Antioppressive practice: practice frameworks for work with oppressed groups

1 / 39
About This Presentation
Title:

Antioppressive practice: practice frameworks for work with oppressed groups

Description:

Organisation. Justice. Aboriginal Community ... Organisation. The power of the group: ... Forum organisation needed to model non oppressive practices. Justice ... –

Number of Views:242
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 40
Provided by: latro
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Antioppressive practice: practice frameworks for work with oppressed groups


1
Anti-oppressive practice practice frameworks for
work with oppressed groups
  • Lecturer Erin Wilson
  • Email EWilson_at_scopevic.org.au

2
Todays lecture
  • What is oppression?
  • How can CD workers act in order to overcome it?
  • A community development framework
  • A method of community development work.
  • To start, some personal context...

3
How might we define oppression?
  • What have oppression and meaning making got to do
    with each other?

4
OppressionThe knowledge claims of modernity,
based on a dogmatic belief in one universal
Truth, have been instrumental in silencing,
erasing or marginalising the diverse voices,
needs and practices of the Other. (Leonard, 1999
vi)
  • ...What does this mean?

5
Oppression via
  • A limited set of knowledges are validated
    excluding those of minority groups
  • alternate ways of knowing and acting are
    belittled and denied
  • members of alternate cultures and knowledge
    groups are forced to adopt the dominant knowledge
    system which dictates what is to be known and how
    it is to be known
  • Epistemic oppression
  • Wilson, 2005

6
On the ground this means.
  • problems and solutions are defined within
    dominant theories and viewpoints
  • experts outside of the immediate context of
    experience are charged with classifying and
    solving social issues
  • the interpretations or meanings of those
    experiencing the problems are marginalised or
    delegitimated
  • the legitimated social welfare arena of the
    dominant system focuses on ideas of participation
    in but not control over knowledge around social
    issues Wilson, 2005

7
Oppression
  • what the elites of today want is for the
    people not to think.
  • (Freire, 1972 102)
  • we have been in various ways silenced, deprived
    of the authority to speak
  • (Smith, 1990 1)

8
What does empowerment mean if we focus on the
need to overcome this kind of oppression?
9
Agency
  • Is the ability/ power to produce knowledge or
    make meaning and act on this basis
  • But the meanings we make and the actions we take
    need to fit with social justice goals (ie. need
    to overcome rather than reinforce disadvantage
    and oppression).
  • Wilson, 2005.

10
How can we (and others) make meaning (ie. produce
knowledge) that is not oppressive?
  • The CD job is to work with others to foster their
    ability to express their views, think, analyse
    and take actions, BUT so that they engage with
    their responsibility to not oppress others

11
The ethics of meaning makingMeaning making or
knowledge production as counter-oppressive
  • exploring multiple and different meanings
  • acknowledging the partial nature of all
    knowings
  • validating the locatedness of meaning making
  • utilising a critical and reflexive attitude
    that evaluates the oppressive potential of
    meanings
    Wilson, 2005

12
How do we make meaning based on these
characteristics?What process can we use?
13
Transformative dialogue
  • Dialogue is, at its simplest, the process
    through which we engage with many meanings and
    make our own meaning, either as individuals or as
    groups
  • Transformative dialogue can be seen as
  • a meeting place
  • an encounter
  • an interaction
  • a process of exposure and expansion
  • an attitude of openness and movement
  • Wilson, 2005.

14
Steps of transformative dialogue
  • 1. Recognise the other person as a separate and
    different individual, turn toward the other.
  • 2. Explore, encounter, experience from the
    standpoint of the other.
  • 3. Move between views and hold in tension
    multiple understandings and positions
  • 4. Enact the meaning by doing - living towards
    (Buber, 1947)
  • and work to foster these approaches in others.
    Wilson, 2005

15
The process
  • We cant make meaning, judgements, analyses,
    decisions based on a single view of the world -
    the potential for oppression here is high.
  • We need to seek out different views, bring people
    together to experience different ways of
    understanding.
  • We are changed through exposure to different ways
    of seeing something
  • We need to find ways to act justly that reflect
    these views.

16
Building liberatory communities
  • How do we build communities that are not
    oppressive?
  • By affirming and encountering difference
  • Engaging with different ideas and learning to
    understand the context from which they have grown
  • Dialoguing about these
  • Applying the ethics of meaning making to how we
    make sense of our world and choose our actions
  • Seeking to foster relationships that are able to
    encounter, exchange and critique ideas
  • Bringing forward the views of many into our
    actions together
    Wilson, 2005

17
If we take this view of overcoming oppression...
How does this affect our understanding of
community development?
18
A community development model
Relationship
CD
Organisation
Justice
Aboriginal Community Management and Development
Program, 1998.
19
Relationship
  • If we arent connected to the people were
    fighting for theres an emptiness, a coldness at
    the centre. Its the same coldness thats at the
    heart of prejudice - the coldness of separation.
  • (Fran Peavey quoted in Penter and Sullivan,
    1993 95).

20
Relationship
  • Relationships undermined by capitalist society,
    emphasis on individual
  • CD sees relationships as core building blocks of
    community
  • Relationships help us understand new ways of
    thinking
  • Need to foster, maintain and extend relationships
    and encounters
  • Relationship as social capital
  • Use relationship as an analytical tool to map
    weaknesses and strengths of community web
  • Wilson, 2005

21
Organisation
  • When you counter injustice effectively, you
    organize together.
  • (Kuyek, 1990 148)

22
Organisation
  • The power of the group
  • Need to bring people together into participative,
    collaborative and counter-oppressive association
    with each other
  • These associations are the core collectives for
    action in community development whether action is
    lobbying, service delivery, community management,
    research, advocacy etc
  • Wilson, 2005.

23
Organisation
  • Purposes of organisation in CD
  • mobilising people to act
  • means of increasing social capital
  • model for alternative forms of social, political,
    economic, cultural organisation and social
    relations
  • a location for alternative discourse development
    and dissemination

24
Justice
  • Effective action is measured by the benefit it
    has to the poorest of the poor.
  • (Kelly Sewell, 1988 36)

25
Justice
  • Work to overcome unjust and oppressive
  • Structures (social, political, cultural,
    economic)
  • Discourses (including beliefs and knowledges)
  • Relations (social relations, interpersonal and
    structural relationships)
  • Practices (within or outside the group/community)
  • Wilson, 2005

26
A community development model
Relationship
CD
Organisation
Justice
Must have all three elements to be CD - use this
model to evaluate our work.
27
Example Pilbara Social Justice Forums
  • Relationship
  • bring people together for 2 days/nights to hear
    different experiences
  • build alliances across communities
  • Organisation
  • Organised actions to take as a collective
  • More influential with govt when representing many
    communities
  • Forum organisation needed to model non oppressive
    practices
  • Justice
  • focus on issues that cause disadvantage
  • identify shared solutions

CD
28
What does this mean we do as community
development workers?How do we work?What might
be the key ingredients of our practice?
29
A community development method framework - 7
elements
Relationship
Basing Placing Relating Exchanging Doing Building
Reflecting
Organisation
Justice
Wilson, 2005
30
A CD method framework - cycles or steps
  • Basing
  • Placing
  • Relating
  • Exchanging
  • Doing
  • Building
  • Reflecting
  • Wilson, 2005

31
Basing
32
Placing
33
Relating
34
Exchanging
35
Doing
36
Building
37
Reflecting
38
References
  • Aboriginal Community Management and Development
    Program (1998). 2nd year semester 1, 1998, course
    material. Perth Centre for Aboriginal Studies
    ,Curtin University of Technology.
  • Buber, M. (1947). Between man and man. London
    Collins.
  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed.
    London Penguin.
  • Kelly, A. Sewell, S. (1988). With head, heart
    and hands Dimensions of community building.
    Brisbane Boolarong.
  • Kuyek, J. (1990). Fighting for hope organizing
    to realize our dreams. Montreal Black Rose
    Books.
  • Leonard, P. (1999). Introduction. In B, Pease
    J. Fook (Eds.). Transforming social work
    practicepostmodern critical perspectives. NSW
    Allen and Unwin.
  • Penter, C. Sullivan, H. (1993). Managing for
    socially just change - illusion or reality a
    dialogue on experiences of community management.
    In Power, politics and performance. Community
    management in the 90s. Conference Papers, Vol 1.

39
References continued
  • Smith, D. (1990a). Texts, facts and femininity.
    Exploring the relations of ruling. London
    Routledge
  • Wilson, E. (2005).Community in diversityreinventi
    ng liberatory practice. Doctoral thesis, Perth
    UWA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com