek advice from your supervisor, and do
not attend any more Project Reviews or QA
Walkthroughs. - Fail to submit a Final Report.
- Ignore the advice on how to structure your
report. - Fail to submit a File.
- Omit from the file all the required elements.
- Plagiarise your Literature Review or any other
part of the report or File - Fail to rewrite a Literature Review which has
been awarded an advisory grade of F.
64The Final Hurdles
65The Final Few weeks
- Ideally you should now be stopping all project
work, and concentrating on the write-up of your
draft report and assembling your project file - Following this, there are two important tasks
prior to submission - QA Review 3
- Project Review 4
66QA Walkthrough 3
- This Walkthrough is meant to allow you to
undertake a review of your deliverables with
another student. On this occasion you have
potentially four different elements which you
might wish to review - Any software or other product developed
- Your final report
- Your project file
- Your viva presentation.
- You may therefore wish to undertake an extended
version of the walkthrough on this occasion to
cover several of these elements.
These are guidelines only you may decide to
change this to suit your individual project,
67Project Review 4
- The purpose of Project Review 4 is twofold
- to ensure that the project has been completed
successfully, and that project documentation has
provided effective monitoring - to ensure that you have a clear understanding of
the the requirements for submission, and a clear
plan for what you will will produce for the
report and the file. - Your supervisor will give you guidance on the
report structure and on the file organisation. - It is therefore crucial that you attend this
meeting.
68What do I do now?
- Firstly, ensure that you complete the project
work. - Secondly, go back to the module handbook, and
read Section 5 and Appendix C on how to present
the Report and the Project File. - Thirdly, make arrangements with your partner to
undertake QA Walkthrough 3 - Finally meet with your project supervisor to
prepare for and attend Project Review 4. - Submit the File by the Deadline
- Prepare for and attend the Viva.
69The Timetable for Presentations and Vivas
- This will be published on the Website at the
start of May, and you should ensure that you
attend the session at the correct time and place.
If the time allocated causes problems, contact
Tony Fleet at the earliest opportunity. - This time is allocated as part of your
assessment. If you fail to turn up without
medical evidence you will definitely lose marks
and may fail the module as a result. - While we will make every effort to keep to time,
the times allocated can only be approximate.
70Finally
- Good luck in finishing your project, and
obtaining your degree. - Submission Deadline
- 3.00pm Wednesday 9th May 2007