Title: Planning Identity Preservation IP Systems for Crops
1Planning Identity Preservation (IP) Systems for
Crops
- Bill Wilcke
- University of Minnesota
- Biosystems Ag Engineering Dept
2What is Identity Preservation?
- IP involves growing and handling crops in ways
that prevent mixing with seeds or DNA from other
crops. - IP might also involve documentation such as
keeping records, saving samples, inspecting crops
and facilities, and/or testing of crop purity.
3Why use Identity Preservation?
- To meet customer demands for
- Specific varieties or hybrids.
- Crops that have (or do not have) certain
characteristics. - Crops that are grown in certain ways.
- To prevent the crop being produced from
contaminating other crops.
4Identity Preservation...
- Is it possible?
- Yes - as long as tolerances for contamination
arent too low! - Is it worthwhile?
- Maybe, but make sure that benefits exceed costs.
5IP Examples
- Crops that are grown for seed.
- Organically produced crops.
- Some GM and non-GM crops.
- Enhanced-value crops
- High protein wheat and soybeans.
- Food-grade corn and soybeans.
- Specific varieties that process better.
6To Implement an IP System
- Develop a customer-oriented attitude.
- Prepare an IP plan anticipate possible points of
contamination and plan to minimize contamination. - Set up a good record system.
- Save samples.
- If necessary, test crops.
7Customer-Oriented Attitude
- Consider contracting before planting.
- Know what the customer wants.
- Does the buyer certify the process or test the
final product? - What is the maximum allowable contamination level
(0, 0.5, 1, 5)? - Make sure other family members and employees
share your attitude.
8Minimize Contamination
- Seed
- Ask supplier about seed purity.
- Save seed samples, or at least save bag labels.
- Consider testing seed purity.
9Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Field selection
- Consider previous crop and potential for
contamination by volunteer plants. - Maintain enough distance between fields to
minimize cross-pollination. - Seed corn producers use 660-ft separation.
- Bees also carry pollen between fields.
- Selection of different maturity and planting date
can reduce cross-pollination. - Could harvest field borders separately.
10Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Planting
- 500 of the wrong type seeds in a planter box
equals 1 contamination. - Clean planter when switching crops.
- Estimated cleaning time 15 min for a 12-row
planter. - Or start with a clean planter and plant the IP
crop first. - Identify fields keep records.
11Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Combining
- 3 to 5 bu remain in an empty combine.
- Clean the combine when switching crops.
- Estimated cleaning time 0.25 to 8 hrs.
- Or clean combine before harvest and do the IP
crop first. - Or consider using separate combines for IP and
non-IP crops. - Identify fields keep records.
12Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Farm grain handling
- Clean hauling vehicles when switching crops.
- Select self-cleaning pits and conveyors, or clean
handling equipment when switching crops.
13Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Storing crops on farms
- Farm storage makes overall IP systems more
effective. - Provide a variety of bin sizes.
- Clean bins before harvest.
- Avoid grain handling mistakes!
- Consider using bins that are not tied into the
handling system for other crops.
14Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Storing crops on farms (cont.)
- Maintain crop quality during storage
- Limit moisture to safe levels.
- Aerate to control temperature.
- Check frequently.
- Label bins keep records.
15Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Commercial grain handling
- 10 to 100 bu can remain in system between loads.
- Need to clean system between crops or use
different receiving systems for different crops. - IP will work best at facilities with multiple
receiving points, or at small specialized
facilities. - Avoid delivery during busy harvest season.
16Minimize Contamination (cont.)
- Commercial grain handling (cont.)
- Tell buyer what is being delivered.
- One 800-bu truck dumped in the wrong 80,000-bu
bin equals 1 contamination. - 10 to 50 bu often remain in empty railcars and
barges.
17Testing for Contamination
- Visual examination
- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
- Measures DNA fragments.
- Very sensitive claimed sensitivity of 0.1.
- Takes several days and costs 100 to 400 per
sample.
18Testing for Contamination (cont.)
- Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbentassays (ELISA)
- Detects proteins associated with genetic
modification (GM) rather than DNA itself. - Uses color change in a liquid or on a test strip.
- Some versions can give approximate level of GM
content others just give yes or no answer. - Tests take 5 to 15 minutes and cost 7 to 10 per
sample.
19Testing for Contamination (cont.)
- Herbicide bioassay
- Can only be used to test for herbicide resistance
genes. - Will only work with live seeds.
- Treat germinated seeds with herbicide to see if
gene for herbicide tolerance is present. - Takes several days.
20Testing for Contamination (cont.)
- Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy
- Research is underway shows some promise.
- Could use same machine that measures protein,
oil, and other quality factors.
21Accuracy of Tests
- There is some concern about test standards,
procedures, and accuracy. - The USDA is setting up a lab in Kansas City to
check commercial labs and GM test kits. - Getting representative samples is at least as
important as test accuracy.
22GM Test Labs and Test Kits
- Grain Journal magazine has a good list of GM test
labs and test kits on its website - www.grainnet.com
23IP Costs Can Include
- Special seed
- Special equipment, or extra time and labor for
cleaning equipment - Record keeping systems
- Under-utilized storage space
- Extra transportation costs
- Certification
- Testing
24Sources of IP Info
- U of M BioAgEng postharvest website
- www.bae.umn.edu/extens/postharvest/
- USDA Ag Marketing Service (AMS), Identity
Preserved Grain Logistical Overview - www.ams.usda.gov/tmd/ipgrain
- Iowa State University, Iowa Grain Quality
Initiative website - www.iowagrain.org