The GlobalEd Project: An experimental study of negotiation and decisionmaking

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

The GlobalEd Project: An experimental study of negotiation and decisionmaking

Description:

Focus: High School and Middle School Students ... Focus: High School and Middle School students. throughout the U.S.. Supporting Literature ... –

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: paulaj7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The GlobalEd Project: An experimental study of negotiation and decisionmaking


1
The GlobalEd Project An experimental study of
negotiation and decision-making
2
What is the GlobalEd Project?
  • An Experimental Web-based Study of Student
    Decision Making and Negotiation Skills.
  • A problem-based simulation related to
    international studies, the use of technology, and
    student outcomes.

3
GlobalEd Roots
ICONS International Communication and
Negotiation Simulations University of Maryland
Emphasis College and High School Students
CPIN Connecticut Project in International
Negotiation University of Connecticut Focus
High School and Middle School Students
GlobalEd Focus High School and Middle School
students throughout the U.S.
4
Supporting Literature
  • Transfer of knowledge (Bednar, Cunningham, Duffy,
    Perry, 1992).
  • PBL (Scardamalia Bereiter, 1994 Brown et al,
    2003).
  • Global Citizenship (Lima Brown, 2008 Lima
    Brown, 2007).
  • The GlobalEd Project (Boyer et al, 2005 2006
    2007 Brown et al, 2002 2003).

5
The GlobalEd Project at UConn
  • Problem-based learning environment using an
    online simulation.
  • Embedded in the social studies curriculum.
  • Interdisciplinary
  • Students from a class negotiate treaties
    concerning current word issues, while they
    represent real-world countries.
  • Students are assigned to issue area groups (4-5
    students).
  • Synchronous life conferences and e-mail
    communication.
  • Simulation controllers (SIMCON).
  • A doctoral student in international relations

6
Brief Overview of the Simulation
  • Each classroom from various schools is assigned a
    country.
  • 4-6 weeks before the simulation begins, students
    receive a scenario set 6 months into the future.
  • Begin exchanging opening messages outlining
    initial positions and interests.
  • Continue by responding to other countries
    statements and proposals.
  • Participate in real-time conferences to work
    toward the formulation of common policies and
    positions. Generally 2 conference sessions per
    issue area.
  • Students Goal To negotiate treaties among the
    countries

7
Issue Areas of the Simulation
Global Environment
World Health
Human Rights
Conflict and Cooperation
International Economics
8
Previous Simulations Students from across the
USA
9
The delegates of the Canadian Conflict and
cooperation committee would like to request that
the global community unite all efforts against
terrorism by aligning with support for a treaty
proposed by Pakistan, US, or Russia. If
possible, we feel that the merging of all
treaties would be in our best interest. As
always we would like the input and responses from
the world's delegations.
In response to the request for the U.S. opinion
on listing the priorities of negotiating a treaty
on this subject, we will not negotiate in the
areas of animal cloning, human cloning, and sex
selection. For, these topics are a blunt
violation of human rights.
10
How is data collected?
With teacher, student and parent cooperation
With web-based surveys
Through email traffic on the GlobalEd system
11
Methods
  • Participants are assigned to all male, all female
    or mixed gender groups within their class.
  • 2 weeks before the simulation began, students
    filled out the instruments
  • On-line Instruments
  •  Student Demographic Information
  •  Student interest
  • Technology Self-efficacy
  •  Academic Self-efficacy
  • Leadership
  •  Global Citizenship
  •  Learning Styles Inventory


12
Our General procedure
Measuring pre- post- follow-up student learning
outcomes
  • Knowledge
  • Attitudes
  • Behaviors

13
Knowledge Items
  • Rate your knowledge about the country that you
    have been assigned.
  • Rate your overall knowledge of the other
    countries in the simulation.
  • Rate your knowledge of American foreign policy.

14
Attitudes/Interest Items
  • I am very interested in the topic of
    international relations.
  • I am very interested in international
    environmental issues.
  • I enjoy working on group projects in school.
  • I am motivated to do well in school.

15
Behaviors/Skills Items
  • Rate your skills for working in groups in
    educational settings.
  • Rate your problem solving skills in educational
    settings.
  • Rate you negotiating/conflict resolution skills.
  • Rate your communication skills (speaking and
    writing).

16
Descriptive Data
Students provided descriptive responses to the
questions
-- What are the top 3 things you hope to learn
from the simulation? -- pretest
-- What are the top 3 things you have learned
from the simulation? -- posttest
17
Instrument Quality
  • Reliability for stability measure

-- knowledge items pre-test .62 post-test
.71
-- behavior items Pre-test .88 post-test .88
-- interest items Pre-test .84 post-test .87
  • Validity use of experts

-- Current version validated by experts
18
High School Student Comments
We believe that this simulation was a successful
look on how real negotiations might go. . . . I
personally feel that it really opens your eyes to
how to handle trying to reach common goals and
how hard it really it sic to do so.
We believe to avoid such problems as countries
trying to have their ways is to open your eyes to
others views. Also trying to think as another
country is a good way to understand others views.
Global recognition of others views is a great way
to understand everyone's ideas, thoughts,
comments, beliefs.
19
www.globaled.uconn.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com