Title: Electrostatics: What we have so far
1Electrostatics What we have so far
- for the vector field D, the flux density, we
have - interpretation if the volume dv encloses charge
dQ rvdv then the net flux emerging from the
point is the charge density rv - we also have the electric field as the gradient
of potential - so combining
if e is constant wrt space
2Laplace and Poissons Equations
- for a uniform dielectric, the relation between
the potential and the charge density is given by
Poissons equation - if the charge density is zero we get Laplaces
equation (a special case of Poisson) - we can now change our method of solution from an
integral approach to one involving the solution
of a differential equation, then apply BCs - once we have V(r), we have everything since we
can get E from V
if e is constant wrt space
3Whats next History of magnetics
- from http//history.hyperjeff.net/electromagnetis
m.html by Jeff Biggus - 1st cent BCE
- Chinese fortune tellers begin using loadstone to
construct divining boards, eventually leading to
the first compasses. (Mentioned in Wang Ch'ung's
Discourses weighed in the balance of 83 B.C.) - 1st cent CE
- South-pointing divining boards become common in
China - ca 271 True compasses come into use by this date
in China. - 6th century (China) Discovery that loadstones
could be used to magnetize small iron needles. - 11th century (China) Iron magnetized by heating
it to red hot temperatures and cooling while in
south-north orientation. - 1086 Shen Kua's Dream Pool Essays make the first
reference to compasses used in navigation. - 1155-1160 Earliest explicit reference to magnets
per se, in Roman d'Enéas. - 1190-1199 Alexander Neckam's De naturis rerum
contains the first western reference to compasses
used for navigation.
419th century
- 1820 Oersted notes deflection of a magnetic
compass needle caused by electric current
demonstrates effect is reciprocal initiates
unification of electricity and magnetism. - 1820 Biot and Savart deduce the formula for
the strength of the magnetic effect produced by a
short segment of current carrying wire. - 1827 Ohm formulates the relationship between
current to electromotive force and electrical
resistance - 1835 Gauss formulates separate electrostatic
and electrodynamical laws, including Gauss's law
- 1838 Faraday explains electromagnetic induction,
electrochemistry and formulates his notion of
lines of force. - 1838 Weber and Gauss apply potential theory to
the magnetism of the earth.
5Observations on magnetic fields
- there are no magnetic point charges
- we never see a force relationship that is exactly
analogous to Coulombs force law for a single
point charge - bar magnets, for instance, always have force
loops that start and end on the bar - you always have both a south pole and a north
pole - if there are no permanent magnets present
- if there is no current flowing in a circuit,
there is no magnetic field - if there is current flow, there is always a
magnetic field produced
6Origin of magnetic fields
- simple experiment
- two parallel dc-current carrying wires, carrying
current in the same direction, are attracted to
one another - this is NOT due to coloumbic attraction
- the wires are space-charge neutral, and hence
there is no electric field outside the wires - a sheet of floating metal placed between the
wires has no effect on the force - the magnitude of the force between the wires is
proportional to - the product of the two currents
- the inverse of the square of the distance between
the wires - if the directions of current flow are opposite,
the force is repulsive - the rail gun page http//home.insightbb.com/jmen
gel4/rail/rail-intro.html - magnetic fields cannot be explained solely on the
basis of Coulombs law - but when combined with special relativity, the
existence of a field that is related to moving
charge appears
7Magnetic force
- the force on a moving charge in a magnetic field
is perpendicular to both the velocity and the
magnetic flux density (or magnetic induction) B - it obeys the relationship
- in general, this looks to be trickier than
Coulombic force, since we immediately have two
vectors involved
- from http//hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hf
rame.html
8Cross products
- cross product vector result
- direction set by right hand rule
- cross product is not commutative
- A x B - B x A
- in rectangular coordinates
run cross product applet http//www.phy.syr.edu/c
ourses/java-suite/crosspro.html
9Example the Hall effect
- example bar of conducting material, carrying a
current I due to an applied electric field E,
electrons as carriers
e-
- if apply magnetic field to drifting carriers a
Lorentz force is generated
- note Lorentz force is proportional to velocity,
direction depends on carrier type (sign of q)
10Lorentz forces and the Hall effect
11Magnetic flux density B
- SI unit of magnetic flux density (magnetic
induction) - Tesla Weber/m2 kg / (secAmp)
- weber volt-second
- One tesla is defined as the field intensity
generating one newton of force per ampere of
current per meter of conductor - unit force / (lengthamp)
- nice dimensional and units tables
- http//www.sizes.com/units/index.htm
- http//www.udel.edu/mvb/units.html
- http//hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/units.h
tmluni4 - B often given in the non-SI unit of gauss 1T
104 gauss - earths magnetic field is 1/2 gauss 5x10-5 T
- 1T is 10,000 x earths magnetic field
- hair dryer B 10-7 10-3 T (0.2 to 20x earth's
B field) - color TV 10-6 T (2 earth's B field)
- small bar magnet will produce B 10-2 T
- sunspot B 0.3 T
- MRI body scanner magnet B 2T
- National High Magnetic Field Lab at Los Alamos
(LANL) 60 T Long Pulse Magnet - powered using a 1.4 gigaWatt inertial storage
motor-generator
12Biot-Savart (bE'O-su-vär) Law
- magnetic equivalent of Coulombs Law
- a short element of a current carrying line
contributes to the B-field - refs
- hyperphysics
- Fitzpatricks page over in UT-Physics
- mo is the permeability of free space,
- units Henry / meter
- value 4px10-7 H/m
- issue current must always flow in a closed loop
- so you can never have a single points worth of
magnetic flux density
13Biot-Savart (bE'O-su-vär) Law
- we also use a version without the m
- the magnetic field intensity H, or more simply
the magnetic field - units of H amperes per meter
- for a short segment of current, dH is
- issue current must always flow in a closed loop
- you never have a single points worth of
magnetic field - need to do a full path integral to find the
actual magnetic field - integral form
- integration path is along the current, which
always forms a closed path, since current can
only flow in a closed loop
14Example magnetic field of a line current
- infinitely long, straight current filament,
current flowing from ? to ? - by symmetry, there should be no variation with
respect to z or ?
z
z
15Example magnetic field of a line current
- infinitely long, straight current filament
- dL x r12 is INTO the page here
16Example magnetic field of a line current
- infinitely long, straight current filament,
current flowing from ? to ?
17Example magnetic field of a line current
- infinitely long, straight current filament,
current flowing from ? to ?
note direction is ?, points around the wire
18Another line current circular loop
- assume a line current forms a circle in the x-y
plane centered at the origin, radius ro - lets find the magnetic field for points on the
z-axis - by symmetry, the field at points on the z axis
should not depend on angle ? - lets look in the y-z plane
z
z
field _at_ point 2
y
ro
y
ro
ro
1
rod?
x
current out of page
source _at_ point 1 current into page
19circular loop line current
- line current forms a circle in the x-y plane
centered at the origin, radius ro
dH
- BUT as we go around the loop of current the rho
directed components will cancel - for points on z-axis H points only in the
z-direction
20Circular loop line current H-field on z-axis
- for points on z-axis H points in the z-direction
only - to get total H field still need to integrate dHz
over ? from 0 ? 2?
21Circular loop (ring) current asymptotic behavior
- for z gtgt ro (far away)
- for z ltlt ro
22Amperes Circuital Law
- similar in form to Gausss law
- the line integral of the magnetic field H about
any closed path is equal to the direct current
enclosed by the path
I
23Example Amperes Circuital Law and a long
straight wire
- just like when trying to use Gausss law, we need
to look for symmetries to pick the best path
along which to evaluate the line integral - youd like the dot product to either give a
constant or zero - for an infinitely long straight current filament
on the z-axis, symmetry suggests - field should not vary with z or ?
- field should be constant in magnitude for fixed r
- to get direction of H field
- direction of current z
- direction to observation point r
- direction of field z ? r ?
- lets use circles of constant radius r
z
r
?
I
24Example Amperes Circuital Law and a long
straight wire
- for an infinitely long straight current filament
on the z-axis, symmetry suggests - field should not vary with z or ?
- field should be constant in magnitude for fixed r
- to get direction of H field
- direction of current z
- direction to observation point r
- direction of field z ? r ?
- lets use circles of constant radius r so dl is
the same direction as H, and H is constant in
magnitude! - dot product is a constant!
25Example Amperes Circuital Law and finite radius
wire
- for an infinitely long straight current carrying
wire of radius a on the z-axis, symmetry suggests - field should not vary with z or ?
- field should be constant in magnitude for fixed r
- to get direction of H field
- direction of current z
- direction to observation point r
- direction of field z ? r ?
- lets use circles of constant radius r so dl is
the same direction as H, and H is constant in
magnitude! - dot product is a constant!
- for r gt a, exactly the same as for the filament
!
26Example Amperes Circuital Law and finite radius
wire
- what about INSIDE the wire?
- symmetries are all still the same!
- lets use circles of constant radius r so dl is
the same direction as H, and H is constant in
magnitude! - dot product is a constant!
- for r lt a, the only difference is the amount of
current inside the path
z
a
y
r
x
27Example Amperes Circuital Law and finite radius
wire
z
a
y
r
x
- what happens at r a?
- so H is continuous here as you move from inside
to outside the wire
28Example Amperes Circuital Law and coaxial cable
- finite radius wire carrying current I in z
direction, surrounded by finite thickness
shield carrying the return current I in the z
direction - symmetries are all still the same!
- lets use circles of constant radius r so dl is
the same direction as H, and H is constant in
magnitude! - dot product is a constant!
- for r lt b, the same as for the finite radius wire
since current contained is the same
29Example Amperes Circuital Law and coaxial cable
- what happens for r gt b?
- for r gt c its really easy
- Ienclosed 0 ? H 0
- for b gt r gt c ,we just need to find out the net
current enclosed
30Example Amperes Circuital Law and coaxial cable
31Differential form of Amperes law
- Amperes law is an integral form
- is there a differential form as well?
- recall we did something like that with Gausss
law - here lets look at a generic H field, and a path
as shown, with the path small enough that the
field changes only slowly on it
32Differential form of Amperes law
- generic H field, and a path as shown, with the
path small enough that the field is changes
slowly on it
33Differential form of Amperes law
z
- we still need the value of H along each side of
the path - assuming we know the value at the center Ho, we
can estimate the value along the sides using a
one term Taylor series approximation - for path 1-2 we are located a distance ½dx from
our central point, and the rate of change of H we
need is its change wrt x
dx/2
1
2
x
34Differential form of Amperes law
35Differential form of Amperes law
36Differential form of Amperes law
- but by Amperes law this path integral over H
should equal the current passing through the
closed path - here our path is in an x-y plane, so the current
passing through it would have to be in the
z-direction - assume the current density is Jz, then the
current would be - Ienclosed Jz(area) Jz(dxdx)
37Differential form of Amperes law
- letting the path become smaller and smaller the
approximations become exact, so we have - doing the same thing for surfaces oriented in the
x-z and y-z planes gives the same basic results
38Amperes law at a piont
- so we have found a relationship between the
vector current density J and the vector magnetic
field H
39The Curl operator
- these limits occur frequently in physics, so they
get a special name the curl - the curl of a vector field F is a vector function
whose component in a particular direction (âi) is
found - by first orienting an infinitesimal patch
normal to the desired direction (i.e., the area
dSi) , - then finding the line integral of F around the
patch, - and then finding the ratio of the line integral
to the patch area - the component of the curl in direction âi is
- or in short hand
- and the curl of H is J !
40Curl in rectangular coordinates
- from Amperes law weve actually found the curl
in rectangular coordinates
41Curl in other coordinates
- cylindrical coordinates
- spherical coordinates
42What does Curl mean?
- the paddle wheel analogy in water flow (applet)
- examples
vector field analyzer
43What does Curl mean?
- the paddle wheel analogy in water flow (applet)
- examples
vector field analyzer
44Curl of H from a wire
- For a circular wire we found
45Curl of H from a wire
- but its a lot easier in cylindrical coordinates!
46Curl of H from a wire
- For a circular wire we found
47Curl of H from a wire
- For a circular wire we found
vector field analyzer
48Curl applets
- http//www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Teaching/Courses/EFT/dy
namics/html/curl.html - http//math.la.asu.edu/kawski/myjava/vfanalyzer/
49some math and vector results we may need
- Stokes Theorem
- you can get this using the curl concepts
discussed above - and we had the Divergence Theorem from before
- and a couple general vector identities
from Lorrain and Corson
50Magnetic flux through a closed surface
- wed get the total flux through a closed surface
by doing the integral - but there are no magnetic charges, and the net
flux through a closed surface is always zero - equal flux in and out
- or using the divergence theorem
51Amperes Law from the curl equation
- we can reverse the derivations to get back to
integrals - apply Stokes theorem to H
- but
- so
- which says that the path integral of H along a
closed path equals the current flowing through
the surface (area) bounded by the path
52Potential functions for magnetic fields
- recall that in electrostatics it was sometimes
easier to find the potential function, then get
the electric field from the gradient - we could either integrate over charge density to
get V, or solve a differential equation (Poisson
or Laplace) subject to boundary conditions - is there a potential function for H, and is it
easier to find?? - lets assume there is a scalar magnetic potential
Vm that gives H from the negative gradient (just
like in electrostatics) - what conditions, if any, are there on Vm?