Jul' 24, 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Jul' 24, 2002

Description:

Quantifying measurement complexity requires an explicit dynamical model. ... The Grover problem can be solved with two measurements, each taking time. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: IQI
Category:
Tags: jul | measurement

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jul' 24, 2002


1
Quantum search by measurement
Andrew Landahl
QCMC 02
Institute for Quantum Information
http//www.iqi.caltech.edu
Andrew Childs, MITEnrico Deotto, MITEdward
Farhi, MITJeffrey Goldstone, MITSam Gutmann,
Northeastern
Based on quant-ph/0204013
Jul. 24, 2002
2
Computation is Physical
Measurement circuit
Unitary circuit
Adiabatic
Topological field theory
3
Adiabatic Theorem Born, Fock 28
Qualitative
System stays in ground state of if
changed slowly enough.
Quantitative
If , then the probability of
atransition
4
Adiabatic algorithms Farhi et al. 00
Search problem
Find the minimum of the function
Adiabatic solution
  • Encode in the Hamiltonian .
  • Prepare the ground state of
    .
  • Evolve adiabatically from to .
  • Measure the final energy .

N.B. By Lloyd 96 this can be simulated by a
quantum circuit.
5
Quantum measurement algorithms
Can we simulate adiabatic algorithms by the Zeno
effect? How well?
Two questions
How many measurements? How long does it take to
measure?
Perturbation theory
Phase estimation
6
How many measurements?
Perturbation theory
So after M perfectly projective measurements, the
probability of staying in the ground state is
7
The System-Meter Model von Neumann 55
Interaction
Evolution
8
The System-Meter Model
Measurement complexity
Suppose we can resolve all displacementsto a
resolution
Then if
We can measure if
9
The good, the bad, and the ugly
The good
  • Measurement algorithm polynomially related to
    adiabatic algorithm

(Measurement)
(Adiabatic)
The bad
  • Meter is continuous, not digital.

The ugly
  • Measurements arent perfectly projective.

10
Digital System-Meter Model Kitaev 95
Digitizing the system-meter model is phase
estimation!
Computational basis momentum eigenbasis
Pointer r qubits
Hamiltonian n qubits (digitizable a la Zalka
98)
Algorithm Phase estimation
11
The Grover problem
Standard problem statement
Given a list of elements, all of which are
but one , find the by querying the list.
As a minimization problem
Minimize the function
12
Grover oracles
Unitary
Hamiltonian
Measurement
13
Adiabatic algorithm for Grover search
Features of the minimum gap
Features known independently of problem instance!
Naïve complexity
Actual complexity
Gap is only small for a time
14
Grover in two measurements!
Another feature of the minimum gap
Naïve complexity
Two-measurement algorithm
Actual complexity
  • Measure
  • Measure

Success probability ½!
Time
15
Summary
  • Computation is Physical.
  • The Zeno effect can efficiently simulate
    adiabatic evolution.
  • Quantifying measurement complexity requires an
    explicit dynamical model.
  • The digitized version of von Neumanns
    system-meter model is Kitaevs phase estimation
    algorithm.
  • The Grover problem can be solved with two
    measurements, each taking time.

16
Adiabatic algorithm for 3SAT
Instance
Set U of one-bit variables and collection C of
conjunctive clauses of at most three literals,
where a literal is a variable or a negated
variable in U.
Solution
A truth assignment for U.
Example
As a minimization problem
Minimize
, where
Adiabatic solution
, where
17
Quantum Zeno Effect
Point-of-view 1
fixed projective measurements suppress
unitary evolution with probability .
Point-of-view 2
rotating projective measurements evolve
states by with probability .
18
Quantum Zeno Effect
Pictorial analogy
Malus Law (Point-of-view 2)
http//230nsc1.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/polcr
oss.html
19
Quantum Zeno Effect
Mathematical example
Unitary
Measurement
measurements every
Point-of-view 2
Point-of-view 1
20
Effects of finite precision
Under the system-meter evolution
The reduced system density matrix becomes
Where is the Hadamard (elementwise) product,
and
21
Effects of finite precision
Define
Then
If measurement were perfect, then we would have
. All we really need is
Which happens if
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com